Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

apples and oranges

(1,451 posts)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:22 PM Dec 2012

Diners Called 'Fat Girls' On Check


When three friends finished their meal at a California restaurant, they did not expect to be insulted on the bill.

That is exactly what happened to Christine Duran, Christina Huerta and Isabel Robles when they visited Chilly D's Sports Lounge, part of the Cameo Club Casino, in Stockton, Calif., according to ABC affiliate News 10. When the three diners got their check they saw "fat girls" written on their bill.

"I got the bill, and I was like, why does the receipt say, 'fat girls?'" Duran told News 10. At first, her friends didn't even believe her. &quot Huerta) was like, 'You're lying,' And I was like, 'No, I'm serious. Look at it.' She was like, 'fat girls?'"


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/09/diners-called-fat-girls-on-restaurant-bill-check-cameo-club-cardroom-lounge_n_2267805.html
197 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Diners Called 'Fat Girls' On Check (Original Post) apples and oranges Dec 2012 OP
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #1
"rude" is if people stare overlong at them... PCIntern Dec 2012 #2
Ouch Fla_Democrat Dec 2012 #3
I just watched the video. The restaurant is 21 and up only. slackmaster Dec 2012 #13
"Accurate?" Who the hell cares if it was "accurate?" dballance Dec 2012 #32
What in the world?!?? alcibiades_mystery Dec 2012 #64
Agree with you 100%. Employees should be happy that they have customers come in to their southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #79
I don't agree with the "fat girls" thing Confusious Dec 2012 #114
I never said people are overweight due to restaurant's large portions - Don't call my opinion stupid dballance Dec 2012 #128
Now you go from blaming restaurants to blaming parents. former9thward Dec 2012 #137
Misdirection Central. Where did I blame parents? dballance Dec 2012 #150
A. I didn't call YOU stupid Confusious Dec 2012 #140
Well There You go Again dballance Dec 2012 #146
So I guess you didn't write: Confusious Dec 2012 #160
On your bill they wrote Douchebag. trumad Dec 2012 #51
So you think that being fat is equivalent to being a douchebag? FarCenter Dec 2012 #57
Worse -- you can lose weight obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #62
+1 n/t Agschmid Dec 2012 #104
I always liked that bumpersticker treestar Dec 2012 #109
I prefer the original quote from Winston Churchill mythology Dec 2012 #165
Ba da bing. yardwork Dec 2012 #148
*snort* ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #168
At Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:18 PM an alert was sent on the following post: Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2012 #121
I think I love juror #4. nt msanthrope Dec 2012 #130
What, no love for # 2? :-P nt Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2012 #134
If it walks like a duck...well... trumad Dec 2012 #143
The way things are going around here I thought it was going to be because Bake Dec 2012 #189
Disgusting condoning of unacceptable and discriminatory behavior by the restaurant. blueclown Dec 2012 #55
Unacceptable? Yea Confusious Dec 2012 #115
No? quakerboy Dec 2012 #149
You said it yourself Confusious Dec 2012 #158
The action was writing that down quakerboy Dec 2012 #173
The act of writing a a bad name Confusious Dec 2012 #187
So someones stature makes them equal to a "shit customer"? quakerboy Dec 2012 #196
Well that's good Confusious Dec 2012 #197
Unless it's something that's been tolerated more than once by the restaurant mythology Dec 2012 #191
I was talking about DU's reaction to this... blueclown Dec 2012 #193
(Huerta) was like... And I was like ... She was like... progressoid Dec 2012 #4
THAT's what he should have put on the bill Union Scribe Dec 2012 #20
I was thinking "valley girls" Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #31
So, were they? zappaman Dec 2012 #5
If they were, do you think they didn't already know it? Warpy Dec 2012 #6
Not ok. zappaman Dec 2012 #7
It was unlikely that anyone found it "necessary to bully them" jberryhill Dec 2012 #78
If I were 'Jeff' and wanted a tip...I would distingish them by "3 pretty ladies".. angstlessk Dec 2012 #105
What specifically leads you to believe that one scenario is unlikely LanternWaste Dec 2012 #116
probably because of where it was on the bill arely staircase Dec 2012 #126
Post hoc ergo prompter hoc. LanternWaste Dec 2012 #144
it validates, or is at least consistent, with the first arely staircase Dec 2012 #163
Post hoc ergo 'propter' hoc? Sorry (I was confused). But agree w/your point anneboleyn Dec 2012 #167
Because it strikes me as a simple act of unenlightened stupidity jberryhill Dec 2012 #155
I generally thought that "table 3" was sufficient. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #156
There was a story just like this a few months ago jberryhill Dec 2012 #159
There have been a couple of these incidents in recent months mythology Dec 2012 #194
It's the internet effect jberryhill Dec 2012 #195
Why do you want to know? n/t pnwmom Dec 2012 #9
Curious. n/t zappaman Dec 2012 #11
i want to know what the guy who did it looks like JI7 Dec 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #37
Why? Would that make it okay? Iggo Dec 2012 #39
see post #7 n/t zappaman Dec 2012 #45
And that matters how to a decent society? dballance Dec 2012 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #82
Thanks! /eom dballance Dec 2012 #111
Dumb management! Why would they come back just to get an apology? tblue Dec 2012 #8
good for them for speaking out Enrique Dec 2012 #10
Restaurant owners/bosses need to remind their servers that tables are NUMBERED SoCalDem Dec 2012 #12
I know! RiffRandell Dec 2012 #141
This ^ kiva Dec 2012 #142
On Yelp people are defending "Jeff" and calling the complainers "liberals" tblue Dec 2012 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #15
And if I were to say "that's the most fucking insane thing I've heard today" REP Dec 2012 #16
I love you for this, REP. smokey nj Dec 2012 #17
REP is my straight girl crush for a reason obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #63
REP's a good egg! smokey nj Dec 2012 #87
+1 obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #89
+1 pintobean Dec 2012 #99
Certainly, if I were labeled as "Bordlerline Psychotic/Schizophrenic" on a restaurant check, Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #18
The use of "was," instead of the subjunctive ... REP Dec 2012 #19
God, I am so embarrassed. Edited to fix. Thanks. (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #22
Oh. I thought it had happened ... misunderstood your intent. REP Dec 2012 #41
The check made no comment on their behavior, it was their physical appearance that was referenced. 11 Bravo Dec 2012 #34
What if they're labeling you... Iggo Dec 2012 #46
I imagine many people took "Dr." Frist's diagnosis as valid, also. LanternWaste Dec 2012 #56
What behavior did these women exhibit? obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #65
And if it said wrinkled, old ladies they would go to the plastic surgeon? nt bigbrother05 Dec 2012 #23
When I am that age I will wear my wrinkles with pride (nt). Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #25
How libertarian of you. UnrepentantLiberal Dec 2012 #24
That may be okay in the UK pintobean Dec 2012 #28
"That may be okay in the UK" marmar Dec 2012 #33
'Bevan' alas is a Welsh name ... REP Dec 2012 #44
Aneurin "Nye" Bevan geardaddy Dec 2012 #77
It was in the poster's profile pintobean Dec 2012 #47
Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification. marmar Dec 2012 #48
