General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen the word 'pussy' is used an insult, do you perceive it as sexist?
I do.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)It is generally used to define someone as being wimpy, less able, etc...
Which are not typically considered to be descriptive of cats. Especially those in storybooks.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 14, 2013, 10:04 PM - Edit history (1)
the Popular Great Depression Era song My Girl's Pussy
"The double entendre has been used for over a hundred years by performers, including the late-19th-century vaudeville act the Barrison Sisters, who performed the notorious routine 'Do You Want To See My Pussy?'"
notice the cats in their aprons.
"In their most famous act, the sisters would dance, raising their skirts slightly above their knees, and ask the audience, "Would you like to see my pussy?" When they had coaxed the audience into an enthusiastic response, they would raise up their skirts, revealing that each sister was wearing underwear of their own manufacture that had a live kitten secured over the crotch"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrison_sisters
MissMarple
(9,656 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)demmiblue
(36,865 posts)yardwork
(61,650 posts)Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)so while I don't think pussies are negative...I react to the intended insult.
joeunderdog
(2,563 posts)That's quite a challenge.
I guess I'm just gonna have to dig deeper into my bag of insults while I'm on DU.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Response to redqueen (Original post)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Response to redqueen (Reply #18)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Do you really see what youre saying here?
Response to bunnies (Reply #40)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Ted Nugent has absolutely NOTHING in common with mine!
Response to bunnies (Reply #68)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
though he *does* have cat scratch fever.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Because woman are gutless and weak and men who are gutless and weak are effeminate, like women, Brave men have balls, womanly men are pussies.
Got it.
Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #141)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)Response to yardwork (Reply #151)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #168)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I like your responses though. Well done.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)2pus·sy
noun \ˈpu̇-sē\
pluralpus·sies
Definition of PUSSY
1
usually vulgar: vulva
2
a usually vulgar: sexual intercourse
b usually vulgar: the female partner in sexual intercourse
Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #251)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Welcome to earth!
Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #259)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)So the argument doesn't work in reverse.
Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #261)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Insisting that I am the problem....not the definition that you disagree with.
Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #268)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)along with their children by our government, in my name, eg. When I think of that, and their pleas to us here to try to stop the carnage, a mere word doesn't even get on my radar screen frankly.
I wish we all that luxury, to spend endless hours and days on one word. But I do use the opportunity to try to draw attention to the actual problems women face in today's world every chance I get. And oddly enough, those claiming to care about women, rarely seem to care about these issues I have raised and often accuse ME of trying to distract from the huge problem of a single word. I otoh, believe this focus on words is meant to distract from the real issues facing women today.
How many threads is this on this one word and how much has this done for women anywhere? My guess is, nothing, not a thing, and maybe that's the goal, to make women look petty.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)And, as a bonus, 20 recommendations make it possible for everyone to see that, no doubt, we place more importance on word usage than about what authoritarian (*cough, cough*) laws the Republican men are ramming through legislatures against us.
How necessary was this OP? It's as productive as flame bait.
And irritating.
donheld
(21,311 posts)I'll bet you knew that. I hope you care.
Response to donheld (Reply #278)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I'll be fine, but thanks.
I used to think it was no big deal myself, but I've changed my mind about a lot of things related to feminist issues over the years.
Response to redqueen (Reply #44)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
RC
(25,592 posts)Mail Message
At Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:02 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
I didn't want to annoy you
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2374829
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Used a sexist term, in a thread where many say it is a sexist term, to make a point.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:06 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Not a sexiest term when used like this.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Isn't this a thread about that very word? If you don't want to discuss the word don't start a thread about it. Let's be clear, I'm so not a fan of devilgrrl I find her to be extremely rude to just about everyone, but in this case, she's discussing the word the thread is about. Don't start a thread if you only want to hear your point of view. I say leave it.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Oh, for crying out loud already. Keep this meta crap in Meta. Expressing no opinion on the alerted reply. If you're going to play around in (or read) a thread like this one, you shouldn't be surprised by what you find there.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: OFFS! What WAS the subject of this OP???
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
I was Juror #1.
BTY, there is nothing sexy about Ted Nugent.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)The poster was only trying to answer the OP's question. A lock really would have chilled the discussion. I'm glad you and 4 others saw it that way.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I can see how someone might interpret the repeated use of the slur in this tautology as being insensitive.
