General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne general liked wearing ribbons, the other won World War II. (PHOTO)
Can you guess which ones?
[IMG][/IMG]
Hekate
(90,806 posts)Wish I still had the campaign button that passed through my hands as a little kid! He was a good president, too.
ananda
(28,876 posts).. but he didn't do much.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)1. He Kept America at Peace.
Eisenhower was confronted with major Cold War crises every year he was in office: Korea, Vietnam, Formosa, Suez, Hungary, Berlin, and the U-2. While more than once America seemed on the brink of war and those around him clamored to drop the Bomb, Eisenhower always kept a level head. He dealt calmly and rationally with each situation, always finding a solution that avoided war without diminishing America's prestige.
2. He Ended the Korean War.
He alone had the prestige to persuade Americans to accept a negotiated peace and convince the Chinese that failure to reach an agreement would lead to dire consequences. Eisenhower considered this to be his greatest presidential accomplishment.
3. He Balanced the Budget, Not Just Once, But Three Times.
Despite much pressure to do otherwise, he also refused to cut taxes and raise defense spending. His fiscal policy contributed to the prosperity of the 1950's.
4. He Sponsored and Signed the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956.
This gave birth to America's interstate highway system. Eisenhower worked hard to get the bill passed and it was his favorite piece of legislation.
5. He Sponsored and Signed the Civil Rights Bill of 1957.
This was the first civil rights bill since Reconstruction. Much to Eisenhower's dismay, Congress amended the bill and critically weakened its effectiveness.
Joey Liberal
(5,526 posts)And he had an affair with his enlisted driver - he ended up promoting his female DRIVER from sergeant to captain.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)With Oveta Culp Hobby, wife of Gov. Hobby of Texas and head of the Women's Army Corps. It was supervised by Hap Arnold. Jacqueline Cochran, famous aviatrix, said "I will not take orders from a woman who does not know her ass from a propeller."
former9thward
(32,082 posts)Truman issued the order to desegregate the armed forces but is was largely ignored. Eisenhower enforced it and the last all black army unit was disbanded in 1954.
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)1. Overthrew the democratically elected government of Guatemala, leading that nation into decades of civil war with more than one hundred thousand civilians murdered by right wing death squads, with the support of the US government;
2. Overthrew the democratically elected government of Iran and re-installed the Shah, leading to the imprisonment, torture, and murders of tens of thousands of people, with the support of the US government;
3. Opposed democratic elections in Vietnam, as agreed to in Geneva, instead supporting right wing dictator Diem and thus paving the way for the destruction of Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia,
4. Elevated right wing paranoid Richard Milhouse Nixon to the vice presidency, setting him up to be president, enough said;
5. Was a huge sponsor of the military industrial complex, that is until he was about to leave office, at which point he made one, count 'em one speech, opposed to said complex....
I could go on...
Eisenhower was a great general, but Stevenson would have made a better president.
a la izquierda
(11,797 posts)kiva
(4,373 posts)- refused to risk his own popularity to stop McCarthy until the senator began intruding into army affairs.
- approved a CIA mission to (along with the Brits) overthrow Mohammad Mosaddegh - the democratically elected leader of Iran - and replace him with the Shah...and that went ever so well. You can directly trace the hostage crisis from the 1970s and much of the problems we have with Iran in general to that event.
- approved another CIA mission to overthrow another democratically elected leader, Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán of Guatemala. Ike's buddies, including the Dulles brothers, were heavily invested in United Fruit company, and the US essentially backed a takeover of *again* a democratically elected government to save US investors. In the end, this intervention and the ensuing US support of future dictators eventually cost the lives of thousands of Guatemalan people.
- oversaw the CIA planning of the invasion of Cuba that JFK eventually approved.
- yes, he put Warren on the court, but no one, including Ike's brother, believe that Eisenhower thought Warren was a strong supporter of civil rights. Warren was the governor of California during WWII, when Japanese and Japanese-Americans were interned in concentration camps, a move Warren supported. I like Warren, and he did great good, but Ike was by all accounts surprised and none too please with Warren's decisions, including Brown v Board.
- as for other Cold War events: yes, he ended the Korean War but Truman was limited by another Republican darling, General McArthur, in his attempts to end the war. I would hardly say that the U-2 crisis with Powers or US involvement in Vietnam after the French withdrawal were positives to put in Ike's column. In fact, I honestly don't see that Eisenhower did well with any of the events/places you listed, though I'm up for education so please let me know what you see as his positives (really not snarky, just want to know).