Interesting they took it out obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #67
I looked right before I posted that pintobean Dec 2012 #73
Definitely... onpatrol98 Dec 2012 #112
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #30
Sorry, how is referring to something as "hurtful" the same as "endorsing it"? (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #59
Here is the post you deleted, as you seem to have trouble remembering what you wrote mere hours ago: REP Dec 2012 #132
Because yeah, hurting people is the best way to get them to take a good, hard look at themselves and Brickbat Dec 2012 #38
I did not "endorse it". I believe the word I used was "hurtful". Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #42
This seems to endorse it: REP Dec 2012 #52
You do know that the side effects of some drugs is weight gain right? riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #49
Thanks. jackbenimble Dec 2012 #170
I suggest the "server" be renamed for a few months Coyotl Dec 2012 #180
My intention was to express the hope that while this was a hurtful and regrettable incident, Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #61
We know nothing about their lifestyles. pintobean Dec 2012 #70
Point taken (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #81
dal ati at balu geardaddy Dec 2012 #85
I was thinking REP Dec 2012 #124
"pen ôl" geardaddy Dec 2012 #186
How do you know they aren't pregnant? Being "fat" IS the "healthier lifestyle" riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #90
You showed your ass. You can't unshow it. forestpath Dec 2012 #117
Here is the post he deleted: REP Dec 2012 #122
2/3 of Americans are overweight Kalidurga Dec 2012 #21
what happened wouldn't be ok even if they just liked to eat a lot JI7 Dec 2012 #29
Yes that is true Kalidurga Dec 2012 #53
There are some real jackass-ish responses to this OP. marmar Dec 2012 #27
Well no tip for you DUMBASS TexasBushwhacker Dec 2012 #35
not only an asshole thing to write but also bad business liberal_at_heart Dec 2012 #152
they offered 25 percent off and then 50 percent off the meal ? how fucked up is that JI7 Dec 2012 #36
I love that they are getting national attention for this Enrique Dec 2012 #40
The manager should have paid the bill and then fired Jeff on the spot. yellowcanine Dec 2012 #54
I agree. If I was that manager that's exactly what I would have done. slackmaster Dec 2012 #58
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #60
Certain descriptions are just fine. "Mustache" for example would be no problem, Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #66
"especially the ones who tend to place large orders" Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #75
OK, point taken. I will edit accordingly. (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #80
I can't imagine a $7.50 item and a single soda being "large" anywhere much better than Taco Bell nt dmallind Dec 2012 #92
Jeff? Enrique Dec 2012 #68
Or, they could simply refer to the table number. n/t demmiblue Dec 2012 #69
Why should any of those descriptions ... surrealAmerican Dec 2012 #74
Jayzus, disgusting assumptions. My sister's transplant meds are making her fat riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #76
You assume a false dichotomy dmallind Dec 2012 #83
and if you don't want to be called a fucking asshole.. frylock Dec 2012 #84
Yes, you are right. pintobean Dec 2012 #91
Yes. You are right. I don't mind being called that because sometimes it's accurate. Speck Tater Dec 2012 #120
You Can Put Your Righteous Indignation About Fat People Away HangOnKids Dec 2012 #162
That's some rather tortured logic to justify the inexcusable. marmar Dec 2012 #86
WTF?? loyalsister Dec 2012 #88
The other day, a 6 year old neighbor girl pintobean Dec 2012 #97
I don't know about that treestar Dec 2012 #110
This message was self-deleted by its author former-republican Dec 2012 #71
And the video is funny why? obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #93
The news reporter former-republican Dec 2012 #103
I don't see how the reporter was funny in the least obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #123
what's funny ? JI7 Dec 2012 #94
Watch the anchorman former-republican Dec 2012 #108
News people? Let's see how big this thread gets. TreasonousBastard Dec 2012 #139
Most people here have said what I would have said. Pretty damn shitty thing to do. BlueJazz Dec 2012 #72
These threads always bring out the really classy crowd. (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #95
Don't they, though? GreenPartyVoter Dec 2012 #177
Holy SHIT. liberalmuse Dec 2012 #96
Back in the dark ages, before computers and automated receipts, I used to wait on tables. MADem Dec 2012 #98
They were losangeleslibker Dec 2012 #101
He talks though. losangeleslibker Dec 2012 #106
"Table 2" would have worked....if the tables had numbers. MADem Dec 2012 #153
This was a casino lounge jberryhill Dec 2012 #113
Well, I can solve that problem, easily! MADem Dec 2012 #151
Well too bad they didn't have you on staff jberryhill Dec 2012 #154
My waitering days were a half century ago, damn near! MADem Dec 2012 #166
+1 LWolf Dec 2012 #183
Just curious: Why does the ticket say "Fat Girls/1" and "Guests: 1" KansDem Dec 2012 #100
lazy waiter/bartender justabob Dec 2012 #119
Thanks! KansDem Dec 2012 #184
The explanation ticks me off. That is not how to keep the Bills strait. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #102
Bad business move treestar Dec 2012 #107
How can anyone here rationalize this? gollygee Dec 2012 #118
Who says they don't/didn't? Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #129
I'm asking people here who think this is OK or funny gollygee Dec 2012 #131
I am 260 pounds so I am in their shoes in a way. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #133
I don't understand why you're disagreeing with me gollygee Dec 2012 #135
I think we are too. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #136
ROFL gollygee Dec 2012 #138
funny if people got these recepits DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #125
A pull down menu choice???? Kalidurga Dec 2012 #127
Lemme guess: The restaurant cannot print the table number so they had no choice muntrv Dec 2012 #145
some people are so clueless these days njcamden_25884 Dec 2012 #147
Definitely a dickhead move on the part of "Jeff". TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #157
I don't think it's understandable under any circumstances. n/t ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #169
So in your book patrons abusing servers is acceptable? TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #171
Of course not... ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #172
AND I have had it up to here with agenda blinded IDIOTS who can't or won't... TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #185
Why are you arguing about bad patrons ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #188
AND why are you DELIBERATELY MISREPRESENTING my words? TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #190
You said it was understandable... ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #192
How about this? From now on when Jeff goes out to eat his receipts are labeled "bigot". alp227 Dec 2012 #161
Lets see a pic of "Jeff" please. flvegan Dec 2012 #164
If Jeff was working for me he would have to look at his pay check to see. aandegoons Dec 2012 #174
I'd have paid with small bills and as much change as I had on hand--no tip n/t eridani Dec 2012 #175
A dumb business move liberal N proud Dec 2012 #176
Obviously the server wasn't thinking. In_The_Wind Dec 2012 #178
SAD Mr Dixon Dec 2012 #179
If it said 'Fat Boys' RandiFan1290 Dec 2012 #181
Females being overweight is an unforgiveable sin in our society. raccoon Dec 2012 #182

