Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
318 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When the word 'pussy' is used an insult, do you perceive it as sexist? (Original Post) redqueen Feb 2013 OP
Yes. ScreamingMeemie Feb 2013 #1
double entendre (pussy) arely staircase Feb 2013 #210
Too funny! And vulgar. MissMarple Feb 2013 #257
you bet. cali Feb 2013 #2
Yep. Luminous Animal Feb 2013 #3
Yes n/t demmiblue Feb 2013 #4
Yes. Its use implies that women are weak and wimpy. yardwork Feb 2013 #5
of course...the person who says it, intends it to be an insult Fresh_Start Feb 2013 #6
It's getting harder and harder to be offensive and politcally correct these days. joeunderdog Feb 2013 #211
Ain't dat da troot! Petrushka Feb 2013 #277
Of course. It refers to the feminine, and nothing is worse than that in macholand. n/t Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #7
feminine is an adjective - eom arely staircase Feb 2013 #201
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #8
This is NOT about me, or my hapoiness. nt redqueen Feb 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #33
oh boy. bunnies Feb 2013 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #42
Believe me... bunnies Feb 2013 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #71
lol bunnies Feb 2013 #75
I believe that should be "pants crap fever". 11 Bravo Feb 2013 #87
! bunnies Feb 2013 #95
So he's like a woman, eh? Because he like a woman, eh? Luminous Animal Feb 2013 #141
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #143
Cats are weak????!!!!! yardwork Feb 2013 #151
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #160
So could mine. yardwork Feb 2013 #161
n/s JustAnotherGen Feb 2013 #307
Yeah right. Luminous Animal Feb 2013 #168
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #173
This whole OP was flame bait trolling. cleanhippie Feb 2013 #224
Devil....it may not offend you, but it IS what's called a vulgarism, in one sense, per Merriam... Honeycombe8 Feb 2013 #251
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #253
As I said, it may not offend YOU, but you are not alone in the world. This is not devilgrrl island. Honeycombe8 Feb 2013 #259
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #260
Hey, I'm not the one being inconsiderate of others who find a term really vulgar & offensive. Honeycombe8 Feb 2013 #261
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #263
Nope. You attacked me, when I merely cut and pasted the definition of a word. Honeycombe8 Feb 2013 #268
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #270
Doesn't offend me either. What does offend me are women being droned to death sabrina 1 Feb 2013 #311
This thread is for the purpose of *****A-T-T-E-N-T-I-O-N*****!!!1!!! pacalo Feb 2013 #317
It's also what a lot of gay kids are bullied with. donheld Feb 2013 #278
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #281
Don't worry about me... redqueen Feb 2013 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #45
Results of your Jury Service RC Feb 2013 #65
It's really lame when someone alerts a post like this DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2013 #91
I can understand it, though... redqueen Feb 2013 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #121
I see your point, if I don't necessarily agree with it. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2013 #127
Thanks... apparently the target of the alert has a fan club (I certainly sympathize) redqueen Feb 2013 #135
or, it could be, as much as we LOVE devil, lol, seabeyond Feb 2013 #147
Oh well, you win some & you lose some. pacalo Feb 2013 #318
The whole point of the OP was to get people to use the word "pussy" in a way they didn't like cleanhippie Feb 2013 #226
bullshit. it was because someone used it and it didnt get hidden. and the same old seabeyond Feb 2013 #230
Yawn. cleanhippie Feb 2013 #232
what about your fabricated outrage. oh really, lets make up a story and insist it is fact seabeyond Feb 2013 #233
What are you on about now? Isn't there someone somwhere on DU using a word you don't like? cleanhippie Feb 2013 #236
gettin' snotty? nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #237
Panties in a twist? That's SOME hypocrisy you have there. Couple that with never-ending outrage cleanhippie Feb 2013 #238
people get away with that always. i figured you would alert and whine about a personal attack again seabeyond Feb 2013 #240
Bwahahaha! You seem scared of what you posted so you changed it. There is a word some people use cleanhippie Feb 2013 #243
this would be merely another example of fabricated accusations for your agenda. outraged? prove it seabeyond Feb 2013 #245
Your incessant outrage is obvious to even the most casual observer. But whatever works for you. cleanhippie Feb 2013 #255
ya, that. and you get the last word. seabeyond Feb 2013 #258
ha ha datasuspect Feb 2013 #302
No, discussion of misogynist slurs is not a conspiracy against people who use them. nt redqueen Feb 2013 #287
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #128
i like you. seabeyond Feb 2013 #132
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #136
That sounds entirely reasonable to me. redqueen Feb 2013 #139
I love you! JustAnotherGen Feb 2013 #308
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #309
i really think some people post stuff just to get other people to post arely staircase Feb 2013 #192
You know they do. RC Feb 2013 #208
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #209
That is EXACTLY the point of this OP. cleanhippie Feb 2013 #227
Yes, it isn't the fault of the person posting offensive shit, redqueen Feb 2013 #292
my 5 yr old niece? my 50 yr old alcoholic brother? oh, wait.... rapist and rapist seabeyond Feb 2013 #293
All good examples, but I was thinking of that comment about abused women, redqueen Feb 2013 #298
oh, gosh yes. isnt that always the one. seabeyond Feb 2013 #299
nice try arely staircase Feb 2013 #312
I didn't try, I succeeded in interpreting your post. redqueen Feb 2013 #313
please proceed, redqueen arely staircase Feb 2013 #314
Proceed to do what? Post tired internet memes redqueen Feb 2013 #315
You have never met a brave or courageous woman? Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #181
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #185
So we should use Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #189
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #191
Only you would think so. Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #195
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #215
ego, maybe ? arely staircase Feb 2013 #214
Use "wimp" or "wuss" or just plain "coward." Warpy Feb 2013 #133
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #137
i was told not wuss, that it is a combo of the two words.... i didnt know. seabeyond Feb 2013 #148
Oh, I think the post above yours says it best Warpy Feb 2013 #154
i like spineless asshole! (when you're being less political) bettyellen Feb 2013 #246
You know, in the interest of further muddying the waters... Orrex Feb 2013 #274
Yes, sexist and against community standards IMHO. nt stevenleser Feb 2013 #9
In spite of the modern interpretation, its etymology may have nothing to do w/genitals: LeftinOH Feb 2013 #10
Sciences not allowed!!11!!! Viva_La_Revolution Feb 2013 #284
Yes, but... JaneyVee Feb 2013 #11
I can't stop laughing at this bigtree Feb 2013 #19
nope. nt RandiFan1290 Feb 2013 #12
Yes, and same as that Beaver Ad HockeyMom Feb 2013 #13
The HS mascot in the town I grew up in is a freaking beaver! Imagine being a teen girl yelling Mnemosyne Feb 2013 #56
Guess ya don't know about the Gamecocks? Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2013 #166
I do now! Mnemosyne Feb 2013 #267
University of South Carolina. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2013 #295
No DavidDvorkin Feb 2013 #14
I no longer donate, so I can't. If someone else wants to do a poll, I'll delete this. nt redqueen Feb 2013 #25
Message auto-removed hotcheese Feb 2013 #15
ooh, seek help bigtree Feb 2013 #23
Feminists are well used to such vitriol. redqueen Feb 2013 #61
Nope, but out of respect for those that do... EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #16
Same here. n/t FSogol Feb 2013 #21
yeah me too d_r Feb 2013 #32
I want to hug this whole subthread for having consideration for their community bettyellen Feb 2013 #244
is it being used as a noun or adjective? snooper2 Feb 2013 #17
Nope. It's a diminutive of pusillanimous. nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2013 #20
Nope. That's not the etymology according to any valid source Check the OED for example. Gormy Cuss Feb 2013 #242
Of course. The inference is femininity as a perjorative Melinda Feb 2013 #22
Yep. It is sad. nt redqueen Feb 2013 #27
No NV Whino Feb 2013 #24
Yes idwiyo Feb 2013 #26
no, because it is light-hearted Enrique Feb 2013 #28
IMO having femaleness associated with weakness and cowardice is not lighthearted. redqueen Feb 2013 #36
Is really worse than having maleness equated with arrogance and being unlikable SpartanDem Feb 2013 #55
I was thinking about that earlier Orrex Feb 2013 #92
Yes, good insights and well stated... redqueen Feb 2013 #93
Happy to chime in! Orrex Feb 2013 #110
agreed. good point and thank you for saying this clearly. seabeyond Feb 2013 #94
You caught me in a moment of lucidity Orrex Feb 2013 #111
ya... but, have you placed me on ignore? you are psychic. you can reply perfectly seabeyond Feb 2013 #114
Hey, who said that? Orrex Feb 2013 #273
Are you a man by any chance? n/t Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #49
Of course it is. nt sufrommich Feb 2013 #29
Absolutely wryter2000 Feb 2013 #30
I do - nt Ohio Joe Feb 2013 #31
Sure. It's not like they are talking about a cat. nt Nay Feb 2013 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author Lint Head Feb 2013 #35
it is sexist, it is not a question of my perception. nt La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2013 #37
I would of course agree... redqueen Feb 2013 #48
Yes. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #38
No CBGLuthier Feb 2013 #39
Yes! retread Feb 2013 #41
yes. obviously. purposely. duh... lol, nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #43
No, I find it insulting to cats though. Cleita Feb 2013 #46
It is in that context Taverner Feb 2013 #47
I agree re: slang for vulva. redqueen Feb 2013 #52
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #78
No. It's a legitimate Golf term. OffWithTheirHeads Feb 2013 #50
Yes. gollygee Feb 2013 #51
No more than when the word dick is used as an insult. phleshdef Feb 2013 #53
I guess you could see it that way Drale Feb 2013 #54
I don't hear the word used to refer to cats. redqueen Feb 2013 #57
Because the original use for the word "pussy" referred to cats Drale Feb 2013 #62
The only people I've ever known who used that word for cats gollygee Feb 2013 #66
yes! my old Irish aunties used to holler POO see, POOO se, POO see because they grew up on a farm bettyellen Feb 2013 #241
