Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
145 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox News just aired a live suicide following a car chase. (Original Post) RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 OP
Do not watch fox news DisabledAmerican Sep 2012 #1
They always want to impeach Democratic presidents jmowreader Sep 2012 #8
Apparently they think this one will stick DisabledAmerican Sep 2012 #17
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Jazzgirl Sep 2012 #35
Huclabee is an irrelevant prick. Bush was a damn torturing murderer and he hasn't been impeached. Lint Head Sep 2012 #58
OK, 4 Americans Killed by terrorists and the Whitehouse needs to own it? jorno67 Sep 2012 #92
I monitor Faux News for RNC propaganda RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #18
Even when I had pain meds it wasn't enough DisabledAmerican Sep 2012 #20
How would they have known beforehand? jmowreader Sep 2012 #2
they used to show car chases with a 10 second delay NightWatcher Sep 2012 #7
The time delay was only 5 seconds. By the time avebury Sep 2012 #111
It is common practice to put car chases on delay RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #10
classy, but typical. They got tired of the train wreck that is the R$ campaign? NightWatcher Sep 2012 #3
this is a new low... oldhippydude Sep 2012 #4
"If it bleeds, it leads" Warpy Sep 2012 #5
Maybe they will have to specialize in snuff films after the election to keep their ratings. n/t DemzRock Sep 2012 #6
LA had a car chase this morning that ended peacefully, I think Liberal_in_LA Sep 2012 #9
This could have happened on any station Bennyboy Sep 2012 #11
No they usually put these on delay in case they end badly. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #12
exactly - he tried to cut away as soon as he saw the delay was not working DrDan Sep 2012 #90
Think of all the public places, Dr.'s offices, restaurants....that show nothing but Fox "News" NightWatcher Sep 2012 #13
Mention this along w the exact date and time to every place that plays FOX in public. slampoet Sep 2012 #14
As if life for Rupert couldn't get any worse .. svip Sep 2012 #15
No, Fox News is a cable channel. TheMightyFavog Sep 2012 #66
I expect they will replay it countless times lpbk2713 Sep 2012 #16
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #19
His alleged crimes have nothing to do with FOX airing a suicide. myrna minx Sep 2012 #21
I was just thinking that there would be some right wingers commenting treestar Sep 2012 #144
If it was on delay why did they show it? RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #23
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #22
Yeah, RedStateLiberal! REAL men can watch live suicides while they're griling steaks! Brickbat Sep 2012 #25
hahaha d_b Sep 2012 #29
I'm sure it gave that troll a huge boner. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #30
Looks like a couple of them picked this very special time just to reply to you. Brickbat Sep 2012 #34
And they're gone. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #44
The Troll Patrol is always on the job :) Great Caesars Ghost Sep 2012 #109
Somebody didn't eat thier Trollios today. Ellipsis Sep 2012 #26
Don't you dare come on here and start right off the bat abusing DUers. kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #31
THE INTERNET MAKES ME SOOOO ANGRY!!!! Kindly Refrain Sep 2012 #32
Babe Ruth says hello BeyondGeography Sep 2012 #33
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #24
I refuse to watch it again. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #27
It's okay now--the video has been pulled eom Maeve Sep 2012 #107
That was sad, but it was tame compared to 8:00pm network TV ksoze Sep 2012 #28
You do understand the difference between reality and fiction right? RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #37
Slow down and take a deep breath... ksoze Sep 2012 #39
So that makes it okay? RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #41
Actually, and I will violate a code in US Media nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #67
THIS is why it is fucked up. renie408 Sep 2012 #42
when you quote someone, the extra stuff really sweetens it up ksoze Sep 2012 #46
You are equating a real human being committing suicide renie408 Sep 2012 #49
Your point is not lost on everyone. randome Sep 2012 #65
The point wasn't 'lost' on anybody. I disagree with him. renie408 Sep 2012 #78
Good enough. randome Sep 2012 #133
Comparing fictional programs and a live, daytime suicide broadcast into dentist offices, lobbies, myrna minx Sep 2012 #48
You couldn't really even see anything. MrSlayer Sep 2012 #36
Oh no....why oh why did I YouTube that? :( reformist2 Sep 2012 #43
I saw that too. Horrific. Everyone was in shock. nolabear Sep 2012 #108
Quality journalism, as always. :rolleyes: reformist2 Sep 2012 #38
HOLY SHIT! That is so wrong! renie408 Sep 2012 #40
Fox News needs to be placed under arrest. Panasonic Sep 2012 #45
then why were you watching, for pete's sake? mike_c Sep 2012 #47
Actually, that's not a bad point. renie408 Sep 2012 #50
Because I expect them to have it on a delay. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #53
It's a dumb mistake by Fox, no doubt. randome Sep 2012 #59
So I can't post a thread to point out irresponsible broadcasting? RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #63
'Irresponsible' or a studio fuck-up. randome Sep 2012 #70
It's irresponsible to have such a studio fuck-up. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #81
