General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe higher the income gap, the higher the mental illness. USA tops in both.
In brief:
People in more equal societies are far less likely to experience mental illness.
In more detail:
Until recently it was hard to compare levels of mental illness between different countries because nobody had collected strictly comparable data, but recently the World Health Organisation has established world mental health surveys that are starting to provide data. They show that different societies have very different levels of mental illness. In some countries only 5 or 10% of the adult population has suffered from any mental illness in the past year, but in the USA more than 25% have.
We first showed a relationship between mental illness and income inequality in eight developed countries with WHO data - the USA, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Germany, Italy, and Japan. Since then we've been able to add data for New Zealand and for some other countries whose surveys of mental illness, although not strictly comparable, use very similar methods - Australia, the UK and Canada. As the graph below shows, mental illness is much more common in more unequal countries. Among these countries, mental illness is also more common in the richer ones.
Why More Equality?
For full details of the research, visit our main evidence section. (Read this in Italian )
Evidence shows that:
1) In rich countries, a smaller gap between rich and poor means a happier, healthier, and more successful population. Just look at the US, the UK, Portugal, and New Zealand in the top right of this graph, doing much worse than Japan, Sweden or Norway in the bottom left.
http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/why/evidence/mental-health
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)i think he was using these graphs.....
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Unequal societies are unhealthier. This is something to keep in mind.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Look across the bottom of the chart... Germany, Japan (quasi-fascist militarist), Italy, Spain.
Probably doesn't mean anything... but the inequality angle may not mean what it seems to mean either.
One would want to see the relative correlation of *other* factors, like healthcare systems for instance, to see whether income inequality was uniquely correlative in the way that would suggest a causal connection.