Better to use "pusillanimous" -- gets the point across better but with an alliterative catch. . . Journeyman Feb 2013 #58
Yes Aerows Feb 2013 #59
Yes. nt hack89 Feb 2013 #60
No. The word has been used for so long and so casually, it now exists on its own, IMO. randome Feb 2013 #63
Of course. This is always an interesting topic n/t Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #64
No. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #67
spider... good point. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #79
Thank you! redqueen Feb 2013 #83
Yeah. It's an annoying part of our super-machismo culture. Dash87 Feb 2013 #69
Yes. It should NEVER be used here. I will go ballistic if I see it. DevonRex Feb 2013 #70
of course TorchTheWitch Feb 2013 #72
I always figured it to be in reference meanit Feb 2013 #73
Yes. It is a sexist insult, IMO. War Horse Feb 2013 #74
Nope Soundman Feb 2013 #76
Absolutely. n/t DonViejo Feb 2013 #77
My first reaction is it is homophobic... joeybee12 Feb 2013 #80
If you can't figure that out on your own, procon Feb 2013 #81
yup. redq is like the HUGEST sexist on du, for all times. we try.... seabeyond Feb 2013 #82
Yes! LiberalLoner Feb 2013 #84
Yes. (And it's a 'Hide' in the DU jury context for me...) nt petronius Feb 2013 #85
There is no other way TO perceive it. WinkyDink Feb 2013 #86
No. Not until I saw this thread. protect our future Feb 2013 #88
What?! You actually thought a man using this term for another man was referring to a CAT? WinkyDink Feb 2013 #96
No, of course not. I've always used the protect our future Feb 2013 #113
Sexist and homophobic Marrah_G Feb 2013 #89
Yes. Starry Messenger Feb 2013 #90
YES! MuseRider Feb 2013 #97
Mooserider! lonestarnot Feb 2013 #271
WOW! Hi there! MuseRider Feb 2013 #288
Absolutely yes. LanternWaste Feb 2013 #98
Yes. I prefer the non-sexist "asshole". dairydog91 Feb 2013 #100
It is sexist. So is calling someone a dick. el_bryanto Feb 2013 #101
Exactly. The power differential and lack of institutional and social oppression redqueen Feb 2013 #102
and yet they are both insults to men arely staircase Feb 2013 #219
Not really, but I'm a dick. N/T galileoreloaded Feb 2013 #103
yes. n/t Whisp Feb 2013 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #105
It's sexist, lame, and also decidedly unimaginative. There are far better insults one can use, like Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #106
How about 'pompous, ignorant, self-important, shit-stirring bucket of filth'? redqueen Feb 2013 #116
Yes, yes! Or "soul-sucking vortex of depressing, monotonous boring negativity, putrid essence Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #142
Absolutely. Apophis Feb 2013 #107
Insults are supposed to be Insulting. JoePhilly Feb 2013 #108
so cause you really really want to insult be homophobic or sexist. hmmm, nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #115
Well, yes. JoePhilly Feb 2013 #196
I was either Juror #2 or #3: apocalypsehow Feb 2013 #109
juror 5... if adminstration would only add it to tos. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #118
+1. I agree. n/t. apocalypsehow Feb 2013 #165
No more than when someone is called a "dick" - lynne Feb 2013 #112
Both are perfectly viable insults without being sexist. Swamp Lover Feb 2013 #145
and then one can get their post hidden. seabeyond Feb 2013 #150
No. nt. polly7 Feb 2013 #117
Shocking. redqueen Feb 2013 #119
lol lol. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #120
ya. da. polly7 Feb 2013 #124
If you were only wanting one answer, why did you pose it as a question? polly7 Feb 2013 #123
Using the word "pussy" as a derogatory term sufrommich Feb 2013 #131
See, there ya go. That's just what I was thinking of. polly7 Feb 2013 #140
or sorta holding onto an over year long grudge which makes it petty. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #152
I am?? polly7 Feb 2013 #157
I did not mean to insult you. redqueen Feb 2013 #167
Gotta give you this... pacalo Feb 2013 #316
Context redqueen Feb 2013 #156
You were asked not to use it. polly7 Feb 2013 #164
No. Because I'm clearly not "defending" the word. redqueen Feb 2013 #169
'Feign outrage over it'. polly7 Feb 2013 #172
Apologizing to people who defend some of the most commonly used misogynist slurs? redqueen Feb 2013 #174
What slurs do I use? polly7 Feb 2013 #175
Where did I say you used any? redqueen Feb 2013 #179
This message was self-deleted by its author polly7 Feb 2013 #186
"Relationships"? Men joking about how they'd like to fuck Sarah Palin, except for redqueen Feb 2013 #199
Well, here's where we'll never agree. polly7 Feb 2013 #206
It's not any more of an insult to ask people to stop using it here sufrommich Feb 2013 #182
You'll never see me using one of those terms or defend them. polly7 Feb 2013 #194
Nope, but if someone calls me a vagina we're fightin'. n/t cherokeeprogressive Feb 2013 #122
yes, of course it is. n/t Scout Feb 2013 #125
Yes loyalsister Feb 2013 #126
except the male terms are their own body parts they love and dicks have always held the power seabeyond Feb 2013 #158
I guess I don't get the vigorous qazplm Feb 2013 #213
i do not think i have EVER used either of the terms either on du or real life. seems like more a man seabeyond Feb 2013 #217
I agree about that cultural aspect loyalsister Feb 2013 #216
Yes, it's meant as a sexist insult Warpy Feb 2013 #129
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #130
Yes. n/t Small Accumulates Feb 2013 #134
Yes. It translates to, "you're weak, like someone with a vagina." It's sexist and obnoxious. Squinch Feb 2013 #138
Is it sexist if you use it... one_voice Feb 2013 #144
I looked up how the word came to mean a weakling OKNancy Feb 2013 #146
No but PETA gets ticked off! whistler162 Feb 2013 #149
i didn't used but have learned better since and do believe that now. TeamPooka Feb 2013 #153
Thanks. And despite the lack of a power imbalance or institutionalized or social oppression against redqueen Feb 2013 #171
I always think of it that way. n/t RKP5637 Feb 2013 #155
Me? No. MrSlayer Feb 2013 #159
Quite. nt bemildred Feb 2013 #162
Yes ! In_The_Wind Feb 2013 #163
Yes, to the same extent calling someone a "dick" is sexist. GodlessBiker Feb 2013 #170
I agree that we shouldn't use either... redqueen Feb 2013 #183
I don't. It's just part of modern slang. Like d*uche or d*ck LittleBlue Feb 2013 #176
No. It's become so commonplace I think it lost all sexist connotation. I'm a woman, for the record gateley Feb 2013 #177
I don't use it in general speech, so I don't use it here. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #178
I really don't see how it could possibly not be taken as sexist...and it lowers my opinion Rowdyboy Feb 2013 #180
does the same for me, and i agree iwth your post. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #184
so if one calls ted nugent a pussy arely staircase Feb 2013 #197
Thery're both words that I choose not to use...One is racist, the other sexist and homophobic Rowdyboy Feb 2013 #222
Well said, I wish I could give that post a rec Ohio Joe Feb 2013 #225
It really doesn't take much effort to be insulting as hell and still not use those few words.... Rowdyboy Feb 2013 #231
one is racist but the homophobic nature of the other is debatable arely staircase Feb 2013 #228
Its a matter of opinion, I'll admit. I've perceived it as homophobic since the first time Rowdyboy Feb 2013 #235
our history probably isn't as different as you assume arely staircase Feb 2013 #248
Actually, its probably more a generational thing. I was in middle school in 1969 Rowdyboy Feb 2013 #262
many sexist slurs against women are also used against gay men to imply they're feminine... and not bettyellen Feb 2013 #249
such as? arely staircase Feb 2013 #250
no, otherwise i wouldn't use it. arely staircase Feb 2013 #187
yes BainsBane Feb 2013 #188
Yes Solly Mack Feb 2013 #190
not really. Algebra Palin Feb 2013 #193
Yes. nt Sienna86 Feb 2013 #198
YES nt s-cubed Feb 2013 #200
Yes, but I don't think that is always the intent. nt ZombieHorde Feb 2013 #202
Doesn't bother me but I won't use it out of respect for those it does bother. tblue Feb 2013 #203
Yes. myrna minx Feb 2013 #204
Mrs Slocombe said it all the time. edbermac Feb 2013 #205
When I was younger I used the word myself now that I'm older yes its the epitome of sexiest... trublu992 Feb 2013 #207
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Feb 2013 #212
It can be. Depends on context. Xithras Feb 2013 #218
Well, let's try the ol' "reverse the situation" test on it.... Flying Squirrel Feb 2013 #220
very good, valid and logical response. hadnt even thought of it like that but a clear reason it is seabeyond Feb 2013 #229
No I don't n/t quinnox Feb 2013 #221
yep. bettyellen Feb 2013 #223
No. I perceive it as vulgar. nt rrneck Feb 2013 #234
Sexist always. n/t Gormy Cuss Feb 2013 #239
Generally not. bluedigger Feb 2013 #247
When the word "dick" or "dickhead" is used as an insult, do you perceive THAT as sexist too? RBInMaine Feb 2013 #252
Yes. ChazII Feb 2013 #254
No. I consider the source. tavernier Feb 2013 #256
I do too. forestpath Feb 2013 #264
No, but I'm English... jannyk Feb 2013 #265
Umm, it is an insult, it is meant to be offending, MadHound Feb 2013 #266
I don't view the word any more or any less sexist Gemini Cat Feb 2013 #269
no smackd Feb 2013 #272
No. Nor do I concide calling someone easttexaslefty Feb 2013 #275
Hmmm. Is a gendered insult that implies inferiority sexist? EDIT Deep13 Feb 2013 #276
Incredible, isn't it? When the TOS was watered down, it set the stage for things to get worse. redqueen Feb 2013 #286
on top of that, since tos does not say no sexism, sexism is allowed. and there you go. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #289
Yep. And there went my star. nt redqueen Feb 2013 #291
Right, because as we all know "bigotry...based on gender.." doesn't mean sexism Gormy Cuss Feb 2013 #300
seems to be the thing lately. i have seen a couple men say it and a couple on jury. seabeyond Feb 2013 #303
Seems to be a lot of spurious defenses of word usage lately. Gormy Cuss Feb 2013 #304
yes. it really is. there is still tweaking going on. so, i still have hope. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #305
context sigmasix Feb 2013 #279
Only a real 'dickhead' would even pose that question Zambero Feb 2013 #280
Who cares? lbrtbell Feb 2013 #282
Of course. Every time it is used to insult an individual, it also insults every woman, everywhere. Zorra Feb 2013 #283
Yes. wildeyed Feb 2013 #285
it does not bother me either. but, i get that it is sexist. i get that it is used to denigrate seabeyond Feb 2013 #290
True, plus I believe in common courtesy. wildeyed Feb 2013 #297
Yes. n/t Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #294
Yes. No shades of gray on this one. nt. NCTraveler Feb 2013 #296
Yes and any of the variations alarimer Feb 2013 #301
Sexist ismnotwasm Feb 2013 #306
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #310

