General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGamers are the least violent people I know...
I don't know a single gamer who ever stuffed a jock into a locker.
I don't know a single gamer who ever tossed a jock out of the locker room into a hallway naked.
I have never seen two gamers come to blows over a game.
I have never seen a riot at a professional gaming event.
I have never seen a gamer run out and burn a car when his "team" won a championship.
I have never seen a fight break out at a gaming convention.
I'm sorry but all this anti-gaming stuff is really bizarre.
Where is all the anti-sports stuff? If we want to talk about violence in our society how about a sport where the idea is to hit the other guy as hard as you can? Ultimate fighting? Where are the complaints about that? How about a guy who gets shot for wearing a team jacket? How about soccer riots? I remember watching cars burn on TV after our hockey team won the Stanley Cup.
When did gamers all of a sudden become the "violent" people?
An aside.. So far this year Childs Play, the gamer charity that gives gifts to needy and sick kids has raised 3.3 million dollars. Yeah we should take their games away
Here's a link in case you want to help us out: http://childsplaycharity.org/
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Point the finger at anything and everything except the guns.
it definitely can't be the guns causing problems!!!
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The Collar, etc."
Matariki
(18,775 posts)I think this is all a lot of noise from the people who don't want to put the blame where it rightfully belongs. And who want to create a lot of noise so no one else can discuss those things either.
Not just guns, semi-automatic guns, guns with over-sized magazines, etc. But the shambles our mental health system is in. Which is in shambles, thanks to a very large extent, Republican policy of stripping as much away from public programs as they can. Starting with their fucking idiot saint - Ronald Reagan - who closed down mental hospitals and flooded cities with mentally ill people unable to take care of themselves.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)There is a Culture of Violence. Either you reject it and and seek peace in all aspects of your life or you don't.
i think a lot of DU'ers are deeply immersed in violent noise and are afraid to admit that to themselves let alone silence it.
Point fingers at the guns and gun nuts
but you'll still have serious societal problems with violence unless it's addressed as a society and its members agree to change.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Yet, they don't have near the issues with violence that we do.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I'm just flabbergasted people don't see it, the USA has ~5% of the world's population and we spend as much as the rest of the world combined on war and preparing for war and some people wonder why we have a culture of violence.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Indeed. There is some real evidence that we are completely mad as a nation.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)I think there is little proof that video games or violent movies cause actual real world violence.
There IS however evidence that violent crime goes up during wartime.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)which so many here a part of and refuse to admit.
Same issue with Rape Culture.
Many otherwise wonderfully liberal DU'ers just can't wrap their minds around the concept.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)OhioChick
(23,218 posts)In a study involving 12 surgeons and 21 surgical residents, video game skill was correlated with laparoscopic surgery skill as assessed during a simulated surgery skills course, according to a report in the February issue of Archives of Surgery, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
James C. Rosser Jr., M.D., of Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, and colleagues asked 33 surgeons (21 residents and 12 attending physicians) about their video game--playing habits, then assessed their performance at the Rosser Top Gun Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program, a one-and-a-half day course that scores surgeons on time and errors during simulated surgery drills. During the study, conducted from May through August, 2002, the surgeons also played three video games for 25 minutes while the researchers assessed their gaming skills.
Of the surgeons who participated in the study, 15 reported never playing video games, nine reported playing zero to three hours per week, and nine reported playing more than three hours per week at the height of their video game playing. "Surgeons who had played video games in the past for more than three hours per week made 37 percent fewer errors , were 27 percent faster and scored 42 percent better overall than surgeons who never played video games. Current video game players made 32 percent fewer errors, were 24 percent faster and scored 26 percent better overall than their non-player colleagues," the authors write. Those in the top one-third of video gaming skill made 47 percent fewer errors, performed 39 percent faster and scored 41 percent better on the overall Top Gun score than those in the bottom one-third.
