General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRW: Experimental software in Ohio won it for Obama
This site explains how Ohio was stolen.
Some early exit polls told a different story than the actual vote, proving fraud. (The fact that early exit polling changes in light of better evidence subsequently is ignored.)
Polling agreeing with the outcome actually proves fraud. Corrupt pollsters matched their Ohio polls to the fraudulent totals they knew were coming, creating cover for the fraud.
Anecdotal evidence of turnout is preferred to actual turnout because it supports the fraud argument.
How hard would it be to apply a software patch designed to automatically return a D+8 result? Incredibly easy. Is it also a coincidence that the most far left pollsters were predicting a D+8 electorate for OH despite evidence to the contrary? We call that "creating cover".
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2043301/pg1
codjh9
(2,781 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Everything about it seems like a Twilight Zone reversal of 2004.
Oh well. At least this time we are on the winning team!
LisaL
(44,974 posts)You'd have to be delusional to think Husted would use that software to help Obama.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)They think Husted stole the election for Obama? I mean really.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)So if he was going to steal it for anyone using his experimental software, it sure as hell wouldn't be Obama.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)and won!
False equivalency even from Dems now?
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)What an insane fucking analysis. How can any one take a loser like that seriously?
Zambero
(8,965 posts)Wow, a Republican official that fixed the election for Obama, who would have thunk it? But mathematically speaking, Romney's carrying Ohio would still have left him far short of 270 electoral votes. Back the conspiracy theory drawing board!
tblue
(16,350 posts)I don't care what looks silly. Let's take a look inside those e-voting machines and make the entire process as transparent as possible. It's not that hard and, again, it doesn't matter who thinks it looks silly. Who made thst the standard anyway?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Don't believe a word of it but I support it since if both sides are complaining about voting machines maybe we can get rid of them.