Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:23 PM Feb 2013

NC bill could mean prison time for topless women

RALEIGH -- A bill that could send women to prison for going topless in public appears headed for approval by the North Carolina legislature.

The Republican-backed bill headed to a floor vote in the House would amend the state's indecent exposure law to expand the legal definition of "private parts" to explicitly include "the nipple, or any portion of the areola, or the female breast."

Depending on whether such exposure is judged to be "for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire," the woman could be charged with a felony, punishable by up to six months in prison for first-time offenders. More mundane exposure would be a misdemeanor meriting up to 30 days in jail.

Co-sponsor Rep. Rayne Brown, R-Davidson, told members of the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that her bill was triggered by topless rallies promoting women's equity that were held during the last two years in Asheville. Though her district is more than a two-hour drive from Asheville, Brown said her constituents are concerned whether the topless protests are legal.

<snip>

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/politics&id=8991671

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PufPuf23

(8,791 posts)
8. It is a slippery slope from the right to bare arms to the right to bare nipples.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:28 PM
Feb 2013

What odd times and odd creatures are humans.

GoneOffShore

(17,340 posts)
11. Will they outlaw "Slippery Nipples"?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:46 PM
Feb 2013
The Slippery Nipple is a layered cocktail shooter most commonly composed of Baileys Irish Cream and Sambuca.
Wikipedia

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
4. So the second amendment is held up to be the most supreme of amendments.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:25 PM
Feb 2013

The first amendment not so much.

riverbendviewgal

(4,253 posts)
7. interesting . it is legal for a woman to be topless in Ontario
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:28 PM
Feb 2013

Very true....but to tell you the truth, I rarely see any going topless other than the beach.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/07/19/gwen-jacobs.html

While Jacob's court case did open the door for women to breastfeed in public, little else has changed since that sweltering day in July when she went topless to get relief from the heat, said Judy Rebick. She was president of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women, Canada's largest women's group, at the time Jacob went to court.

"In 20 years I don't think I've ever seen a woman topless on the street," Rebick said. "Women don't walk around topless because they get hassled, they get harassed if they do. People stare at them. It's cultural, something about North America and the Puritan history."

sinkingfeeling

(51,460 posts)
9. Guess they only like seeing female breasts in dark, smokey, strip clubs. And of
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:39 PM
Feb 2013

course, in Playboy in the john.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
10. "Any portion of the female breast"
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:43 PM
Feb 2013

So does this mean a woman can be thrown in the slammer for wearing a low-cut shirt?

They're only a few steps away from requiring burqas

reflection

(6,286 posts)
12. The double standard is indefensible.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:48 PM
Feb 2013
http://gotopless.org/

I support the right of women to go topless, and I don't say it in a stupid "huh huh boobies" way, but in a way that demands a logical explanation for the double standard. There is none.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
13. I see a lawsuit a coming with this one, should it pass.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:51 PM
Feb 2013

If they're going to ban a woman's nipples, they should be banning a man's nipples too.

subterranean

(3,427 posts)
15. Glad to see they're focusing on the important issues.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:58 PM
Feb 2013

I wonder how many of Rep. Brown's constituents actually expressed concern about the legality of bare breasts in Asheville.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
18. What is it about the female anatomy that horrifies them so much?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:27 PM
Feb 2013

Big deal. Did they forget to graduate mentally from Middle School?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NC bill could mean prison...