Response to redqueen (Reply #99)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Since you responded to me, allow me to post my reply to your OP here. No, when the word is used as an insult, I do not think of it as sexist. But I also understand that even if I don't think of it as being sexist, everyone else's results may differ. For what it's worth, I don't think of genetailia, or sex, or anything along those lines when I hear invective being hurled with words like "pussy", "dick(head)", all the variants of "fucker", etc.
thanks.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)so that may well have been the real impetus for the alert... I'm not asserting above, just speculating.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)we (as in someone) does not agree with her and it is exactly what you say.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)so they could have it hidden.
It's pure flame bait.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)came in and said it was not a sexist term. so putting the question out to a larger number of people.
and the vast majority clearly see it as a sexist term.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I find your incessant outrage to be boring.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)without any knowledge what so ever.
ya, right.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Go bother someone else.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)and you have the making of one fine person.
You stay classy and have a nice day.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and my post hidden. hence, me editing. i know how you do things. i gotta be careful as you accuse, yet....
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)to describe when a person is being afraid. What is it? Hmmm, it's on the tip of my tongue....
Please, don't stop. Whatever you do. Do. Not. Stop! This is priceless!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)oh wait, you cant. it is a chicken shit arguing style.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I'll bet you're a real hit at parties.
Do you even KNOW why you are outraged right now? Do you even REMEMBER why you responded to me in the first place?
Hint: me observing your perpetual outrage isn't it. But you've made this about you anyway. Nice job!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)funny cuz it's true.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Response to RC (Reply #65)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)lol
Response to seabeyond (Reply #132)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)And seabeyond, and redqueen - and a bunch of rabble rousing women at DU. And this thread cracks me up.
Especially how seabeyond handles herself. She's awesome!
Okay - enough of this mutual admiration society - back to discussing the pword.
Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #308)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)something they can alert on.
RC
(25,592 posts)This OP really belongs in META and not here. You can bet the OP has been inoculated right up front, too.
You also gotta know if we tried something like this, our OP would have been hidden or locked
Response to arely staircase (Reply #192)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)It's the fault of the person who 'makes them do it', amirite?
Gee, that special kind of 'logic' sure is familiar.
I wonder where I've heard that kind of effort to blame someone else for one's unacceptable actions before...
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)apologists?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)how they 'know how to push buttons'... remember that one?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)my brother i just mentioned. years ago, i told him i would not be hangin' with him when he drank, ever again. we all are expected to walked on egg shells.
he agreed. we should.
i told him... fuck that.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
redqueen
(115,103 posts)It's a real shame people try to shift blame like that. You ought to consider not doing it.
The purpose of this thread was to get an idea of how many DUers actually think the insult isn't misogynist. As it turns out, most see it as being misogynist.
I am not surprised at all, this being a progressive board.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)and use references to Obama quotes in nonsensical ways?
I think you've got that covered.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)Response to Sekhmets Daughter (Reply #181)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)"devilgrrl" to call someone a wimp, or coward? I'll make a note of it right now
Response to Sekhmets Daughter (Reply #189)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)Response to Sekhmets Daughter (Reply #195)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
Warpy
(111,277 posts)Calling them slang for a female body part insults every woman present.
Response to Warpy (Reply #133)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)but it makes sense. and i loved the word. so i just say coward now.
Warpy
(111,277 posts)"gutless puke" will work for me.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Orrex
(63,216 posts)I first heard the term "wuss" in summer of 1984, and at that time an unimpeachable authority indicated that it refers to the male urethra.
The authority in question was none other than my then 13-year-old friend Ted. You're not calling Ted a liar, are you?
Well, are you?
Unfortunately, I haven't found any online etymology to back up his interpretation, so it's possible that the entire internet is wrong.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)LeftinOH
(5,354 posts)(from Wikipedia)
The meaning "weak or cowardly person" has a separate etymology. Websters 1913 Revised Unabridged Dictionary lists this version of pussy as an alternate spelling of "pursy", an otherwise obsolete English word meaning "fat and short-breathed; fat, short, and thick; swelled with pampering ..."[1] The interpretation is often misconstrued, as it contains multiple meanings which some consider derogatory.[2] In fact, when pussy appears in the earlier 1828 edition of the dictionary, this definition is presented for the word, while the older pursy is simply offered as a "corrupt orthography".
Pursy (pronounced with a short u, and with the r slurred or silent) was in turn derived from an Old French word variously spelled pourcif, poulsif, poussif, meaning "to push, thrust, or heave". In this sense, it is cognate with the modern French verb pousser, also meaning "to push".