Response to apples and oranges (Original post)

PCIntern

(25,544 posts)
2. "rude" is if people stare overlong at them...
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:26 PM
Dec 2012

disgusting and reprehensible is printing that on the check.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
13. I just watched the video. The restaurant is 21 and up only.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:39 PM
Dec 2012

Obviously the three are WOMEN, not girls.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
32. "Accurate?" Who the hell cares if it was "accurate?"
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:00 PM
Dec 2012

So what if they happened to be overweight? Have you seen the stats on how many US citizens are overweight or obese? Thanks in part to restaurants like Chilly D's with their ridiculously large portions of food that no person should consume in one sitting.

How would you feel about a bill that had "Nigger Bitches Table 1" on it? It might be accurate that the people were female African-Americans but it would still be disgusting and over the line.

We establish lines in the sand about how to be decent to others. This clearly crossed all those lines.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
79. Agree with you 100%. Employees should be happy that they have customers come in to their
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:36 PM
Dec 2012

establishment to eat and enjoy their dinner and receive a check and tip and all say thank you. How dare the waiters be so rude. These ladies came in and spent their money. They could have gone anywhere but they chose to go to their establishment. I sure hope the establishment is going to make it up to them. It isn't the right to judge people especially when they are spending good money in your establishment. Nothing but rude, rude, rude.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
114. I don't agree with the "fat girls" thing
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:22 PM
Dec 2012

But saying people are overweight because restaurants give large portions is just, well, stupid. Sorry I can't say it in a different word.

Restaurants have a thing called "doggie bags"

People have things called "choices." some people just make the wrong ones.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
128. I never said people are overweight due to restaurant's large portions - Don't call my opinion stupid
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:15 PM
Dec 2012

I only implied restaurants' overly large portions are a contributing factor to our current epidemic of obesity. So please don't call me stupid. It's insulting.

Yes, people have choices. They certainly have the choice to not gorge themselves and take home doggie bags instead.

When I go to McDonalds and order a "small" drink these days it is the size of what would have been considered a "large" drink when I was growing up. So don't try to tell me things have not changed and that the portion sizes are not a factor. We also still deal with that whole "clean your plate" mentality parents used on us. I believe that makes many people try to finish off the whole plate they are served even when they were full about half way through it.

former9thward

(32,006 posts)
137. Now you go from blaming restaurants to blaming parents.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:55 PM
Dec 2012

Don't individuals have ANY responsibility for their decisions? I left home at 17 and from that day on EVERY decision I made, good or bad, was my responsibility and my fault. NO ONE had any contributing fault for anything I did or did not do.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
150. Misdirection Central. Where did I blame parents?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:17 PM
Dec 2012

Are you kidding me? Please quote or link to where I blamed parents.

Or for, that matter I said people are not responsible for their own behavior. That's actually at the core of the problem here.

People behaved badly. They insulted other people for no other reason than their presumed prejudice against overweight people.

So yes, I agree with you. People have total responsibility for their decisions. Like their decision to ridicule people. If they get fired for that it is totally their responsibility and their fault. Just as you assert.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
140. A. I didn't call YOU stupid
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:57 PM
Dec 2012

I called the idea that restaurants are somehow responsible for half the population being overweight stupid.

B. wether or not they give me 5 gallons of soda, it's still my choice to drink that 5 gallons in one sitting.
I don't eat a whole large pizza in one sitting. If the restaurant wants to serve lard, that's their choice. I just won't go there. I'm not just going to eat any and all shit set before me.

C. I gave up in finishing everything 15 years ago. We aren't animals. We don't just act on instinct. We can learn new behaviors.

If they can't learn to be responsible, it's no ones fault but their own.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
146. Well There You go Again
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:09 PM
Dec 2012

I never said you called me stupid. I objected to you calling my opinion stupid because I have every right to have my opinion.

