Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:43 AM Dec 2012

Something I want to say to the gunners.

The past couple of days here you can find just about any kind of post you want stating just about any kind of sentiment there is on either side of the gun issue.
No matter if you can see it or not, the killings last Friday has changed this debate forever in the way you hoped it never would. We are on that slippery slope you feared we would never be on. There is nothing you can do or say to stop it.
It doesn't matter what other virtues you posses, if you maintain your intransigent stand against any type of gun control or regulation , what you say is wasted words and wasted energy because the tide is now against you. You can help society do something about these killings or not. It doesn't matter because society wants to protect itself from the thing you find so important to yourselves, your guns. It's too late to talk to us about your rights or about the impossibility of gun laws to have any effect on gun violence.
Twenty children in CT are more powerful than all of you millions put together.

74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Something I want to say to the gunners. (Original Post) upaloopa Dec 2012 OP
America fears gun nuts more than gun nuts fear, well, every fucking thing Skittles Dec 2012 #1
They fear not being able to buy... ellisonz Dec 2012 #4
This. My niece's husband told me that he should be able to buy a tank if he wants to Skidmore Dec 2012 #23
And yet they tell me in the Gungeon... ellisonz Dec 2012 #25
He's nuts. RBInMaine Dec 2012 #26
Ron Paul thinks they should legalize ALL drugs, oldbanjo Dec 2012 #36
Not sure you're aware of this, but people CAN buy and own tanks. N/T beevul Dec 2012 #31
Jet fighters too Major Nikon Dec 2012 #34
Yes. I think It was ST:TNG actor Michael Dorn that owns his own F-86 sabre. beevul Dec 2012 #43
I can legally fly one of those Major Nikon Dec 2012 #48
You can have my Sabrejet when you pry it out of my cold dead hands. Bucky Dec 2012 #57
Here's one thing that's kind of interesting Major Nikon Dec 2012 #68
As a gun owner, I agree with you 100%!! Ghost in the Machine Dec 2012 #29
we are SICK of gun nuts bastardizing the 2nd amendment Skittles Dec 2012 #33
Your right if the name is not listed they would not do it. oldbanjo Dec 2012 #38
Apologists like you make me vomit. 300,000,000 guns in this country, and all it does is make it easy dorksied Dec 2012 #39
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #55
He's so right, after all it was lawn furniture used to commit the killings Katashi_itto Dec 2012 #40
A "well regulated militia"? Like the US military, that gave members LSD without their consent? The Ghost in the Machine Dec 2012 #56
Don't forget to use a some WD for lube Katashi_itto Dec 2012 #72
You're despicable. llmart Dec 2012 #74
This is about DEAD BABIES from your "precious." 99Forever Dec 2012 #53
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #60
I'm not your fucking bud and I don't require ... 99Forever Dec 2012 #61
8583 murders in the US by guns in 2011. The next closest are knives/cutting instruments at 1694 neverforget Dec 2012 #73
lets see what happens former-republican Dec 2012 #2
no. it's on the Congress. It's on us as outraged citizens. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2012 #3
No it's on the President former-republican Dec 2012 #8
We can replace Congress. jeff47 Dec 2012 #10
Because I don't think the President wants to wait or the public two years on a maybe former-republican Dec 2012 #13
So...skipped over everything after the 2nd sentence? (nt) jeff47 Dec 2012 #15
I didn't intentionally skip over it former-republican Dec 2012 #20
Because we're talking about a lot of fixes, not a single ban. jeff47 Dec 2012 #67
You replaced them in 2010, now look at how bad this Country is, oldbanjo Dec 2012 #42
"It'd be a lot easier if I was a dictator," GWB said. Was he? Do you want one? freshwest Dec 2012 #24
Whom the Republican Party is plotting as we type to attack/sabotage... ellisonz Dec 2012 #6
There's a lot of stuff going on behind closed doors. former-republican Dec 2012 #9
The GOP/NRA cabal wants no deal... ellisonz Dec 2012 #11
The hell with what the NRA wants former-republican Dec 2012 #12
You're not a betting man are you? ellisonz Dec 2012 #14
No sir I am not former-republican Dec 2012 #16
FUCK NO IT ISN'T Skittles Dec 2012 #7
There are very few thinking people in Amercia, oldbanjo Dec 2012 #44
I agree Skittles Dec 2012 #45
Ultimately it's on the court's to rule on the constitutionality of any gun related laws. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #52
Triumphalism over the massacre of 20 little children isn't the way to go n/t Azathoth Dec 2012 #5
that is what gun nuts need to know Skittles Dec 2012 #17
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #18
aw their widdle feelings getting hurt again Skittles Dec 2012 #19
This isn't a CONTEST & this isn't to be thought of as an attempt to get a POLITICAL WIN. pacalo Dec 2012 #22
Well said BainsBane Dec 2012 #21
Hmmmmmm Saboburns Dec 2012 #27
A mass murderer BainsBane Dec 2012 #28
"A mass murderer. Not likely. I don't own guns." Neither did the lady who drowned her 5 kids in the Ghost in the Machine Dec 2012 #30
I see what you did there... truebluegreen Dec 2012 #35
that one is almost entertaining Skittles Dec 2012 #41
You did?? Oh boy!! It's magic! Ghost in the Machine Dec 2012 #62
Give it up BainsBane Dec 2012 #50
You're a real piece of... Ghost in the Machine Dec 2012 #54
Fuck off. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #64
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #58
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #65
Then I must retire from the Democratic Party and this site The Traveler Dec 2012 #32
That's really mature. Skidmore Dec 2012 #37
The main problem is mental illness in this Country, oldbanjo Dec 2012 #47
The availability of guns is also a problem. Skidmore Dec 2012 #49
I support you on this. oldbanjo Dec 2012 #46
"I'm taking my gun and going home" _ed_ Dec 2012 #59
The poster stated no such thing and further you know they didn't TheKentuckian Dec 2012 #66
Buh-bye. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #63
Feel free to let the door hit you in the ass on the way out Downtown Hound Dec 2012 #70
Only thing I have to say to the gun crowd bakpakr Dec 2012 #51
"But semi-auto firing and large capacity magazines are 'cosmetic features' of firearms" in 3...2...1 Aristus Dec 2012 #69
Shootings don’t tend to substantially affect views on gun control. snooper2 Dec 2012 #71