It WAS on delay and they failed to pull the plug. randome Sep 2012 #87
They claimed it was on a delay. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #95
Why are you so intent on this? randome Sep 2012 #130
Why are you so intent on excusing them? RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #138
so they have a responsibility to keep viewers psychologically aroused and excited... mike_c Sep 2012 #73
I salute you! randome Sep 2012 #76
I don't think car chases are any of those things. RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #83
You're right. It's really irresponsible to show it. lunatica Sep 2012 #51
The media needs to stop broadcasting car chases... Drunken Irishman Sep 2012 #52
/\ That/\ renie408 Sep 2012 #54
Two points nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #57
Totally right. Why do we need to watch that crap? Jennicut Sep 2012 #80
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #55
People graduate high school all by themselves too n/t arcane1 Sep 2012 #60
I just watched the post of this suicide that was locked by a jury nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #56
Nadin...I have to agree with you on this w8liftinglady Sep 2012 #61
And it was international too nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #64
I disagree with you. renie408 Sep 2012 #69
You can disagree all you want (GRAPHIC) nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #75
So everyone's death is everybody's business. renie408 Sep 2012 #84
Yuo posted that, which we want news sanitized nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #86
You did not answer MY questions. renie408 Sep 2012 #91
Actually car chases are releveant nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #103
No they are not relevant zappaman Sep 2012 #104
Once again, I cannot tell who you are talking to. renie408 Sep 2012 #112
Acttually yes journalists do cover them nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #119
Sorry, but working for free at the online version of The Pennysaver zappaman Sep 2012 #122
Ohh...SNAP renie408 Sep 2012 #145
Not everyone listens to the radio any more. In fact, it's somewhat passe. randome Sep 2012 #131
Wars and disasters are national news. Brickbat Sep 2012 #99
+1 n/t zappaman Sep 2012 #79
What countries? BooScout Sep 2012 #117
I have seen footage like that nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #120
Live footage? BooScout Sep 2012 #124
Life a few times, nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #128
Wow this thread really pulls the trolls gollygee Sep 2012 #62
I have 2 words - Budd Dwyer LynneSin Sep 2012 #68
Jack Ruby. Wasn't that live, too? randome Sep 2012 #71
Good points with both of these examples. revolution breeze Sep 2012 #74
I think there is a difference between renie408 Sep 2012 #77
I feel...funny defending Fox News. randome Sep 2012 #89
This isn't about FOX. They all do it. renie408 Sep 2012 #97
A car chase is not news? Because that's all they thought they had at first. randome Sep 2012 #129
Bad example... Drunken Irishman Sep 2012 #96
It's sensationalism. renie408 Sep 2012 #98
Didn't realize ther was a statistic for people committing suicide after a car wreck LynneSin Sep 2012 #105
Don't blame FOX. I really don't care. Drunken Irishman Sep 2012 #118
Great post. nt Union Scribe Sep 2012 #127
i don't know why but your Post Comes off as kind of Selfish to Me JI7 Sep 2012 #72
I'm relating a personal experience I just had RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #88
Disgusting sakabatou Sep 2012 #82
I watched it - stunned DrDan Sep 2012 #85
the suicide happened and the guy is dead whether you saw it or not JI7 Sep 2012 #93
And now it is all over Youtube. renie408 Sep 2012 #100
i don't think they should show live car chases JI7 Sep 2012 #106
That's been my point through this whole thread. renie408 Sep 2012 #114
According to Smith it was on a five second delay sylvi Sep 2012 #94
Looking at the film, it was like *he* was on a five-second delay. A producer in the background yells Brickbat Sep 2012 #102
You're wrong... BooScout Sep 2012 #121
The FCC should fine the shit out of them for this but I'm sure it's not the first time. Initech Sep 2012 #101
Unfortunately, FCC has no jurisdiction when it come to cable channels. Great Caesars Ghost Sep 2012 #110
That a news channel transmits somebody'd death nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #113
What does cable have to do with it? zappaman Sep 2012 #116
You're right and you're wrong. onenote Sep 2012 #142
You're right, it's not the first time someone got shot on TV ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #125
Under what law or rule would the FCC do that? onenote Sep 2012 #141
I hope every business that is stupid enough to run Fox News on the TVs in their establishments Duer 157099 Sep 2012 #115
The guy was an armed carjacker who was shooting at police ksoze Sep 2012 #123
I don't see emotional outpouring for the guy. Mariana Sep 2012 #143
Showing actual suicides and homicides is OK -- showing fictional ones should be forbidden FarCenter Sep 2012 #126
OK...just read thru the thread AnOhioan Sep 2012 #132
And that's a wrap! randome Sep 2012 #135
Thanks for the summary Victor_c3 Sep 2012 #137
Don't see the problem here. Pacafishmate Sep 2012 #134
I think this comment says a lot more about you... RedStateLiberal Sep 2012 #140
I know you are not surprised??? mstinamotorcity2 Sep 2012 #136
OK, I just saw this on YouTube... Rosco T. Sep 2012 #139