I also never said that restaurants "are somehow responsible for half the population being overweight." You might want to re-read my post and try to understand I only implied they are a contributing factor.

Not to mention you inserted "half the population being overweight" when I never wrote such a thing.

If you want to rebut my opinion then fine. Please do it on actual statements I made though.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
160. So I guess you didn't write:
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 11:53 PM
Dec 2012
"So please don't call me stupid. It's insulting."


"You might want to re-read my post and try to understand I only implied they are a contributing factor."


You only implied. Well, I think the implication is stupid, for the same reason I stated before.

If you have an opinion, it's going to be criticized, especially if that implication "implies" everyone is a helpless victim who can't wipe their own asses.

Not to mention you inserted "half the population being overweight" when I never wrote such a thing.


I inserted half the population because half the population of America is overweight.

You know, facts.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
109. I always liked that bumpersticker
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:05 PM
Dec 2012

even when I was thin - I may be fat, but you're ugly, and I can lose weight.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
165. I prefer the original quote from Winston Churchill
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:42 AM
Dec 2012

Bessie Braddock: “Sir, you are drunk.”
Churchill: “Madam, you are ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.”

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,501 posts)
121. At Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:18 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:35 PM
Dec 2012

At Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:18 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

On your bill they wrote Douchebag.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1957332

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Nothing but a personal attack.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:29 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: I don't disagree, but it is a personal attack. Saying rude things about people on the news and saying rude things to a DUer are not equivalent.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I call this an accurate description.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Rude, but accurate.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Direct personal attack. Nothing was added beside headline to call another a name.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Yeah, it's a personal attack. But it's accurate.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
189. The way things are going around here I thought it was going to be because
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 07:32 PM
Dec 2012

use of the term "douchebag" is no longer appropriate!

Just so we're clear, we CAN still call Rethugs and Teabaggers (sorry, I repeat myself) "douchebags," right?



Bake

blueclown

(1,869 posts)
55. Disgusting condoning of unacceptable and discriminatory behavior by the restaurant.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:16 PM
Dec 2012

I'm appalled, really.

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
149. No?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:16 PM
Dec 2012

You don't think that the writing on the check might be indicative of some sort of discrimination? I can assure you there is plenty of discrimination re fat people. And its an extraordinarily rare person who would write that on the bill, and not express that in their actions in some fashion.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
158. You said it yourself
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 11:49 PM
Dec 2012

There's a difference between saying a word, and taking action.

But also saying a word doesn't mean someone has done something.

Unless of course, you have proof some action was taken.

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
173. The action was writing that down
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 06:04 AM
Dec 2012

As a start. And if you believe that a person who would write that on the check treated those diners the same as any others of a different stature, I have some oceanfront property in Arizona I would like to offer you, at a great price.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
187. The act of writing a a bad name
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 02:52 PM
Dec 2012

Does not equate to doing something discriminatory.

I've worked in retail. I've had shit customers, I called them all sorts of names. I didn't do anything discriminatory.

Now again, unless you have proof, which you probably don't, you're just blowing smoke out your ass.

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
196. So someones stature makes them equal to a "shit customer"?
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 09:23 PM
Dec 2012

I bet money when you didn't like a customer, it effected your actions. Possibly the expression on your face. You may think that you didnt change a thing, but unless you are an amazing actor, they knew and it effected their experience.

And the act of writing it down indicates that this was not a carefully held internal secret for the person serving them. Which makes it even more likely than with your average person who sees a fat person and things ill of them that this servers actions were effected by it.

In short, neither of us were there. Neither of us can prove that this server did or did not alter his/her actions toward these patrons based on their stature. But I can tell you which is more likely to be correct, based on real world experience.

That said, I don't care to speak with you any more. I find you unnecessarily unpleasant, and the need to try and make your post mildly personally insulting rather than focusing on the argument between us does not make me inclined to believe any positive outcome will come of further discussion with you on this matter. So, Have a good day, a good winter season, and best of luck.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
197. Well that's good
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 10:27 PM
Dec 2012

I won't have to put up with you reading shit into my posts that wasn't there.

Or reading shit into peoples thoughts that do not equate to actions.

"I find you unnecessarily unpleasant"

Ditto, though more "thought police" unpleasant.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
191. Unless it's something that's been tolerated more than once by the restaurant
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 07:42 PM
Dec 2012

I think it's more appropriate to blame the waiter, who has now been fired.

Even if you assume the waiter has done this before, I know I've never looked at the name section on a receipt. I would assume most people don't.

blueclown

(1,869 posts)
193. I was talking about DU's reaction to this...
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 07:50 PM
Dec 2012

And particularly the post that is now hidden by jury decision.

I commend the restaurant on firing the waiter... they should also fire the manager.

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
6. If they were, do you think they didn't already know it?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:34 PM
Dec 2012

Why did some jerk feel it necessary to bully them over it?

Why do you think it was OK?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
78. It was unlikely that anyone found it "necessary to bully them"
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:36 PM
Dec 2012

It is, however, likely that someone taking the order found it necessary to distinguish one group of customers from other groups or single customers for the purpose of ensuring that the order was given to the correct group of customers.

Mine would probably say "balding old fart", for example.

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
105. If I were 'Jeff' and wanted a tip...I would distingish them by "3 pretty ladies"..
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:01 PM
Dec 2012

still able to know whom I am serving..and I will get a tip.....and not notoriety..and all overweight women out to get my piece of crap!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
116. What specifically leads you to believe that one scenario is unlikely
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:24 PM
Dec 2012

What specifically leads you to believe that one scenario is unlikely (necessary to bully them&quot and the other (distinguish one group of customers from other groups) more likely?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
126. probably because of where it was on the bill
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:51 PM
Dec 2012

the part that distinguishes customers

and as someone pointed out earlier, if jeff wanted a tip he should have put "nice women" or if he had to go the objectification/infantile route "hot chicks" or even "hot bitches" would have been a better choice.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
144. Post hoc ergo prompter hoc.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 09:51 PM
Dec 2012

"where it was on the bill the part that distinguishes customers"

Post hoc ergo prompter hoc.

