Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,102 posts)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:36 PM Sep 2012

"Reagan inherited a worse economy from Carter than Obama did from Bush..."

That is what Rush Limbaugh just said on his show.

As I recall, inflation was the big problem in the Carter years? The high interest rates were initiated by Paul Volcker to control the inflation. However, Carter was still creating jobs, moreso than Reagan did in his first four years, as I recall?

But, in my opinion, Rush probably actually believes what he said as do many of his listeners. I think he is wrong. I think we were near catastrophe when Bush left office.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Reagan inherited a worse economy from Carter than Obama did from Bush..." (Original Post) kentuck Sep 2012 OP
The problem with D Cup is that he knows it's bullshit. He has some serious contempt for the morons Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2012 #1
Inflation was also a problem in the Ford years and the Nixon years, don't forget. SharonAnn Sep 2012 #19
But there's no comparison or very little between Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2012 #21
W.I.N. CBGLuthier Sep 2012 #22
There's Not A Credible Economist Who Would Agree With Him DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #2
Who needs credible economists when you have a gullible audience? JHB Sep 2012 #18
Rush knows better, Sekhmets Daughter Sep 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author ieoeja Sep 2012 #4
...and the first.thing he did was make it worse jmowreader Sep 2012 #5
the answer, my friend, is blowing in my journal hfojvt Sep 2012 #6
Thanks! kentuck Sep 2012 #7
and another example of where I swatted down that myth hfojvt Sep 2012 #8
Sixty-year-old Rabbit weighs in Jack Rabbit Sep 2012 #9
Ive been hearing this one for a while from righties.. DLine Sep 2012 #10
Total Bullshit. nt onehandle Sep 2012 #11
That was all Ford's fault. deaniac21 Sep 2012 #12
It's absolute bullshit, even ProSense Sep 2012 #13
Carter inherited a bad economy from Nixon/Ford. bulloney Sep 2012 #14
Jobs created under Carter: 10.3 million. Jobs created under Bush 43: 1.95 million. Efilroft Sul Sep 2012 #15
On a per annual basis, there were more jobs created under Carter than Reagan. bulloney Sep 2012 #16
Rush is wrong! We had B Calm Sep 2012 #17
Rush doesn't believe a word he says, and that includes "Hello." He sells snake-oil to SUCKAHS! WinkyDink Sep 2012 #20

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,501 posts)
1. The problem with D Cup is that he knows it's bullshit. He has some serious contempt for the morons
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:38 PM
Sep 2012

who listen to him.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
22. W.I.N.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:31 PM
Sep 2012

Saw an All in the Family the other day that mentioned Ford's pathetic WIN button program.

Whip
Inflation
Now


For those who were not alive. Who says republicans don't have any ideas about how to run an economy.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
18. Who needs credible economists when you have a gullible audience?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:54 PM
Sep 2012

To dittoheads, simply invoking the names Carter, Clinton, or Obama justifies any awful claim about Democrats. Facts are irrelevant.

They've always been at war with Eastasia.

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
3. Rush knows better,
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:42 PM
Sep 2012

but his listeners don't. I think we should just assume that the fools who tune into his 3 hours of hate will always vote for the most regressive candidate they can...

Response to kentuck (Original post)

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
5. ...and the first.thing he did was make it worse
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:45 PM
Sep 2012

Reagan's infamous tax cut and the spending cuts it forced suppressed the GDP by 4.5 percent and increased unemployment to 10.8 percent. The so-called Reagan economic miracle happened after he embraced Keynesianism.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
6. the answer, my friend, is blowing in my journal
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:49 PM
Sep 2012
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/142

"Remembering the Carter years and the Reagan 'stimulus'". Check it out for a quick history lesson.

Of course, everything you need to know you can learn from my journal.

Mostly because reading my journal is a lot like going to kindergarten.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
8. and another example of where I swatted down that myth
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:54 PM
Sep 2012
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/100

"Let's just put that little myth to rest. For one thing, the unemployment rate was 5.4% in January 2008. There were 144,607,000 Americans employed in January 2008 and only 140,436,000 employed a year later. That's 4.1 million lost jobs. In Reagan's term employment numbers went from a high of 100,378,000 to a low (after some ups and downs) fifteen months later of 99,032,000. I guess 1.3 million lost jobs is almost as bad as 4.1 million. Wait, let's use the Bush trick and talk about the PERCENTAGE of lost jobs. Then it's 1.3% for Reagan compared to 2.9% for Bush and we can say they are almost the same.

And unemployment rate went to 11% in 1983, this is true, but it was also 8.5% in 1981 and 8.3% in 1983. So 10.8% is not the same now as it was then. We hit record lows of unemployment in the 1990s that most economists thought was impossible. Economists used to say that a 5% unemployment rate was "full employment"."

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
9. Sixty-year-old Rabbit weighs in
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:13 PM
Sep 2012

I was born the same year as Rush (1951). The economy was never in worse shape in my lifetime and his than it was in 2009 when the Frat Boy left the office he usurped.

To say that Rush is wrong is to say a lot more about how bad things were under the usurper than it says about how great things were under President Carter. Inflation was a big problem under Carter. I was married in 1979 and our first child was born in 1980. Under those circumstances starting a family seemed like a dicey proposition. Contrary to what Kentuck implies in the OP, job creation under Carter was weak, not appreciably better than it had been under President Ford. Of course, that was a long way from the way the economy was hemorrhaging jobs under the usurper.

DLine

(397 posts)
10. Ive been hearing this one for a while from righties..
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:19 PM
Sep 2012

Of course they are merely parroting what they heard from Rush or some other GOP shill and can't explain how it was worse. But its been out there a while.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
13. It's absolute bullshit, even
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:26 PM
Sep 2012

if people are digging into inflation data, which they aren't.


Consecutive job losses August 1981 to December 1982: 17 months, -2.8 million jobs. (Also note, the job losses started during Reagan's term.)


Job losses/weak gains April 1990 to September 1992: 30 months, -723,000 jobs


Job losses/weak gains June 2000 to December 2003: 43 months -1.6 million jobs.


Consecutive job losses February 2008 to February 2010: 25 months, -8.8 million jobs

Years can be pluged in here: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021302622

bulloney

(4,113 posts)
14. Carter inherited a bad economy from Nixon/Ford.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:35 PM
Sep 2012

I remember Nixon imposing a 90 day wage and price freeze in 1971 due to runaway inflation. I remember Ford's Whip Inflation Now campaign where everyone was wearing "WIN" buttons. Unemployment was high during the Nixon/Ford administrations, too.

Republicans want to control the dialogue to make it sound like the economic problems of the 70s were all under Carter. The economy sucked under Carter, but it sucked for several years before he took office.

Efilroft Sul

(3,579 posts)
15. Jobs created under Carter: 10.3 million. Jobs created under Bush 43: 1.95 million.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:37 PM
Sep 2012

And Wall Street imploded under the Dim Son. Rush lies all the time, all the time Rush lies.

bulloney

(4,113 posts)
16. On a per annual basis, there were more jobs created under Carter than Reagan.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:48 PM
Sep 2012

I think there were around 18 million jobs created under 8 years of Reagan.

The Reagan presidency was an 8-year Weekend at Bernie's for Republicans. They've made so much crap up on Reagan and have said it for so long that they actually believe their lies now.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
17. Rush is wrong! We had
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 02:49 PM
Sep 2012

plenty of high paying union jobs and the automobile companies were not facing bankruptcy. Inflation was the big problem, but I did enjoy getting 16% on my CDs, just wished I had more money back then to invest.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Reagan inherited a ...