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
8. They always want to impeach Democratic presidents
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:44 PM
Sep 2012

Fox News was formed to get Clinton impeached. They've been working on impeaching Obama since Election Day 2008.

 

DisabledAmerican

(452 posts)
17. Apparently they think this one will stick
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:49 PM
Sep 2012

saw it at Thinkprogress

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/28/925781/huckabee-suggests-obama-should-be-impeached-over-libya-incident/


HUCKABEE: It was a planned orchestrated attack led by terrorists, terrorists, Bill. And this White House has to explain why it hasn’t owned up to that. Why it can’t say it. I think frankly, if this issue really gets traction that it deserves, and let it say it deserves, go back. Richard Nixon was forced out of office because he lied. And because he covered some stuff up. I will be blunt and tell you this. Nobody died in Watergate. We have people who are dead because of this. There are questions to be answered and Americans ought to demand to get answers. [...]

HEMMER: Just one more thing here. What you’re describing, comparing events of today to Watergate.

HUCKABEE: I sure am….Bill, i’m not saying this just out of some political interest. I’m saying that our trust as a nation is built on our ability to know that when our president, whoever he is, Democrat or Republican, looks us in the eye and tells us something, we ought to know he is telling us the truth.

Jazzgirl

(3,744 posts)
35. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:05 PM
Sep 2012

Seriously who cares what they think? Stick what? Seriously, bush is responsible for more deaths for the lies he told getting us in Iraq and Afghanistan and nobody impeached his ass. Of course this isn't like Watergate and neither were Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush flat out lied and got hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed but thats okay. Puh-leez.

jorno67

(1,986 posts)
92. OK, 4 Americans Killed by terrorists and the Whitehouse needs to own it?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:59 PM
Sep 2012

Or the President should be impeached...Somebody call George W Bush and give him a heads up!

 

DisabledAmerican

(452 posts)
20. Even when I had pain meds it wasn't enough
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:57 PM
Sep 2012

to watch fox news. Trust me I've been on some high level pain meds since I became disable at work. There wasn't one that could make me watch fox news.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
111. The time delay was only 5 seconds. By the time
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:20 PM
Sep 2012

Shepard Smith was telling them to cut if off it was already too late.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
10. It is common practice to put car chases on delay
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:44 PM
Sep 2012

in case it ends badly. This one ended with a suicide. Guy was far away from cops, pulled over and ran with a gun then stopped and put it to his head and pulled the trigger. None of it was on delay. Shep tried to explain that they put it on delay and apologized. It was not on a delay, they showed it and it made me sick. They have no shame.

Warpy

(111,274 posts)
5. "If it bleeds, it leads"
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:40 PM
Sep 2012

has been the motto for a lot of news organizations. Lead stories are often based on whether or not there is video, especially on local stations, rather than importance to viewers. News has become totally tabloid and Pox is leading the pack.

It's why I turned them off in 2004.

 

Bennyboy

(10,440 posts)
11. This could have happened on any station
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:45 PM
Sep 2012

LIVE is thing? Do you want to see taped and edited footage? How many live Car chases have you seen? They are live.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
12. No they usually put these on delay in case they end badly.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:46 PM
Sep 2012

This one ended very badly and they failed to use a delay.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
90. exactly - he tried to cut away as soon as he saw the delay was not working
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:55 PM
Sep 2012

but the camera caught it. I happened to be watching at the time.

It could happen to any station.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
13. Think of all the public places, Dr.'s offices, restaurants....that show nothing but Fox "News"
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:46 PM
Sep 2012

I wonder how many little kids just saw brains on the windshield.

svip

(22 posts)
15. As if life for Rupert couldn't get any worse ..
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:47 PM
Sep 2012

.. now he's gonna have to write a MASSIVE check to the FCC.

TheMightyFavog

(13,770 posts)
66. No, Fox News is a cable channel.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:34 PM
Sep 2012

The courts have determined that the FCC cannot control content on cable.

However, if there's some over the air station that simulcasts Fox News, then there might be a case...

Response to RedStateLiberal (Original post)

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
21. His alleged crimes have nothing to do with FOX airing a suicide.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:59 PM
Sep 2012

Take your personal attacks back to FOX nation, please.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
144. I was just thinking that there would be some right wingers commenting
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 07:16 PM
Sep 2012

exactly along those lines on the Fox boards or yahoo boards and the like, but we got our own personal troll to do it here!