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
1. Yes.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:34 PM
Feb 2013

It is generally used to define someone as being wimpy, less able, etc...

Which are not typically considered to be descriptive of cats. Especially those in storybooks.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
210. double entendre (pussy)
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:47 PM
Feb 2013

Last edited Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:04 PM - Edit history (1)

the Popular Great Depression Era song My Girl's Pussy



"The double entendre has been used for over a hundred years by performers, including the late-19th-century vaudeville act the Barrison Sisters, who performed the notorious routine 'Do You Want To See My Pussy?'"



notice the cats in their aprons.

"In their most famous act, the sisters would dance, raising their skirts slightly above their knees, and ask the audience, "Would you like to see my pussy?" When they had coaxed the audience into an enthusiastic response, they would raise up their skirts, revealing that each sister was wearing underwear of their own manufacture that had a live kitten secured over the crotch"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrison_sisters

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
6. of course...the person who says it, intends it to be an insult
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:37 PM
Feb 2013

so while I don't think pussies are negative...I react to the intended insult.

joeunderdog

(2,563 posts)
211. It's getting harder and harder to be offensive and politcally correct these days.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:53 PM
Feb 2013

That's quite a challenge.

I guess I'm just gonna have to dig deeper into my bag of insults while I'm on DU.

Response to redqueen (Original post)

Response to redqueen (Reply #18)

Response to bunnies (Reply #40)

Response to bunnies (Reply #68)

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
141. So he's like a woman, eh? Because he like a woman, eh?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:16 PM
Feb 2013

Because woman are gutless and weak and men who are gutless and weak are effeminate, like women, Brave men have balls, womanly men are pussies.

Got it.

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #141)

Response to yardwork (Reply #151)

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #168)

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
251. Devil....it may not offend you, but it IS what's called a vulgarism, in one sense, per Merriam...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:41 PM
Feb 2013

2pus·sy
noun \ˈpu̇-sē\
pluralpus·sies


Definition of PUSSY


1

usually vulgar: vulva


2

a usually vulgar: sexual intercourse

b usually vulgar: the female partner in sexual intercourse

Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #251)

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
259. As I said, it may not offend YOU, but you are not alone in the world. This is not devilgrrl island.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:31 PM
Feb 2013

Welcome to earth!

Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #259)

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
261. Hey, I'm not the one being inconsiderate of others who find a term really vulgar & offensive.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:44 PM
Feb 2013

So the argument doesn't work in reverse.

Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #261)

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
268. Nope. You attacked me, when I merely cut and pasted the definition of a word.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:25 AM
Feb 2013

Insisting that I am the problem....not the definition that you disagree with.

Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #268)

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
311. Doesn't offend me either. What does offend me are women being droned to death
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 03:56 PM
Feb 2013

along with their children by our government, in my name, eg. When I think of that, and their pleas to us here to try to stop the carnage, a mere word doesn't even get on my radar screen frankly.

I wish we all that luxury, to spend endless hours and days on one word. But I do use the opportunity to try to draw attention to the actual problems women face in today's world every chance I get. And oddly enough, those claiming to care about women, rarely seem to care about these issues I have raised and often accuse ME of trying to distract from the huge problem of a single word. I otoh, believe this focus on words is meant to distract from the real issues facing women today.

How many threads is this on this one word and how much has this done for women anywhere? My guess is, nothing, not a thing, and maybe that's the goal, to make women look petty.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
317. This thread is for the purpose of *****A-T-T-E-N-T-I-O-N*****!!!1!!!
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 04:50 AM
Feb 2013

And, as a bonus, 20 recommendations make it possible for everyone to see that, no doubt, we place more importance on word usage than about what authoritarian (*cough, cough*) laws the Republican men are ramming through legislatures against us.

