Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2663 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (62)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Andrew Kaczynski tweet (Original Post)
Playinghardball
Sep 2012
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. That's viral!
Ouch!
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)2. . n/t
speedoo
(11,229 posts)3. Pretty much summarizes Romney's campaign.
Bless his vacant brain.
Cha
(297,317 posts)4. Good, because the 47% one was the real Romney. nt
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)5. It would be more impressive if you knew the number of people who watched his acceptance speech
I did a search on youtube for "mitt romeny RNC" and a couple of different videos of the speach came up. One with approximatley 355,000, another with 477,000, and a third with 286,000 views. So, unless I'm missing something, that is a total of about 1,000,000 views for his acceptance speech versus 3,000,000 views for his 47% video - or about 3x the number of people saw the 47% video online as did see his RNC acceptance speech.
.... and the republicans die-hards still claim that the only reason Romney is lagging in the polls is because of an oversampling of democrats. Maybe it has somehting to do with their candidate?
Spazito
(50,365 posts)6. Here's the Pew Research data that confirms it...
Love those numbers!
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)7. Nice one! n/t