Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:14 AM Oct 2012

Are we done bedwetting???

Have we realized why President Obama was really, really smart, when faced with Mitt's debate strategy?

How when faced with the lies and deceit:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251120949


How when faced with deliberate provocation:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021464287

How when faced with with Robme Wanting a Platform for Zingers/47% apology:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475018


President Obama did his best not to engage a bully? He didn't explain, defend, or otherwise let this asshole deliver his zingers, his apology, his schtick. He acted like a President.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1469106

Because he knew this was coming:

Upcoming Jobs Numbers:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475945


Are we done bedwetting???? Because if Big Bird can get it together:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475202

So can we all. It's a long five weeks. Gird your loins. Find out how you can help get the vote out on Election Day, and then do it.

Yes, We Can. And We Will. Again.




145 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are we done bedwetting??? (Original Post) msanthrope Oct 2012 OP
Meh. It's DU. The group hysteria thing always makes me think of the original Star Trek gkhouston Oct 2012 #1
Oh--the crapping oneself was completely expected. It's just that they've had 24 hours, and I'm msanthrope Oct 2012 #3
Ha! Good one! randome Oct 2012 #4
A classic for you.... msanthrope Oct 2012 #9
It will have to wait until after work. But thanks. randome Oct 2012 #34
Red shirt as in first one killed on the hostile, alien planet? Raster Oct 2012 #50
Red shirt as clueless noob who's gone by the second commercial break. gkhouston Oct 2012 #107
Either scenario works for me. Red shirt it is! Raster Oct 2012 #108
Oh yeah! Godless in Seattle Oct 2012 #123
Obama DID go too easy on him and needed to be more energetic, but this was NOT a major game change. RBInMaine Oct 2012 #124
. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #2
Anything that smells like bad news spreads through MineralMan Oct 2012 #5
LOL! tallahasseedem Oct 2012 #45
LOL! Nice analogy. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2012 #49
LOL. So true. My husband says that when I watch Morning Joe and then go on DU CTyankee Oct 2012 #87
It's a phenomenon. MineralMan Oct 2012 #89
We are idealists and therefore, never satisfied with the way things are. CTyankee Oct 2012 #90
I think there are many kinds of idealists. MineralMan Oct 2012 #96
Are we done .. 99Forever Oct 2012 #6
Preach it! DonViejo Oct 2012 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2012 #68
Never Glitterati Oct 2012 #131
I bet if you took a survey on DU about who exactly is working the Obama campaign, and who is not, msanthrope Oct 2012 #133
Working on 7 adult republicans next door Glitterati Oct 2012 #134
Volunteer at your local campaign and get Democrats to the polls on election day.... msanthrope Oct 2012 #135
Well, I would, except..... Glitterati Oct 2012 #136
I don't think it was 'strategy' to appear disorganized simply because good news was on the horizon. randome Oct 2012 #7
No--I think the plan to not give a platform to the 47 apology msanthrope Oct 2012 #12
I'll buy the '47%' omission. randome Oct 2012 #18
No--let me clarify....I think avoiding provocation of ABM is automatic and well-rehearsed. msanthrope Oct 2012 #21
"He underestimated just how much of a piece of shit Romney really is." speedoo Oct 2012 #32
The funniest part is when Rmoney couldn't get any 47% talk into the debate OriginalGeek Oct 2012 #33
I knew without a shadow of a doubt there was method to what we thought was madness LynneSin Oct 2012 #8
This thought is what got... tallahasseedem Oct 2012 #47
I'm still displeased, and donors large and small are, too jsmirman Oct 2012 #10
Oh--not pleased. But politics is a shit sandwich. Sometimes, you take a big bite. Something for msanthrope Oct 2012 #14
I think the thing to hammer is that there's no reality there jsmirman Oct 2012 #27
Yah, that's why there were only 30,000 who showed MineralMan Oct 2012 #16
I think it's notable that the campaign has acknowledged reality jsmirman Oct 2012 #19
The reality is that the result will be a net no change. MineralMan Oct 2012 #20
A healthy attitude nxylas Oct 2012 #74
Agreed - and there's credibility won by proving one can process reality jsmirman Oct 2012 #80
+1 shireen Oct 2012 #77
Yep, we don't lose anything by being honest about the past jsmirman Oct 2012 #78
Obama wasn't quick on his feet. LiberalAndProud Oct 2012 #122
Welcome to Chicken Little Underground. Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #11
Hahaha, LOL Sugarcoated Oct 2012 #65
The debate is now soooooooooooo Wednesday..... KharmaTrain Oct 2012 #13
Exactly, and the new jobs report has him majorly trenidng up obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #15
And Romney's apologizing, and BigBird isn't going away. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #17
The Big Bird thing has shown surprising staying power to me obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #35
The news cycle moves on... MineralMan Oct 2012 #22
Biden/Ryan. We should pass out Depends. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #25
Maybe some folks should just watch it in the bathroom. MineralMan Oct 2012 #30
Turn the TV up loud, wrap the laptop in plastic and bring it in....it could work. msanthrope Oct 2012 #39
This debate will be FAR more entertaining then any of the Presidential debates. Jennicut Oct 2012 #79
I am so excited for that one! obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #36
I can't wait, either. I love Joe Biden. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #40
He seriously cracks me up obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #42
I've nearly forgiven him for Clarence Thomas. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #46
+1 obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #53