Which off hand does nothing to either validate or deny the second scenario.

Odd that...

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
163. it validates, or is at least consistent, with the first
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:20 AM
Dec 2012

doesn't make it not boorish

the way he chose to distinguish these customers was crude and offensive

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
167. Post hoc ergo 'propter' hoc? Sorry (I was confused). But agree w/your point
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 01:05 AM
Dec 2012

or did I miss a joke on "prompter"? Sorry, I have read through this entire thread, and I think I am suffering from eye-fatigue. I used to wait tables (long time ago -- in the 90s), and we would have been fired on the post for something like this, no doubt about it.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
155. Because it strikes me as a simple act of unenlightened stupidity
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:47 PM
Dec 2012

And if you think I'm "defending" anyone by calling them "stupid", save it.
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
156. I generally thought that "table 3" was sufficient.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:48 PM
Dec 2012

I've never seen a bill with a description of the customers on it.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
159. There was a story just like this a few months ago
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 11:50 PM
Dec 2012

The previous story was in connection with take-out orders, and this one appears to be a casino cocktail lounge / sports bar.

I've ended up stuck with tabs in places where people move around, mingle, and come and go, and have seen staff use descriptions to identify which combination of patrons correspond to which tabs.

But I'm surprised nobody has dug up the last go-round of pretty much the same story, which iirc involved some sort of racial characterization.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
194. There have been a couple of these incidents in recent months
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 07:51 PM
Dec 2012

Some idiot at a pizza place wrote Lady Chinky Eyes and somebody at a Chick-fil-A wrote Ching and Chong on receipts.

I don't get the point of doing things like this on the side of the idiots who bother with using the inappropriate words. I would imagine most of the time it's not going to be seen, and if it is, you're going to get fired. Of course I'm trying to apply logic to idiots so that could be the flaw in thinking.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
195. It's the internet effect
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 08:21 PM
Dec 2012

Today, in a country of hundreds of millions of people, some asshole did something really stupid. It's a social crisis is what it is.

Response to JI7 (Reply #26)

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
50. And that matters how to a decent society?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:12 PM
Dec 2012

How exactly does it matter to the argument people in the restaurant were assholes by labeling them "Fat Girls" even if they were over weight?

I don't know about your background or heritage but at various times in our sordid US history we've discriminated against all sorts of people. Right from the start some colonies executed people who were not of the same religion or even just part of a different sect of Christianity as their colony. How would you have been treated?

I'd also find it equally offensive if I got a check with "Gay Boys" on it when I go out with all my gay friends. Even if that were accurate how would that make it acceptable?

The people in the restaurant were clearly being demeaning to the women.

Response to dballance (Reply #50)

tblue

(16,350 posts)
8. Dumb management! Why would they come back just to get an apology?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:35 PM
Dec 2012

They should comp them a meal and treat them like queens. That's what you do if you want to demonstrate goodwill toward your customer base and neighbors. Who needs to eat at a stupid casino anyway?

They really hurt those people and, no, it's not funny when somebody's crying.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
10. good for them for speaking out
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:37 PM
Dec 2012

and going on TV. I'm sure they know this will subject themselves to rude comments from total fucking assholes everywhere, including DU. But they went out there anyway.

Hopefully that restaurant will pay a price for this, and businesses everywhere will try their best to make sure they don't hire assholes to deal with the public.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
12. Restaurant owners/bosses need to remind their servers that tables are NUMBERED
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:37 PM
Dec 2012

and that's ALL they need to enter when they need to identify them

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
141. I know!
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 09:06 PM
Dec 2012

This has happened before with a Jewish couple, and an Asian couple. I waitressed in HS and college, and we had table numbers. Not excusing someone for being a stupid jerk, but WTF?

Response to apples and oranges (Original post)

REP

(21,691 posts)
16. And if I were to say "that's the most fucking insane thing I've heard today"
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:43 PM
Dec 2012

... would that be encouragement seek much-needed mental health care?


<---- because I care

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
18. Certainly, if I were labeled as "Bordlerline Psychotic/Schizophrenic" on a restaurant check,
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:45 PM
Dec 2012

based upon my behavior at the establishment, I would view this as an indication that I should probably be evaluated by a mental health professional.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
34. The check made no comment on their behavior, it was their physical appearance that was referenced.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:00 PM
Dec 2012

It's kind of pitiful that you can't make that distinction.

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
46. What if they're labeling you...
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:10 PM
Dec 2012

...based on your behavior on a message board?

Would that incentivize you?

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
56. I imagine many people took "Dr." Frist's diagnosis as valid, also.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:16 PM
Dec 2012

I imagine many people took "Dr." Frist's diagnosis as valid, also.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
28. That may be okay in the UK
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:55 PM
Dec 2012

Here in the US, we don't see ridicule for physical appearance as incentive for anything. Well, maybe an ass-whoopin' for the person making the "joke".

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
73. I looked right before I posted that
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:34 PM
Dec 2012

and it was there. It was gone when I went back after I was asked about it.

onpatrol98

(1,989 posts)
112. Definitely...
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:15 PM
Dec 2012

"Well, maybe an ass-whoopin' for the person making the "joke". "

There are those that would've taken that insult as a calling card for a later smack down. Bad humor can be dangerous for your health.

Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #15)

Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #43)

REP

(21,691 posts)
132. Here is the post you deleted, as you seem to have trouble remembering what you wrote mere hours ago:
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:38 PM
Dec 2012
15. That would be somewhat hurtful.

Hopefully this incident will give them the incentive they need to start a healthy diet and exercise program.
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


This improper use of the adverb "hopefully" is usually meant as "I hope," so yes, that does rather seem to be an endorsement, does it not?