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
23. If it was on delay why did they show it?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 03:59 PM
Sep 2012

So you're saying they CHOSE to show someone blowing their brains out live on Fox News. That's worse than what I'm saying: that they were very irresponsible for allowing that to air.

Enjoy your stay here.

Response to RedStateLiberal (Original post)

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
34. Looks like a couple of them picked this very special time just to reply to you.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:05 PM
Sep 2012

Not bad work, for a Friday!

Ellipsis

(9,124 posts)
26. Somebody didn't eat thier Trollios today.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:01 PM
Sep 2012

Welcome to the board.

Remember that next time you see live war footage on TV... oh but you won't will you?

Response to RedStateLiberal (Original post)

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
28. That was sad, but it was tame compared to 8:00pm network TV
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:03 PM
Sep 2012

Graphically it was PG at best. Do you watch TV and see what is on there today. Makes that look like Disney.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
37. You do understand the difference between reality and fiction right?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:06 PM
Sep 2012

Watching someone end their own life live on TV is hardly PG. WTF?

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
39. Slow down and take a deep breath...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:09 PM
Sep 2012

I said it was sad, but GRAPHICALLY it was tame compared to even network TV shows. It may have been Emotionally graphic, but the shot was way off and is nothing compared to other such events which have been GRAPHICALLY worse.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
41. So that makes it okay?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:12 PM
Sep 2012

They were incredibly irresponsible for letting that air live. That's the point of this thread. I really don't see the point of trying to minimize it by comparing it to fictionalized violence but whatever floats your boat.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
67. Actually, and I will violate a code in US Media
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:36 PM
Sep 2012

I wish they did it more often, we stopped pretending this does not happen.

Reporting used to be far more graphic... and it is STILL this graphic in many places around the world.

Yes, it is disturbing... it should be disturbing.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
42. THIS is why it is fucked up.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:13 PM
Sep 2012

Because we have gotten so...I don't even know...depraved?? as a society that somebody would say LIKE IT IS A GOOD THING "Oh, well, the shot was so far off and is nothing, really"

WHAT THE FUCK?

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
46. when you quote someone, the extra stuff really sweetens it up
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:17 PM
Sep 2012

to be clear one more time, I responded to the GRAPHIC warning. I found the act sad and horrible. I found the video tame GRAPHICALLY compared to what our kids see EVERYDAY on regular TV and video games. I get the pumped outrage since it was Fox, but back off with the faux outrage over something I did not say.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
49. You are equating a real human being committing suicide
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:19 PM
Sep 2012

to a video game.

It's not faux anything. I AM outraged. And honey, that was aimed AT YOU, not at FOX.

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
48. Comparing fictional programs and a live, daytime suicide broadcast into dentist offices, lobbies,
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:18 PM
Sep 2012

of all types and restaurants is just rather shocking. I don't even know what to say about this caviler attitude toward real live violence.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
36. You couldn't really even see anything.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:05 PM
Sep 2012

I saw the R. Budd Dwyer suicide when I was a kid. This was nothing in comparison.

nolabear

(41,986 posts)
108. I saw that too. Horrific. Everyone was in shock.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:16 PM
Sep 2012

I always wonder at the rage that makes someone do what he did. He spared no one. The FOX situation was different, though no less tragic.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
45. Fox News needs to be placed under arrest.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:15 PM
Sep 2012

In other words, Rupert Murdoch needs to be indicted for this disgusting and exploitative behavior of that said TV Nooz assholes.

Every car chase always winds up on Faux. Cops was cancelled years ago.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
47. then why were you watching, for pete's sake?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:18 PM
Sep 2012

Why would you watch a live pursuit in real time if you fear being offended by tragic outcomes? Don't you think YOU have any responsibility for your choices, or is it entirely up to news agencies to sanitize reality for you?

renie408

(9,854 posts)
50. Actually, that's not a bad point.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:21 PM
Sep 2012

I don't think they should film chases at all. But having done so, I think out of respect for the guy who ended up killing himself on live TV, that they should have had it on delay.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
53. Because I expect them to have it on a delay.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:25 PM
Sep 2012

They claimed they did have it on delay but they showed the suicide anyway.

And I wasn't watching for a car chase. I monitor all the cable news channels during the day while I work using the DirecTV News Mix. I noticed a car chase on Fox and saw the ending.

They have a responsibility to their viewers to not let something so disturbing air. I am criticizing them for such irresponsible broadcasting.

This isn't about me. It's about a news network showing a live suicide to millions of Americans. But, I guess it's all my fault for watching based on your unfair assumptions.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
59. It's a dumb mistake by Fox, no doubt.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:29 PM
Sep 2012

But it doesn't do them any good to have broadcast it so, what's the point of this thread? To say they aren't very good at their jobs? We already know that.

And a slip-up like this, I would imagine, could happen to any news organization that jumps on the chance to film something live, thinking it's 'just' a car chase.