The word pussy can also be used in a derogatory sense to refer to a male who is not considered sufficiently masculine (see Gender role). When used in this sense, it carries the implication of being easily fatigued, weak or cowardly.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)this thread is about feeeeliingssss... please take your facts elsewhere, they dampen the outrage.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts)I'm a sick man.
RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)with women looking for a "Woody". The man that wrote that ad must be very OLD besides.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)that at a sporting event.
I'm guessing the name was picked before the truckers had cb's.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)A gamecock is a fighting cock. You know, that "sport" that Oklahoma refuses to outlaw, because they are still being dragged kicking and screaming into the latter part of the 19th century.
Some guy from South Carolina told me about a football game between the Gamecocks and the Trojans. I bet announcing that was fun.
"The Trojans are taking a wraparound offense"
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)Maybe you should have made this a poll.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Response to redqueen (Original post)
hotcheese Message auto-removed
bigtree
(85,998 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)There has been an increasing level of hate and vitriol, directly proportional to the increase in feminist activism online. It's to be expected, really.
EastKYLiberal
(429 posts)I refrain from using it.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)d_r
(6,907 posts)I didn't think about it being sexist but it was explained to me on du. i believe if something bothers people dont do it. so i learned.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)It's a false etymology based on the words having a similar sound.
Melinda
(5,465 posts)I guess I'm a bit surprised that you'd even have to ask this on this site... and so, it's official nothing here should surprise me anymore. I haz a sad now.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Although, it does depend on context.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)like dick and prick, etc.
The c-word and the b-word on the other hand carry some hatred, imo, so they are different.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)To me, the use of this word as an insult insults all women.
I do not see the word as analogous to 'dick' or 'prick' due to the lack of the institutional and social oppression of males for being male.
SpartanDem
(4,533 posts)I guess for me it's digging way too deep I don't think there anything seriously wrong with any of those terms male or female.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)I actually considered posting a copycat thread along those lines but decided against it.
In addition to what you correctly note about the lack of institutional oppression of males, the terms "dick" and "prick" don't really address (i.e., diminish) the subject's masculinity in the way that "pussy" is intended to do. The terms identify the subject as a jerk but leave his manhood untouched, so to speak.
Granted, they are terms seldom applied to women, but even so they don't even imply that "jerkiness" is an inherently male trait; they're simply saying "you're a male and you're a jerk."
In short, anyone who tries to draw an equivalence of sexism between "pussy" and "dick" is full of crap, which is an admirably gender-neutral state of mind, I should think.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Thank you
Orrex
(63,216 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i have not been able to say it in a way that is understood.
also, dick being a part of the male anatomy and something men absolutely love. and when a male body part is given to a woman then it is a compliment. she gots some balls.
not the same at all.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)Who knows how long it might last?!?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)without even knowing what i said.
awesome.... ness
Orrex
(63,216 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I'm assuming you mean as directed at a man or boy as an insult (calling him weak). To me, calling a male a female as an insult is clearly sexist.
Ohio Joe
(21,758 posts)Nay
(12,051 posts)Response to redqueen (Original post)
Lint Head This message was self-deleted by its author.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)however since there are both men and women who disagree, and I would rather they entered the thread without already being put on the defensive, I decided to word the question diplomatically.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)A kid my son used to train with simply cut to the chase: If he wanted to accuse a guy of being weak and spineless, he simply accused him of having a vagina. It was a big eyebrow raiser to hear that for the first time, but I had to give him credit for being honest in his blatant sexism. He was only 17 years old, but he respected my request that he not say that anymore.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)but that still does not mean I will use the word casually, since many do consider it offensive. There are plenty of other words that work as well.
retread
(3,762 posts)appropriate
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)I always thought it referred to felines because they are easy to spook and very cautious when in unfamiliar circumstances. I don't know when that word came to mean female genitalia, but I never took that term to refer to women in that context. Maybe I'm just uninformed.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)However as a term to refer to a woman's vulva - I think it's cute
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Response to redqueen (Reply #52)
Downs Message auto-removed
OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Which seems obvious to me.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Drale
(7,932 posts)but the way I always looked at it was the it means your skittish like a cat. Most cat's will run away from a fight unless they really think they can win.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)The only exception is in double entendres (and one very old children's story).
For that reason I have never understood how it could possibly refer to cats.
