'Does your husband know you've been touching Petraeus under the table?
hope both of these women and Petraeus and all the men involved are getting all the attention they obviously needed 
Some divorce attorneys are going to get a nice payday soon LOL
It's the daily mall but who cares, more juicy to read 
'Does your husband know you've been touching Petraeus under the table?' The cat-fight emails sent by Paula Broadwell to supposed love rival Jill Kelly
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2232133/Does-husband-know-youve-touching-Petraeus-table-The-cat-fight-emails-sent-Paula-Broadwell-supposed-love-rival-Jill-Kelly.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
The mistress of shamed former CIA chief David Petraeus accused her supposed love-rival of touching him under the table and asked if her husband was aware of her actions, in a string of threatening emails.
Paula Broadwell's affair with Petraeus was exposed after she sent a series of messages to Florida socialite Jill Kelly, apparently warning her off her lover.
She does have that, "I'll let you stick it anywhere you want for a scoop look"
while petrahorny has that "Can you believe I'm tapping this! I look like a turtle! expression"
= new reply since forum marked as read
For their sakes, I hope it doesn't extend to their intellects as well.
I use concubine loosely like consort or paramour--I use the words interchangeably re gender.
Would extracurricular fuckbuddy be better? What would you prefer? 
you're not name calling and then you use 3 negative epithets for the principles in the liaison. 
I'm not putting anything in terms of ownership. I'm agreeing it is done by either sex these days. I'm looking for a mere term for the relationship that is not a cuss word. So for my own purposes, I just call all cases of it "concubinage." I guess I don't ever see it as a relationship of equality. Not if it's an extended affair. You do?
Yeah maybe there's a point to reviving the medieval word "par amour" (I think comes from Fr.) since it is uni-sex.
-------------
Some poster on a blog points out that it sounds more chic than "Adulterer"
Paramour is not so much ‘illicit’ as ‘destructive, an indulgence of betrayal for momentary or temporary pleasure’. Perhaps the word paramour implies an affluent or aristocratic setting. The formality of referring to an adulterer as a ‘paramour’, as in, ‘affair of the heart (l’ amour)’ – a seedy and scarcely hidden refuge of those that marry for family or monetary advantage, rather than respect and affection for a mate.
On a lighter note, this was posted:
"Down south, we often confuse “paramour” with its homonym, “power mower.” Then again, it’s great when you can get your paramour to cut your grass."
Last edited Tue Nov 13, 2012, 08:16 PM - Edit history (1)
In that case, it's not equal & she's the predator 
This is a dual gender demon:
"In folklore traced back to medieval legend, a succubus (plural succubi) is a female demon or supernatural being appearing in dreams, who takes the form of a human woman in order to seduce men, usually through sexual intercourse. The male counterpart is the incubus. Religious traditions hold that repeated intercourse with a succubus may result in the deterioration of health or even death."
He doesn't seem like an incubus--he risked and lost too much in the deal. An incubus would be like a rapist.
"An incubus (nominal form constructed from the Latin verb, incubo, incubare, or "to lie upon"
is a demon in male form who, according to a number of mythological and legendary traditions, lies upon sleepers, especially women, in order to have sexual intercourse with them. Its female counterpart is the succubus."
Just speculating here...not arguing with you. (I mean, who really knows?...but in this case it seems to me that SHE has the power....the power to destroy...)