Maybe they'll be fined. So what? Stations are fined all the time.

I just don't get the outrage.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
63. So I can't post a thread to point out irresponsible broadcasting?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:33 PM
Sep 2012

That's the point of this thread as I've repeated over and over in comments.

For the record if MSNBC or CNN had done this I'd be just as outraged.

Fox fucked up big time and that deserves to be called out. Just think of all the kids that could have seen this on all the TV sets that show Faux News all over the country in waiting rooms or restaurants. If that doesn't deserve outrage I don't know what else does.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
70. 'Irresponsible' or a studio fuck-up.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:37 PM
Sep 2012

Apparently viewers could hear personnel in the background saying to cut the feed but it wasn't in time. Someone fucked up or the equipment did. Either way, even for Fox News, that's hard to see as 'irresponsible', IMO.

Sometimes a fuck-up is just a fuck-up.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
81. It's irresponsible to have such a studio fuck-up.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:47 PM
Sep 2012

Especially when it comes to car chases. Everyone puts them on delay to avoid exactly what happened live today on Fox News.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
87. It WAS on delay and they failed to pull the plug.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:54 PM
Sep 2012

You can hear the personnel in the background trying to stop it. Somebody or some component screwed up.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
95. They claimed it was on a delay.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:01 PM
Sep 2012

I have no reason to believe them since they aired it anyway. If the delay wasn't working then they shouldn't have it on at all. If the delay was working then they showed it on purpose. Either way they fucked up and that's irresponsible.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
130. Why are you so intent on this?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:47 PM
Sep 2012

No one knows when a component will fail until...it fails! A faulty time delay is more plausible than Fox News wanting to gross out their viewers.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
138. Why are you so intent on excusing them?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:05 PM
Sep 2012

I've never claimed they wanted to gross out their viewers. I've only said they were irresponsible in the way they handled the coverage of this event. They probably shouldn't have been covering it to begin with but they chose to do so, so they should have taken precautions to make sure they wouldn't show what they DID indeed show. They deserve to be held accountable.

Even if it was just a fuck up, they should still be held accountable. People should know how they fucked up and the consequences of their mistake. I was greatly disturbed by what I saw. Imagine all the sets in waiting rooms and restaurants that show that channel and all the kids who might have seen the suicide. If I was traumatized I can imagine a lot of people were as well. Fuck up or not, they do deserve criticism whether you agree or not.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
73. so they have a responsibility to keep viewers psychologically aroused and excited...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:40 PM
Sep 2012

...with "entertaining" bits of edgy reality, like live high speed pursuits, but they should protect you from having to see how they actually end if things don't turn out well? I don't buy it.

Fair disclosure-- I turned the TV off permanently in 1990. I still think THAT is the appropriate way to protect oneself from the possibility of seeing offensive stuff on the box.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
83. I don't think car chases are any of those things.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:50 PM
Sep 2012

Or even newsworthy. If they're going to cover it they should do so responsibly. Why is this lost on so many people?

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
51. You're right. It's really irresponsible to show it.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:22 PM
Sep 2012

they know better. But I wouldn't put it past them to pretend to not notice and let it pass. They're losing ratings while Rachel Maddow gains them. She's beating them now.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
52. The media needs to stop broadcasting car chases...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:22 PM
Sep 2012

No good ever comes from 'em. I don't understand the fascination with car chases in this country.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
57. Two points
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:28 PM
Sep 2012

1.- I tend to tweet them when they happen so people can AVOID THEM.

2.- They are really easy stories.

And on a slow news day, news copters justify their existence.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
80. Totally right. Why do we need to watch that crap?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:47 PM
Sep 2012

I say it all got worse with the OJ car chase back in the 90's.

Response to RedStateLiberal (Original post)

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
56. I just watched the post of this suicide that was locked by a jury
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:26 PM
Sep 2012

And your reaction, and that of many folks here, is cultural.

Two points.

1.- IN the US we have far more graphic things on the teevee machine that are scripted. I guess knowing the actor will stand up and go home makes it ok.

2.- This is actual standard fare in countries (yes in the evening news) that have less access to guns. Usually they are preceded by a warning... but that is all.

I have asked to myself many a times if we really like to live in a fantasy world, where things like this are hidden from people by both media and willful ignorance.

Yes, it is a disturbing piece of tape... it should be... but read point number one... so should our graphic portrayal of violence that passes for family entertainment.

Shep Smith violated an unwritten code of not showing this crap to viewers, that is all.

w8liftinglady

(23,278 posts)
61. Nadin...I have to agree with you on this
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:30 PM
Sep 2012

We sanitized the war so much that no one knew what was actually happening there.
Same with Hurricaine Katrina.
I DO remember the news from the 60's.
It was graphic.
It was real.
It hit home.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
69. I disagree with you.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:36 PM
Sep 2012

I don't care what they show in other countries. They do all kinds of things in other countries that I don't want done here. Scripted violence is just that..scripted.