"Training curricula that include video games may help thin the technical interface between surgeons and screen-mediated applications, such as laparoscopic surgery," the authors conclude. "Video games may be a practical teaching tool to help train surgeons."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070220012341.htm
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)Try telling that to an unsuspecting bag of M&Ms!
randome
(34,845 posts)However, just as anything else in society affects us, violent gaming can inflame an already disturbed individual.
Just as alcoholism is not solely determined by genetics, a predisposition to alcoholism means that other factors will have an undue influence on the individual.
For those who say gaming is to blame, I think they're wrong.
For those who say violent gaming has no affect on us at all, I say they're wrong, too.
cali
(114,904 posts)SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)You spend a lot of time with gamers? Been to a lot of conventions? Joined many gaming clubs? Know anything about what you are talking about? Anything?
randome
(34,845 posts)Unless you 'game' 24/7. Your anecdotal evidence means next to nothing.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Yes, the last bastion of someone without a valid point "you don't know what the hell you are talking about".
A lifetime spend gaming and hanging out with gamers from all walks of life, at lan parties, gaming conventions, online, and before that, game rooms, table games, board games, tells me I may know slightly more about the gaming community than you do.
If you are so much better than all the gamers and I, and we are so violent and hateful, why don't you go to the link I posted and put your money where your mouth is. The kids need the help.
randome
(34,845 posts)If anecdotal evidence consisting of, what, maybe one hundredth of one percent of the total number of gamers in the world is intended to make some kind of point, I don't know what it is.
It's a useless data point is all I'm saying.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Remember the riot at Happy Valley because that scumbag Paterno got dissed?
The team loses the championship the fans riot, the team wins the championship the fans riot.
I'm more of a flight sim person than a gamer but the poster has a point, there are things far more associated with violence in our culture than gaming and they're totally absent from this discussion.
randome
(34,845 posts)I also said that violent gaming can influence already disturbed individuals. Just as the availability of guns makes it easier for mass killings to occur.
I don't know what the answer is to prevent more mass killings but it doesn't help us reach a conclusion by pointing out that some miniscule number of gamers are NOT violent.
You can say that the vast majority of human beings are not violent so therefore we should relax and do nothing. But that doesn't help, either.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)In my experience it's far more likely to be the type A jock sort than the nerd/gamer.
The problem is the tools of violence, it's possible to kill someone with your bare hands in a fight but it's unlikely without some training and then it still takes some exertion.
With a gun a nine year old can kill a MMA champion with ease.
What I foresee happening is that we are going to turn our entire damn way of life into a prison camp in order to avoid coming to grips with the fact that guns make it frighteningly easy to kill in less than a second.
cali
(114,904 posts)builds his own computers for that purpose and can enthuse about it for hours. I listen. He has more than a few friends who share his interest. He's 25 and he's been into for a few years.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I've never had an urge to roll tanks into a neighboring country.
Well, almost never.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)I usually play as Rome and start trying to conquer. It works for a while, but I always end up losing my empire a couple of centuries in.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)But that still means taking out another civilization or 2 so I have enough cities to compete with the warmongers.
In Civ4 I loved using a Great Artist "culture bomb" to get a neighbor's city to revolt to my empire.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)theKed
(1,235 posts)but I got over it.
Poor Poland...
There was also the two week period i spent dropping oddly shaped rocks off the side of my house, trying to build a wall.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)That doesn't mean I'm going to turn into a genocidal maniac.
Oh, and MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH THERMONUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!*
*shameless Civ2 reference
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...because all the AI-led civilizations will automatically declare war on you if you use them!
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... ooops ...
(Make that an empty plastic bag that says Cheetos on it.)
BTW, your post is spot on.
IT'S THE GUNS, STUPID.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Thanks.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I think it needs legs.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Each side can point to studies to support their arguments.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Many of these mass-murderers were gamers. That doesn't mean that all gamers are going to be mass-murderers, or that they are any more likely to do so. However, there is a legitimate debate as to whether violent videogames can desensitize one to violence.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)because every study I've seen has shown the opposite. Rush Limbaugh is preaching this same junk on his show and it's just an attempt to divert attention from guns.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)A quick Google search can help you turn up several studies.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/video-games/9593188/Violent-video-games-make-teenagers-more-aggressive-study-finds.html
http://archive.news.iastate.edu/news/2010/mar/vvgeffects
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)The date is mixed at best so you certainly don't have enough to try and pin these actions on videogames. However, I can find plenty of evidence to pin this shooting and all others on guns.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)If someone is already mentally challenged, could violent games help desensitize them and make it easier to murder in real life?