So no, I really don't agree that Eisenhower was all that; and honestly, the only reason Eisenhower was in Europe was because FDR thought Marshall was too valuable at overall planning to just use in Europe.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)He had no choice but to embrace the FDR doctrine when it came to social programs. Had Eisenhower come out against Social Security & a great deal of other FDR policies, he would've been tossed from office. Eisenhower was a product of his time ... like Clinton in the 90s. Both tied to the ideology of an era ... neither could really afford radical adjustment. It's why I think Eisenhower is overhyped and Clinton gets too much criticism for his centrist leadership in the 90s.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)Racism and segregation was alive and well. Gays would never come out. Abortion was illegal. Let's just say---not as Liberal as we would be considered now. And if any of those issues were brought up in politics then---they would be closed issues.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Even FDR had some awful conservative streaks when it came to social policy - namely his refusal to end lynching, even though he promised to do so during his campaign. He didn't because he didn't want to piss off the southern Democrats. His record on civil rights would be considered atrocious by today's standards.
kiva
(4,373 posts)Eisenhower was lucky in that he had no political baggage so he could adapt to the country's ideology, a luxury that most politicians don't have.
Too many people have only heard about Ike's warning about the military-industrial complex and somehow think that made him a liberal...not so much.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)"The biggest damn mistake I ever made."
rexcat
(3,622 posts)overthrow several democratically elected leaders of countries in Central and South America for business interests. Also overthrew the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran in 1953 and put in a brutal dictator. It was a complacent time and education in this country was woefully inadequate in math and science to such a degree that the Soviet Union put the first successful satellite into space. It took us years to catch up. I could go on but I hope you get the point.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)democratically-elected President Mossadeh in 1953, more than one scholar dates the hatred of the U.S. (the Great Satan) and the radicalization of many Muslims to that event. Before that they respected us and wanted to emulate us because we weren't colonialists.
A couple of things to note:
1. the CIA did it, just a few years after that agency was formed;
2. they/we did it for oil.
Some things never change.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)He ended a war, the Korean War, that could have gone the way of Vietnam and gave us peace for the rest of his term in office.
He gave America prosperity in the fifties by refusing to cut taxes, but he did cut military spending.
He brought the first legislation for civil rights.
He created the interstate highway system. Up until then travel between states was an adventure and often not a good one.
Kennah
(14,315 posts)OK, not exactly, but he created ARPA, which led to the Internet.
dsc
(52,166 posts)and he sent troops to Little Rock two very important things that changed the country for the better.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Too bad such a situation really was a fluke in American history.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)People wanted someone to end the Korean War and his name came up. He ran as one because the Democratic ticket was already full.
struggle4progress
(118,348 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)he would have had to run against Adlai Stevenson in the primaries. He figured he would stand a better chance against Adlai in the General Election. The rest is history. I was there and pretty much knew the politics. I don't know what revisionist shit is out there these days.
struggle4progress
(118,348 posts)Supreme Court Justice Douglas said Truman had told him, in the presence of Supreme Court Justice Vinson, that he (HST) had offered Eisenhower the Democratic nomination for President in a November 5 meeting at Blair House, and that Eisenhower had rebuffed the offer on the grounds that he was a Republican from a long-term Republican family
Contemporary news accounts, with named sources, usually are not regarded as revisionist. You can find the tale in McCollough's Pulitzer Prize biography Truman and also in the biography Eisenhower: Soldier and President by the very well-regarded historian of the twentieth century, Stephen Ambrose
Cleita
(75,480 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)I was for Ike, even as a kindergartener, but my parents voted for Adlai.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)PatSeg
(47,600 posts)I saw a biography on Eisenhower and it said that both parties wanted Ike as their candidate and Eisenhower went with the Republicans. Had things been different, I suppose he could have been a Democratic president and his agenda probably would have been very similar.
I was alive as well, but too young to remember much of anything other than the "I Like Ike" campaign buttons. Best campaign slogan ever.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...and feared that the isolationist would win.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)They were sane back then. He was asked to run as a Democrat, refused because he was a Republican.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)Eisenhower's criticism of Truman's containment policy was the beginning of the now ubiquitous Republican mantra: "Democrats are pussies on foreign policy, elect us and we'll bomb the shit out of everybody we don't like." If Ike wasn't actually a Republican, he would've never put that shithead John Foster Dulles and his brother at the helm of his foreign policy team.