How necessary was this OP? It's as productive as flame bait.

And irritating.






Response to donheld (Reply #278)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
44. Don't worry about me...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:00 PM
Feb 2013

I'll be fine, but thanks.

I used to think it was no big deal myself, but I've changed my mind about a lot of things related to feminist issues over the years.

Response to redqueen (Reply #44)

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
65. Results of your Jury Service
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:18 PM
Feb 2013
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
At Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:02 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I didn't want to annoy you
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2374829

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Used a sexist term, in a thread where many say it is a sexist term, to make a point.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:06 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Not a sexiest term when used like this.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Isn't this a thread about that very word? If you don't want to discuss the word don't start a thread about it. Let's be clear, I'm so not a fan of devilgrrl I find her to be extremely rude to just about everyone, but in this case, she's discussing the word the thread is about. Don't start a thread if you only want to hear your point of view. I say leave it.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Oh, for crying out loud already. Keep this meta crap in Meta. Expressing no opinion on the alerted reply. If you're going to play around in (or read) a thread like this one, you shouldn't be surprised by what you find there.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: OFFS! What WAS the subject of this OP???

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.


I was Juror #1.

BTY, there is nothing sexy about Ted Nugent.
 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
91. It's really lame when someone alerts a post like this
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:59 PM
Feb 2013

The poster was only trying to answer the OP's question. A lock really would have chilled the discussion. I'm glad you and 4 others saw it that way.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
99. I can understand it, though...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:14 PM
Feb 2013

I can see how someone might interpret the repeated use of the slur in this tautology as being insensitive.

Response to redqueen (Reply #99)

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
127. I see your point, if I don't necessarily agree with it.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:08 PM
Feb 2013

Since you responded to me, allow me to post my reply to your OP here. No, when the word is used as an insult, I do not think of it as sexist. But I also understand that even if I don't think of it as being sexist, everyone else's results may differ. For what it's worth, I don't think of genetailia, or sex, or anything along those lines when I hear invective being hurled with words like "pussy", "dick(head)", all the variants of "fucker", etc.

thanks.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
135. Thanks... apparently the target of the alert has a fan club (I certainly sympathize)
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:12 PM
Feb 2013

so that may well have been the real impetus for the alert... I'm not asserting above, just speculating.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
147. or, it could be, as much as we LOVE devil, lol,
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:25 PM
Feb 2013

we (as in someone) does not agree with her and it is exactly what you say.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
226. The whole point of the OP was to get people to use the word "pussy" in a way they didn't like
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:52 PM
Feb 2013

so they could have it hidden.

It's pure flame bait.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
230. bullshit. it was because someone used it and it didnt get hidden. and the same old
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:55 PM
Feb 2013

came in and said it was not a sexist term. so putting the question out to a larger number of people.

and the vast majority clearly see it as a sexist term.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
233. what about your fabricated outrage. oh really, lets make up a story and insist it is fact
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:00 PM
Feb 2013

without any knowledge what so ever.

ya, right.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
236. What are you on about now? Isn't there someone somwhere on DU using a word you don't like?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:04 PM
Feb 2013

Go bother someone else.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
238. Panties in a twist? That's SOME hypocrisy you have there. Couple that with never-ending outrage
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:12 PM
Feb 2013

and you have the making of one fine person.

You stay classy and have a nice day.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
240. people get away with that always. i figured you would alert and whine about a personal attack again
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:17 PM
Feb 2013

and my post hidden. hence, me editing. i know how you do things. i gotta be careful as you accuse, yet....

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
243. Bwahahaha! You seem scared of what you posted so you changed it. There is a word some people use
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:25 PM
Feb 2013

to describe when a person is being afraid. What is it? Hmmm, it's on the tip of my tongue....





Please, don't stop. Whatever you do. Do. Not. Stop! This is priceless!

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
245. this would be merely another example of fabricated accusations for your agenda. outraged? prove it
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:27 PM
Feb 2013

oh wait, you cant. it is a chicken shit arguing style.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
255. Your incessant outrage is obvious to even the most casual observer. But whatever works for you.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:56 PM
Feb 2013

I'll bet you're a real hit at parties.

Do you even KNOW why you are outraged right now? Do you even REMEMBER why you responded to me in the first place?


Hint: me observing your perpetual outrage isn't it. But you've made this about you anyway. Nice job!

Response to RC (Reply #65)

Response to seabeyond (Reply #132)

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
308. I love you!
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 03:00 PM
Feb 2013

And seabeyond, and redqueen - and a bunch of rabble rousing women at DU. And this thread cracks me up.

Especially how seabeyond handles herself. She's awesome!


Okay - enough of this mutual admiration society - back to discussing the pword.

Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #308)

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
192. i really think some people post stuff just to get other people to post
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:12 PM
Feb 2013

something they can alert on.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
208. You know they do.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:43 PM
Feb 2013

This OP really belongs in META and not here. You can bet the OP has been inoculated right up front, too.
You also gotta know if we tried something like this, our OP would have been hidden or locked

Response to arely staircase (Reply #192)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
292. Yes, it isn't the fault of the person posting offensive shit,
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:50 AM
Feb 2013

It's the fault of the person who 'makes them do it', amirite?

Gee, that special kind of 'logic' sure is familiar.

I wonder where I've heard that kind of effort to blame someone else for one's unacceptable actions before...

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
298. All good examples, but I was thinking of that comment about abused women,
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 01:58 PM
Feb 2013

how they 'know how to push buttons'... remember that one?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
299. oh, gosh yes. isnt that always the one.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:03 PM
Feb 2013

my brother i just mentioned. years ago, i told him i would not be hangin' with him when he drank, ever again. we all are expected to walked on egg shells.

he agreed. we should.

i told him... fuck that.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
313. I didn't try, I succeeded in interpreting your post.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:21 PM
Feb 2013

It's a real shame people try to shift blame like that. You ought to consider not doing it.

The purpose of this thread was to get an idea of how many DUers actually think the insult isn't misogynist. As it turns out, most see it as being misogynist.

I am not surprised at all, this being a progressive board.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
315. Proceed to do what? Post tired internet memes
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:37 PM
Feb 2013

and use references to Obama quotes in nonsensical ways?

I think you've got that covered.

Response to Sekhmets Daughter (Reply #181)

Response to Sekhmets Daughter (Reply #189)

Response to Sekhmets Daughter (Reply #195)

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
133. Use "wimp" or "wuss" or just plain "coward."
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:10 PM
Feb 2013

Calling them slang for a female body part insults every woman present.

Response to Warpy (Reply #133)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
148. i was told not wuss, that it is a combo of the two words.... i didnt know.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:27 PM
Feb 2013

but it makes sense. and i loved the word. so i just say coward now.

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
274. You know, in the interest of further muddying the waters...
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:05 AM
Feb 2013

I first heard the term "wuss" in summer of 1984, and at that time an unimpeachable authority indicated that it refers to the male urethra.

The authority in question was none other than my then 13-year-old friend Ted. You're not calling Ted a liar, are you?


Well, are you?


Unfortunately, I haven't found any online etymology to back up his interpretation, so it's possible that the entire internet is wrong.

LeftinOH

(5,354 posts)
10. In spite of the modern interpretation, its etymology may have nothing to do w/genitals:
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:38 PM
Feb 2013

(from Wikipedia)

The meaning "weak or cowardly person" has a separate etymology. Websters 1913 Revised Unabridged Dictionary lists this version of pussy as an alternate spelling of "pursy", an otherwise obsolete English word meaning "fat and short-breathed; fat, short, and thick; swelled with pampering ..."[1] The interpretation is often misconstrued, as it contains multiple meanings which some consider derogatory.[2] In fact, when pussy appears in the earlier 1828 edition of the dictionary, this definition is presented for the word, while the older pursy is simply offered as a "corrupt orthography".

Pursy (pronounced with a short u, and with the r slurred or silent) was in turn derived from an Old French word variously spelled pourcif, poulsif, poussif, meaning "to push, thrust, or heave". In this sense, it is cognate with the modern French verb pousser, also meaning "to push".