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)movies, tv shows, music, the Internet.
People who go on mass shooting sprees may happen to play games as well, but it isn't the games that are causing the problem. They may add to the problem but it isn't the cause. Mental health issues are often a cause, easy access to guns doesn't help keep people safe that's for sure. If someone had the urge to go on a mass shooting spree, I'd rather they call up Call of Duty and shoot a shitload of video game characters than hop on the Internet and buy some guns or go to their parents closet and grab some guns and leave the house with them.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Most of the shooting deaths in this country are retail rather than wholesale.
Some of us want to focus on the entire problem rather than a small fraction of it.
I suspect that some small number of people who play violent video games will indeed be effected negatively by the violence, people that weren't wrapped tight to start with. Fine, if you get the guns away from everyone then those small number won't have nearly the opportunity to kill that they would if guns remain in society.
The other great majority of retail murders will also be made much more difficult by removing guns from society.
Bicoastal
(12,645 posts)You know, the guy who shot up the movie theater in Colorado. His hometown paper says he played soccer and ran cross-country in High School.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jul/20/quiet-unassuming-and-deadly-san-diegan-accused-mas/
So, you know, not your classic shut-in nerd who wanted to murder all the All-American jocks who tormented him.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)in my experience. Not violent, but potentially very unstable (especially the males).
Desensitization is essentially reprogramming reward centers.
Remember who made Doom.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Calling gamers unstable is a stereotype. That's as bad as me saying everyone who likes sports is stupid and failed at school, because the majority of sports fans I've met in my experience are assholes who only knew how to throw a ball and would have failed school if they didn't get special treatment. See how stupid that sounds? Well it's just a stupid as your comment.
And what's with the Doom comment? As far as I know nothing bad happened to the creators of Doom.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)that was designed to desensitize soldiers in dark enclosed environments. It was developed pre-MOUT, and released to the public.
You should educate yourself. For example, go find out what percentage of soldiers in WW2 that were capable of killing another vs. Vietnam vs. OIF. Up from 5% to 95%.
Or research why the .mil stopped requiring pilots licenses to operate drones, because the average 18 YO has no issue chasing the same chemical reward that his FPS gave him when he made the next level and see the images as detached as a computer simulation. Yeah, video games are harmless. Read more, friend.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)by John Carmack and John Romero. It had nothing to do with the USMC. The Marines may have licensed the engine and used it for something but it was certainly not created for them. Carmack was a programmer who created the engine and Romero designed most of the levels. Carmack went on to design rocket engines. Take your bullshit "facts" elsewhere.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)You don't even kill people in Doom. You kill demons spawned from the depths of hell. I swear DU really is going nuts lately.
Bicoastal
(12,645 posts)You know what's funny? You and others like are starting to sound like the very same people who stigmatized introverts and social outcasts when they were growing up--"stay away from that nerd Billy, he plays Dungeons and Dragons instead of going out for sports. Probably unstable; definitely emotionally f-ed up."
There were plenty of these at every school, but usually they grew up and did just fine. And the guy who shot up "Dark Knight Rises" was a jock in high school. There are stereotypes, and then there are facts.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)He got into trouble for trying to steal some computers as a kid and was evaluated by a psychologist as having no empathy for other people. Of course, now he's a dedicated philanthropist who gives to multiple charities, so I'm a bit skeptical of the validity of the original evaluation.
Bicoastal
(12,645 posts)...I think I can rest easy knowing that John Carmack isn't going to murder me in my bed.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)world. Yet mass shootings are, for the most part, a phenomenon overwhelmingly concentrated in the US. Clearly there is something much deeper going on than the mere existence of the games and the players.