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
38. Because yeah, hurting people is the best way to get them to take a good, hard look at themselves and
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:03 PM
Dec 2012

find the motivation to make a change. Ass.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
42. I did not "endorse it". I believe the word I used was "hurtful".
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:06 PM
Dec 2012

If I ran a restaurant I would distinguish between parties strictly by table number.

REP

(21,691 posts)
52. This seems to endorse it:
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:13 PM
Dec 2012
Hopefully(sic) this incident will give them the incentive they need to start a healthy diet and exercise program.


Your use of "hopefully," which I take to mean "I hope," implies endorsement.
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
49. You do know that the side effects of some drugs is weight gain right?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:12 PM
Dec 2012

Like transplant meds or some meds for psychiatric conditions?

I'm not saying that this applies to these women but a blanket accusation that anyone who's fat is simply a lazy overeater is disgusting.

You don't know their health history and presuming that you do is ignorant.



jackbenimble

(251 posts)
170. Thanks.
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 01:29 AM
Dec 2012

I take transplant meds and I can attest to the weight gain. I used to be rail thin and was treated nicely by most people I came into contact with. Now I am overweight and I am treated with disgust or am just plain ignored. I'm still the same person. Its a shame people are so shallow they can't see past the exterior.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
180. I suggest the "server" be renamed for a few months
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 08:58 AM
Dec 2012

If it said "the jackass' it might help his tips go down

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
61. My intention was to express the hope that while this was a hurtful and regrettable incident,
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:23 PM
Dec 2012

some good might come of it if it incentivized the women to adopt healthier lifestyles. But clearly some DUers are interpreting my post as an endorsement of the restaurant's actions (which I did not intend), so I will self-delete.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
70. We know nothing about their lifestyles.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:32 PM
Dec 2012

The problem is that you're making assumptions based on appearance.

REP

(21,691 posts)
124. I was thinking
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:41 PM
Dec 2012

"Cusanu y rhan dewaf o fy casgen" but my Welsh is terrible and I don't know the word for "ass."

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
90. How do you know they aren't pregnant? Being "fat" IS the "healthier lifestyle"
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:43 PM
Dec 2012

especially if you want a healthy baby you MUST gain 30 - 50 lbs.

You don't know anything about them or their physical condition.

REP

(21,691 posts)
122. Here is the post he deleted:
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:37 PM
Dec 2012
15. That would be somewhat hurtful.

Hopefully this incident will give them the incentive they need to start a healthy diet and exercise program.
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
21. 2/3 of Americans are overweight
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:48 PM
Dec 2012

I am starting to think this isn't just a problem that an individual develops on their own. I also strongly suspect that obesity is a symptom and not the underlying problem. I don't know what to do about it. But, it is really wrong to single out individuals that have health issues for ridicule.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
29. what happened wouldn't be ok even if they just liked to eat a lot
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:57 PM
Dec 2012

even if it was affecting their health negatively.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
53. Yes that is true
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:15 PM
Dec 2012

I didn't mean to imply that if a person is overweight they always have health issues. But, in so many cases especially when a person is obese there are issues that led to that and there are issues that being obese makes worse. At least in my case, it turns out I had a nutritional deficiency if that makes any sense. I am correcting that problem. It will take years before I will be what I consider healthy.

marmar

(77,080 posts)
27. There are some real jackass-ish responses to this OP.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:54 PM
Dec 2012

Those responses, as well as the behavior of the employees of the bar, are indicative of stunted intellectual/emotional growth.




TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
35. Well no tip for you DUMBASS
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:00 PM
Dec 2012

I'd ask for the manager and explain that I was offended and not paying the bill. PERIOD. What if the bill said "ugly girls" and they were in fact, ugly. Would that make it okay?

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
152. not only an asshole thing to write but also bad business
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:28 PM
Dec 2012

I would definitely do what you suggested and complain to the manager. I would also tell the manager if they were not reprimanded in some way I would not frequent that establishment again.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
36. they offered 25 percent off and then 50 percent off the meal ? how fucked up is that
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:02 PM
Dec 2012

the place really doesn't get customer service. and i'm one of those who believes customers can be assholes and they aren't always right.

they are trying to say it was a new employee but most places that involve customer service, especially food places would not have just offered 25 percent off when informed about what happened.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
40. I love that they are getting national attention for this
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:06 PM
Dec 2012

their first reaction is to chuckle when the ladies complained to them.

Then the ladies got to work and now the restaurant is like "oh shit!".

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
54. The manager should have paid the bill and then fired Jeff on the spot.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:15 PM
Dec 2012

And then deducted the bill from wages due to Jeff. That is what "no tolerance" means.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
58. I agree. If I was that manager that's exactly what I would have done.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:19 PM
Dec 2012

There are plenty of people looking for work. I'm sure that replacing Jeff would not have posed any problem.

Response to apples and oranges (Original post)

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
66. Certain descriptions are just fine. "Mustache" for example would be no problem,
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:26 PM
Dec 2012

except in the case of a female diner. "Tall" is probably OK, "short" maybe not so much. But if you are a business who does not want to alienate any of your customers, the best thing is to just number the tables and refer to the parties by table number.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
92. I can't imagine a $7.50 item and a single soda being "large" anywhere much better than Taco Bell nt
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:44 PM
Dec 2012

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
74. Why should any of those descriptions ...
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:35 PM
Dec 2012

... appear on the customer's receipt?

I understand why a waiter might like to have a description for their own convenience, but there is no reason for it to be shown to the customer.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
76. Jayzus, disgusting assumptions. My sister's transplant meds are making her fat
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:35 PM
Dec 2012

without them she'd be dead.

"Shouldn't be fat"??? What the fuck!

You don't know ANYONE'S health history. Some drugs really do lead to significant weight gain. Some people have to get FAT before they can be healthy. Yet you want to ASSume you know these women are reacting like this because they're feeling guilty? How do you know one or two of them aren't pregnant?