The word pussy can also be used in a derogatory sense to refer to a male who is not considered sufficiently masculine (see Gender role). When used in this sense, it carries the implication of being easily fatigued, weak or cowardly.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
284. Sciences not allowed!!11!!!
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:55 AM
Feb 2013

this thread is about feeeeliingssss... please take your facts elsewhere, they dampen the outrage.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
13. Yes, and same as that Beaver Ad
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:40 PM
Feb 2013

with women looking for a "Woody". The man that wrote that ad must be very OLD besides.

Mnemosyne

(21,363 posts)
56. The HS mascot in the town I grew up in is a freaking beaver! Imagine being a teen girl yelling
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:10 PM
Feb 2013

that at a sporting event.

I'm guessing the name was picked before the truckers had cb's.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
295. University of South Carolina.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 01:38 PM
Feb 2013

A gamecock is a fighting cock. You know, that "sport" that Oklahoma refuses to outlaw, because they are still being dragged kicking and screaming into the latter part of the 19th century.


Some guy from South Carolina told me about a football game between the Gamecocks and the Trojans. I bet announcing that was fun.



"The Trojans are taking a wraparound offense"

Response to redqueen (Original post)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
61. Feminists are well used to such vitriol.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:14 PM
Feb 2013

There has been an increasing level of hate and vitriol, directly proportional to the increase in feminist activism online. It's to be expected, really.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
32. yeah me too
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:47 PM
Feb 2013

I didn't think about it being sexist but it was explained to me on du. i believe if something bothers people dont do it. so i learned.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
242. Nope. That's not the etymology according to any valid source Check the OED for example.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:24 PM
Feb 2013

It's a false etymology based on the words having a similar sound.

Melinda

(5,465 posts)
22. Of course. The inference is femininity as a perjorative
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:42 PM
Feb 2013

I guess I'm a bit surprised that you'd even have to ask this on this site... and so, it's official nothing here should surprise me anymore. I haz a sad now.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
28. no, because it is light-hearted
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:45 PM
Feb 2013

like dick and prick, etc.

The c-word and the b-word on the other hand carry some hatred, imo, so they are different.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
36. IMO having femaleness associated with weakness and cowardice is not lighthearted.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:51 PM
Feb 2013

To me, the use of this word as an insult insults all women.

I do not see the word as analogous to 'dick' or 'prick' due to the lack of the institutional and social oppression of males for being male.

SpartanDem

(4,533 posts)
55. Is really worse than having maleness equated with arrogance and being unlikable
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:08 PM
Feb 2013

I guess for me it's digging way too deep I don't think there anything seriously wrong with any of those terms male or female.

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
92. I was thinking about that earlier
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:03 PM
Feb 2013

I actually considered posting a copycat thread along those lines but decided against it.

In addition to what you correctly note about the lack of institutional oppression of males, the terms "dick" and "prick" don't really address (i.e., diminish) the subject's masculinity in the way that "pussy" is intended to do. The terms identify the subject as a jerk but leave his manhood untouched, so to speak.
Granted, they are terms seldom applied to women, but even so they don't even imply that "jerkiness" is an inherently male trait; they're simply saying "you're a male and you're a jerk."

In short, anyone who tries to draw an equivalence of sexism between "pussy" and "dick" is full of crap, which is an admirably gender-neutral state of mind, I should think.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
94. agreed. good point and thank you for saying this clearly.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:06 PM
Feb 2013

i have not been able to say it in a way that is understood.

also, dick being a part of the male anatomy and something men absolutely love. and when a male body part is given to a woman then it is a compliment. she gots some balls.

not the same at all.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
114. ya... but, have you placed me on ignore? you are psychic. you can reply perfectly
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:41 PM
Feb 2013

without even knowing what i said.

awesome.... ness

wryter2000

(46,051 posts)
30. Absolutely
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:45 PM
Feb 2013

I'm assuming you mean as directed at a man or boy as an insult (calling him weak). To me, calling a male a female as an insult is clearly sexist.

Response to redqueen (Original post)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
48. I would of course agree...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:04 PM
Feb 2013

however since there are both men and women who disagree, and I would rather they entered the thread without already being put on the defensive, I decided to word the question diplomatically.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
38. Yes.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:54 PM
Feb 2013

A kid my son used to train with simply cut to the chase: If he wanted to accuse a guy of being weak and spineless, he simply accused him of having a vagina. It was a big eyebrow raiser to hear that for the first time, but I had to give him credit for being honest in his blatant sexism. He was only 17 years old, but he respected my request that he not say that anymore.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
39. No
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 03:57 PM
Feb 2013

but that still does not mean I will use the word casually, since many do consider it offensive. There are plenty of other words that work as well.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
46. No, I find it insulting to cats though.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:04 PM
Feb 2013

I always thought it referred to felines because they are easy to spook and very cautious when in unfamiliar circumstances. I don't know when that word came to mean female genitalia, but I never took that term to refer to women in that context. Maybe I'm just uninformed.

Response to redqueen (Reply #52)

Drale

(7,932 posts)
54. I guess you could see it that way
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:08 PM
Feb 2013

but the way I always looked at it was the it means your skittish like a cat. Most cat's will run away from a fight unless they really think they can win.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
57. I don't hear the word used to refer to cats.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:12 PM
Feb 2013

The only exception is in double entendres (and one very old children's story).

For that reason I have never understood how it could possibly refer to cats.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
241. yes! my old Irish aunties used to holler POO see, POOO se, POO see because they grew up on a farm
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:20 PM
Feb 2013

When my aunt was quite old, a stray adopted her and since it wasn't really hers, she just called it "Pussy". Her very genteel neighbors were mortified. They insisted she was calling it "Posie" because she was getting dotty (with AZ) and she was constantly talking about that cat- about loving, wanting, needing that cat all the time. That was hilarious.

Journeyman

(15,036 posts)
58. Better to use "pusillanimous" -- gets the point across better but with an alliterative catch. . .
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:12 PM
Feb 2013

and the etymology's better anyway, for you truly are accusing someone of having a "small mind or spirit."

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
63. No. The word has been used for so long and so casually, it now exists on its own, IMO.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:17 PM
Feb 2013

Same as for calling someone a dick.

BTW, I don't use either of those words. Just pointing out how I perceive them and how I think they are perceived by most people.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
67. No.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:19 PM
Feb 2013

I perceive it as misogynistic. (Sexism and misogyny aren't the same thing and the words aren't interchangeable.)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
83. Thank you!
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:46 PM
Feb 2013

That distinction is something I'd like to see become more widely understood. Unfortunately most people seem to think sexism is just a less serious form of misogyny, and actually get upset at things they consider 'petty' being called misogyny.

Sigh.

meanit

(455 posts)
73. I always figured it to be in reference
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:25 PM
Feb 2013

to being like a "pussy willow". Soft, inoffensive and harmless.

But that's just me. lol

But I do realize the vulgar text in which it is usually meant.

War Horse

(931 posts)
74. Yes. It is a sexist insult, IMO.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:26 PM
Feb 2013

But I don't automatically assume that the person using said insult is a sexist.

 

Soundman

(297 posts)
76. Nope
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:31 PM
Feb 2013

In the circles I travel in the term pussy refers to be being scared, like a scaredy cat. If you want to refer to a fellow by a woman's genitalia, the c word is used. This is coming from a fellow who grew up in some not so savory bars.

procon

(15,805 posts)
81. If you can't figure that out on your own,
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:44 PM
Feb 2013

maybe you other issues about women that are even more inappropriate.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
82. yup. redq is like the HUGEST sexist on du, for all times. we try....
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:45 PM
Feb 2013

we try to get her kicked off for her rampant misogyny, but the administration holds firm, allowing her to stay. lol

oh, and welcome to du.

edit... never mind the welcome. i see you have been here for years. lol

protect our future

(1,156 posts)
88. No. Not until I saw this thread.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:56 PM
Feb 2013

But then, I don't look for sexism around every corner and everywhere else as well.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
96. What?! You actually thought a man using this term for another man was referring to a CAT?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:08 PM
Feb 2013

"Get a load of that guy! What a Manx!"