Showing a real human being in their most horrific, distressed moment is not news. It is NOT my business. Who knows why the guy was running, who he was, what his circumstances were. I am sure we will all know what his frigging shoe size was within 24 hours, though.

If you cannot tell the difference between real people and fake people, I think that is a problem. For you.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
75. You can disagree all you want (GRAPHIC)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:43 PM
Sep 2012

but this used to be in the MEDIA here... regularly.



As in your evening news.



This too.



People here were horrified when photos like this ran... mostly in foreign papers. That is Katrina dear



This one, mostly DID NOT run in US Papers, again Katrina my dear.

We need to stop pretending. These things happen, and yes, we need to go back to an era when this was shown, in the evening news, with the proper warning.

We really are living in a fantasy.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
84. So everyone's death is everybody's business.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:50 PM
Sep 2012

Good to know.

Do you think there is a difference between the two examples you gave and some random guy hopping out of his car on the side of the road and shooting himself in the head? WHY was this thing today NEWS? What business is it of mine? For that matter, why are car chases 'news'?

This has nothing to do with my ability to deal with reality. This has to do with the difference between news and sensationalism that seems to completely have completely eluded YOU.

I have dealt with death in person in my own life and, I am sure, will again. To assume that my disgust and outrage is due to my inability to 'handle' the truth is condescending and obnoxious.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
86. Yuo posted that, which we want news sanitized
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:53 PM
Sep 2012

they have been, and it is not doing anybody any favors.

The two katrina photos, did not, mostly, run on US Papers... why is that?

Yes, American media is trying to protect you.

The falling man, we have no clue who he was, and RIP, that photo on 911 media was criticized for running it.

Yet, you know how many scripts have had that in it?

And yes, it is time we go back to more accurate reporting... even the if it bleeds it leads, mostly don't bleed... so people see it as some form of nightly entertainment.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
91. You did not answer MY questions.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:57 PM
Sep 2012

It would appear that you are not talking to me. I am not sure who you are talking to. I never said I wanted the news 'sanitized'. I said this wasn't news, wasn't anybodies business other than those directly involved. What if that were someone close to YOU? Why should that video now apparently be all over Youtube? What national significance does it have? What is the NEWS value? That it happened?

Really? THAT'S your criteria for news? It happened?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
103. Actually car chases are releveant
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:09 PM
Sep 2012

and we tweet them regularly... to help people STAY AWAY FROM THEM.

Car chases are among the most dangerous of police actions, and can and do end badly often.

So it is a duty of a news organization to WARN people when one is happening in your area.

You may not have ended in the middle of one, but you really do not want to. For the record, we almost did the other day... and we try to avoid them.

By the way, I am a journalist, I do this shit for real, and the paper I work for has a twitter feed (where we warn people of fires, chases shootings, oh my, and update them during wild fires and other emergencies when in the field.)

Hey, I did not get to cover that one, and there was no twitter back then, but locally we even had one involving a tank... yup. I am dead serious, and it ended up in the death of the tank driver. It WAS major news.

I was at my sister's well before doing this, and we were watching the tv, when they broke into breaking nooz, the chase involved a city bus. I stayed with her until it was over. As a former medic, I know just how bad they can end. I do not want to be in the middle of one.

So no, I do not fault them for covering a chase. The question, which is what is relevant here, is whether a local chase is worthy of national news. When the tank was involved, I suppose, after all that M-60 was stolen from the local armory.

I guess it is a slow nooz day in the studio... like when we all ended up at a snoozer of a hazmat incident in Lakeside. We, ok, it is MY BEAT... the rest of the nooz crews... slow nooz day.

Here is another one where we all felt pretty much snookered, local dems (all 15 of them) welcoming Romney at the highway exit... nope that wasn't nooz either, but multiple nooz editors had us all in the field covering that.

So to answer your question, yes, they are relevant, and if I happen to get nooz of one right now, over the scanner, guess what I will be doing?

renie408

(9,854 posts)
112. Once again, I cannot tell who you are talking to.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:20 PM
Sep 2012

But hey, I have to give you this, you are no quitter.

Dontcha think it would be more to the point to put out a bulletin on the local radio news since the people who need to know about this stuff would be in their CARS at the time a chase was happening of that was the concern?

And I don't think 'journalists' cover car chases. Matt Taibbi is a journalist. I may just be a lowly horse trainer, but even I can see the difference there.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
119. Acttually yes journalists do cover them
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:25 PM
Sep 2012


You have possibly never heard of the police blotter... it it real

Hell, I also cover local labor... and as I said, fires, and election returns.

And yes, locally my radio stations, KOGO 600 AM and NPR in the FM band, do break into programing if the chase is bad enough, aka like involving a tank...