Hang on...now we are. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #23
Not everything is to be taken LITERALLY on DU! randome Oct 2012 #52
...oh... n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #70
Brought to you by.... msanthrope Oct 2012 #71
Ha! porphyrian Oct 2012 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #93
Ha, Ruprecht! n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #99
Get the genital cuff Kennah Oct 2012 #118
No sex threads!! msanthrope Oct 2012 #130
Was that no sex-threads, or no-sex threads? Kennah Oct 2012 #144
As I have said all along, Mitt looked ultra terrible, sounded worse... Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #24
Obama also gave up ZERO sound bites at the debate obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #26
Recommended. H2O Man Oct 2012 #28
I am. I'm still not happy with how it went and the following uproar, but I've calmed gateley Oct 2012 #31
I'm with the OP, it's obvious that Obama deliberately didn't engage Romney. Fumesucker Oct 2012 #37
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #38
"certain status solely and exclusively on the basis of his identity" sez WinstonChurchill. msanthrope Oct 2012 #41
I missed it. H2O Man Oct 2012 #43
I'm guessing it's MIRT's problem now. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #44
! H2O Man Oct 2012 #54
yep heaven05 Oct 2012 #48
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #51
Well said. polichick Oct 2012 #55
The hidden post above yours should never have been hidden. donheld Oct 2012 #121
This message was self-deleted by its author polichick Oct 2012 #125
Yeah, I don't get that decision. polichick Oct 2012 #127
Again: Well said. randome Oct 2012 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2012 #67
"Your guy?" Isn't he "our guy?" I note your concern. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #57
Oh goody... 99Forever Oct 2012 #58
Are you seriously suggesting that the behavior of an anonymous Internet poster will influence your msanthrope Oct 2012 #61
That is certainly the contention of those who ... bvar22 Oct 2012 #62
Not any criticism--but the persistent use of right-wing and Libertarian sources as critique. msanthrope Oct 2012 #66
Like Romney, you try to have it both ways. bvar22 Oct 2012 #103
Save your strawman attempts.. 99Forever Oct 2012 #63
I generally don't reply to hidden posts. You? nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #72
My replies and basic question are not hidden... 99Forever Oct 2012 #84
I'm not interested in responding to people who use the word 'scumbag' to msanthrope Oct 2012 #91
Run away then. 99Forever Oct 2012 #94
I'm right here, in my own thread. Good day to you. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #95
Run away from... 99Forever Oct 2012 #105
I said good day, and a further admonition to bless your heart. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #109
Shuck and jive. 99Forever Oct 2012 #111
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #59
There you are!!! Now I know I've hit the bigs!! nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #64
never did .... madrchsod Oct 2012 #60
Was going to suggest no fluids at night but your OP should do the trick. great white snark Oct 2012 #69
Could we not make fun of bedwetting? Do you make fun of people who stutter? yellowcanine Oct 2012 #75
This bedwetting was a conscious choice because it was done by adults who should know better. msanthrope Oct 2012 #82
You obviously think this is a joke. Sorry I don't and I am not playing. yellowcanine Oct 2012 #106
Meta. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #110
I'm not worried. AtheistCrusader Oct 2012 #76
Yes, please! Romney really, really wanted to talk about that 47%. Jennicut Oct 2012 #81
Obama had a bit of legroom in the polls Ratty Oct 2012 #83
Oh, so SOME DU'ers get to call names and use generalized pejorative terms? All-righty, then. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #85
Yeah...name the critic I name. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #86
Heh, you've stepped in it now... porphyrian Oct 2012 #88
There are some folks on DU I'd love to play poker with. I could retire. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #92
... porphyrian Oct 2012 #98
The funny thing is, though.... msanthrope Oct 2012 #100
I'd bet on you. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #101
That's one of the nicest things said to me on DU!!! nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #102
... porphyrian Oct 2012 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #97
Okay, so you gave us your "THIS! IS! SPARTA!!!" speech. Got it. Zalatix Oct 2012 #112
This message was hidden by jury decision. porphyrian Oct 2012 #113
LOL. woo me with science Oct 2012 #114
Thanks. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #116
So... Still waiting for this unstoppable Romney momentum they (Cons) has been talking about. Dash87 Oct 2012 #115
You're worried about re-election. Some of us are worried about governing Doctor_J Oct 2012 #117
No! I wanted him to tear into Romney like a pit bull and rip out his throat! Lone_Star_Dem Oct 2012 #119
The only bedwetting was done by those who think losing a debate is losing the election. Bonobo Oct 2012 #120
Your screen name matches the tone of your message perfectly. polichick Oct 2012 #126
Major Teachable Moments Missed... Iggy Oct 2012 #128
Um--$90 billion on green industries is a good thing that got a great response from the msanthrope Oct 2012 #132
I don't give a Crap About Rmoney Iggy Oct 2012 #137
You don't "teach the American people" anything in that setting. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #139
WRONG Again.... Iggy Oct 2012 #141
Social Security. Do we have to change the sheets again? msanthrope Oct 2012 #129
I'm thinking rubber sheets Bobbie Jo Oct 2012 #142
Our side's pundits really blew it. gulliver Oct 2012 #138
They know it now. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #140
President Obama's research team did a poor job. bluestate10 Oct 2012 #143
Kick. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #145

