Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsa misguided step in education reform
http://www.nationofchange.org/misguided-step-education-reform-1355069033It is a common enough idea that if there is something wrong with a society, there is something wrong with how that society is thinking; that education is falling short in some aspect, and that reforms must take place. Indeed, states around the country are calling for education reform in light of poor test scores and poverty. I agree with all these sentiments, but what I can't agree with are the new K-12 Common Core State Standards, slowly rolling out across the nation, that will have taken full effect by 2014.
The Common Core Standards require that by the time students are in their senior years, only 30% of their curriculum reading can be Literature. Of course, Common Core insists that the goal of the new standards is to increase the amount of essays, research, and other documents across all subjects, including social studies and math. The standards "define what all students are expected to know and be able to do, not how teachers should teach," but throughout the 46 states that have already been subjected to the standard, "the burden of teaching the nonfiction texts is falling to English teachers," as Mark Bauerlein, an English professor at Emory University, said in Washington Post's article on the controversy around the standards. This burden on English educators is creating conflict in the classroom, as teachers determine which works of rich literature must go. Not only that, but Common Cores emphasis on nonfiction is misguided and not backed by any studies suggesting information texts prepare students better for life than complex literary study.
Common Core claims its goal is to prepare students for today's "college and work expectations." If our society were flourishing because of the progressive nature of our colleges and workforce this sentiment may hold water, but preparing students for the standards expected by today's jobs and colleges is the perpetuation of a society that is in its death throws. Not only that, but if we prepare students only for college and work expectations, then we are preparing our youth to rely on established systems to survive, but as we know, in a country controlled by the richest 1% who rely on our perpetuation of conformity to sustain themselves, the established system is broken.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 570 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
a misguided step in education reform (Original Post)
xchrom
Dec 2012
OP
jody
(26,624 posts)1. Is Common Core the brainchild of Bill Ayers? nt
We People
(619 posts)2. Of course, and George Soros the funding source
Where's your sarcasm smilie?