Here



I was so glad they did... I was going in that direction when it broke, instead went home.

I was not the only one.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
122. Sorry, but working for free at the online version of The Pennysaver
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:30 PM
Sep 2012

hardly qualifies as journalism.
http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/

Especially when stories are erroneously based on a Facebook posting...
http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/8423

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
131. Not everyone listens to the radio any more. In fact, it's somewhat passe.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:49 PM
Sep 2012

But I might notice something when passing the TV in the break room.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
99. Wars and disasters are national news.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:07 PM
Sep 2012

A guy running from the cops and then shooting himself in the head is not.

BooScout

(10,406 posts)
117. What countries?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:24 PM
Sep 2012

I'm in the UK and have access to news channels across Europe, India, Russia and the States........and I HAVE NEVER seen what I saw a little while ago done in any country...on any news program before.

In fairness to Shep Smith.....it was his producer's fault for not shutting off the feed.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
120. I have seen footage like that
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:27 PM
Sep 2012

emanating from Brazil, Mexico, Spain, and a few others.

And yes, his producer goofed

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
128. Life a few times,
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:43 PM
Sep 2012

most of the time, taped with warning. I mean, Mexico has a 24\7 environment now, for mexico city, but not the whole country... and brazil and spain also do not have 24\7 channels

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
62. Wow this thread really pulls the trolls
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:32 PM
Sep 2012

But yeah, that's what delay is supposed to be for. Or stop covering car chases all the time.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
68. I have 2 words - Budd Dwyer
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:36 PM
Sep 2012

If it happens live it's not like Fox knew ahead of time it was going to happen.

This happened back in the mid 80s when Budd Dwyer, former PA State Treasurer, was about to be sentenced for some fraud he had committed. A few days before that happened Dwyer hosted a press conference that some of the local news filmed live and at the end of the speech Dwyer pulled out a gun and shot himself. I remember watching it on TV.

No one had a clue it was going to happen but you can't blame the people who film it live. It's not like Dwyer said at the onset of his speech that at the end of it he was going to kill himself.

revolution breeze

(879 posts)
74. Good points with both of these examples.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:43 PM
Sep 2012

My mother was a sophomore in high school when she watched Jack Ruby shoot Lee Harvey Oswald on live television.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
77. I think there is a difference between
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:45 PM
Sep 2012

war and Lee Harvey Oswald and some random guy who hops out of a car on the side of the road and shoots himself in the head.

What is the NEWS value of the last thing? Why do WE have the right to watch that?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
89. I feel...funny defending Fox News.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:55 PM
Sep 2012

They had it on delay and personnel can be heard shouting to pull the plug and someone or something failed to do that.

There IS no news value in this and that's why they tried to pull the plug.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
97. This isn't about FOX. They all do it.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:04 PM
Sep 2012

And as long as WE accept it, they will keep doing it. This is about what news is and what news isn't. This is about some poor guy who was scared and freaked out and pulled a gun out and shot himself in the head on national television. It wasn't a video game and he was somebody's family. And now it is out there. Unless we start saying, "HEY! Some things are OFF LIMITS!" we really will wind up with snuff TV.

So, just shrugging and blowing it off isn't going to get that done. We SHOULD be outraged at what passes for news and what gets on TV. They show FOX News in my bank. What about somebody in there with a child?

And now this guy's family gets to live with his death all over Youtube. Great.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
96. Bad example...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:03 PM
Sep 2012

A typical press conference shouldn't raise suspicions and yes, sometimes, things are out of the media's control. However, how many times have car chases ended extremely badly - either with a shootout or a person killing themselves? Any time the media runs with a car chase, there is a very high possibility something awful is going to be shown. It's why, generally, they have a delay ... but for whatever reason, that delay wasn't there this go around.

The comparison isn't fair because we should always suspect the worst from a car chase. FOX shouldn't be broadcasting this shit. It's not news ... it's entertainment.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
105. Didn't realize ther was a statistic for people committing suicide after a car wreck
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:14 PM
Sep 2012

Still not blaming Fox.

WE have no clue what will happen at the end of a car wreck outside of some dead and damaged people from the wreck - which shouldn't be shown.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
118. Don't blame FOX. I really don't care.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:24 PM
Sep 2012

I think it's clear they were in the wrong here. For starters, the incident you cite was a big reason why they decided to go with the 10 second delay ... so they could avoid problems like this. The fact that didn't happen this go around just shows how incompetent FOX can be. There is no reason they couldn't have stopped this from broadcasting. They've got censors set up for a reason, delays set up for a reason, and it failed here.

Beyond that, though, I still fail to see why they were broadcasting this in the first place? Is it really news and knowing the chances this could end badly - a nasty car accident, a shootout, a suicide, maybe a hostage situation...anything, really, why go ahead with the broadcast?