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
1. Meh. It's DU. The group hysteria thing always makes me think of the original Star Trek
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:16 AM
Oct 2012

series, where people on the bridge would collectively lurch left and lurch right during red alerts.

As long as Romney's wearing the red shirt at the end of the day, it's all good.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
3. Oh--the crapping oneself was completely expected. It's just that they've had 24 hours, and I'm
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:18 AM
Oct 2012

tired of the bullshit.

Change the sheets and remember we have 5 weeks ahead.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
50. Red shirt as in first one killed on the hostile, alien planet?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:31 AM
Oct 2012

AGENT MIKE: Just asking a question and making an observation. We are in no way suggesting or threatening harm to Mr. Robme. We're not like that other batshit-crazy political site.

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
107. Red shirt as clueless noob who's gone by the second commercial break.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 02:01 PM
Oct 2012

Yes, that usually means death-by-alien, but I'd be good with became-infatuated-with-best-friend-of-the-alien-girl-of-the-week-and-jumped-ship.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
124. Obama DID go too easy on him and needed to be more energetic, but this was NOT a major game change.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 04:56 AM
Oct 2012

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
5. Anything that smells like bad news spreads through
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:20 AM
Oct 2012

DU like a fart in church. Good news, not so much. We're a site full of news watchers and followers, so daily stuff gets a lot of attention. We also listen to pundits a lot, so whatever they say gets lots of attention. Sometimes, DU looks like a panic attack when there's news that we don't like.

Then, the next day, it all settles down and waits for the next silent fart. We begin again at that point.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,869 posts)
49. LOL! Nice analogy.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:29 AM
Oct 2012

It's like, OMG, who farted?! We're all gonna die!

When that sort of political indigestion and flatulence occurs I tend to drift away from DU for a bit until the fart dissipates rather than stick around, just inhaling the vapors and complaining. The purely anthropological and sociological aspects of internet-based mass hysteria are interesting, up to a point, and also pretty predictable.

So I guess DU has now had its necessary dose of Beano and we can breathe again for awhile.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
87. LOL. So true. My husband says that when I watch Morning Joe and then go on DU
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:08 PM
Oct 2012

I am pissed off for the rest of the day!

Don't get me wrong. I'd be unhappy without my DU. I just think that liberals tend to be Chronically Morally Outraged...

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
90. We are idealists and therefore, never satisfied with the way things are.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:14 PM
Oct 2012

It's a good thing in one sense and it's a bad thing in another...

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
96. I think there are many kinds of idealists.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:24 PM
Oct 2012

I'm an idealist, but always recognize that ideals are rarely realized. We get shadows on the back of the cave, but the ideal can't be seen clearly.

Then there are idealists who can't be satisfied by anything less than the perfected ideal. They are doomed to disappointment, since each has a different ideal in mind.

