Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 03:15 PM Jan 2013

President Obama raised capital gains rates to higher than Clinton levels.

During the Clinton years, the short-term rate was taxed at the same rate as individual income (39.6 percent) and long-term capital gains at 20 percent, but because of the health care law, those rates now exceed Clinton levels. The short-term rate is now 43.4 percent and the long-term rate in 23.8 percent.

Capital gains rates are at the highest in more than two decades, higher than Clinton rates.

Capital gains goes to 23.8 percent and a tax increase also applies to incomes at $250,000
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022116613

White House: The Seven Things You Need to Know About the Tax Deal
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022118640

"Perhaps the best prism through which to see the Democrats’ gains is inequality."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022123732

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama raised capital gains rates to higher than Clinton levels. (Original Post) ProSense Jan 2013 OP
If the US went over the "cliff", what would the capital gains rates have been? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #1
It's in the OP: Short-term 39.6 percent and long-term 20 percent ProSense Jan 2013 #4
So they are higher now than if no deal was made? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #7
no hfojvt Jan 2013 #18
Highest cap gains under clinton was 29.2%. so, no. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #10
Those are the maximum rates, and you ProSense Jan 2013 #11
Yes, they're the maximum rates, and they were in effect for 5 years of the 8 year clinton HiPointDem Jan 2013 #13
For four years, and ProSense Jan 2013 #14
your claim is false. why don't you just admit it, or amend it? HiPointDem Jan 2013 #15
No, it's not and your link is a piece from 2011. n/t ProSense Jan 2013 #16
It's not a 'piece', it's a list of historical tax rates. Is there some reason you think a list from HiPointDem Jan 2013 #17
but Clinton set the precedent hfojvt Jan 2013 #19
i'm debating only the truth value of the claim made by the other poster. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #21
They went up, that is the important thing. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2013 #2
So was obnoxiousdrunk Jan 2013 #3
I don't know, but ProSense Jan 2013 #6
Not really, the Bush tax cuts did expire but tax rates can be set retroactively. PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #8
It's completely wrong. ProSense Jan 2013 #9
according to wiki, he is wrong hfojvt Jan 2013 #20
another 10% of something is lot better than 100% of nothing-major victory for President Obama graham4anything Jan 2013 #5
Kick! n/t ProSense Jan 2013 #12
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
7. So they are higher now than if no deal was made?
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jan 2013

Sorry for the redundant question. Just curious about wonkish details.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
18. no
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:49 PM
Jan 2013

the deal actually didn't change capital gains rates from what would have happened if nothing was done

but we are still supposed to celebrate this as a win for Benedict Obama

pay no attention to the fact that the deal LOWERS the tax rate on dividends from 39.6% down to 20%.

Obama will tell you he raised those from 15%.

He wants you to be happy with his betrayal.

I suppose we might as well be happy since there is not a tanjed thing we can do about it.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
13. Yes, they're the maximum rates, and they were in effect for 5 years of the 8 year clinton
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:06 PM
Jan 2013

presidency.

hence it's false to say rates are higher than during the clinton presidency.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
14. For four years, and
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:22 PM
Jan 2013

here are the rates for the other four years:

1993 to 1996
Top Regular Rates
Wages & Other Earned 43.7%
Unearned except cap gains 40.8%

Above Taxable Inc. (joint) of 255,100
Capital Gains Max 29.2%

1997 to 2000
Top Regular Rates
Wages & Other Earned 43.7%
Unearned except cap gains 40.8%
Above Taxable Inc. (joint) of 275,000
Capital Gains Max 21.2%

2013 on
Top Regular Rates
Wages & Other Earned 44.6%
Unearned except cap gains 44.6%

Above Taxable Inc. (joint) of 390,100
Capital Gains Max 25%

The rates on high income earners when up.



 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
15. your claim is false. why don't you just admit it, or amend it?
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:41 PM
Jan 2013

Besides which, cap gains tax would have gone up to 21.2 + 3.8% Medicare tax if we'd just jumped off the fiscal cliff.

Which is higher than what this deal brought.

http://www.ctj.org/pdf/regcg.pdf

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
17. It's not a 'piece', it's a list of historical tax rates. Is there some reason you think a list from
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:48 PM
Jan 2013

2011 can't adequately show what tax rates were in the 90s?

and since you missed it:

Besides which, cap gains tax would have gone up to 21.2 + 3.8% Medicare tax if we'd just jumped off the fiscal cliff.

Which is higher than what this deal brought.


http://www.ctj.org/pdf/regcg.pdf

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
19. but Clinton set the precedent
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:58 PM
Jan 2013

betray the people and help the rich in his 2nd term.

Obama is just following in his footsteps. WWCD.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
2. They went up, that is the important thing.
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 03:26 PM
Jan 2013

It could be better, but the settement was negotiated not directed.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. I don't know, but
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jan 2013

"So was brother graham making shit up ?"

...that's completely inaccurate. The poster asked, "Am I wrong?"

Answer: Yup!

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
8. Not really, the Bush tax cuts did expire but tax rates can be set retroactively.
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jan 2013

It's all about whether you want your base to be what the Bush rates were or what the actual
rates would have been (and were) had the cliff bill not been signed. For the next few years you'll
be hearing the cliff bill be called both the 'Obama tax cut' and the 'Obama tax increase'.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
9. It's completely wrong.
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 03:42 PM
Jan 2013

The rates did not go up to 40 percent and then lowered to 20 percent.

In fact, the rates when back to 39.6 percent and 20 percent, and then went up to 43.4 percent and 23.8 percent.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama raised ca...