Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:53 PM Dec 2012

“If you're out walking, we're going to stop you, ask why you're out walking, check for your ID,”

SWAT cops to ask for IDs from everyone in Arkansas town

In order to bring crime down, residents of Paragould may soon have to endure police officers brandishing semi-automatic assault riddles on the regular. What’s more, Stovall says, is he intends to have the cops collecting identification from everyone and anyone in an attempt to discourage criminal activity.

"This fear is what's given us the reason to do this. Once I have stats and people saying they're scared, we can do this," Stovall said, according to the Paragould Daily Press. "It allows us to do what we're fixing to do."

“We will be asking for picture identification. We will be ascertaining where the subject lives and what they are doing in the area. We will be keeping a record of those we contact.”

More here, including a pic of a SWAT tank...uhhh...car?
http://rt.com/usa/news/swat-guns-paragould-arkansas-224/



57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“If you're out walking, we're going to stop you, ask why you're out walking, check for your ID,” (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 OP
I don't think so. marybourg Dec 2012 #1
brave american gun owners will exercise their right to take down this tyranny, right??? yeah, right msongs Dec 2012 #2
Probably not AlexSatan Dec 2012 #26
How the hell does a town of that size justify a paramilitary arrangement Skidmore Dec 2012 #3
Did you read the article? dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #9
Ummmm, no... n/t Earth_First Dec 2012 #4
Oddly enough, it's the gun nuts that are advocating a police state more than anyone. reformist2 Dec 2012 #5
Truer words were never written n/t Fumesucker Dec 2012 #7
No it's not. Bake Dec 2012 #13
Welcome to Amerika liberal N proud Dec 2012 #6
Paragould is Paranoid Eric the Reddish Dec 2012 #53
Link to local story Newsjock Dec 2012 #8
If he gets away with this, you KNOW it will spread dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #11
We are prepared to throw your hind-end in jail, OK? We're not going to take a lot of flack." Liberal_in_LA Dec 2012 #12
Channeling George C Scott, evidently. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #22
This will be great on Youtube but it will bankrupt the county ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #47
Paragould, AR. Population about 20,000. MineralMan Dec 2012 #10
Demographics of Paragould FarCenter Dec 2012 #31
Something interesting about those demographicsm, which only go to 2010. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #50
Just announcing they WILL do it may have enough of a chilling effect. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #49
That's true in small towns everywhere. MineralMan Dec 2012 #55
"asking for picture identification" but that's not required to vote. nt jody Dec 2012 #14
Why all the outrage when Bloomberg does something similar in NYC with 'stop and frisk'?!? X_Digger Dec 2012 #15
NY Village Voice story seemed to be seen by a lot of people dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #23
I'll admit to posting it a few times, hehe.. n/t X_Digger Dec 2012 #24
On McLaughlin Group Mort Zuckerman was crediting "stop and frisk" with getting guns off the street FarCenter Dec 2012 #30
Of course he was.. but look at the *actual* stats.. X_Digger Dec 2012 #32
That will not be the case in Paragould -- see demographics link above. FarCenter Dec 2012 #34
Why even bother with the fourth amendment? X_Digger Dec 2012 #35
It appears to be legal for the police to ask someone in public for identification FarCenter Dec 2012 #37
We can thank the SCOTUS for that violation of the 4th (ID) X_Digger Dec 2012 #40
The people in this country ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #16
Paragould...or Paranoid, AR SoCalDem Dec 2012 #17
Germany tried that, twice. It didn't work either time HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #18
uh, RT News. Really? cali Dec 2012 #19
Look upthread for a local source Newsjock Dec 2012 #21
Umm....this is not Nazi Germany. WTF? Avalux Dec 2012 #20
in a free society safety's gamble but how come securing safety requires a loss of rights. leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #25
depending on my mood... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #27
WTF is a semi-automatic assault "riddle" Glassunion Dec 2012 #28
Awww geez....now we gotta ban ..."riddles" !!!! dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #36
He wasn't that bad... until he went to Hogwarts sakabatou Dec 2012 #42
"What walks on four legs in the morning ... surrealAmerican Dec 2012 #39
A drunk donut baker. Glassunion Dec 2012 #46
I've never heard of a semi-automatic assault riddle. slackmaster Dec 2012 #29
Paragould is not too far from where we lived in Missouri. I think there is something in the water. MissMarple Dec 2012 #33
I didn't notice any actual numbers in the article. onethatcares Dec 2012 #38
"They may not be doing anything but walking their dog, but they're going to have to prove it" progree Dec 2012 #44
"[P]olice officers brandishing semi-automatic assault riddles..." sakabatou Dec 2012 #41
"Halt! what do you get when you cross a chicken with a checkerboard?" 0rganism Dec 2012 #48
This is so much like Ray Bradbury's story "The Pedestrian" Music Man Dec 2012 #43
I hope the ACUL jusms all over this shit! High crime rate is not probable cause. I might have to.... Logical Dec 2012 #45
Why do we call cop's AR-15s semi-automatic upaloopa Dec 2012 #51
Let them ask away. . . . BigDemVoter Dec 2012 #52
Won't work rustydog Dec 2012 #54
When Facism comes to America.............. Smilo Dec 2012 #56
Bwahahahaha! I'd give him my lawyer's name and address! ILLEGAL, ANYONE?! WinkyDink Dec 2012 #57
 