MuseRider

(34,111 posts)
97. YES!
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:13 PM
Feb 2013

It is high passed time that we do not have to say this again. It is not like this is not known. I am assuming, of course, that it has cropped up once again while I was away and we had to go through another crop of nasty posts where we had to go through all the reasons we don't like it and hear all the reasons they only mean it in fun and how it should not bother us. If not then I am just torqued at the moment over something else and I should just say YES, it is a sexist insult and I am done defending my reasons determining that a part of my body need not be used as an insult to someone else.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
98. Absolutely yes.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:13 PM
Feb 2013

Absolutely yes. And I'd hazard that anyone thinking otherwise is either being disingenuous (whether they realize it or not), or else merely an idiot let loose from a village.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
101. It is sexist. So is calling someone a dick.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:15 PM
Feb 2013

You are taking a gender's perceived problems and boiling them down to a body part. Sexist.

Of course calling someone a Dick is probably less bad as Dicks, as it turns out, have quite a lot of power in our society.

Bryant

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
102. Exactly. The power differential and lack of institutional and social oppression
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:20 PM
Feb 2013

based solely on one's sex makes all the difference in the world.

Response to redqueen (Original post)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
106. It's sexist, lame, and also decidedly unimaginative. There are far better insults one can use, like
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:28 PM
Feb 2013

Bloviating Shitwit.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
116. How about 'pompous, ignorant, self-important, shit-stirring bucket of filth'?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:51 PM
Feb 2013

It's a bit long, but it covers all the bases

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
142. Yes, yes! Or "soul-sucking vortex of depressing, monotonous boring negativity, putrid essence
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:17 PM
Feb 2013

of the spot on the venn odor diagram where perpetually bland meets rotting garbage, tiresome repulsive repetitive humorless flogger of ridiculous gibberish"

...We're still talking about Ted Nugent, now, right?

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
108. Insults are supposed to be Insulting.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:32 PM
Feb 2013

I know that seems like an obvious statement, but I think its important when we discuss the appropriateness of ANY term that is used as an "insult".

Let's all STEP BACK.

Let's imagine that I really really want to INSULT you.

I've already decided that I'm going to INSULT you. I just need to decide HOW.

And so, I pick the word, or phrase, that I think will upset YOU the most. In other words, the word used is not important, except to the extent that it angers the target.

A Homophobe hates to be called GAY.
A right wing tough guy will hate to be called a PUSSY.

I'm not saying it a great idea to use these terms, its not ... but ... I do think some use them specifically because they know the target will be angered.

Which is usually the POINT of an insult.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
196. Well, yes.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:15 PM
Feb 2013

If your goal is to insult a specific person, you select the term that will anger that person the most.

Sexist, Homophobic, racist, so on.

Now, we could discuss whether its nice to INSULT people.

But my point is more simple ... once you decide to be insulting, you intentionally select the term that will anger your target the most.

btw ... I do not generally support being insulting.

apocalypsehow

(12,751 posts)
109. I was either Juror #2 or #3:
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:33 PM
Feb 2013

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
At Tue Feb 12, 2013, 03:59 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Yup - he ain't on our side
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=397382

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

"pussies" is sexist language that should not be allowed at DU. Please hide; we may have debates about certain words here but I think this one should be pretty clear cut.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 12, 2013, 04:07 PM, and the Jury voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Broad brushing any religious organization is also unacceptable.

Also, agree with the alerter. 'Pussies' is just a dumbass thing to call anything but a cat.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: The entire post is peppered with bigotry.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This one was tough. I resorted to checking the Community standards before I opted to vote to Leave It Alone. "Should not be allowed," is different than "Shall not be allowed." If the admins wish to ban sexist language, I hope they will update the community standards to remove any doubt.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'm reluctant to hide (because truth is a defense, to some extent) but the language does need some cleanup. Poster is relatively new and may be unaware of DU's norms.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

So there you have my position on the matter.

lynne

(3,118 posts)
112. No more than when someone is called a "dick" -
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 05:36 PM
Feb 2013

- both are insults but I don't feel that either is particularly sexist.

 

Swamp Lover

(431 posts)
145. Both are perfectly viable insults without being sexist.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:24 PM
Feb 2013

One can call a woman a dick and a man a pussy.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
123. If you were only wanting one answer, why did you pose it as a question?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:02 PM
Feb 2013

Pussy? I've never considered it in the context of being insulting using it as a woman's body part. And you can laugh and scoff at that all you like.


Authoritarian, black and white thinkers - have difficulty understanding abstract or creative concepts and may be suspicious of people who think unconventionally. Authoritarian types often expect too much from others and may use deceitful tactics or aggressive behavior to get what they want.
According to Adorno's theory, the elements of the Authoritarian personality type are:
Blind allegiance to conventional beliefs about right and wrong
Respect for submission to acknowledged authority
Belief in aggression toward those who do not subscribe to conventional thinking, or who are different
A negative view of people in general - i.e. the belief that people would all lie, cheat or steal if given the opportunity
A need for strong leadership which displays uncompromising power
A belief in simple answers and polemics - i.e. The media controls us all or The source of all our problems is the loss of morals these days.
Resistance to creative, dangerous ideas. A black and white worldview.
A tendency to project one's own feelings of inadequacy, rage and fear onto a scapegoated group
A preoccupation with violence and sex.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
131. Using the word "pussy" as a derogatory term
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:10 PM
Feb 2013

for someone considered weak or ineffectual is not the sign of someone who understands " abstract or creative concepts". It's the sign of someone who can't express themselves above the level of a 14 year old.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
140. See, there ya go. That's just what I was thinking of.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:16 PM
Feb 2013

I don't insist my opinion of the word is the right one and insult people for not seeing it my way. It's that head-clubbing thing until you get it right! ... it just doesn't work on me.

Sorta like *toilet. I found that completely disgusting, debasing and horrible. Others found it perfectly acceptable. Life is fucking strange sometimes, no??

polly7

(20,582 posts)
157. I am??
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:32 PM
Feb 2013

Last edited Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:07 PM - Edit history (1)

No, just really scratching my head at being insulted over my opinion on what I see as a harmless word ........ vs. your own support for the word *toilet. Which was allowed to remain. Care to address that?

The OP asked a question. I stated my opinion, which was simply, no. Who's carrying the grudge, hmmmmmm?????

But, if you're accusing anyone of 'pettiness', you should probably ask yourself why anyone would troll a protected forum for personal, sensitive information to pass around in pm's to hurt and slander that person because you didn't get your way on something. Ick.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
167. I did not mean to insult you.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:41 PM
Feb 2013

I made a sarcastic reply, because I am aware of your opinion on this issue due to reading your posts on the issue in the past.

I did intend to be sarcastic, I didn't intend to be insulting. I'm sorry.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
316. Gotta give you this...
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 04:20 AM
Feb 2013


Sounds like she's not happy about people remembering some very embarrassing, inconvenient history, so I can understand the attempt to dismiss those with more than one brain cell of memory as holding a......grudge!1!

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
156. Context
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:31 PM
Feb 2013

I'm not opposed to the word itself. When used as slang for vulva I like it. It is when it is used as an insult that I find it offensive.

As for that other word, yes, it is horrible, disgusting, foul, etc. It originated in the context of prostitution and porn. I did not use it as an insult. I used it thusly: 'men who do x view women as b******'. In that statement, am i calling women 'b******'? No.

It is logical to disagree with the premise, and say that no, men who do x are not viewing women as 'b*****'... It is not logical to pretend that *I* think of women that way.

The fact that people are more outraged about that singular use of the word than thoughtful about its actual meaning (in porn and prostitution) speaks volumes.

It is the producers of porn and the customers of prostitutes who coined that term. To direct outrage at the feminist who used it to make a point about the widespread objectification of women is the height of hypocrisy.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
164. You were asked not to use it.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:37 PM
Feb 2013

I think *toilet is one of the most disgusting, sickening terms I've ever heard ........ in ANY context. As did others. You were asked not to use it, instead ..... you still defend it. You laughed at me for being offended over it and insulted others for being the naughty word police. I posted a simple 'no' to your question here and got your typical insulting reply. Ironic, no??



redqueen

(115,103 posts)
169. No. Because I'm clearly not "defending" the word.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:45 PM
Feb 2013

What is actually ironic is that you do defend slurs which most feminists find misogynist, but you're still attacking me for simply using the word in a non insulting way.

