Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 08:58 AM Nov 2012

The Sins Of General David Petraeus

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mhastings/the-sins-of-general-david-petraeus



The fraud that General David Petraeus perpetrated on America started many years before the general seduced Paula Broadwell, a lower-ranking officer 20 years his junior, after meeting her on a campus visit to Harvard.

More so than any other leading military figure, Petraeus’ entire philosophy has been based on hiding the truth, on deception, on building a false image. “Perception” is key, he wrote in his 1987 Princeton dissertation: "What policymakers believe to have taken place in any particular case is what matters — more than what actually occurred."

Yes, it’s not what actually happens that matters — it’s what you can convince the public it thinks happened.

Until this weekend, Petraeus had been incredibly successful in making the public think he was a man of great integrity and honor, among other things. Most of the stories written about him fall under what we hacks in the media like to call “a blow job." Vanity Fair. The New Yorker. The New York Times. The Washington Post. Time. Newsweek. In total, all the profiles, stage-managed and controlled by the Pentagon’s multimillion dollar public relations apparatus, built up an unrealistic and superhuman myth around the general that, in the end, did not do Petraeus or the public any favors. Ironically, despite all the media fellating, our esteemed and sex-obsessed press somehow missed the actual blow job.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Sins Of General David Petraeus (Original Post) xchrom Nov 2012 OP
Seduced?!! lalalu Nov 2012 #1
This view is opposed by the words of Charles Wright ... JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2012 #2
One of my favorites. lalalu Nov 2012 #3
 

lalalu

(1,663 posts)
1. Seduced?!!
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 09:07 AM
Nov 2012

I have never liked Petraeus but seduced is not accurate. Broadwell is as much of a slug as Petraeus. I personally believe she is another Judith Miller doing work for republicans.

Now we have this Kelley woman and General Allen involved. I have never seen the position of "Unpaid Social Liaison" listed before. Is that a new term for hooker?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,364 posts)
2. This view is opposed by the words of Charles Wright ...
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 09:34 AM
Nov 2012

It’s not what you look like, when you’re doin´ what you’re doin´.
It’s what you’re doin´ when you’re doin´ what you look like you’re doin´!



&feature=related

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Sins Of General David...