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
1. America fears gun nuts more than gun nuts fear, well, every fucking thing
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:53 AM
Dec 2012

we are SICK of their COWARDICE AND IGNORANCE

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
4. They fear not being able to buy...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:03 AM
Dec 2012

...whatever gun they want whenever they want for whatever purpose to take anywhere they want.

They're like spoiled children at Christmas...no more presents for them!

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
23. This. My niece's husband told me that he should be able to buy a tank if he wants to
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:18 AM
Dec 2012

and he firmly believes that he should be able to own any kind of weaponry to defend himself and his family against the government.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
25. And yet they tell me in the Gungeon...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:22 AM
Dec 2012

...that their beliefs can't be characterized as "unlimited gun rights." When I ask them if that means they believe there should be a limit on the number of guns they can own or places where they shouldn't be able to take their gun...they get nasty and refuse to answer the question. It's never enough with these clowns.

I'm sorry your niece is married to such a fool.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
43. Yes. I think It was ST:TNG actor Michael Dorn that owns his own F-86 sabre.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:59 AM
Dec 2012

I could never afford one of course, but If i could wave a magic wand, I'd have one of these:




Unarmed, of course...and then I'd have to learn how to fly and get a pilots license.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
48. I can legally fly one of those
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:29 AM
Dec 2012

But from a practical standpoint I'd have to learn how not to kill myself in one first, otherwise my first flight probably wouldn't end well.