Drale
(7,932 posts)as in pussycat.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)are older, like over 70, and foreign.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)When my aunt was quite old, a stray adopted her and since it wasn't really hers, she just called it "Pussy". Her very genteel neighbors were mortified. They insisted she was calling it "Posie" because she was getting dotty (with AZ) and she was constantly talking about that cat- about loving, wanting, needing that cat all the time. That was hilarious.
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)and the etymology's better anyway, for you truly are accusing someone of having a "small mind or spirit."
Absolutely it is.
hack89
(39,171 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Same as for calling someone a dick.
BTW, I don't use either of those words. Just pointing out how I perceive them and how I think they are perceived by most people.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I perceive it as misogynistic. (Sexism and misogyny aren't the same thing and the words aren't interchangeable.)
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)That distinction is something I'd like to see become more widely understood. Unfortunately most people seem to think sexism is just a less serious form of misogyny, and actually get upset at things they consider 'petty' being called misogyny.
Sigh.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)That and another word.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)Because it is.
meanit
(455 posts)to being like a "pussy willow". Soft, inoffensive and harmless.
But that's just me. lol
But I do realize the vulgar text in which it is usually meant.
War Horse
(931 posts)But I don't automatically assume that the person using said insult is a sexist.
In the circles I travel in the term pussy refers to be being scared, like a scaredy cat. If you want to refer to a fellow by a woman's genitalia, the c word is used. This is coming from a fellow who grew up in some not so savory bars.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)But yes, also sexist.
procon
(15,805 posts)maybe you other issues about women that are even more inappropriate.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)we try to get her kicked off for her rampant misogyny, but the administration holds firm, allowing her to stay. lol
oh, and welcome to du.
edit... never mind the welcome. i see you have been here for years. lol
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)petronius
(26,602 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)protect our future
(1,156 posts)But then, I don't look for sexism around every corner and everywhere else as well.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)"Get a load of that guy! What a Manx!"
protect our future
(1,156 posts)term interchangeably with "wus."
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Very much so. I don't allow it in my classroom either. It's a bigoted slur.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)It is high passed time that we do not have to say this again. It is not like this is not known. I am assuming, of course, that it has cropped up once again while I was away and we had to go through another crop of nasty posts where we had to go through all the reasons we don't like it and hear all the reasons they only mean it in fun and how it should not bother us. If not then I am just torqued at the moment over something else and I should just say YES, it is a sexist insult and I am done defending my reasons determining that a part of my body need not be used as an insult to someone else.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)MuseRider
(34,111 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Absolutely yes. And I'd hazard that anyone thinking otherwise is either being disingenuous (whether they realize it or not), or else merely an idiot let loose from a village.
dairydog91
(951 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)You are taking a gender's perceived problems and boiling them down to a body part. Sexist.
Of course calling someone a Dick is probably less bad as Dicks, as it turns out, have quite a lot of power in our society.
Bryant
redqueen
(115,103 posts)based solely on one's sex makes all the difference in the world.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)Response to redqueen (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Bloviating Shitwit.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)It's a bit long, but it covers all the bases
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)of the spot on the venn odor diagram where perpetually bland meets rotting garbage, tiresome repulsive repetitive humorless flogger of ridiculous gibberish"
...We're still talking about Ted Nugent, now, right?
Apophis
(1,407 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I know that seems like an obvious statement, but I think its important when we discuss the appropriateness of ANY term that is used as an "insult".
Let's all STEP BACK.
Let's imagine that I really really want to INSULT you.
I've already decided that I'm going to INSULT you. I just need to decide HOW.
And so, I pick the word, or phrase, that I think will upset YOU the most. In other words, the word used is not important, except to the extent that it angers the target.
A Homophobe hates to be called GAY.
A right wing tough guy will hate to be called a PUSSY.
I'm not saying it a great idea to use these terms, its not ... but ... I do think some use them specifically because they know the target will be angered.
Which is usually the POINT of an insult.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)If your goal is to insult a specific person, you select the term that will anger that person the most.
Sexist, Homophobic, racist, so on.
Now, we could discuss whether its nice to INSULT people.
But my point is more simple ... once you decide to be insulting, you intentionally select the term that will anger your target the most.
btw ... I do not generally support being insulting.
apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
At Tue Feb 12, 2013, 03:59 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Yup - he ain't on our side
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=397382
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
"pussies" is sexist language that should not be allowed at DU. Please hide; we may have debates about certain words here but I think this one should be pretty clear cut.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 12, 2013, 04:07 PM, and the Jury voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Broad brushing any religious organization is also unacceptable.