For me, ideals are targets, and targets only. We keep aiming for them, but we have inaccurate tools that miss most of the time. All we can do is keep trying.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
6. Are we done ..
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:21 AM
Oct 2012

... making personal insults about our fellow party members for expressing their valid concerns?

I fucking doubt it.

Response to 99Forever (Reply #6)

 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
131. Never
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:19 PM
Oct 2012

What better why to split up the party?

It's the ground game on DU - beat up on your fellow DEMs while doing NOTHING to get your candidates elected.

If you're living on DU, you ain't out there getting the job done.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
133. I bet if you took a survey on DU about who exactly is working the Obama campaign, and who is not,
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:31 PM
Oct 2012

it would be rather interesting.

I'll be watching the Biden/Ryan debate with my fellow Obama campaign workers. And on election day, I'll be a legal observer, again, for my President.

You?

 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
134. Working on 7 adult republicans next door
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:45 PM
Oct 2012

Keeping their power on, encouraging them to get their home out of foreclosure and explaining why Obama is a far better choice than Romney.

I don't think I can handle any more than 7 at a time.

As for the Biden debate, I don't think I'm watching anymore debates. While I expect Joe to wipe the floor with Ryan, I just can't take the demoralizing if it doesn't happen.

on edit:
But, the truth is, shitting all over your compatriots like this isn't helping.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
135. Volunteer at your local campaign and get Democrats to the polls on election day....
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:47 PM
Oct 2012

it might be more rewarding!


 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
136. Well, I would, except.....
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:48 PM
Oct 2012

there isn't one. My county votes 90% republican (if you can believe the voting machines) and we don't even HAVE a DEM party here.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
7. I don't think it was 'strategy' to appear disorganized simply because good news was on the horizon.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:21 AM
Oct 2012

But you're right, it's time to stop crying and march on!

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
12. No--I think the plan to not give a platform to the 47 apology
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:27 AM
Oct 2012

was thought out before hand. The non-Angry Black Man is an automatic.

But I think the disengagement was a reaction to Romney's Gish Gallop routine.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
18. I'll buy the '47%' omission.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:39 AM
Oct 2012

Not convinced that everything else was part of some hidden strategy, though. But, hell, if it was me on stage there, I don't know if I'd have done better, either!

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
21. No--let me clarify....I think avoiding provocation of ABM is automatic and well-rehearsed.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:45 AM
Oct 2012

I think responding to the Gish Gallop routine was on the fly.

I do think the President was prepared to debate. He was not prepared to debate THAT.

If I could fault the President, it would be that he expected that Romney would have the integrity to show up and debate the positions he's held for the past 18 months. He underestimated just how much of a piece of shit Romney really is.

speedoo

(11,229 posts)
32. "He underestimated just how much of a piece of shit Romney really is."
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:55 AM
Oct 2012

I agree and that was the only error. For the hand-wringers, that error was unforgivable, but it turns out that Obama's decision, apparantly on the fly, to limit his response, was right because we are now seeing a ton of "Romney lies" reaction.

So, bottom line, Obama did pretty well given what he was confronted with. The hand-wringers, as usual, were wrong.

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
33. The funniest part is when Rmoney couldn't get any 47% talk into the debate
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:56 AM
Oct 2012

he dutifully went over to Fox and had them ask about what he would have said.


AND he said he would have said he was wrong. lol! I've seen less flipping at Cirque Dy Soleil.


(((("Psssst - hey rich guys - the moochers are tryna take your stash!&quot )))

"Ohhhhh, hey there li'l 47%ers - I was just bullllllllllshittin'...y'all cool...."

((((Pssst, hey rich guys - no they aren't...&quot )))

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)
10. I'm still displeased, and donors large and small are, too
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:25 AM
Oct 2012

as are voiunteers.

The Obama campaign has admitted their candidate's ineffectiveness, because the most effective follow up to the debate is, "yeah, our man really should have done better, considering what a serial prevaricator he was facing and the fact that his opponent contradicted himself nearly every time he opened his mouth."

That establishes credibility by being willing to acknowledge the reality of Obama's weirdly flaccid performance, hammers the reality that Romney is a liar, establishes the lack of credibility of any of Romney's "positions," and sets us up to move on.

Pleased with the debate? Very much no. I don't care what the incumbent scorecard has been in past debates. In that debate the opportunities cried out to be seized and so many of us would have been ready with withering, above-board counterattacks.