You don't have to see anything wrong with it. I do. I find it tactless and furthers my point that the media today is more interested in sensationalism than reporting hard news.

FOX should be criticized for this. Any network that would allow this to get through should be ... even if it was an accident. The fact is, this all could've been avoided had they not broadcast the car chases.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
88. I'm relating a personal experience I just had
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:55 PM
Sep 2012

where I watched a live suicide minutes before posting. What do you expect? Objective journalism on a message board? Give me a break.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
85. I watched it - stunned
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:53 PM
Sep 2012

but Shep was taken aback that, supposedly, their 5-second delay did not work.

At least that was a part of the apology.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
100. And now it is all over Youtube.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:07 PM
Sep 2012

For his family and friends to see it. How convenient for them.

Why was this news in the first place?

JI7

(89,252 posts)
106. i don't think they should show live car chases
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:16 PM
Sep 2012

there will always be a chance of a horrible outcome. and it's not really a live news worthy story other than as some cheap way to get ratings through exploitation.

 

sylvi

(813 posts)
94. According to Smith it was on a five second delay
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:00 PM
Sep 2012

At least that was his claim in his apology. In fact you can hear him saying, "Cut away" several times. For some reason the technician or whoever was running the film did not do so.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
102. Looking at the film, it was like *he* was on a five-second delay. A producer in the background yells
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:07 PM
Sep 2012

"NO" right when the guy puts the gun to his head. Smith doesn't react until later.

BooScout

(10,406 posts)
121. You're wrong...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:29 PM
Sep 2012

I unfortunately watched it live. Shep was yelling "Get it off! Get it off!" I think someone screwed up but I'd blame the producer on this one. It would be a producer's responsibility to shut the feed down, not the anchor's.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
113. That a news channel transmits somebody'd death
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:21 PM
Sep 2012

no, won't be the last either.

Oh and did I forget to mention this is cable?

onenote

(42,714 posts)
142. You're right and you're wrong.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:57 PM
Sep 2012

Even if it was broadcast it wouldn't be against any law and would be protected by the First Amendment. The fact that it was cable is often relevant when it comes to content -- such as "indecency" or "profanity" (specifically defined to encompass sexual content) -- since the courts have held that subscription services are more like newspapers and entitled to broader first amendment protection than broadcast (and because the Communications Act applies content restrictions to "radio" communications -- a term that covers broadcast, not cable).

30 years plus of communications law experience speaking here.

onenote

(42,714 posts)
141. Under what law or rule would the FCC do that?
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:54 PM
Sep 2012

There is no rule or law that addresses the depiction of violence, live or 'made up' on television. And the presentation of a live news event -- protected by the First Amendment.

Sorry, but its not even a close call.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
115. I hope every business that is stupid enough to run Fox News on the TVs in their establishments
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:21 PM
Sep 2012

get plenty of backlash from any customers with kids who might have witnessed this.

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
123. The guy was an armed carjacker who was shooting at police
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:32 PM
Sep 2012
Doesn't make his death any less sad, but the emotional outpouring here for him should be maybe be transferred to our dying and wounded soldiers, the cops being killed by criminals like him or the person who he ripped out of his car at gunpoint.

Mariana

(14,858 posts)
143. I don't see emotional outpouring for the guy.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:58 PM
Sep 2012

I see disgust at Fox News for broadcasting a suicide. It's not the same thing.

AnOhioan

(2,894 posts)
132. OK...just read thru the thread
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 05:50 PM
Sep 2012

#1 Fox goofed up.

#2 There is no point about invoking the FCC..the FCC has no jurisdiction.

#3 Car chases are news...barely..they are also sensationalism....something that all news programs employ to one degree or another.

#4 TV/Cable News stopped being news awhile ago...it is now entertainment.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
137. Thanks for the summary
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:02 PM
Sep 2012

Now I know not to bother replying to the thread.

Oh wait, I just did. I should probably delete that first sentence, but if I did then this sentence would make any sense

mstinamotorcity2

(1,451 posts)
136. I know you are not surprised???
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:01 PM
Sep 2012

Look at owner. Rupert Murdock. His Paper over in Great Britain hacked a dead child's cell phone and had the parents thinking the child was alive. When they were really checking her messages. Rodger Ailes is extremely heartless. They have faked the news on so many levels that when real news comes along they "Just Can't Handle The Truth" lol

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
139. OK, I just saw this on YouTube...
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 06:11 PM
Sep 2012

.. and they DID insert a delay when the guy got out of the car . All you saw was him put the gun to his head and fall down. No bang, no spew and Shep was almost screaming "GET OFF OF IT!" A longer delay and they would have not even shown that... but I will give them credit for trying, and major credit to Shep for apologizing for it.

Then again if it had been O'Really or the Hammity, they would have let it run and found a way to blame Obama for it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fox News just aired a liv...