Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What happened to the love DU had for Anonymous? (Original Post) Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 OP
Good question rbixby Feb 2013 #1
I sympathize with people who struggle against the excessive secrecy of our government, but JDPriestly Feb 2013 #2
I soured on OWS when I saw them in person at the DNC. wildeyed Feb 2013 #3
That's not what I saw in Boston Marrah_G Feb 2013 #6
That's not what I saw in Springfield MO. either. n/t Lady Freedom Returns Feb 2013 #16
The people here aren't liberals. librabear Feb 2013 #4
Speak for yourself about not being libaral. n/t Lady Freedom Returns Feb 2013 #10
I'm still a supporter of all three Marrah_G Feb 2013 #5
+1 n/t Lady Freedom Returns Feb 2013 #9
Anonymous is a concept. OWS is irrelevant. And Assange is a conceited asshole. nt EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #7
Not having spokespeople is a two-edged sword starroute Feb 2013 #8
repression of left wing populist movements datasuspect Feb 2013 #11
Then perhaps you should find another forum that values your overuse of the word 'pigfuckers'. randome Feb 2013 #12
that's just my shorthand terminology datasuspect Feb 2013 #18
I will never have anyone on Ignore. I think that's the easy way out. randome Feb 2013 #19
That's gonna leave a mark! Earth_First Feb 2013 #13
That being said... Lady Freedom Returns Feb 2013 #14
Julian Assange will be on Bill Maher this Friday IcyPeas Feb 2013 #15
Thanks for the tip Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #17
Still here. Scuba Feb 2013 #20
Anonymous appears to have been taken over by libertarians mwrguy Feb 2013 #21

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
2. I sympathize with people who struggle against the excessive secrecy of our government, but
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 01:46 PM
Feb 2013

if they violate the law, they know they will probably pay a price.

Assange was not especially targeting the US government. He just went for secrecy. I don't think they have evidence that he really did anything other than publish information that was provided to him by others including whistleblowers.

As for Anonymous, they aren't well defined. It's hard to have an attitude toward Anonymous.
Seems to be some sort of amorphous non-group of individuals doing various things.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
3. I soured on OWS when I saw them in person at the DNC.
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 01:51 PM
Feb 2013

They appeared to be a bunch of mean drunks with hated for everyone. They snarled traffic for no reason and then insulted the people standing around waiting for them to move so we could get where we were going. I was extremely supportive of OWS at the start, but sadly my personal interaction with them was not positive.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
8. Not having spokespeople is a two-edged sword
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 02:08 PM
Feb 2013

It means there are no leaders for the government to take out, but it also means that anybody who claims to speak for OWS or Anonymous can't be disavowed. That means that any obnoxious loudmouth who says things the national media will love to jump on can be painted as a de facto representative of the movement.

In addition, Anonymous has been disrupted by the many arrests of active hackers, even though they claim they haven't.

And OWS seems to have moved away from public protest and into community organizing -- everything from Occupy Sandy to Occupy the NRA. They're actively working on issues like debt and foreclosure, but they a lot less visible.

I think OWS, or some mutation of it, is going to come back round in a variety of forms. But at the moment, they're at a low ebb -- and DU, which does tend to chase the shiniest targets, reflects that.

 

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)
11. repression of left wing populist movements
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 02:18 PM
Feb 2013

is of paramount importance to pigfuckers everywhere.

the greasy wheels of paid disruptors, trolls, and rw media influence thrive here and everywhere else.

DU is NOT a hotbed of left wing populist movement ideology.

 

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)
18. that's just my shorthand terminology
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 02:26 PM
Feb 2013

you could just ignore me. please feel free to do so.

on edit:

what is it about left wing populist movements that is so repellent to you?

do you prefer the state sanctioned right wing populist movements like the Tea Party?

pick a side.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. I will never have anyone on Ignore. I think that's the easy way out.
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 02:30 PM
Feb 2013

And I don't have a problem with populist movements at all. I just wish the ones we saw last year were a little more effective.

OWS fell apart because, like the GOP, no one was in charge.
Anonymous has been wrong at times, as when they mistakenly identified the wrong person as a pedophile.
And of course there was that ridiculous assertion that they saved us from Carl Rove during the election. Juvenile stuff.
And Assange truly is a narcissist, that's just my view of his actions.

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
14. That being said...
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 02:22 PM
Feb 2013

There are some members here that are big backers of such things as OWS.

So let's not alienate those/us that do.

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
21. Anonymous appears to have been taken over by libertarians
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 02:53 PM
Feb 2013

They do a few good things, but lately it seems like they just want to wreck government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happened to the love...