But it's OVER. Yes, I'm fully ready to move on. The goals are still the goals. The president has gotten the picture from people he has to listen to - big donors who told him his performance was shit. So now we all move on. Nothing wrong with doing so by acknowledging reality.

But yes, it's time for all of us to fight that lying sack of shit that is Romney harder than ever.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
14. Oh--not pleased. But politics is a shit sandwich. Sometimes, you take a big bite. Something for
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:32 AM
Oct 2012

you though-- a new meme.....

Romney had such disrespect for the President and the Presidency that he refused to debate in good faith. He refused to show respect for us, the American people.

That same 47 percent he is apologizing to??? He didn't respect us enough to give us a real debate on issues.

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)
27. I think the thing to hammer is that there's no reality there
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:50 AM
Oct 2012

With clear as day proof that the man stands for nothing, why should anyone believe his plans extend any further than tax cuts for the rich and murdering regulation and Big Bird?

Everyone knows he has no respect for anyone. I'd go more with the image of a sneering plutocrat who plays pretend on the topic of taxes and jobs, all the while continuing to promote tax cuts for the rich on his site, not paying taxes on his own, and reaping the benefits of tax breaks for outsourcing American jobs.

His money is offshore and so are the American jobs he sent packing.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
16. Yah, that's why there were only 30,000 who showed
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:35 AM
Oct 2012

up in Madison yesterday to cheer the President. Everyone is pissed at Obama, for sure.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
20. The reality is that the result will be a net no change.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:44 AM
Oct 2012

This morning, there is different news. Tomorrow, there will be more different news. The debate isn't the only news.

Personally, I thought the President did just fine in backing off and letting Willard rant on.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
74. A healthy attitude
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:41 PM
Oct 2012

Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and start all over again. The "11-dimensional chess" bullshit, pretending that the President's poor performance was part of some fiendish plan, probably does more harm than good, as it just makes us look like sore losers. Whatever happened to taking defeat on the chin, like an adult?

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)
80. Agreed - and there's credibility won by proving one can process reality
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:51 PM
Oct 2012

I'm fairly well to the left, and I tend to tune out people of my own persuasion when they're clearly talking bullshit, lol.

shireen

(8,333 posts)
77. +1
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:46 PM
Oct 2012

Most people watching the debate are not as sophisticated as the DU crowd. They may not be familiar with the issue details so they may have believed the numbers thrown out by Romney -- after all, he is running for the highest office in the land and they are giving him the benefit of the doubt.

The first debate is critical, and Pres. Obama, a smart thoughtful man, could have handled it better. But he didn't fail, and generally gave a good impression depite Romney's distracting performance.

But as you wisely point out, it's over and we have to move on. I'm sure the president now knows what he's dealing with, and will be able to handle Romney more effectively for the next two debates.

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)
78. Yep, we don't lose anything by being honest about the past
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:49 PM
Oct 2012

and what happened in the past is that Mitt lied his rear end off and temporarily got away with it.

Okay.

Plenty to work with from there. Doesn't change the past, but we can change the future.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
122. Obama wasn't quick on his feet.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 03:54 AM
Oct 2012

Romney caught him off guard. Still, I believe Obama's instinct to play defense was the right one. We have had smatterings of discussions here about gender perception. What I saw was Obama checking his temper in the face of provocation. A couple of times he breathed deep and gathered himself, but he did not explode in anger. He looked tired and care worn and that reminded me that he has other things on his mind beyond landing a zinger or two for political theater. Mitt's lies pissed me off, and I was terribly annoyed when they said, "We mostly agree." My blood pressure sky rocketed every time. Still and all, the words that some DUers would put in Obama's mouth don't strike me well when I imagine President Obama speaking them. Perhaps they would have been momentarily gratifying, but ultimately not as effective as the message discipline that Obama exercised.

Do I think it was planned? Beyond the resolve not to pound the 47% angle, no, I don't. As I said, I think Obama acted from instinct. Watching the drama play out over the ensuing hours helps me to trust his instincts.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
13. The debate is now soooooooooooo Wednesday.....
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:28 AM
Oct 2012

...we now how job numbers to play with and surely some other poll or document dump will come our way later today or over the weekend.

It's the sturn and drang that makes DU the fun place it is...especially during election time.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
35. The Big Bird thing has shown surprising staying power to me
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:57 AM
Oct 2012

Social Media is a real force in news and politics now, and twitter is all a... err.... flutter with Big Bird hash tags and parody accounts. Things like this help keep Romney's snarkiness and meanness alive and relevant. Anyone over a certain age watched "Sesame Street," or had kids that did/do.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
22. The news cycle moves on...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:45 AM
Oct 2012

And so it goes. Next week the debate will be forgotten and something else will take its place.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
30. Maybe some folks should just watch it in the bathroom.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:52 AM
Oct 2012

Save steps.