Bucky

(54,013 posts)
57. You can have my Sabrejet when you pry it out of my cold dead hands.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:52 AM
Dec 2012

If the Founding Fathers were around in the 1950s, I'm sure they would've included jet fighters in the Second Amendment. When the black helicoptors come for me, it's my Constitutional right to fight for my freedom, not to just go hiding out in some cornfield hoping they'll fly by and not use their infrareds or the GPS on that goddamn chip their Gray allies put in my head--I don't care what the fuck my dad or the judge or Dr. Lowenfeld says, that shit really happened and I just fucking know the government was involved. You know what the first thing Communists do when Communism takes over a country? They start rounding up the airplanes. A well-winged citizenry is the best defense against totalitarianism, be it Red, Gray, or the so-called mental health professionals who cover up for their so-called experiments. Weather balloons my ass. Hell's bells, weather balloons don't probe you, I mean, not there anyway. If I could just get my sabrejet off the ground, those silver floating nazis'd be the first to go. God bless America!

[font face="times new roman"]Star Trek? No, try Freedom Trek! fightin' for freedom![/font]

(NB: Dorn owns and flies a sabrejet, not a prop plane. I mean, c'mon, he's a Klingon for crying out loud!)














































<== These fuckers are watching you!








.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
68. Here's one thing that's kind of interesting
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 12:00 PM
Dec 2012

I was talking to Roger Hardesty about his two F-5s (he owned two of them at one point, I'm not sure if he still does) and I noticed one of them still had the 20mm cannons intact (I don't remember if the other one did or not). I asked him if they were operational. His answer was, "well, I don't have any ammunition."

I thought about how hard it would have been for a guy who owned two F-5s to get M39 ammo and I decided to stop asking questions about it.

Ghost in the Machine

(14,912 posts)
29. As a gun owner, I agree with you 100%!!
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:46 AM
Dec 2012

Because what you are actually saying is that gun nuts owners don't really fear anything, we are just exercising our 2nd Amendment RIGHT to keep and bear arms, and non-gun owners fear us, or guns, more than we fear "every fucking thing"! Therefore, I am in agreement that I am SICK of the COWARDICE AND IGNORANCE of the anti-gunners. It's common for people to fear that which they don't understand...

That being said, yes, this was a VERY TRAGIC occurrence, but one that *could* have been avoided by the mother of a mentally disturbed son NOT having guns in her home.

We have an average of 40 murders per day in the US, which covers ALL categories: shootings, stabbings, strangulations, beaten to death with bare hands, being run down with a vehicle, etc. The thing is, you only hear about the one or two in your area, on your local news... until a tragedy like this happens. Then it becomes national news.

This is where I have to agree with the statement by Morgan Freeman that the media is partly to blame. I am going to be paraphrasing here, but it basically boils down to the media sensationalizing these events and focusing for days on end about the perpetrator, giving them their (usually post mortem) 15 minutes of fame. It also gives other sick individuals ideas of what *they* can do to top the last one, making themselves the center of attention all across the nation, making that poor, pitiful nobody into SOMEBODY PEOPLE WILL REMEMBER, even though they are dead and can't even get any "enjoyment" of that "fame" or "infamy".

The media should totally ignore the perpetrator, not even mentioning his/her name, and focus on the tragedy of the innocent victims. If they mention the perp at all, they should only use words like "sick, twisted psychopath" or "mentally unstable lunatic" or words of that sort, so others who have these thoughts just *might* change their minds and just kill themselves instead of being remembered as that "sick, twisted maniac who shot up a school, mall, movie theater or whatever.

EVERY innocent life taken is tragic, but it is NOT just gun nuts owners who are doing the killings...

Peace within, Peace between, Peace among.....