AlexSatan

(535 posts)
26. Probably not
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:22 PM
Dec 2012

Obviously there is the court system to go through first.

By the time that happens, the cops will recognize all of the locals who should be there and the bad elements will have decided to avoid the area. So there will not be much of a group left who cares enough to push it.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
3. How the hell does a town of that size justify a paramilitary arrangement
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:56 PM
Dec 2012

like that? Martial law? Who declared martial law and why?

Bake

(21,977 posts)
13. No it's not.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:24 PM
Dec 2012

That's bullshit. Especially since there are a lot of good Dem "gun nuts" here on DU. If you don't believe it, just take a look at GD. Anybody who doesn't call for banning all guns MUST be a gun nut.

Bake

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
8. Link to local story
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:06 PM
Dec 2012
http://www.paragoulddailypress.com/articles/2012/12/15/top_story/doc50cbbb312e241511092932.txt

... Stovall said he did not consult an attorney before announcing his plans to combat crime. He even remained undaunted when comparing his proposed tactics with martial law, explaining that "I don't know that there's ever been a difference" between his proposals and martial law.

Stovall said task force members would not even be required to be looking for a specific suspect before stopping citizens on the street.

"Anyone that's out walking, because of the crime and the fear factor, (could be stopped)," he said.

Should an individual not produce identification, Stovall said his officers would not back down. Individuals who do not produce identification when asked could be charged with obstructing a governmental operation, according to Stovall.

... On Friday, however, Gaskill retreated from the severity of the plan he and Stovall offered to citizens at the town hall.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
11. If he gets away with this, you KNOW it will spread
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:14 PM
Dec 2012

to every power hungry no neck mayor in the country.

 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
12. We are prepared to throw your hind-end in jail, OK? We're not going to take a lot of flack."
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:17 PM
Dec 2012

"Will there be people who buck us? There may be. But we have a right to be doing what we're doing. We have a zero-tolerance. We are prepared to throw your hind-end in jail, OK? We're not going to take a lot of flack."

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
22. Channeling George C Scott, evidently.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:14 PM
Dec 2012

Standing up there in front of that huge American Flag, tossing machismo around with wild abandon.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
50. Something interesting about those demographicsm, which only go to 2010.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:52 PM
Dec 2012

I notice the place has about a quarter of the pop. in the age group of 25-40...
and that most of the "crime wave" is in the area of burglary, theft, etc. which indicates drugs might be a problem.

Even tho the census demographics stop at 2010, it also looks like the overall rates were decreasing from 2007.

Also of note is that the pop. is mostly white, which rules out a race factor.

I have a feeling this may be the start of distrubing trend, and looks like a solution in search of a problem.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
49. Just announcing they WILL do it may have enough of a chilling effect.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:39 PM
Dec 2012

In our little town's ( pop. 6,000) weekly paper ( owned by a big wig Repub, natch) awhile back was a headline:

"Citizens complain of people walking around at night "

reading the article, it was clear that one or 2 groups of "youths" had suddenly developed a habit of" walking around "
in a lower income mixed race neighborhood, after dark.
race was not mentioned.
age was guessed at, by the complaining "citizens" as being somewhere between 18 and early 20's.
Sheriff's office vowed to investigate and "put a stop" to this nefarious practice. In big type. On the front page.