Really, though, the VP debate is likely to be full of fire and brimstone, and should be entertaining. Completely irrelevant to the outcome of the election, but entertaining.

Loose the Biden of war on the Ryan of defeat!

You know where I'll be during the debate.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
39. Turn the TV up loud, wrap the laptop in plastic and bring it in....it could work.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:12 AM
Oct 2012

When my husband designed his man-cave it did not escape my notice that he positioned the TV in a manner that allowed a viewer to watch unobstructed from the adjoining bathroom when the door was open.

So I had a lock put on the man-cave door. And he thanked me for my foresight.



Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
79. This debate will be FAR more entertaining then any of the Presidential debates.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:49 PM
Oct 2012

Because if there were two more different personalities then Ryan and Biden I couldn't find them.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
36. I am so excited for that one!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:58 AM
Oct 2012

Biden is also exciting to watch -- you never know what he will say. He is, however, a smart guy.

Response to porphyrian (Reply #23)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
24. As I have said all along, Mitt looked ultra terrible, sounded worse...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:47 AM
Oct 2012

. I think the President and his people could have made somewhat better choices about how to deal with an unrelenting liar telling unrelenting lies, but I also don't think it matters in the long run. Mitt lost the night. Also, Obama did not win the night. But Mitt lost. No doubt about it. And that's what matters.
And what's that lyric from Dreamgirls? 'A second rate diva who can't sustain'. That's what's next. Mitt blew out his range the first night. Also, I think of that Bugs and Daffy cartoon where they are topping each other in a Vaudeville show down, the acts get crazier and crazier until Daffy sets himself on fire and his soul leaves his body saying 'it's a great act, but you can only do it once'.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
26. Obama also gave up ZERO sound bites at the debate
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:50 AM
Oct 2012

That, in and of itself, is also something to remember. No ammo for the GOP. They have nothing, as their 2007 Rev. Wright video shows.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
31. I am. I'm still not happy with how it went and the following uproar, but I've calmed
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:55 AM
Oct 2012

down and feel confident again. So no more bed wedding for me!

Response to msanthrope (Original post)

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
41. "certain status solely and exclusively on the basis of his identity" sez WinstonChurchill.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:17 AM
Oct 2012

I'm gonna go eat some pizza and laugh over your unintended funny!!!!

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
48. yep
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:28 AM
Oct 2012

after reading the courage and REASON shown here against a lying, cheating sociopath, I got my second wind. thanks.

Response to msanthrope (Original post)

donheld

(21,311 posts)
121. The hidden post above yours should never have been hidden.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 03:23 AM
Oct 2012

Too many, if there is something posted they don't like It suddenly becomes rude, insensitive...

Response to donheld (Reply #121)

Response to randome (Reply #56)

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
58. Oh goody...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:59 AM
Oct 2012

... snarky nitpicking. That'll win friends and influence people.

I also note you didn't respond to the question I posed to you upthread.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
61. Are you seriously suggesting that the behavior of an anonymous Internet poster will influence your
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:04 PM
Oct 2012

voting behavior, or the voting behavior of any potential Obama voter????

Please.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
62. That is certainly the contention of those who ...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:09 PM
Oct 2012

... continually insist that ANY criticism or questioning of the current administration
or pointing out the rightward direction of the Democratic Party will "suppress voter turnout."

I'm glad we agree that that persistent claim is completely BOGUS.



[font color=firebrick size=3][center]"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."

--- Paul Wellstone[/font]
[/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center]
[/font]

[font size=5 color=firebrick]Solidarity![/font]

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
66. Not any criticism--but the persistent use of right-wing and Libertarian sources as critique.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:20 PM
Oct 2012

Personally, I could have given a rat's ass about the fevered rantings of BBI---it was giving a platform to sources that were right-wing and Libertarian, as an appeal to authority, that was bogus.

Critique the President all you want bvar. I doubt you will change a single vote.

But use DU as a platform for other agendas??? That's a paddlin'



bvar22

(39,909 posts)
103. Like Romney, you try to have it both ways.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:46 PM
Oct 2012

Consistency is the hallmark of an honest broker.
Your dots don't connect.




[font color=firebrick size=3][center]"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."

