Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho leaked the kill-list memo?
http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2013/02/05/obamas-dicey-license-to-kill/Obama's Dicey License to Kill
Last night, NBC News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff published a revelatory article based on an undated 16-page Department of Justice white paper, representing the arguments contained in classified memos produced by the Obama administration that describe the criteria that must be met before the administration plans the killing of a U.S. citizen. Who would have surrendered such a sensitive document about the presidents kill list to NBC News?
Its a valid question, and a little bit silly at the same time. Not to diminish the intrepid reporting of Isikoff who should be made the grand marshal of the next Tournament of Roses Parade for his scoop but Washington often leaks in directions to further stoke policy fires that are already burning. Such a Washington fire has been burning for many months, with Congress demanding that the Obama administration explain its targeted killings of U.S. citizens. Yesterday, before the Isikoff story broke, 11 senators sent the president a formal request that any and all legal opinions devised by the White House about the targeting of citizens be forwarded to the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.
This request makes the senators, or members of their staffs, prime suspects of the leak. Isikoffs story does not discourage that interpretation. He reports that the leaked white paper was given to members of the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees in June by administration officials and that a source with access to the white paper, which is not classified, provided a copy to NBC News. Like any good journalist, Isikoff squirts ink in the water to help camouflage a possible source by quoting the boilerplate outrage of the deputy legal director of the ACLU about the white paper. The ACLU has sued the administration for the memos, Isikoff reports, leaving the careful reader to speculate that perhaps the ACLU obtained the white paper and gave it to him.
The timing of the leak inspires further speculation. President Obamas nominee for CIA director, John Brennan, goes to Capitol Hill on Thursday for his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Depending on how you torque it, the leaked white paper arguably gives drone-architect Brennan a little breathing room by blunting the demands for the classified documents. Thats the sentiment behind a statement issued by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today, in which she says the white paper (and other documents and briefings) have allowed the Intelligence Committee, which she chairs, to conduct appropriate and probing oversight into the use of lethal force. Or, the leak could enrage other senators who feel that the administration hasnt been sufficiently candid with them, and prompt them to draw Brennan and the administration into a memo showdown. As Josh Gerstein reported yesterday in Politico, Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, had previously promised to press Brennan on the targeted killing policy.
Last night, NBC News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff published a revelatory article based on an undated 16-page Department of Justice white paper, representing the arguments contained in classified memos produced by the Obama administration that describe the criteria that must be met before the administration plans the killing of a U.S. citizen. Who would have surrendered such a sensitive document about the presidents kill list to NBC News?
Its a valid question, and a little bit silly at the same time. Not to diminish the intrepid reporting of Isikoff who should be made the grand marshal of the next Tournament of Roses Parade for his scoop but Washington often leaks in directions to further stoke policy fires that are already burning. Such a Washington fire has been burning for many months, with Congress demanding that the Obama administration explain its targeted killings of U.S. citizens. Yesterday, before the Isikoff story broke, 11 senators sent the president a formal request that any and all legal opinions devised by the White House about the targeting of citizens be forwarded to the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.
This request makes the senators, or members of their staffs, prime suspects of the leak. Isikoffs story does not discourage that interpretation. He reports that the leaked white paper was given to members of the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees in June by administration officials and that a source with access to the white paper, which is not classified, provided a copy to NBC News. Like any good journalist, Isikoff squirts ink in the water to help camouflage a possible source by quoting the boilerplate outrage of the deputy legal director of the ACLU about the white paper. The ACLU has sued the administration for the memos, Isikoff reports, leaving the careful reader to speculate that perhaps the ACLU obtained the white paper and gave it to him.
The timing of the leak inspires further speculation. President Obamas nominee for CIA director, John Brennan, goes to Capitol Hill on Thursday for his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Depending on how you torque it, the leaked white paper arguably gives drone-architect Brennan a little breathing room by blunting the demands for the classified documents. Thats the sentiment behind a statement issued by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today, in which she says the white paper (and other documents and briefings) have allowed the Intelligence Committee, which she chairs, to conduct appropriate and probing oversight into the use of lethal force. Or, the leak could enrage other senators who feel that the administration hasnt been sufficiently candid with them, and prompt them to draw Brennan and the administration into a memo showdown. As Josh Gerstein reported yesterday in Politico, Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, had previously promised to press Brennan on the targeted killing policy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 971 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who leaked the kill-list memo? (Original Post)
Recursion
Feb 2013
OP
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)1. Wyden?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)4. Feinstein? I can't decide if this was meant to save or sink Brennan
Then again I've been watching THE SKY IS FALLING posts fly by here all day.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)2. A hero did.
Hopefully they can avoid the hero's reward currently being suffered by PFC Manning.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)3. The whitepaper isn't classified
Comparing this to Manning is apples and oranges. The leaked whitepaper isn't classified, and the leaker knew what it was he or she was leaking. Neither of those apply to Manning's case.
Some Senator gave the go-ahead on the leak for political reasons.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)5. Wow, thanks...if the "targeted killing of Americans" isn't classified
my busy mind wonders about what might be!