Ghost

oldbanjo

(690 posts)
38. Your right if the name is not listed they would not do it.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:43 AM
Dec 2012

The News media creates News they should only report it.

dorksied

(348 posts)
39. Apologists like you make me vomit. 300,000,000 guns in this country, and all it does is make it easy
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:44 AM
Dec 2012

for people to kill each other. Defending yourself? Bullshit. Defending your family? Bullshit. You keep a gun because it makes you FEEL powerful, and that is it, in the end. It is your secondary penis, that you stroke believing that it makes you more of a man. If guns made everything better, with 300,000,000 guns in this country we should all be safe as a baby in his mothers arms, but we aren't, are we?

We have more gun deaths than can ever be justified, and the instances where a gun was used to protect is vastly outweighed by the times that a gun was used in violence to take another life, for whatever justification OTHER than protection.


Response to dorksied (Reply #39)

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
40. He's so right, after all it was lawn furniture used to commit the killings
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:47 AM
Dec 2012

the poor gun owners, just working so hard to make sure they have their, high capacity mags, semi-automatics, and with "Justice" Scala, maybe rocket launchers too. All that stuff so readily available, Able to be gotten access by the mentally ill. Has nothing to do with poor gun owners. IT WAS SOMEOMNE ELSES FAULT, IT WAS SUNSPOTS. IT WAS THE MEDIA. IT WAS SANTA ANNA WIND... Really it was all just lawn furniture that killed those kids.


Unless you belong to a well-regulated militia, you should not be allowed to own a military grade weapon. A well regulated militia means psych exams too. Gun owners are liable for unlimited financial responsibility for and damage caused by their guns


No guns other then six-to 10 round mags for the general populace, and single bolt action hunting rifles.

Ghost in the Machine

(14,912 posts)
56. A "well regulated militia"? Like the US military, that gave members LSD without their consent? The
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:48 AM
Dec 2012

same military that subjected their own troops to radion tests during nuclear bomb teasting? The same military that methamphetamine was developed for, so their soldiers could fight longer and harder, often not even realizing they had been shot until later, when the meth started wearing off?

I've had my fill of you anti-gun nuts already. Maybe I'll take my "precious", as that seems to be the new word of the week for the anti-gun nuts, and go to my range on my own property, and get a little target practice in ... here's what I'll be using:



Now you can feel free to wet yourself, then go cry unconsolable in the corner for a while...

Have a blast today!

Ghost

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
72. Don't forget to use a some WD for lube
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:46 PM
Dec 2012

before you have some private "playtime" with your "weapon.


By well regulated militia I mean something under a National Guard.

Now run along and "play" with your big bad gun.

llmart

(15,540 posts)
74. You're despicable.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:18 PM
Dec 2012

Poor babies aren't even laid to rest yet and you're back on your high horse about your stupid gun. Do you know how pathetic you look to the rest of the sane ones?

Don't bother responding to me because I am now putting you on Ignore.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
53. This is about DEAD BABIES from your "precious."
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:44 AM
Dec 2012

End of debate. You are finished, you just don't know it yet.

Response to 99Forever (Reply #53)

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
61. I'm not your fucking bud and I don't require ...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:16 AM
Dec 2012

... a surrogate penis to hide behind.

And I did cry, and I'll cry again for the 20 babies that are now bullet riddled corpses because of your need to have your fetish fulfillment enabled an asshole to end their lives.

Now, snuggle up to your "precious" while you still can.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
73. 8583 murders in the US by guns in 2011. The next closest are knives/cutting instruments at 1694
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:59 PM
Dec 2012

Other is 1164 and personal weapons such as hands are 728. Add them all up and it's not even close to those murdered by guns.

The good news is that murders by all weapons are falling.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/10/gun-crime-us-state

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
3. no. it's on the Congress. It's on us as outraged citizens.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:00 AM
Dec 2012

I've been doing my part the last few days raising hell with my elected representatives. I hope millions more have as well.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
8. No it's on the President
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:10 AM
Dec 2012

Handing it off to congress is a cop out. It won't pass congress without a deal.
He either leads or he doesn't .

