Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust for a for instance....Dems take the Senate lose The Presidency.........
Could that be a good thing???
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 961 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just for a for instance....Dems take the Senate lose The Presidency......... (Original Post)
a kennedy
Nov 2020
OP
It would have significant advantages. All those House Bills will get a vote, many will pass,
marylandblue
Nov 2020
#2
They would be able to severely neuter what that fucking asshole could do as president.
BlueStater
Nov 2020
#5
No, But we are more likely when all the votes are counted in the blue wall states to win
Demsrule86
Nov 2020
#7
AlexSFCA
(6,139 posts)1. no more judges for 4 years, I'll take it
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)2. It would have significant advantages. All those House Bills will get a vote, many will pass,
and Trump won't care either way, so he will sign. It's not a small thing.
On judges, Trump is no ideologue. If the Senate only approves moderate judges, he will be okay with that. Or no judges at all, but I don't think he would like it.
Vdizzle
(383 posts)3. Impeachment with conviction.
That takes 67 votes.
Vdizzle
(383 posts)8. Yup. Forgot about the 2/3rd thing.
Im just so stressed right now. I need to put the iPad down, have a cocktail, and chill the front door out. Sorry!
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)5. They would be able to severely neuter what that fucking asshole could do as president.
So, yes. Itd be a very good thing.
jcgoldie
(11,687 posts)6. Its not very likely at all
We are fighting like hell to get to 50 so Harris VP could cast tiebreaker... lose the presidency and you need 51.
Demsrule86
(69,096 posts)7. No, But we are more likely when all the votes are counted in the blue wall states to win
the presidency...the senate is not looking that good.