You're right that he wasn't much of an economic conservative like Bob Taft, and socially he was pretty middle of the road. But if Eisenhower was looking for an explanation for the military industrial complex he was warning us about, he should've look in the mirror. He was one of the key players in starting the vicious cycle of presidential candidates having to prove how "tough" they are to get elected.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)They sure are small compared to today.
While working the polls during early voting I wore it one day along with my Never Again button. They are both great conversation starters.
donco
(1,548 posts)one now...looking at an angle it say" i like Ike",then looking at another angle its a picture of Ike.I found it in an old shoe box that belonged to my mom.
Hekate
(90,806 posts)I was in grade school myself at the time, and what I saw on the 5:00 news impressed me deeply. The US President cared enough about this issue (which my mother had to explain to me in terms a child could understand) to actually call up troops to help brave children go to school past barricades of scary-faced adults trying to keep them out.
Certainly my life has presented me with information and complexities far beyond that first impression, but the case remains: President Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) began the desegregation of Southern schools.
Hekate
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,477 posts)yardwork
(61,711 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Has the military become like every corporation in America, where there has to be so many vice-presidents with stars that the meaning of a star becomes small?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)That rank is only open in war time, actually declared by congress.
That is O-10 and translates to General of the Army.
Of course Ike did not punch his combat card, in today's military he'd be lucky to get to Major General, two star...I suspect Colonel would have been the ceiling.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)Eisenhower started out World War II as a Lieutenant Colonel. Obviously, during World War II the military grew to an unprecedented size and there was more opportunity for quick advancement than ever, but that's not the whole story.
The reason Ike moved up so fast is that George Marshall fired Generals who didn't perform well and gave someone else a chance to do better. Ike was one of those people who benefited greatly from this performance over seniority approach that Marshall took. Ricks says that the military almost never does this today, and Generals stay at their posts regardless of performance.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)regarding the Navy, his service, and how the sub service was the closest to the performance over seniority school, but it still mattered who you knew... which in WW II did not. They cashiered so many officers between 1941 and 1943, and made so many six week wonders, that the moder military would have a cow.
Davis H Patreaus would not have remained in the service, for example, and neither would have McKrystol. Both made a few early mistakes that would have cost them their career.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)Noun 1. self-aggrandizement - an act undertaken to increase your own power and influence or to draw attention to your own importance
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)She was actually a Bircher. She (and all of her friends) absolutely hated Ike. In fact, they hated him as much as they hated FDR. One of their big complaints was that he left all of the Democrats in place at Justice and DOD. Of course the thing they hated the most was his Supreme Court appointees like Warren.
Ernesto
(5,077 posts)that Marines make fun of Army uniforms.
Kennah
(14,315 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Generals and other senior officers have some leeway on how much "swag" they want to show off...Patton was certainly proud of his accomplishments, and damn sure wanted everyone else to know it
Journeyman
(15,039 posts)As you can see, he's wearing almost twice as many medals here with his full complement of stars.
And lest anyone think Petraeus is being unfairly compared to a simple, modest man, here's a picture of the general who won the Civil War:
To be fair to the peacock, however, it should be noted that Generals Grant and Eisenhower actually worked.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)appear when I "reply to post".
GoCubsGo
(32,093 posts)Eisenhower liked to wear his ribbons, too:
ReRe
(10,597 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,093 posts)The Eisenhower photo is not. Not trying to defend Petraeus. But, that comparison is unfair. Just sayin'.
ReRe
(10,597 posts).... because Eisenhower was a humble man, not as self-absorbed and flaunting as Petraeus is.
GoCubsGo
(32,093 posts)I agree that Petraeus is a self-absorbed asshole, far more than Eisenhower. But, to show one who is posed for an "official" photo, where the norm is to display all the bling, and compare him to another who is not, IS unfair. So is laying any "loss" in Iraq--if it was a loss, at the feet of Petraeus. It is just as unfair as claiming that WWII was won because of Eisenhower. It wasn't. Eisenhower was a part of it, but he was by no means the whole reason the Allies won. Just ask the nearly 9 MILLION Soviet troops who died fighting right along with him.
GoCubsGo. I see where you're coming from.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,049 posts)No shortage of decoration there.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)No Vested Interest
(5,167 posts)All the noise- clanking - those medals on Zhukov's chest must have made when he sauntered around?
Seriously - I laughed out loud at this photo.
Iggo
(47,566 posts)That would make my day!