It's all about deals in Washington.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
10. We can replace Congress.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:16 AM
Dec 2012

And have many times in the past when the old guard refused to keep up with the times.

What makes you think this will be done in a week? It took us decades of insanity to reach this point. We won't be undoing that in a month.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
13. Because I don't think the President wants to wait or the public two years on a maybe
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:27 AM
Dec 2012

It's just a hunch I have "nothing more"
 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
20. I didn't intentionally skip over it
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:44 AM
Dec 2012

I think it can be written and voted on in a week with the dreaded fiscal cliff.
They banned the new manufacture of machine guns with a voice vote at the last minute in 1986.

William Hughes introduced an amendment known today as the Hughes Amendment that essentially banned the possession of machine guns manufactured after the date of enactment (May 19, 1986). This amendment DID NOT PASS out of committee. A voice vote was called which Charlie Rangel called for the ayes (to pass)

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
67. Because we're talking about a lot of fixes, not a single ban.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 11:03 AM
Dec 2012

Effective gun control will not be passed in a single bill.

oldbanjo

(690 posts)
42. You replaced them in 2010, now look at how bad this Country is,
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:58 AM
Dec 2012

the people that have been put in Congress with the help of the Tea Party are destroying this Country. The Country over reacted and that hurt this Country, they want to do it again, Let the Democrats loose in 2016 and you will need all the guns you can get.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
24. "It'd be a lot easier if I was a dictator," GWB said. Was he? Do you want one?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:21 AM
Dec 2012

Of course it's the Congress. Obama has been telling people for over a month to call their representatives to make the budget go the way he's pushing it, taxes on the rich, no cuts to the social safety net. He's trying to influence people on this issue now.

It was, and will always be, up to us and just voting a man in office doesn't relieve us of our responsibilty to change the states and the people in office. He's leading, just as he is supposed to do.

If Obama isn't not good enough to you, tell us which Republican can do a better job.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
9. There's a lot of stuff going on behind closed doors.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:13 AM
Dec 2012

Sometimes when you want something you have to give something .

That's how it works when you don't control both houses.

How important is it to him " and what he gives up in the deal"
Will it outrage members here ?

maybe... maybe not...

let see what happens

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
11. The GOP/NRA cabal wants no deal...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:17 AM
Dec 2012

...they don't want a compromise. They want nothing done at all. We aren't giving up anything because they won't even negotiate. That's how it's going to be. We're taking this issue to 2014.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
12. The hell with what the NRA wants
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:21 AM
Dec 2012

There are far more powerful lobbies in the GOP that want things left the same.

Don't be surprised to see a deal worked out the last minute with a AWB rider attached.
But also don't be surprised if the rich still keep most of their money.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
14. You're not a betting man are you?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:27 AM
Dec 2012
Don't be surprised to see a deal worked out the last minute with a AWB rider attached.
 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
16. No sir I am not
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:33 AM
Dec 2012

If we don't retake congress in 2014 then it's over on any kind of new gun control.
Is the President a betting man? He better be if that's his plan, cause it's a gamble.

Is the President willing to gamble this or does he wants his legacy to have passed the most comprehensive gun control measure ever passed in the country?

I don't know

oldbanjo

(690 posts)
44. There are very few thinking people in Amercia,
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:07 AM
Dec 2012

47% of this Country voted against their own interests.

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
45. I agree
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:11 AM
Dec 2012

which makes it more important than ever to take America back - we have been held hostage by these rightwing wackjob cowards for FAR TOO LONG

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
52. Ultimately it's on the court's to rule on the constitutionality of any gun related laws.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:31 AM
Dec 2012

The president can propose and draft, congress can pass, but if it's not constitutional it will be unenforceable.

