Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:11 PM Nov 2012

Everybody saying turnout was down --please STOP it (here's why)

you are comparing the votes counted at this point (not the total) with the total votes counted at the completion of the 2008 count.

there are probably 3 million votes to be counted in California alone, probably 2 million from Washington state (Washington's deadline for votes was to have them postmarked by election day) and votes from the rest of the country.

so some people are comparing apples and oranges.

worse, what's laughable is that some are saying Obama's total is 9 million down from 2008 another at the same time is saying he's 8 million down from 2008, because the numbers are changing hourly!

anyone who says that Obama is 8 million behind 2008's total is comparing a partial count with a full count. USELESS.

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/09/15054671-turnout-down-from-2008-too-soon-to-tell?lite

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/2012-elections/nov-general/pdf/unprocessed-ballots-report.pdf

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everybody saying turnout was down --please STOP it (here's why) (Original Post) CreekDog Nov 2012 OP
Last night, Nate Silver tweeted (and it was in an OP here at DU)... DonViejo Nov 2012 #1
I saw a few of these threads here today and am just amazed at people CreekDog Nov 2012 #2
Well, thanks for making a thread about it, CreekDog! It's a service Cha Nov 2012 #3
The Freepers are heavily into this. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #4

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
1. Last night, Nate Silver tweeted (and it was in an OP here at DU)...
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:14 PM
Nov 2012

"do not believe reports of low turnout...10 million votes have yet to be counted" or words to that effect: 10 million uncounted votes.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
2. I saw a few of these threads here today and am just amazed at people
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:28 PM
Nov 2012

people making broad statements about turnout, that those people don't even realize votes are still being counted???

that may not be obvious to everyone.

but everyone looking up election numbers should realize it.

Cha

(297,503 posts)
3. Well, thanks for making a thread about it, CreekDog! It's a service
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:57 PM
Nov 2012

to inform people who don't have all the information they need before assuming a conclulsion.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
4. The Freepers are heavily into this.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:02 AM
Nov 2012

It's already an article of faith over there that Obama got fewer votes than McCain did in 2008. All the Republicans had to do to win was to nominate a candidate who could match McCain's total -- or, more precisely, the total of the McCain - Palin ticket. The falloff in the Republican votes came because Sarah wasn't on the ticket and because many conservatives who held their nose and voted for McCain just wouldn't do so a second time. All this proves that the Republicans can win easily by running a strongly conservative candidate.

Even more promising is that some of them, disgusted by the parade of RINOs foisted on them by the GOP establishment, are giving more consideration to abandoning the Republican Party and going third party.

CreekDog, the details in your post are valuable, but my lurker account on FR will not be sharing this information. Let them go on thinking that tacking hard right is the sure route to victory.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Everybody saying turnout ...