Also, agree with the alerter. 'Pussies' is just a dumbass thing to call anything but a cat.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: The entire post is peppered with bigotry.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This one was tough. I resorted to checking the Community standards before I opted to vote to Leave It Alone. "Should not be allowed," is different than "Shall not be allowed." If the admins wish to ban sexist language, I hope they will update the community standards to remove any doubt.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'm reluctant to hide (because truth is a defense, to some extent) but the language does need some cleanup. Poster is relatively new and may be unaware of DU's norms.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
So there you have my position on the matter.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)lynne
(3,118 posts)- both are insults but I don't feel that either is particularly sexist.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)One can call a woman a dick and a man a pussy.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)lol.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Pussy? I've never considered it in the context of being insulting using it as a woman's body part. And you can laugh and scoff at that all you like.
Authoritarian, black and white thinkers - have difficulty understanding abstract or creative concepts and may be suspicious of people who think unconventionally. Authoritarian types often expect too much from others and may use deceitful tactics or aggressive behavior to get what they want.
According to Adorno's theory, the elements of the Authoritarian personality type are:
Blind allegiance to conventional beliefs about right and wrong
Respect for submission to acknowledged authority
Belief in aggression toward those who do not subscribe to conventional thinking, or who are different
A negative view of people in general - i.e. the belief that people would all lie, cheat or steal if given the opportunity
A need for strong leadership which displays uncompromising power
A belief in simple answers and polemics - i.e. The media controls us all or The source of all our problems is the loss of morals these days.
Resistance to creative, dangerous ideas. A black and white worldview.
A tendency to project one's own feelings of inadequacy, rage and fear onto a scapegoated group
A preoccupation with violence and sex.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)for someone considered weak or ineffectual is not the sign of someone who understands " abstract or creative concepts". It's the sign of someone who can't express themselves above the level of a 14 year old.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I don't insist my opinion of the word is the right one and insult people for not seeing it my way. It's that head-clubbing thing until you get it right! ... it just doesn't work on me.
Sorta like *toilet. I found that completely disgusting, debasing and horrible. Others found it perfectly acceptable. Life is fucking strange sometimes, no??
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 14, 2013, 09:07 PM - Edit history (1)
No, just really scratching my head at being insulted over my opinion on what I see as a harmless word ........ vs. your own support for the word *toilet. Which was allowed to remain. Care to address that?
The OP asked a question. I stated my opinion, which was simply, no. Who's carrying the grudge, hmmmmmm?????
But, if you're accusing anyone of 'pettiness', you should probably ask yourself why anyone would troll a protected forum for personal, sensitive information to pass around in pm's to hurt and slander that person because you didn't get your way on something. Ick.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I made a sarcastic reply, because I am aware of your opinion on this issue due to reading your posts on the issue in the past.
I did intend to be sarcastic, I didn't intend to be insulting. I'm sorry.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)Sounds like she's not happy about people remembering some very embarrassing, inconvenient history, so I can understand the attempt to dismiss those with more than one brain cell of memory as holding a......grudge!1!
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I'm not opposed to the word itself. When used as slang for vulva I like it. It is when it is used as an insult that I find it offensive.
As for that other word, yes, it is horrible, disgusting, foul, etc. It originated in the context of prostitution and porn. I did not use it as an insult. I used it thusly: 'men who do x view women as b******'. In that statement, am i calling women 'b******'? No.
It is logical to disagree with the premise, and say that no, men who do x are not viewing women as 'b*****'... It is not logical to pretend that *I* think of women that way.
The fact that people are more outraged about that singular use of the word than thoughtful about its actual meaning (in porn and prostitution) speaks volumes.
It is the producers of porn and the customers of prostitutes who coined that term. To direct outrage at the feminist who used it to make a point about the widespread objectification of women is the height of hypocrisy.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I think *toilet is one of the most disgusting, sickening terms I've ever heard ........ in ANY context. As did others. You were asked not to use it, instead ..... you still defend it. You laughed at me for being offended over it and insulted others for being the naughty word police. I posted a simple 'no' to your question here and got your typical insulting reply. Ironic, no??
redqueen
(115,103 posts)What is actually ironic is that you do defend slurs which most feminists find misogynist, but you're still attacking me for simply using the word in a non insulting way.