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)The CAB was first awarded around the time of 2003-2004. I think it was safe to say that this guy was far removed from ground combat at that point in his career. He was probably sitting on some FOB while mortars landed 1000 meters away
However, in his defense, half of those medals are automatic. You get one for serving in Europe, you get another for serving in the Army during a time of war, you get another ribbon for going to Iraq, you get another one because you didn't get into trouble for the first 5 years of your career, you get another one because you were in the Army,.... you get the idea. Most are automatic.
Hell, I was in only 5.5 years active and I have an easy 4 rows of ribbons - and I didn't do anything above and beyond what my peers did. I was just an average run of the mill sort of officer.
MADem
(135,425 posts)This guy wasn't quite an "In the rear with the gear" sort, but he managed his career very artfully and minimized his exposure to actual danger.
He did get shot--on the firing range, when some idiot dropped their weapon, or something.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Yet he came away from the conflict with a Bronze Star for Combat Valor.
It's not uncommon to see a valor award on an upper level military officer, but a lot of those were earned in their days at lieutenants or, for former enlisted Mustang officers, their time as low-ranking 'straight-leg' grunts.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/patraeus-allegedly-earned-a-bronze-star-for-combat-valor-without-firing-his-rifle-2012-11#ixzz2Cc8iGm5I
-..__...
(7,776 posts)most are campaign and service awards, and a number of foreign state decorations.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's so much easier on the uniforms, too.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)-..__...
(7,776 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
Kingofalldems
(38,485 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)larocks4552s
(26 posts)Ike was a great man. One of the few decent Republicans.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)he was a soldiers soldier and a soldiers General.
quietwrite
(12 posts)wearing wedding bands didn't seem as important.
Angleae
(4,493 posts)You wear them all. If he denies one when it's awarded he is no longer promotable and his career ends.
When I was finishing my USMC time ('68), I had a private who wore nothing more than his purple heart ribbon when at work for me. However, his ribbon also had 2 gold stars on it..... This means that he was wounded 3 times.
NOBODY ever gave him any shit. He was a real hero in our eyes.
Angleae
(4,493 posts)AR 640-30 section 7
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)I can assure you they have.
sammytko
(2,480 posts)Know if it's the same for army.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)All or none, now.
http://www.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/afi36-2903.pdf
Pg. 48, para. 4.9.1.3.3
Pg. 58, para. 4.12.1.3.2
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)He has something like 40+ individual medals (many with multiple oak leaf clusters). It looks like he leaves out his foreign government awards, which are lowest in order of precedence, and his State Dept. awards.
I looked at one of the top ribbon vendors' rack-building sites and found that they don't even include a lot of the stuff Petraeus has been awarded.
I haven't seen a photo of Petraeus wearing minis. Wonder what that would look like!
Trailrider1951
(3,414 posts)The other one is a Warrior and a Humanitarian.
I like Ike.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)started the embargo of Cuba, and sanctioned the assasination of the elected Prime Minister of Iran.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)had to deal with Patton, McCarthy a couple of loose cannons. But evidentally Patreaus never was in a combat. Does anyone know that for sure.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)You are woefully misinformed.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)the power. He earned his way. Every general has to have some type of understand to get through the political mine field. I think the president back during WWII ran the country and was commander-in-chief. The republicans tpday give way to much power to the generals and they are running the crazy house.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 19, 2012, 12:58 AM - Edit history (1)
Ike never in combat.
As a two star Patreous was on the receiving end, albeit not directly, of mortar fire. He even got a bronze star with V for it.
That does not mean that he is not a political animal. One thing this war did not do was to get rid of the political peace time military. Patreous would not have made it in the WW II military and Ike would not have made beyond Colonel in today's military.
Ike started the war as a Lt. Col...Patreaus started with two stars and division command.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)in the period of WWII time period were a different breed of soldier then today. Not that the soldiers of today are bad soldiers because they aren't. But back then the soldiers life was totally different. Even down to the barracks and living situation.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)This link has several photos with Ike wearing many more ribbons.
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=3&cp=7&gs_id=l&xhr=t&q=Eisenhower&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&tbo=d&site=&source=hp&rlz=1R2ADRA_enUS432&oq=Eisenho&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7be683e4f9339ce6&bpcl=38625945&biw=1280&bih=579
Note that in Ike's time, the US Army had a lot less "fruit salad" on the books. Ribbons had a bit more meaning then.
Also, Petraous's photo is for probably for an official personnel file (that's the style appearance), Ike's appears to be in more of an actual work setting.
(My credentials are 22+ years in the U.S. Air Force.)
But feel free to just make stuff up based on no evidence whatsoever.