You don't know shit about them and your attitude is the really shameful thing here.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
83. You assume a false dichotomy
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:40 PM
Dec 2012

In that you can either a) feel guilty about being fat or b) feel proud of being fat. In reality it's not only possible but the most healthy and mature option to be neither of the above.

The issue here is the societal context or loading of the term. US society typically uses "fat" as a pejorative. Whether I think being fat is wrong (I don't) is irrelevant to the fact that the majority of the people, mindless gullible consumers of the shallow Hollywood image that they are for the most part, do think so, and use the term for those who fail to follow the herd. There are few people indeed who use the term in a neutral or positive way, so it is an insult independent of my personal opinion of weight (which, FWIW, is that it is no more indicative of personal value or character attributes than eye color. But until "green eyed" is a common value for X in the sentence "stupid X white suburbanites", as "fat" is now, my opinion is not the one that determines which meaningless characteristic is insulting).

frylock

(34,825 posts)
84. and if you don't want to be called a fucking asshole..
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:40 PM
Dec 2012

then don't post fucking assholish stuff on the internet, am I right?

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
120. Yes. You are right. I don't mind being called that because sometimes it's accurate.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:32 PM
Dec 2012

How can I take offense at the truth?

The truth may "set us free" in an ideal world, but mostly the truth just pisses us off.

I have chosen not to be pissed off by the truth. And yes, some times I AM a fucking asshole. I'm not necessarily proud of it, but I'm not offended by it either.

If you are offended it's not because another offended you. It's because you are offendable.

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
162. You Can Put Your Righteous Indignation About Fat People Away
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:17 AM
Dec 2012

Because a jury has hidden your post:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=inbox&view=746668

I am a skinny person by the way but your post got you a hide. How clever are you now for bashing folks?

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
88. WTF??
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:42 PM
Dec 2012

Tall, red hair, wearing a blue shirt.... are neutral descriptions unless there is some bizarre negative association.
American culture absolutely does not understand "fat" as anything other than negative. I think that it would be pretty surprising if anyone didn't take offese at being called "fat."

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
97. The other day, a 6 year old neighbor girl
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:51 PM
Dec 2012

laughed, pointed at my gut, and asked if I was pregnant. I laughed and said "no, I'm just fat".

If you ask me that question, you're going to get a totally different response. Maybe you need to grow up.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
110. I don't know about that
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:07 PM
Dec 2012

Any degree of awareness in the US and you know that coming from someone else, it's an insult.

Response to apples and oranges (Original post)

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
108. Watch the anchorman
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:05 PM
Dec 2012

He talks about a CHANNEL 3 exclusive or what ever the hell the channel is.
Then he starts like they just broke some child abduction case or murder.

News people make something out of nothing on a slow news day.

and I think it's funny , you don't?

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
72. Most people here have said what I would have said. Pretty damn shitty thing to do.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:33 PM
Dec 2012

It's not nice to hurt other people.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
98. Back in the dark ages, before computers and automated receipts, I used to wait on tables.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:51 PM
Dec 2012

We had to physically write out the orders on pieces of paper and provide them to the chefs, who would then prepare the food for delivery to the customers. The chefs would return the pieces of paper to us with the cooked food. When the diners were finished, we had to add up all the items (in our heads) and put the subtotal on the bottom, figure out the tax, add all that together for a grand total and provide the paper to the customer. The customer would then figure out how much to tip us, and they'd leave that on the table while paying at the register. No one used credit cards back then (it was the real dark ages). Cash was king.

The way I kept track of who's who in the zoo on a pocketful of tabs was to write something called the TABLE NUMBER in the right hand corner of the tab.

I guess this whole "table number" concept is too hard for the "computer receipt" set to figure out?

It worked real well, though--I never had to write "Fat girls" or "Old guy" or "Obnoxious family with four kids with green snot coming out of their noses..." I never lost a tip because I had a need to personally insult a customer in order to remember who ordered the clams casino!

TABLE NUMBERS! What a concept!

losangeleslibker

(66 posts)
101. They were
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:57 PM
Dec 2012

paying customers which is what the server should have only cared about. Who the fuck cares what a person looks like as long as they pay you. My brother is autistic and he goes out a lot. What if someone wrote retard on his receipt, it's the same fucked up concept.

losangeleslibker

(66 posts)
106. He talks though.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:02 PM
Dec 2012

But it's easy to tell he's autistic if you know about the syndrome. I admit that he's embarrassed me in public being that he's my older brother and all. He's 29 and I'm 22. People are all different so just live with it. That waiter should have figuratively shut his mouth.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
153. "Table 2" would have worked....if the tables had numbers.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:30 PM
Dec 2012

Or the "Number on a stick" thing I mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

The "issue" with the server is that he was having trouble keeping track of his customers. If he couldn't do it by table number, he should have invented a code to identify people--hair color or shirt color or what-have-you, using a code that made sense only to him.

Maybe he's in the wrong line of work. His customer service skills seem to be wanting.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
113. This was a casino lounge
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:20 PM
Dec 2012

In some places, people have a tendency to get up, move around, re-group, have others meet them and move to a bigger table or better spot, etc.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
151. Well, I can solve that problem, easily!
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:23 PM
Dec 2012

You give the diners a large number on a stick after you take their order. You tell them if they move, they need to bring their number on a stick with them.

This was common at a crowded and popular dining establishment I used to frequent in Italy. People would stream in late at night after hitting the clubs, and that sort of moving/regrouping happened all the time. The waiters would simply look for the correct number on the stick (the sticks were about three feet high with a base, and a big number on top of 'em) and slap the order down at that table.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
166. My waitering days were a half century ago, damn near!
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:54 AM
Dec 2012

That said, the owner of that joint should get a grip and repair the culture of that environment...anyone with a half-clue about leadership should have taught their staff not to insult the paying customers...it never ends well when that happens, and the tips stink, too!