--- Paul Wellstone[/font]
[/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center]
[/font]

[font size=5 color=firebrick]Solidarity![/font]

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
63. Save your strawman attempts..
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:09 PM
Oct 2012

... for someone else. Address the issue of you insulting other members of the Democratic Party for expressing their VALID concerns or don't. That's the ONLY thing I care to discuss with you.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
84. My replies and basic question are not hidden...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:04 PM
Oct 2012

... yet you have yet to respond to them.

Next excuse?

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
91. I'm not interested in responding to people who use the word 'scumbag' to
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:19 PM
Oct 2012
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1216698

describe DUers who aren't defending a fugitive rapist.

I think your comportment on various Assange threads speaks for itself.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
105. Run away from...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:56 PM
Oct 2012

... question.

I see you need to have virtually everything explained in detail so you can understand it. Why am I not surprised?

Response to msanthrope (Original post)

great white snark

(2,646 posts)
69. Was going to suggest no fluids at night but your OP should do the trick.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:29 PM
Oct 2012

OUTSTANDING post msanthrope. So outstanding you brought out some Obama hating heavy hitters.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
75. Could we not make fun of bedwetting? Do you make fun of people who stutter?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:44 PM
Oct 2012

Bedwetting is not a conscious choice or a character trait any more than stuttering is.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
82. This bedwetting was a conscious choice because it was done by adults who should know better.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:55 PM
Oct 2012

But, I think this is a topic worth Meta--go post there about how 'bedwetting' should be on the list of no-nos.

I'll pop the corn.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
106. You obviously think this is a joke. Sorry I don't and I am not playing.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:57 PM
Oct 2012

I have no desire to try to get it put on any kind of list. What others think is on or off the "list of no-nos" is not my standard for deciding whether something is morally right. I am speaking as a person who had this as a problem when I was young and it is not funny to me. I also have an elderly father in law who has problems with this because of the blood thinning medications he takes. You can do with that what you want. But I noticed you did not answer my question of whether stuttering is something you would joke about. If you say no I honestly don't see how this is different.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
81. Yes, please! Romney really, really wanted to talk about that 47%.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 12:53 PM
Oct 2012

And Obama would not let him. It is still unresolved for Mittens and then he started the apology tour about it.

Ratty

(2,100 posts)
83. Obama had a bit of legroom in the polls
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 01:03 PM
Oct 2012

He tried to bring a bit of civility and intelligence back to presidential debates, turning away from the freakshow sound-bite obsessed circus the republicans have turned it into. Of course the media is in a tizzy. "Where's my sound bite? Where's something catty I can report on to spice up the story?? Waaah!"

Response to msanthrope (Original post)

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
112. Okay, so you gave us your "THIS! IS! SPARTA!!!" speech. Got it.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 02:55 PM
Oct 2012

And you better believe I am PASSING IT ON.

K&R!

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
115. So... Still waiting for this unstoppable Romney momentum they (Cons) has been talking about.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 03:15 PM
Oct 2012

The rebound that never was? Greg Gutfield, Hannity, and Bill Kristol sure know how to call it.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
117. You're worried about re-election. Some of us are worried about governing
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:05 PM
Oct 2012

the man who was weak, timid, and unprepared Wednesday night cannot possibly hold his own against hostile congress. His performance was a disaster, regardless of how much people hate Rmoney. ANyone who believes we saw "9-D chess" or some masterstroke is, frankly, nearly as delusional as the Birthers. I now know why, even with heavy majorities in Congress in 2009-2010, minimal progress was made. The ONLY reason to go to the polls now is to keep Rmoney out of office. Anyone hoping for real Democratic leadership is quite obviously going to have to wait for 2016.

Yeesh. I wish we could still unrec these nutty vanity posts.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
119. No! I wanted him to tear into Romney like a pit bull and rip out his throat!
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:37 AM
Oct 2012

Not really. I just figured you should get at lead one insane reply.

I was a champion (state) debater in HS. Granted that was more than two decades ago now, but still. That was the worst moderation I've ever seen. Even on a HS level. Debates have rules, and Romney walked all over them, spewing a stream of lies as he went. I get that people were angry he got away with that. Still, this isn't HS, and there's a lot more at stake than a medal and a trophy. Obama was in a situation where he was damned if he did, and damned if he didn't.

It was unpleasant to witness, to say the least. So, I get how some people reacted who are honest Obama supporters. Then there's those here who were salivating over the debate to feed their unrest. Trying to make it into something it wasn't.