And I haven't used it since. Unlike others, who feign outrage over it.
Again... attacking the feminist, ignoring the origin. Telling. So telling.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Yeah ......... us naughty word police / six year olds just learning a new swear word. If you had any sensitivity toward women - feminists or not, you'd have apologized for it. Instead you chose to be insulting and STILL try your hardest to insinuate there's something wrong with those of us who objected to it. Yes, it is telling. Me, not falling over in a fucking faint over a word I've always likened to a scaredy cat, vs. you, the only person on this board to ever use and defend to the death a filthy degrading term. Very, very telling.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)For daring to expose their precious eyes to a word they had managed to avoid, by not bothering to read much at all about the incredibly abusive, multi billion dollar porn industry?
Not a chance.
Do you think feminists who object to the word 'bitch' as an insult are also "falling over in a fucking faint over a word"?
polly7
(20,582 posts)Put up or shut up.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I would echo your "put up or shut up" grade-school crap, but your stubborn insistence on avoiding logic means I'll be bowing out.
Feel free to answer the question re: 'bitch' if you care to demonstrate a willingness to participate in an intellectually honest discussion.
Response to redqueen (Reply #179)
polly7 This message was self-deleted by its author.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)some snide remarks about her voice or political views, or whatever other bullshit... my being offended at the laughing and joking about the idea that it is perfectly acceptable for men to reduce women to objects to be fucked... If that's the kind of relationships you're referring to, then I fucking sure do have a horrible view of them.
I do think men who watch porn or buy sex think of women that way. Laugh all you want, apparently you're not overly concerned about objectification, so party on.
As for your view on the word 'bitch', I don't recall, but just as with this word, due to your minimization of issues you don't personally consider important, it wouldn't surprise me if you did take the 'shut up, word police' side in the past. I don't remember if you had, or I wouldnt have asked.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I don't see joking about wanting to have sex with someone as reducing that person to something filthy. Juvenile, crass ... yep. Filthy *toilets? No.
WTF are you talking about 'laugh all you like'? I've never discussed porn with you, but I believe grown, consenting adults have every right to do as they choose.
What issues have you seen me not consider important?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)than any other insulting words. It's one of those words that should be filed under "Nugent talk",like "that's gay" or "lardass". It's not authoritarian to expect people to be able to post without using language that sound like schoolyard taunts.
polly7
(20,582 posts)A question was asked, I responded. I've honestly always taken it as a comparison to a scaredy cat and never even use it myself, but understand where others are coming from. Isn't it great we can all express our own honest opinion and not get slammed for it? Oh wait ....
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Scout
(8,624 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I also think it's sexist when "dick, prick, etc" are used as insult. The implication that femaleness OR maleness are negative things is sexist.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)so not quite the same. though from here on out i will be hiding dicks and certainly pricks cause the men on du are offended.
qazplm
(3,626 posts)rush to say d*cks/Pr*cks really isn't the same.
Ok, it's not equivalent, it's still not good, and it's still attacking based on gender.
Why not just say, yes, you are right, we shouldn't be using male body parts to insult either. Let's just avoid using any gender-based body parts as an insult/slur.
Instead, what we get are a kind of mocking, derisive not really a big deal response.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)uses on another man. i do nto often hear women use the terms.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I just try to be consistent on the literal specifics. It's one of the only ways to come close to convincing some.
Warpy
(111,277 posts)and I take it that way. It's offensive.
Response to redqueen (Original post)
Post removed
Small Accumulates
(149 posts)Squinch
(50,955 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)equally against both sexes? Only asking cuz I call both men and women 'dicks'. I don't use the 'p' word except sometimes when I'm calling my cat. Yes, I actually call my cat that, sometimes I also call him 'cat' and occasionally by his name.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Weakness
The meaning "weak or cowardly person" has a separate etymology. Websters 1913 Revised Unabridged Dictionary lists this version of pussy as an alternate spelling of "pursy", an otherwise obsolete English word meaning "fat and short-breathed; fat, short, and thick; swelled with pampering ..."[1] The interpretation is often misconstrued, as it contains multiple meanings which some consider derogatory.[2] In fact, when pussy appears in the earlier 1828 edition of the dictionary, this definition is presented for the word, while the older pursy is simply offered as a "corrupt orthography".