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
100. Just curious: Why does the ticket say "Fat Girls/1" and "Guests: 1"
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:53 PM
Dec 2012

...with three meals?

Does the "1" refer to "1 table" or perhaps the table number?

justabob

(3,069 posts)
119. lazy waiter/bartender
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:30 PM
Dec 2012

Usually when you open a check, the computer prompts for number of guests. Often waiters just hit "enter" to get out of the screen quickly, rather than entering the right number. On edit: the Fat girls/1 part..... That would normally be where the table number is, so 42/1... table 42 check 1. If you ask for split checks you would get 42/1, 42/2, 42/3...

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
102. The explanation ticks me off. That is not how to keep the Bills strait.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:57 PM
Dec 2012
When their server returned, the three girls questioned him about the "fat girls" label, but the waiter denied any wrongdoing, according to News 10. He said an employee named "Jeff," whose name appears on the receipt, must have typed "fat girls" into the system to keep track of their bill


My Dave has work around and in the food and beverage business for a long time. He says they have numbers for the tables. Each server knows what tables they have that night. All the servers know the table's #'s. It is part of their training when they first start. Using that on the checks for ID is not professional in the less!

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
118. How can anyone here rationalize this?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:28 PM
Dec 2012

No way.

There is no excuse for that kind of rudeness. Imagine if they had put whatever physical issue you're most sensitive about. "Bald guy" or "Acne face" or something. I mean, really. There is now way this is OK.

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
129. Who says they don't/didn't?
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:28 PM
Dec 2012

They just got caught this time. It is totally unprofessional and and just plain mean.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
131. I'm asking people here who think this is OK or funny
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:35 PM
Dec 2012

to put themselves in the shoes of these women. Yes, they might have done it before, but that isn't my point.

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
133. I am 260 pounds so I am in their shoes in a way.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:44 PM
Dec 2012

I have been ridiculed all my life. My mother took me to doctors and tried to help with what I ate and exercised with me. Nothing seem to help.
This is in no way funny. It hurts. People who are heavy does not need it pointed out as this place did. The mirror does a great job of that.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
135. I don't understand why you're disagreeing with me
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:46 PM
Dec 2012

It sounds like we are in agreement. We must be talking past each other?

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
136. I think we are too.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:54 PM
Dec 2012

And I think I have been spending way to much time in meta. I am arguing with what I agree with!

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
127. A pull down menu choice????
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:01 PM
Dec 2012

Tell me I didn't hear that in the report. How on earth would that be a choice on a pull down menu?

muntrv

(14,505 posts)
145. Lemme guess: The restaurant cannot print the table number so they had no choice
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:08 PM
Dec 2012

but to print "fat girls."

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
157. Definitely a dickhead move on the part of "Jeff".
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 11:29 PM
Dec 2012

However, it may possibly be understandable if the women were highly obnoxious, or even only slightly obnoxious on top of a customer from hell before them.

It's not excusable. It is understandable.

As for why no table numbers. My guess would be the restraunt owner had some touchy feely idea about nobody, being a number. If so, he was a bloody fool for not issuing very clear and explicit instruction on what is and isn't acceptable as a table/customer identifier. Alternately "Jeff" was not a new employee and this was his way of resigning in a manner intended to harm his employer.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
171. So in your book patrons abusing servers is acceptable?
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 02:07 AM
Dec 2012

Or at least, no matter what provocation those patrons offer, the server has no choice but to accept it?

Like I said, it's not excusable, but if he'd just been given a faceful of abuse, it's understandable why he might not be thinking straight and do something stupid in response.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
172. Of course not...
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 03:35 AM
Dec 2012

and I never suggested it was acceptable.

There are ways to deal with the abusive patron without resorting to calling someone else fat. You have no knowledge to suggest the 3 women were being obnoxious or the server had dealt with anyone obnoxious. Regardless, writing "fat girls" on the check was not acceptable, understandable or reasonable. It was childish, mean, hateful and judgmental.

You can look for excuses for the server all you want but I don't care to.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
185. AND I have had it up to here with agenda blinded IDIOTS who can't or won't...
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 11:10 AM
Dec 2012

...accept that EXCUSE AND EXPLAIN are NOT the same fucking thing.

No I have no knowledge of what actually caused Jeff to write what he did. However, bad customer behaviour is generally the most likely reason for a server to act up.

Yes there are ways of dealing with abusive patrons, IF your boss is willing to back you up, but given what a cheap bastard his boss was in response to the customer complaint, I suspect the only two acceptable to to that boss might be "Suck it up, or fuck off."

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
190. AND why are you DELIBERATELY MISREPRESENTING my words?
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 07:37 PM
Dec 2012

oh yeah, that would agenda blindness.

I raised bad patron behaviour as a POSSIBLE REASON for Jeffs actions, I at NO TIME excused those actions, which twice now you have accused me of doing.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
192. You said it was understandable...
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 07:50 PM
Dec 2012

I said I didn't find it understandable. No agenda.

Bye! Have a nice life.

alp227

(32,025 posts)
161. How about this? From now on when Jeff goes out to eat his receipts are labeled "bigot".
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:12 AM
Dec 2012

Or he has to wear "I'm bigoted against fat people" on his name tag.

flvegan

(64,408 posts)
164. Lets see a pic of "Jeff" please.
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:27 AM
Dec 2012

Then, and only then, can we pick him apart appropriately. And then he can apologize for being a shit. And if not...

And then he can be fired. And if he isn't, that shop should never be visited again.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
178. Obviously the server wasn't thinking.
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 08:37 AM
Dec 2012

He needs a lesson on what is acceptable to be written a guest check.
[img][/img] Ignorance is not an excuse for being rude.

raccoon

(31,110 posts)
182. Females being overweight is an unforgiveable sin in our society.
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 09:35 AM
Dec 2012

Therefore, many insensitive, rude, self-centered people think it's their divine right to comment on it.




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Diners Called 'Fat Girls'...