Have'nt heard of any "problems" since.

What non-southerners need to know is that in these small towns, people do not "walk aorund" at night.
Usually houses are lights out by 10 pm, everybody indoors, most are asleep.
So a group of older "youths" wandering around an entire area after dark is looked at with much suspicion.
Esp. if they are not white.

Mayberry is a strange place at times.






MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
55. That's true in small towns everywhere.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:04 PM
Dec 2012

And people call the cops. That's fine. What that small city is doing, though, is something entirely different. It's frightening, and illegal.

I grew up in a town of 6000 in California. You're right, it was lights out early there, too. Anyone out after 10 PM was suspicious.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
15. Why all the outrage when Bloomberg does something similar in NYC with 'stop and frisk'?!?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:32 PM
Dec 2012

Why do threads on the award-winning piece in the Village Voice about the Schoolcraft Tapes drop like stones, but *this* gets outrage?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002449690

eta: Grammar

eta2: To be clear, I'm not defending this AR town's actions, I'm just as pissed at this as I am at Bloomberg in NYC.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
30. On McLaughlin Group Mort Zuckerman was crediting "stop and frisk" with getting guns off the street
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:37 PM
Dec 2012

He was very supportive of gun control, of Bloomberg, and of the stop and frisk policing.

&list=UUHUco2KL1kMdNjjDyORHiFw&index=1

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
32. Of course he was.. but look at the *actual* stats..
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:45 PM
Dec 2012
http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data

In 2011, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 685,724 times.
605,328 were totally innocent (88 percent).
350,743 were black (53 percent).
223,740 were Latino (34 percent).
61,805 were white (9 percent).
341,581 were aged 14-24 (51 percent).


X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
35. Why even bother with the fourth amendment?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:58 PM
Dec 2012

If it saves just one child..



Sorry, infringements on our basic rights piss me the hell off.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
37. It appears to be legal for the police to ask someone in public for identification
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:53 PM
Dec 2012

The person does not have to give the police identification.

The police can proceed to stop and frisk if they have some reason.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
18. Germany tried that, twice. It didn't work either time
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:44 PM
Dec 2012

Maybe his trooper in Arkansas can do better than the Stasi.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
25. in a free society safety's gamble but how come securing safety requires a loss of rights.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:18 PM
Dec 2012

people dont want strangers to come along and shoot them but how do you know who's gonna shoot you unless you start checking people (btw im not for this) but then you give up more of your right to not be hasseled by the man? is curfew next?

 

a geek named Bob

(2,715 posts)
27. depending on my mood...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:24 PM
Dec 2012

I'd either have a friendly chat with the officers, or sue the town into bankruptcy for false arrest and wrongful prosecution.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
28. WTF is a semi-automatic assault "riddle"
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:25 PM
Dec 2012

Dixiegrrrrl - I know that's not your type-o, it's in the article.

Is that when someone walks up to you, asks: "What building has the most stories?" and before you can answer they ask: "What is broken every time its spoken?" and before you can answer they ask: "What gets wetter when it dries?" etc...

Or is it when someone has "Take away the whole and some still remains. What is it?" written on a stick that they hit you with?

surrealAmerican

(11,361 posts)
39. "What walks on four legs in the morning ...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:11 PM
Dec 2012

... two at mid day, and fills you full of holes in the evening?"

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
29. I've never heard of a semi-automatic assault riddle.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:26 PM
Dec 2012

Can I get one wrapped up in a real-tree camouflage mystery, and barrel-shrouded in an enigma?

MissMarple

(9,656 posts)
33. Paragould is not too far from where we lived in Missouri. I think there is something in the water.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:52 PM
Dec 2012

A lot of people I used to know in high school are real right wing nutty. When Obama won I bet a lot of folks went for the bomb shelters and storm cellars.

onethatcares

(16,168 posts)
38. I didn't notice any actual numbers in the article.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:03 PM
Dec 2012

just some bullshit about crime has increased by 4x in certain areas and in others maybe by 3x.