Pursy (pronounced with a short u, and with the r slurred or silent) was in turn derived from an Old French word variously spelled pourcif, poulsif, poussif, meaning "to push, thrust, or heave". In this sense, it is cognate with the modern French verb pousser, also meaning "to push".
The word pussy can also be used in a derogatory sense to refer to a male who is not considered sufficiently masculine (see Gender role). When used in this sense, it carries the implication of being easily fatigued, weak or cowardly.
Men dominated by women (particularly their partners or spouses and at one time referred to as 'Hen-pecked') can be referred to as pussy-whipped (or simply whipped in slightly more polite society or media).
It's from wiki, but it sounds authentic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pussy
whistler162
(11,155 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)so I do not use the term anymore
redqueen
(115,103 posts)men on the basis of their sex, I still don't use male body parts as insults.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)It's a generic insult, a synonym for coward. When you hear someone called a dick or a dickhead do you perceive it as sexist? I'll bet not. And you shouldn't because it isn't.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)We should not use the body parts of either sex as insults.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I am curious though to know your thoughts re: the ideas in post 92.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Nothing wrong with using a d*uche or having a penis or an anus (a**hole), it is what it is. Sexual/excretory organs and sexual/excretory behaviors will be used as insults for whatever reason.
gateley
(62,683 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I use "wuss" or "wimp" in the context in which that word is ordinarily used.
I feel a compulsion to give you the wrong answer just on principle, but if I'm honest, my avoidance of the word must suggest that I take offense at it.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 15, 2013, 02:18 AM - Edit history (1)
of the person who uses it just as much as "faggot", "retard", and even "n****r. But then haters gotta hate, apparently, and DU doesn't always call them on their bullshit.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)that is the same as calling him a n***er?
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)There are many other extremely nasty things I can call someone without descending into racism, sexism and homophobia. Why should I be an ass with my words when a different word will convey exactly the same disdain without causing anyone to feel insulted? Why would I choose to be deliberately rude to my friends on the left?
Ohio Joe
(21,758 posts)Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)And its a shame so many people can't (or more likely don't want to) refrain from being bigots. But this is still my favorite spot on the intertubes.....
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)i have never perceived it as homophobic. feminists have a bit more of an argument that it is sexist. i have always thought of it as synonymous with coward. if a homophobe wants to insult a gay person he/she is not going to use "pussy." They are going to go straight for a version of f****t, which i do feel is akin to n****r.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)my middle school principal's son kneed me between classes and called me one. To me, its not cool. I can understand that you don't share my history-I'm just saying I personally find it offensive.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)though never specifically kneed and called that word. i can tell you this. i have never heard skinheads yell "pussy" while unfortunately i have heard "faggots" and "dykes" hurled at me and my friends. never experienced violence, but harrassed going into clubs in the early 90s, yes. i had friends who were once assaulted near same houston clubs.
but yes, to a large extent, what words mean to one may be different than to others based on your experience. your principal's son didn't become a houston skinhead in around 91-94, did he?
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)in small town Mississippi.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)in a good way.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)"pussy" is specifically used against men, i think the feminist critique of it has some validity. but it is not a "slur" against women per se. bitch and c*** are slurs against women. i have never heard the latter used against a man to imply he is feminine, and i have only heard gay men called bitch by other gay men.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)Algebra Palin
(34 posts)i think it's a bastardisation of pursy.
meh. most people say, bitch, anyway.
Sienna86
(2,149 posts)s-cubed
(1,385 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)I'm a woman but I don't take that word as anything that has anything to do with me as a person or as a woman. It's an ugly word that's tasteless and cutting. But I don't get too incensed by it because I guess I'm fresh out of outrage. I am so tired of being mad and a victim, so I'm choosing not to see myself that way for once.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)edbermac
(15,941 posts)trublu992
(489 posts)Whats weak about female genitalia?
Response to redqueen (Original post)
seaglass This message was self-deleted by its author.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Pussy is one of those funny words that is "acceptable" or "unacceptable" depending on how it's used. Pussy has multiple origins, some of which are offensive, and some aren't.
If you call someone a "pussy" meaning "weakling", then it's sexist. The use of "pussy" to describe a weakling comes from the same source as calling a man a "woman" or a "little girl". It suggests that women are inferior and, by proxy, that men who are similar to women are inferior. It's a term that demeans women and is sexist.
If someone is called a "pussy" because they're "cowardly", then no sexism is involved. The use of pussy to refer to cowards comes from a reference to feline cats, which typically run away when spooked and usually only fight when cornered. It's the same insult as calling someone a "fraidy cat". Because that insult doesn't reference women, it can't be sexist by definition.