And the last video game I can remember playing was Ms. Pac-Man; I've never been a part of gamer culture.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)You're no expert on interactions between psycho active drugs and HD interactive graphics in some people.
And the lack of connection of this thread to our collective lack of research and treatment of mental illnesses as a society, point to a colossal presupposition that does none of us any good.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)And yet they have a murder rate a tiny fraction of that in the land of the free and a gun killing rate you can count on your digits most years.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/07/a-land-without-guns-how-japan-has-virtually-eliminated-shooting-deaths/260189/
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)A lot of them would be AO here which might as well be banned since no retailer will carry them.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)May or may not be useful to the conversation we NEED to have. I'm certainly in no position to judge.
But I'm not going to throw out any possibilities. I'm going to listen to people who are educated about the issues. And I'm going to place the appropriate levels of reliance on statistics that they deserve.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Because the same ones are sold pretty much world wide and it seems only here do they cause a high murder rate.
Which kind of indicates to me that the problem is probably more something to do with American culture than it is video games.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)But the 2 may be related. To discount actions/reactions/interactions is a tricky business at best.
Culturally speaking, how many other nations use psycho active drugs, or advertise products to ask your doctor for, like Americans? (with side effects like laundry lists)
You are accurate to state that this violent phenomenon is manifested mostly in America.
Sincerely asking.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Drunk and disorderly, barroom brawl, ten feet tall and bulletproof, mean drunk, don't listen to him it's the liquor talking, the language recognizes that alcohol has violence causing propensities.
And if it were prescribed psychoactive drugs that were causing the problem you would expect the murder rate to climb as the drugs are used more and more but the opposite is happening, the murder rate is actually falling and has been for nearly two decades although it's still much higher than the rest of the developed world.
Remember "shock and awe", there were entire bars full of Americans watching that on big screen TVs and cheering every time a bomb went off, nobody complained about a "culture of violence" then and Iraq really never did anything to us other than thumb their noses sometimes.
I think the culture of violence starts at the very top and won't change until the US stops being so bellicose internationally.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)The legal recreational drug. And mom was a bit of a barfly, yes?
I think (with no real evidence) that your cultural observation is spot on.
From the way we march in to a country and just take over, giving the locals a choice between cash or bullets, to vulture capitalism. Ingrained, entrenched, and taught from an impressionable age. American values and mores.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/07/what-online-harassment-looks
http://www.dailydot.com/culture/anita-sarkeesian-ted-talk-misogynist-comments/
Yes, I know - they didn't actually physically hurt anyone in real life, but to suggest that that they are not really capable of violence - which is what you are attempting to do - is ridiculous. This woman was attacked in every way BUT physically. Why? Because she wanted to discuss the objectification of women in video games.
The level of abuse is not just illogical - it is irrational and bordering on pathological. It wasn't just one gamer - it was many, so wrapped up in their fantasy worlds that they believed it appropriate to threaten someone with rape, torture, and murder; to attempt to ruin her reputation; to destroy her on as many levels as they could without actually leaving their computers.
Healthy individuals do not react in this fashion. They do not entertain fantasies of this kind. They do not completely freak out because someone criticizes their hobby.
Violent video games are not part and parcel responsible for people committing acts of violence, but it is ridiculous to suggest that they cannot play a role in desensitizing people toward violence - and possibly pushing an already unstable individual to the point where they see merit in acting out what they are playing on their screens.
The people who attacked Anita Sarkeesian are not particularly stable individuals - stable people don't do what these people did. They are most certainly gamers, though.
Bicoastal
(12,645 posts)I thought liberals didn't do that sort of labeling.
That's your evidence that gamers are unstable people? I'd hate to see what you think of sports fans.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)So why couldn't these videos have a negative effect on certain susceptible people?
Bicoastal
(12,645 posts)A work of fiction by JD Salinger made one certain susceptible person shoot John Lennon.
Should we start banning books?
Warpy
(111,267 posts)I know because those are my people.