In the end, I don't see it as having any lasting damage to the elections outcome unless it's repeated. Which I find highly unlikely. So, let the haters froth. They live for it, it's all they have to bring them joy in the world. Sad as that is.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
120. The only bedwetting was done by those who think losing a debate is losing the election.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:47 AM
Oct 2012

Obama has and will go down in history as having been beaten or dominated in the debate.

He came off as weak and not passionate. He nodded too much when he was lectured and he failed to make any strong points.

BUT...as Rachel Maddow has pointed out, it has very little impact on the ultimate results of the election. So don't worry too much about it.

But seriously, the only bedwetting was done by people like you who cannot even stand to hear what people almost unanimously agreed with as Obama's loss in the debates. You sound like children who are angry that they can't watch TV after 10 o'clock. They attack those who gave their honest opinions and stamp their feet like petulant children. They are doing the bedwetting because they are the ones that think it is a big deal.

So... you need to clean your own sheets, wipe the tears off your face and pull it together. It's not the end of the world. But he did perform poorly.

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
128. Major Teachable Moments Missed...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:18 AM
Oct 2012

when you can pull 60 MIL people away from the football game, you have to take advantage.

regarding Willard's "You spent $90 BIL in one year on incentives for green industries". Rmoney stated
this what? Three times?

Obama's response: crickets....

I get the political expediency behind this (avoiding Solyndra fiasco) but unfortunately Obama totally
blew it on this-- the American people have to understand and commit to the new clean energy
paradigm. Obama needs to explain just why incentives are needed to get the green energy industry
up and running long term.

Obama has to state that studies show the transition to clean energy will in fact create 1,000's of
new jobs and keep our nation on track to deal with, hellooooooo? Climate change.

He didn't do any of this-- just to avoid talking about one mistake.

weak.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
132. Um--$90 billion on green industries is a good thing that got a great response from the
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:26 PM
Oct 2012

President's base. You think anyone voting for Obama is upset or disappointed by that expenditure? You think he lost independents? Nope--and within 24 hours, Romney was apologizing for overstating the rate of failure---the President got great coverage on the networks about 94% of the companies invested in succeeding.

Heck--I had progressives tell me that they didn't know the President had spent that much and they were happy about it.

That was a Romney MISTAKE--just as stupid as suggesting that cutting the military (after two wars) was a bad thing.

Teachable moment??? I hope Romney does not learn from that mistake.

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
137. I don't give a Crap About Rmoney
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 04:08 PM
Oct 2012

I want the American people (many not all that bright to begin with) to understand why we need to
spend money to incentivise green industries... that's the teachable moment I am referring to that
was missed by Obama. he blew it

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
141. WRONG Again....
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 08:35 PM
Oct 2012

thus what IS the purpose of these so called "debates" then?

A sort of sophomoric popularity contest like the shmucks who run for class president in High School?

Gimme a break. there are dozens of writers/pundits out there making the same point I am.

thanks for the weak spin attempt

gulliver

(13,197 posts)
138. Our side's pundits really blew it.
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 05:04 PM
Oct 2012

I hope they get the message. If they hadn't started squalling after the debate, it would have been a split decision. Our pundits gave the media permission to come down hard on Obama. They really blew it, and I hope they know it.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
143. President Obama's research team did a poor job.
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 09:08 PM
Oct 2012

And the President did a poor job during the debate. One issue that turned my stomach was Romney claiming that he worked with the democratic legislature in Massachusetts to get RomneyCare. The fact is that Romney agreed to the health care plan only after it was clear that the legislature was going to approve and implement it's own plan over a Romney veto. Even after agreeing to a plan, Romney tried to gut three key provisions and was over-ridden by the legislature. Even after the legislature forced the law down Romney's throat, Romney dragged his feet implementing the law. Romney set up insurance industry lackeys to set up the critical exchange, making a fucking mess joke of the exchange. The Massachusetts health care law didn't truly get implemented until after Deval Patrick won election in 2006 and came in with the intention of fixing the plan and getting the exchange working. Patrick and the legislature worked hand in hand, Patrick replaced the Romney appointees with consumer oriented health plan administrators, the plan took off establishing more plan choices, getting more companies to make plan offerings and enrolling more children and adults of every background. In essence, RomneyCare should be called PatrickMassachusettsLegislatureCare. I am fucking enraged that Obama's research team didn't fucking investigate Romney's only claim to fame and provided the President with ammo to walk on stage with. The miss can't fucking happen again because we will have an election that is closer than it should be.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are we done bedwetting???