And I haven't used it since. Unlike others, who feign outrage over it.

Again... attacking the feminist, ignoring the origin. Telling. So telling.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
172. 'Feign outrage over it'.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:51 PM
Feb 2013

Yeah ......... us naughty word police / six year olds just learning a new swear word. If you had any sensitivity toward women - feminists or not, you'd have apologized for it. Instead you chose to be insulting and STILL try your hardest to insinuate there's something wrong with those of us who objected to it. Yes, it is telling. Me, not falling over in a fucking faint over a word I've always likened to a scaredy cat, vs. you, the only person on this board to ever use and defend to the death a filthy degrading term. Very, very telling.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
174. Apologizing to people who defend some of the most commonly used misogynist slurs?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:56 PM
Feb 2013

For daring to expose their precious eyes to a word they had managed to avoid, by not bothering to read much at all about the incredibly abusive, multi billion dollar porn industry?

Not a chance.

Do you think feminists who object to the word 'bitch' as an insult are also "falling over in a fucking faint over a word"?

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
179. Where did I say you used any?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:02 PM
Feb 2013

I would echo your "put up or shut up" grade-school crap, but your stubborn insistence on avoiding logic means I'll be bowing out.

Feel free to answer the question re: 'bitch' if you care to demonstrate a willingness to participate in an intellectually honest discussion.

Response to redqueen (Reply #179)

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
199. "Relationships"? Men joking about how they'd like to fuck Sarah Palin, except for
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:25 PM
Feb 2013

some snide remarks about her voice or political views, or whatever other bullshit... my being offended at the laughing and joking about the idea that it is perfectly acceptable for men to reduce women to objects to be fucked... If that's the kind of relationships you're referring to, then I fucking sure do have a horrible view of them.

I do think men who watch porn or buy sex think of women that way. Laugh all you want, apparently you're not overly concerned about objectification, so party on.

As for your view on the word 'bitch', I don't recall, but just as with this word, due to your minimization of issues you don't personally consider important, it wouldn't surprise me if you did take the 'shut up, word police' side in the past. I don't remember if you had, or I wouldnt have asked.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
206. Well, here's where we'll never agree.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:33 PM
Feb 2013

I don't see joking about wanting to have sex with someone as reducing that person to something filthy. Juvenile, crass ... yep. Filthy *toilets? No.

WTF are you talking about 'laugh all you like'? I've never discussed porn with you, but I believe grown, consenting adults have every right to do as they choose.

What issues have you seen me not consider important?

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
182. It's not any more of an insult to ask people to stop using it here
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:04 PM
Feb 2013

than any other insulting words. It's one of those words that should be filed under "Nugent talk",like "that's gay" or "lardass". It's not authoritarian to expect people to be able to post without using language that sound like schoolyard taunts.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
194. You'll never see me using one of those terms or defend them.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:13 PM
Feb 2013

A question was asked, I responded. I've honestly always taken it as a comparison to a scaredy cat and never even use it myself, but understand where others are coming from. Isn't it great we can all express our own honest opinion and not get slammed for it? Oh wait ....

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
126. Yes
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:05 PM
Feb 2013

I also think it's sexist when "dick, prick, etc" are used as insult. The implication that femaleness OR maleness are negative things is sexist.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
158. except the male terms are their own body parts they love and dicks have always held the power
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:32 PM
Feb 2013

so not quite the same. though from here on out i will be hiding dicks and certainly pricks cause the men on du are offended.

qazplm

(3,626 posts)
213. I guess I don't get the vigorous
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:54 PM
Feb 2013

rush to say d*cks/Pr*cks really isn't the same.

Ok, it's not equivalent, it's still not good, and it's still attacking based on gender.

Why not just say, yes, you are right, we shouldn't be using male body parts to insult either. Let's just avoid using any gender-based body parts as an insult/slur.

Instead, what we get are a kind of mocking, derisive not really a big deal response.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
217. i do not think i have EVER used either of the terms either on du or real life. seems like more a man
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:10 PM
Feb 2013

uses on another man. i do nto often hear women use the terms.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
216. I agree about that cultural aspect
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:06 PM
Feb 2013

I just try to be consistent on the literal specifics. It's one of the only ways to come close to convincing some.

Response to redqueen (Original post)

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
144. Is it sexist if you use it...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:20 PM
Feb 2013

equally against both sexes? Only asking cuz I call both men and women 'dicks'. I don't use the 'p' word except sometimes when I'm calling my cat. Yes, I actually call my cat that, sometimes I also call him 'cat' and occasionally by his name.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
146. I looked up how the word came to mean a weakling
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:24 PM
Feb 2013

Weakness
The meaning "weak or cowardly person" has a separate etymology. Websters 1913 Revised Unabridged Dictionary lists this version of pussy as an alternate spelling of "pursy", an otherwise obsolete English word meaning "fat and short-breathed; fat, short, and thick; swelled with pampering ..."[1] The interpretation is often misconstrued, as it contains multiple meanings which some consider derogatory.[2] In fact, when pussy appears in the earlier 1828 edition of the dictionary, this definition is presented for the word, while the older pursy is simply offered as a "corrupt orthography".
Pursy (pronounced with a short u, and with the r slurred or silent) was in turn derived from an Old French word variously spelled pourcif, poulsif, poussif, meaning "to push, thrust, or heave". In this sense, it is cognate with the modern French verb pousser, also meaning "to push".
The word pussy can also be used in a derogatory sense to refer to a male who is not considered sufficiently masculine (see Gender role). When used in this sense, it carries the implication of being easily fatigued, weak or cowardly.
Men dominated by women (particularly their partners or spouses and at one time referred to as 'Hen-pecked') can be referred to as pussy-whipped (or simply whipped in slightly more polite society or media).

It's from wiki, but it sounds authentic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pussy

TeamPooka

(24,229 posts)
153. i didn't used but have learned better since and do believe that now.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:29 PM
Feb 2013

so I do not use the term anymore

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
171. Thanks. And despite the lack of a power imbalance or institutionalized or social oppression against
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:50 PM
Feb 2013

men on the basis of their sex, I still don't use male body parts as insults.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
159. Me? No.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:33 PM
Feb 2013

It's a generic insult, a synonym for coward. When you hear someone called a dick or a dickhead do you perceive it as sexist? I'll bet not. And you shouldn't because it isn't.

GodlessBiker

(6,314 posts)
170. Yes, to the same extent calling someone a "dick" is sexist.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:45 PM
Feb 2013

We should not use the body parts of either sex as insults.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
183. I agree that we shouldn't use either...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:05 PM
Feb 2013

I am curious though to know your thoughts re: the ideas in post 92.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
176. I don't. It's just part of modern slang. Like d*uche or d*ck
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 06:59 PM
Feb 2013

Nothing wrong with using a d*uche or having a penis or an anus (a**hole), it is what it is. Sexual/excretory organs and sexual/excretory behaviors will be used as insults for whatever reason.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
178. I don't use it in general speech, so I don't use it here.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:01 PM
Feb 2013

I use "wuss" or "wimp" in the context in which that word is ordinarily used.

I feel a compulsion to give you the wrong answer just on principle, but if I'm honest, my avoidance of the word must suggest that I take offense at it.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
180. I really don't see how it could possibly not be taken as sexist...and it lowers my opinion
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:02 PM
Feb 2013

Last edited Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:18 AM - Edit history (1)

of the person who uses it just as much as "faggot", "retard", and even "n****r. But then haters gotta hate, apparently, and DU doesn't always call them on their bullshit.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
222. Thery're both words that I choose not to use...One is racist, the other sexist and homophobic
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:46 PM
Feb 2013

There are many other extremely nasty things I can call someone without descending into racism, sexism and homophobia. Why should I be an ass with my words when a different word will convey exactly the same disdain without causing anyone to feel insulted? Why would I choose to be deliberately rude to my friends on the left?

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
231. It really doesn't take much effort to be insulting as hell and still not use those few words....
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:57 PM
Feb 2013

And its a shame so many people can't (or more likely don't want to) refrain from being bigots. But this is still my favorite spot on the intertubes.....