Anyone got numbers of what kind of crime? Hell, letting your dog crap on the sidewalk and not picking it up is a crime.

progree

(10,908 posts)
44. "They may not be doing anything but walking their dog, but they're going to have to prove it"
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:31 PM
Dec 2012

"They may not be doing anything but walking their dog," added Mayor Gaskill, "but they're going to have to prove it."

(Speaking of dogs. The above quote is in the article in the OP's link -- http://rt.com/usa/news/swat-guns-paragould-arkansas-224/

couldn't resist).

I jog 3 X a week.... I wonder how many times I would be stopped.... And how do I prove that I'm "just jogging" and not running away from a crime scene?

sakabatou

(42,152 posts)
41. "[P]olice officers brandishing semi-automatic assault riddles..."
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:17 PM
Dec 2012

So they're going to joke us to death?

0rganism

(23,955 posts)
48. "Halt! what do you get when you cross a chicken with a checkerboard?"
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:48 PM
Dec 2012

"And you'd better answer correctly or we're hauling your ass in."

Clearly this man has taken over Arkansas:

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
45. I hope the ACUL jusms all over this shit! High crime rate is not probable cause. I might have to....
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:39 PM
Dec 2012

make a visit to that fucking town.

First off, no one needs to carry ID.

Idiots!

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
51. Why do we call cop's AR-15s semi-automatic
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:56 PM
Dec 2012

Assault weapons but can't talk about a civilian assault weapons ban because they really aren't assault weapons?

BigDemVoter

(4,150 posts)
52. Let them ask away. . . .
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:00 PM
Dec 2012

There is NO law that requires that one carry identification. Drivers must have licenses when they drive, but it is NOT a requirement to have one otherwise. the USA has categorically REJECTED the idea of any kind of national ID. What part of this do those assholes not understand?

They're just trying to intimidate, as many people feel like they're obliged to answer or comply with a request if it is asked by a police officer.

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
54. Won't work
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:04 PM
Dec 2012

Yakima tried a version of this..gang violence still atrocious, drive by shootings still common place, burglary still a problem.

Try being neighbors again, do you know who lives in your neighborhood? Do you know your kids inthe neighborhood? Do you know who doesn't belong?
Have you reported suspicious persons, activity.

it takes personal involvement,not entrenchment.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
56. When Facism comes to America..............
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 03:10 PM
Dec 2012

I thought I lived in America - land of the free, guess I am wrong. Jack-booted self righteous thugs will be patrolling the streets.

A town of 26,000 people and they have a fully equipped SWAT team - who arranged that? Because who ever did that is probably the biggest criminal in Paragould.

But shouldn't the mayor be asking what the police department/sheriff's office has been doing? What changed between 2010 and 2012?

http://www.cityrating.com/crime-statistics/arkansas/paragould.html

2010 Crime (Actual Data)* Incidents
Aggravated Assault 63
Arson 5
Burglary 526
Forcible Rape 15
Larceny and Theft 1,164
Motor Vehicle Theft 64
Murder and Manslaughter 0
Robbery 8
Crime Rate (Total Incidents) 1,779
Property Crime 1,754
Violent Crime 86

2012 Crime (Projected Data)* Incidents
Aggravated Assault 109
Arson 6
Burglary 733
Forcible Rape 18
Larceny and Theft 1,480
Motor Vehicle Theft 87
Murder and Manslaughter 0
Robbery 12
Crime Rate (Total Incidents) 2,330
Property Crime 2,305
Violent Crime 138


Stovall has said that any individual who does not produce identification could be charged with obstructing a governmental operation.
“I’m hoping we don’t run across [any] of that,” Stovall said. “Will there be people who buck us? There may be. But we have a right to be doing what we’re doing. We have a zero-tolerance. We are prepared to throw your hind-end in jail, OK? We’re not going to take a lot of flack.” .....
Paragould Chief Stovall is adamant though. Citizens will be stopped and asked to produce ID and a reason for being on the street. “They may not be doing anything but walking their dog,” he said. “But they’re going to have to prove it.”


When I go walking and/or walking my dog - I do not carry ID - how many people do?


This is a very dangerous precedent and one that needs to be stopped quickly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»“If you're out walking, w...