Response to Skittles (Reply #17)

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
19. aw their widdle feelings getting hurt again
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:43 AM
Dec 2012

Michael Moore says it best:

The NRA, for the first time ever, has gone silent. They've taken their Facebook page down. They know they can't show up in Newtown next week and stick it to the people there, like they usually do after one of these mass killings. Let's face it, the gun lobby tonight is on the ropes. Now is the time to act. We can't let this sad moment pass without a true response and a president willing to be a strong leader.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
22. This isn't a CONTEST & this isn't to be thought of as an attempt to get a POLITICAL WIN.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:12 AM
Dec 2012

This is a battle of common-sense values & concern that this country will do what's right versus the Rambo mentality who value their toys more than they value innocent victims. This shouldn't be debatable.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
21. Well said
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:59 AM
Dec 2012

It really is about their intransigence. They are so used to being protected by the NRA and corporate interests, they feel certain that our rights are meaningless. This tragedy is a bridge too far. The more they resist cooperating in sensible efforts, the more radical I become. And I'm certain I'm not alone in that. There are creatures on this site who refuse to even consider limiting magazine sizes. They imagine their freedom requires having weapons that enable mass murder. It does not. The constitution guarantees the right to bear arms, not to stockpile weapons of Mass destruction. Moreover, the constitution can be changed. The more they stonewall, the more determined I become to enact far more dramatic reform. The choice is now theirs. They can cooperate in coming up with measures to prevent the horrifying level of gun violence, or they can make themselves enemies of the people. This is a battle I will not back down from.

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
27. Hmmmmmm
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:33 AM
Dec 2012

I worry much more about someone who labels poster's as 'creatures', and brags about becoming much more radical than I do about someone who owns a gun.

I'm not meaning to be snarky, hyperbolic, or rude.

But I think you ought to worry that your becoming the very thing you seek to change.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
28. A mass murderer
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:38 AM
Dec 2012

Not likely. I don't own guns.

Since I don't know you, I couldn't possibly compare my level of concern on the issue to yours. My point was that the refusal of gun owners to consider any compromise will only create more opposition to their cause.

I have trouble understanding how anyone can privilege their hobby above the lives of children. There are Many terms I could use to describe them, all worse than creatures.

This isn't about some zen inner peace. It Is about protecting our nation's children. If the gun lobby wants to make it a war, I will fight it. If they want to cooperate, I'll work with them. The choice is theirs. But make no mistake about it: we will no longer sit back and allow our children to be slaughtered. Those days are over.

Ghost in the Machine

(14,912 posts)
30. "A mass murderer. Not likely. I don't own guns." Neither did the lady who drowned her 5 kids in the
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:03 AM
Dec 2012

bathtub. Nor did the guys who killed 3000 Americans on 9/11.... How many civilizations were conquered/wiped out with bows & arrows, spears and swords??

Ghost in the Machine

(14,912 posts)
62. You did?? Oh boy!! It's magic!
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:18 AM
Dec 2012

Actually this SUB-THREAD was about a guy saying he couldn't be a mass murderer because he didn't own any guns. Please try to keep up and follow along with the conversation, or remove yourself from it so you don't make yourself look bad.

Actually, what I did was show that even though mass genocide happened with Bows & arrows and swords, they are still legal to buy today. They have laws though... you're still not allowed to kill anyone with them. You can also still buy bathtubs, and it's still against the law to forcefully drown someone in them.


BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
50. Give it up
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:26 AM
Dec 2012

It's over. No one buys your crap any more. Republicans are coming out for gun control. Your lies are finished. Your days of terrorizing this country with guns are over.

Ghost in the Machine

(14,912 posts)
54. You're a real piece of...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:06 AM
Dec 2012

.. something... I haven't quite figured out the word for it yet. This might take some time. Are you some sort of streetcorner preacher or something??

Your lies are finished. Your days of terrorizing this country with guns are over.


#1 - Please point out, exactly, where I lied, or retract your statement and apologize...

#2 - Please point out, exactly, what day, or days, I personally "terrorized this country with a gun" or admit that YOU are the one telling lies, then retract your statement and apologize...