Because "pussy" can refer to either a female body part or a common house cat, the sexism of a pussy insult depends on which one the particular insult is referring to.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)I recently referred to Harry Reid as "a putz." Some might go even further and refer to him as "a pussy."
So, let's say we were talking about Nancy Pelosi instead, and referring to her refusal to put impeachment on the table.
Obviously nobody's gonna call her a "pussy" for it. So we're not talking about pussycats. The question is, is there an equivalent term to describe a woman whom a person feels is lacking in spine? One which refers to male genitalia?
"Nancy Pelosi is a ________" ...
I don't think so.
Objection to the term is upheld IMO.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)used in the manner so many of us know it is used.
thank you
quinnox
(20,600 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Context is all, of course.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)ChazII
(6,205 posts)It is sad when even 3rd graders go into a laughing hysteria when ever they hear the word.
tavernier
(12,392 posts)I've never had a real man use this word as an insult, so it's never been a problem. I've only heard it used on tv by some people who think they are comedians. Oddly, they are no longer on the air, but I suppose they open in a strip joint in the outskirts of some town that starts with the letter F.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)jannyk
(4,810 posts)...there you will hear thousands crying "here puss, come on puss and where's my pussy.." into the dark. That's all it means to me - I use it frequently.
Sticks and Stones will break my bones but Names can never hurt me.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)Insults are meant to offend, demean, belittle and degrade people, that is their purpose. Trying to come up with proper PC insults is futile, since insults, by their very nature, are meant to be offending.
Your best bet is just try not to offend anybody. That is, after all, the civilized thing to do. Sadly, many people simply aren't.
Gemini Cat
(2,820 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:30 PM - Edit history (1)
than 'prick' or 'dick'. What's wrong with having either male or female genitals, and why would someone use any of these words as an insult?
easttexaslefty
(1,554 posts)a dick, sexist. Rude maybe.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)I dunno.
edit:
Wow, I just read some of the other posts.
We've got a bunch of thickies around here.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Now we have people swearing that false analogies ('what about 'dick'?) make all the sense in the world.
Sigh.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)but, ya... bigotry toward gender is pretty much it.
i really really really which administration would give us just this one little carrot. lol
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)On sexism, it's sad that we even had to ask admin to consider clarifying the TOS because of this bizarre insistence that those words don't cover it. It's unfortunate that our request fell on deaf ears.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)sigmasix
(794 posts)context is sometimes more important than the word when it comes to questions like this. Of course one of the contexts to consider is the larger society and history of the use of the word in specific ways. Complicating it further is the need to recognize humor and the use of the impact of the word in artistic statements and cultural critisism. The nice thing about words is the fact that they very rarely are responsible for immediate harm, as they are only marks on paper or sounds emerging from our face holes. my suspicion is that sexism has more to do with intention, than it does with sounds or arrangements of letters on paper.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)Actually until now I hadn't ever considered it ('pussy') sexist but it could certainly be construed as such. My choice of reply title would be an example of insulting someone with the use of a displaced and creatively re-located "male member" as the key descriptive term. Hadn't considered that term sexist either, but I suppose it would work both ways.
lbrtbell
(2,389 posts)If someone were to call me a pussy, there's far more for me to worry about than whether it's sexist. (And I say this, as a woman.) For instance....
Am I being pressured into doing something stupidly dangerous? Will I cave in to that pressure, risking injuring myself?
Or is the person calling me this doing so in a threatening manner? Do I need to engage in self-defense?
Other things to consider...is it sexist against men if someone uses insults such as d*ck (like Cheney), pr*ck, d*ckhead, get some cajones, nut up, ball up, pretend you have some balls, d*ckhead, or whatever?
In short, it isn't about sexism. It's about the age-old practice of using vulgar words as insults. Sh*thead, p*ssface, sh*t for brains, etc.
Where sexism is concerned, I worry a lot more about things that actually matter, such as attitudes toward rape, pay inequality, and reproductive rights.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Recommend.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)But the B word doesn't bother me, go figure.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)women. and i get that allowing any sexism on du just allows a whole lot of sexism on du.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Since it came to my attention that some people are offended by it, I choose not to use it, regardless of my personal feelings.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)Even the way the Brits use them.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)And heterosexist when directed toward a male.
Response to redqueen (Original post)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.