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
228. one is racist but the homophobic nature of the other is debatable
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:53 PM
Feb 2013

i have never perceived it as homophobic. feminists have a bit more of an argument that it is sexist. i have always thought of it as synonymous with coward. if a homophobe wants to insult a gay person he/she is not going to use "pussy." They are going to go straight for a version of f****t, which i do feel is akin to n****r.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
235. Its a matter of opinion, I'll admit. I've perceived it as homophobic since the first time
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:02 PM
Feb 2013

my middle school principal's son kneed me between classes and called me one. To me, its not cool. I can understand that you don't share my history-I'm just saying I personally find it offensive.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
248. our history probably isn't as different as you assume
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:32 PM
Feb 2013

though never specifically kneed and called that word. i can tell you this. i have never heard skinheads yell "pussy" while unfortunately i have heard "faggots" and "dykes" hurled at me and my friends. never experienced violence, but harrassed going into clubs in the early 90s, yes. i had friends who were once assaulted near same houston clubs.

but yes, to a large extent, what words mean to one may be different than to others based on your experience. your principal's son didn't become a houston skinhead in around 91-94, did he?

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
262. Actually, its probably more a generational thing. I was in middle school in 1969
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:46 PM
Feb 2013

in small town Mississippi.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
249. many sexist slurs against women are also used against gay men to imply they're feminine... and not
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:32 PM
Feb 2013

in a good way.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
250. such as?
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:41 PM
Feb 2013

"pussy" is specifically used against men, i think the feminist critique of it has some validity. but it is not a "slur" against women per se. bitch and c*** are slurs against women. i have never heard the latter used against a man to imply he is feminine, and i have only heard gay men called bitch by other gay men.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
203. Doesn't bother me but I won't use it out of respect for those it does bother.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:30 PM
Feb 2013

I'm a woman but I don't take that word as anything that has anything to do with me as a person or as a woman. It's an ugly word that's tasteless and cutting. But I don't get too incensed by it because I guess I'm fresh out of outrage. I am so tired of being mad and a victim, so I'm choosing not to see myself that way for once.

trublu992

(489 posts)
207. When I was younger I used the word myself now that I'm older yes its the epitome of sexiest...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:36 PM
Feb 2013

Whats weak about female genitalia?

Response to redqueen (Original post)

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
218. It can be. Depends on context.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:14 PM
Feb 2013

Pussy is one of those funny words that is "acceptable" or "unacceptable" depending on how it's used. Pussy has multiple origins, some of which are offensive, and some aren't.

If you call someone a "pussy" meaning "weakling", then it's sexist. The use of "pussy" to describe a weakling comes from the same source as calling a man a "woman" or a "little girl". It suggests that women are inferior and, by proxy, that men who are similar to women are inferior. It's a term that demeans women and is sexist.

If someone is called a "pussy" because they're "cowardly", then no sexism is involved. The use of pussy to refer to cowards comes from a reference to feline cats, which typically run away when spooked and usually only fight when cornered. It's the same insult as calling someone a "fraidy cat". Because that insult doesn't reference women, it can't be sexist by definition.

Because "pussy" can refer to either a female body part or a common house cat, the sexism of a pussy insult depends on which one the particular insult is referring to.

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
220. Well, let's try the ol' "reverse the situation" test on it....
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:43 PM
Feb 2013

I recently referred to Harry Reid as "a putz." Some might go even further and refer to him as "a pussy."

So, let's say we were talking about Nancy Pelosi instead, and referring to her refusal to put impeachment on the table.

Obviously nobody's gonna call her a "pussy" for it. So we're not talking about pussycats. The question is, is there an equivalent term to describe a woman whom a person feels is lacking in spine? One which refers to male genitalia?

"Nancy Pelosi is a ________" ...

I don't think so.

Objection to the term is upheld IMO.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
229. very good, valid and logical response. hadnt even thought of it like that but a clear reason it is
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:54 PM
Feb 2013

used in the manner so many of us know it is used.

thank you

tavernier

(12,392 posts)
256. No. I consider the source.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:05 PM
Feb 2013

I've never had a real man use this word as an insult, so it's never been a problem. I've only heard it used on tv by some people who think they are comedians. Oddly, they are no longer on the air, but I suppose they open in a strip joint in the outskirts of some town that starts with the letter F.

jannyk

(4,810 posts)
265. No, but I'm English...
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:59 PM
Feb 2013

...there you will hear thousands crying "here puss, come on puss and where's my pussy.." into the dark. That's all it means to me - I use it frequently.

Sticks and Stones will break my bones but Names can never hurt me.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
266. Umm, it is an insult, it is meant to be offending,
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 11:49 PM
Feb 2013

Insults are meant to offend, demean, belittle and degrade people, that is their purpose. Trying to come up with proper PC insults is futile, since insults, by their very nature, are meant to be offending.

Your best bet is just try not to offend anybody. That is, after all, the civilized thing to do. Sadly, many people simply aren't.

Gemini Cat

(2,820 posts)
269. I don't view the word any more or any less sexist
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:36 AM
Feb 2013

Last edited Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:30 PM - Edit history (1)

than 'prick' or 'dick'. What's wrong with having either male or female genitals, and why would someone use any of these words as an insult?

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
276. Hmmm. Is a gendered insult that implies inferiority sexist? EDIT
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:14 AM
Feb 2013

I dunno.

edit:
Wow, I just read some of the other posts.

We've got a bunch of thickies around here.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
286. Incredible, isn't it? When the TOS was watered down, it set the stage for things to get worse.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:27 AM
Feb 2013

Now we have people swearing that false analogies ('what about 'dick'?) make all the sense in the world.

Sigh.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
303. seems to be the thing lately. i have seen a couple men say it and a couple on jury.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:32 PM
Feb 2013

but, ya... bigotry toward gender is pretty much it.

i really really really which administration would give us just this one little carrot. lol

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
304. Seems to be a lot of spurious defenses of word usage lately.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:38 PM
Feb 2013

On sexism, it's sad that we even had to ask admin to consider clarifying the TOS because of this bizarre insistence that those words don't cover it. It's unfortunate that our request fell on deaf ears.

sigmasix

(794 posts)
279. context
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:42 AM
Feb 2013

context is sometimes more important than the word when it comes to questions like this. Of course one of the contexts to consider is the larger society and history of the use of the word in specific ways. Complicating it further is the need to recognize humor and the use of the impact of the word in artistic statements and cultural critisism. The nice thing about words is the fact that they very rarely are responsible for immediate harm, as they are only marks on paper or sounds emerging from our face holes. my suspicion is that sexism has more to do with intention, than it does with sounds or arrangements of letters on paper.

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
280. Only a real 'dickhead' would even pose that question
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:45 AM
Feb 2013

Actually until now I hadn't ever considered it ('pussy') sexist but it could certainly be construed as such. My choice of reply title would be an example of insulting someone with the use of a displaced and creatively re-located "male member" as the key descriptive term. Hadn't considered that term sexist either, but I suppose it would work both ways.

lbrtbell

(2,389 posts)
282. Who cares?
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 05:13 AM
Feb 2013

If someone were to call me a pussy, there's far more for me to worry about than whether it's sexist. (And I say this, as a woman.) For instance....

Am I being pressured into doing something stupidly dangerous? Will I cave in to that pressure, risking injuring myself?

Or is the person calling me this doing so in a threatening manner? Do I need to engage in self-defense?

Other things to consider...is it sexist against men if someone uses insults such as d*ck (like Cheney), pr*ck, d*ckhead, get some cajones, nut up, ball up, pretend you have some balls, d*ckhead, or whatever?

In short, it isn't about sexism. It's about the age-old practice of using vulgar words as insults. Sh*thead, p*ssface, sh*t for brains, etc.

Where sexism is concerned, I worry a lot more about things that actually matter, such as attitudes toward rape, pay inequality, and reproductive rights.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
283. Of course. Every time it is used to insult an individual, it also insults every woman, everywhere.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:50 AM
Feb 2013

Recommend.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
290. it does not bother me either. but, i get that it is sexist. i get that it is used to denigrate
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:44 AM
Feb 2013

women. and i get that allowing any sexism on du just allows a whole lot of sexism on du.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
297. True, plus I believe in common courtesy.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 01:55 PM
Feb 2013

Since it came to my attention that some people are offended by it, I choose not to use it, regardless of my personal feelings.

Response to redqueen (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When the word 'pussy' is ...