It doesn't matter if they listen to Marilyn Manson or play violent shoot em up video games or anything else. Only a tiny fraction of a percent of people in any group turn violent. Blaming one group or another is simply counterproductive.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)is what they do to their controllers, tv's and console. Other than that, nothing.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Because the risk of being violent in a year is about the same, within a few percent, for the pool of mentally ill and the pool of the general populatoin. .
Livluvgrow
(377 posts)at how many people don't find problems with killing simulators. I also am amazed at the level of selfishness some are exhibiting. Look at how many of you automatically are saying I dont do this it doesn't do that to me. Well maybe not you but maybe a psychopath might have a different reaction to killing simulators, but we know since it doesn't happen to you it cant possibly happen to others.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)My brother still has a BB in his earlobe that I put there fifty years ago, the one in my leg dissolved I think.
And yet we are both the type that will pick up a spider and put it outside rather than squash it, I've waded into a swimming pool to rescue a trapped snake that was swimming around while people around me thought I was nuts, we both will stop and move turtles out of the road if we see them before they are killed.
John Lennon's killer was obsessed with Catcher in the Rye, there's no telling what will set some people off on a path of violence.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I know I've seen it a million times, but I can't put my finger on it! Driving me bananas.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)Livluvgrow
(377 posts)flight simulators, Madden a football simulator, or killing simulators that is what they are. Spin it how you want that is what they are.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)to a bullshit one about video games.
I think there are people who very much want to divert the conversation away from where it needs to be.
I dont think so. Violent culture needs to be put under a microscope and change needs to be made across the board. Banning obviously not but sensible solutions can be found whether it is guns, or violence in multimedia. almost 9000 shooting deaths with 90,000 being shot each year I do believe warrants some kind of a reaction. Now who is right about all of this? Me, you, who
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)but I do like computer games, puzzles mostly like Tetris. However, I too know quite a few gamers and I haven't met a violent one yet. I haven't even had a hint of foreboding around any of them either. Talking about gamers at this point is ridiculous. People seem to forget that humans have been violent for 10's of thousands of years. It started even before the invention of TV if you can believe that.
Mr.Turnip
(645 posts)I do all I can to avoid violent confrontation and I have a grasp of basic goddamn morality. And yes guys I play violent video games, REALLY violent video games, It does't affect my psyche because I like 99% of the population can tell reality from fantasy.
And for the record yes Games can influence people to do crazy things, EVERYTHING CAN. Should we ban Music and Sports too?
Livluvgrow
(377 posts)no but should we responsibly clean it up a bit maybe. Maybe the radio host from Rwanda should have just been left to spew his shit because you know some things just influence people to do crazy things and ya know we should just let it happen
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The point being that you never know what's going to set someone off.
Heywood J
(2,515 posts)gaming is practically a religion. I don't recall hearing of mass shootings every few weeks in Seoul.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)It seems like video games are for Boomers what rock music was to the Greatest Generation. Like throughout history, the older generation gets hysterical about new forms of entertainment corrupting the youth.
Livluvgrow
(377 posts)40 and love video games started with pong and have had all major platforms since. Enjoyed asteroids, pacman, space invaders, defender, smurfs, qbert, NBA jams, techmo bowl, madden, NBA in many versions, and MLB in many versions. I love playing but have no need for games that feed a culture of killing, and dont think it is wrong to expect better of the people in this country. Bans on games aren't what I hope for not remotely close but think their is nothing wrong with examining the issue to see if we can do better. Clearly though from peoples reactions it is going to be a fruitless hope. Kill on.
ancianita
(36,058 posts)Such games teach focus, extended concentration and the building of cause/effect thinking, patience, trial and error risk taking, imagination, goal-oriented planning and strategic thinking. Not to mention the group cooperation with other players that builds social skills and articulation. Not to mention reading! There's SO much that video games teach that have nothing to do with fomenting any violent notions at all. If anything, video games' violence tend toward having a cathartic effect on players of all ages.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I have bought my sons plenty of video games. I'm not against them, I don't think they are corrupting the 'youth'.
Throughout history, the youth think that everyone is against them and nobody understands them...and then they grow up.