#3 - Be thankful you don't own any guns, then find your phone book, look for the nearest Mental Health facility near you... and make an appointment ASAP! You have clearly flown over the cuckoo's nest..

Thanks in advance,

Ghost

Response to BainsBane (Reply #50)

Response to Ghost in the Machine (Reply #30)

 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
32. Then I must retire from the Democratic Party and this site
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:05 AM
Dec 2012

despite my support (in terms of dollars and man hours) for women's rights, LGBT rights, worker's rights, environmental protection, etc.

Clearly, my support for the Second Amendment disqualifies me.

I will continue to support those purposes, but I will not surrender my right to self defence because of your outrage or your fear (thought I do understand ya). I also agree that the current state of regulation of weapons manufacture and ownership is unacceptably lax.

Since you guys don't want guys like me, and my words and thoughts have no value to you, I'll go some where else.

Trav

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
37. That's really mature.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:41 AM
Dec 2012

I swear. If you understand people's concerns about this issue, why not contribute to solutions rather than taking your ball and going home. The fear and outrage that people feel are based in the very real fact that this nation is awash in guns and gun violence.

oldbanjo

(690 posts)
47. The main problem is mental illness in this Country,
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:26 AM
Dec 2012

Sensible regulations on guns would make sense, a mother who had a mental ill kid takes him shooting, what's wrong with that, get real, the mother was the problem. I know some one that is well educated that has a son that lives with her, the son has never held a job, gets anything that he wants and has never done anything wrong. This boy is a time bomb waiting to go off and he's in his 40's.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
49. The availability of guns is also a problem.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:35 AM
Dec 2012

We have had so many other time bombs explode, in public settings and in the privacy of homes. Mental illness was part of the mix for this particular incident but it is not always the issue. There are too many guns in this nation. Period. And there is a culture that insists that there be unfettered access to weaponry of all sort. That people have a need to go around packing what ever caliber of weapon they want so they can feel "safe." I don't feel safe around people who think like this. A civilized people does not behave in this manner. Weapons are used in the place of words and cooperation. They are an easy ugly fix for those among who cannot or will not use the strength of their ideas or the power of their words to engage in society.

_ed_

(1,734 posts)
59. "I'm taking my gun and going home"
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:58 AM
Dec 2012

Good riddance, then. If your gun is more important than "women's rights, LGBT rights, worker's rights, environmental protection, etc." then you sound like you'd be most comfortable with the teabaggers.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
66. The poster stated no such thing and further you know they didn't
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 11:02 AM
Dec 2012

Though I'm not sure why they feel they must resign from anything, I feel no such compulsion.
I'm not going to bellowed away by a bunch of Reaganite, anti-labor, pro-war, anti-environment, free trade, supporting, drone endorsing statists polishing up their street bonofides on as always funneling power from the many to the few.

The poster should stand for what they believe regardless of where the wind is or who likes it.

Why care if you pass the litmus test of someone that cannot pass yours?
Fuck em. Some of them are already trying to use this a fodder for some "deal", some way to turn crisis into a way to melt opposition to ripping off the people while the emotion is high and the desperation of grief is in the air.

Never let a tragedy go to waste and never stop triangulating.

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
70. Feel free to let the door hit you in the ass on the way out
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 12:04 PM
Dec 2012

You're right we don't want you. We're tired of your kind and the shit we keep going through thanks to you cowards.

Take a hike, gun dork.

Aristus

(66,379 posts)
69. "But semi-auto firing and large capacity magazines are 'cosmetic features' of firearms" in 3...2...1
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 12:04 PM
Dec 2012
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
71. Shootings don’t tend to substantially affect views on gun control.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 12:10 PM
Dec 2012

If people would just read my threads maybe they would learn something...

sigh sigh sigh...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021989800




12. Shootings don’t tend to substantially affect views on gun control.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something I want to say t...