Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(19,274 posts)
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 02:37 PM Feb 2013

Colorado ammo magazine maker Magpul threatens to leave state over gun bill

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22593693/colorado-ammo-magazine-maker-threatens-leave-state-over

Colorado's largest and most profitable manufacturer of high-capacity ammunition magazines has vowed to leave the state if lawmakers pass a measure banning the devices — a move officials with the company say could cost hundreds of jobs and upward of $85 million in potential spending this year.

Magpul's threat has Democratic lawmakers scrambling to strike a balance that remains true to their goal of limiting the number of rounds a magazine can hold without frightening off businesses.

"If we're able to stay in Colorado and manufacture a product, but law-abiding citizens of the state were unable to purchase the product, customers around the state and the nation would boycott us for remaining here," said Doug Smith


This will be interesting to watch over the next few weeks.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Colorado ammo magazine maker Magpul threatens to leave state over gun bill (Original Post) NickB79 Feb 2013 OP
Texas would welcome them with open arms badtoworse Feb 2013 #1
As a Coloradoan ... you can have 'em. earthside Feb 2013 #2
like Somalia BainsBane Feb 2013 #5
Let them leave Politicalboi Feb 2013 #3
I'll bet they're bluffing. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #4
good. now if we could just get him to lshut down completely...... bowens43 Feb 2013 #6
The red states and their gun toting/accumulators will welcome them. Hoyt Feb 2013 #7
Boo-fucking-hoo. I'm really getting tired of all of these whiny-pissy pants meadowlark5 Feb 2013 #8
Is Magpul a union shop. Light House Feb 2013 #9
Who said they wanted anyone to lose their jobs? Kingofalldems Feb 2013 #12
Duh, the state itself is considering BANNING the company's product. Bake Feb 2013 #20
If someone is making a harmful product Kingofalldems Feb 2013 #24
I'm not telling you what you care about. Bake Feb 2013 #29
Such Concern!!! HangOnKids Feb 2013 #22
It is VERY unlikely Magpul is Union donheld Feb 2013 #42
What they should do is halt sales to PD's in states that have (or enact), "assault weapons" bans, SayWut Feb 2013 #10
There is a growing movement of just this idea SQUEE Feb 2013 #28
Good Duckhunter935 Feb 2013 #31
Don't let the door hit ya where the Lord split ya. Hard Assets Feb 2013 #11
So you're ok with these people losing their jobs? Light House Feb 2013 #14
If the gunmaker cannot learn to live with the law, Hard Assets Feb 2013 #19
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #39
I live in the neighborhood of their production facility. Yeah, they can go. politicat Feb 2013 #34
You're okay with corporations trying to affect public policy by threats? IveWornAHundredPants Feb 2013 #35
Answer a question with a question. Light House Feb 2013 #36
Sorry, thought that was obvious. IveWornAHundredPants Feb 2013 #37
I'm ok with a company looking out for it's best interest Light House Feb 2013 #38
Be sure and say the same thing to the employees who lose their jobs over it. Bake Feb 2013 #21
If they had real cohones they would leave over the proposal. iiibbb Feb 2013 #13
What they should also do Light House Feb 2013 #16
adaptation iiibbb Feb 2013 #18
Please remember to turn off the lights and to pay the pro-rated fraction of all your CO tax HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #15
So long Autumn Feb 2013 #17
I bet Rick Perry has already called him: Ilsa Feb 2013 #23
and we are a right to work state so you littlewolf Feb 2013 #25
They could always move to Turbineguy Feb 2013 #26
hundreds of jobs for an $85 MILLION enterprise SoCalDem Feb 2013 #27
Fuck em. Lint Head Feb 2013 #30
+1 ellisonz Feb 2013 #44
I smell BS. politicat Feb 2013 #32
I don't blame them. NaturalHigh Feb 2013 #33
+1 xoom Feb 2013 #40
I hope they are bankrupted mwrguy Feb 2013 #41
I have several of their products. High quality stuff. justanidea Feb 2013 #43
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
3. Let them leave
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 02:46 PM
Feb 2013

They sound just like a child who threatens to run away from home. They are the VICTIM.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
4. I'll bet they're bluffing.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 02:48 PM
Feb 2013

They're butthurt and having a tantrum, but I'll bet they'll decide that moving's too expensive.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
7. The red states and their gun toting/accumulators will welcome them.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 02:59 PM
Feb 2013

My guess is Colorado will save much more in uncompensated medical care for previously wounded and mentally challenged gun nuts who might move/go elsewhere.

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
8. Boo-fucking-hoo. I'm really getting tired of all of these whiny-pissy pants
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 03:02 PM
Feb 2013

It's not like the state is imposing some extra tax or fees that cut into their precious profits. Most of their shipments probably go to the bigger gun loving states anyway. The magazine bans in this state certainly aren't going to send them into bankruptcy. They just have to be whiny-pissy pants because they are soooo persecuted and it's just not fair

 

Light House

(413 posts)
9. Is Magpul a union shop.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 03:57 PM
Feb 2013

And why would anyone want these employees to lose their jobs?
These employees have mortgages to pay, food to buy, kids to provide for, why put them out of a job just because a product isn't liked?
I don't like these high capacity magazines, but I don't want people to lose their jobs either.

Kingofalldems

(38,489 posts)
12. Who said they wanted anyone to lose their jobs?
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:12 PM
Feb 2013

Oh yeah, the company is making those threats, no one else.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
20. Duh, the state itself is considering BANNING the company's product.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 07:34 PM
Feb 2013

I'd say that'll hit their bottom line.

But you don't care about that OR the potential job losses.

Bake

Kingofalldems

(38,489 posts)
24. If someone is making a harmful product
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 08:11 PM
Feb 2013

of course I want it banned.

And don't tell me what I care about.

 

SayWut

(153 posts)
10. What they should do is halt sales to PD's in states that have (or enact), "assault weapons" bans,
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:08 PM
Feb 2013

and/or magazine bans.
Doubtful they would, but you never know.


SQUEE

(1,315 posts)
28. There is a growing movement of just this idea
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 09:01 PM
Feb 2013

Some are now refusing to sell anything to LEO or LEA that the state bans for its citizens, and the list is growing.

 

Hard Assets

(274 posts)
11. Don't let the door hit ya where the Lord split ya.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:11 PM
Feb 2013

The gun control laws are needed.

Don't like it, GTFO.

 

Light House

(413 posts)
14. So you're ok with these people losing their jobs?
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:14 PM
Feb 2013

Just because the company makes a product you don't like?
I don't like these hi cap mags either, but I don't wish people to lose their jobs because I don't like what they produce.

 

Hard Assets

(274 posts)
19. If the gunmaker cannot learn to live with the law,
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 05:32 PM
Feb 2013

then I suggest that they move elsewhere.

Jobs lost, sure, but our point will have been made.

Response to Hard Assets (Reply #19)

politicat

(9,808 posts)
34. I live in the neighborhood of their production facility. Yeah, they can go.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 10:15 PM
Feb 2013

It's not hundreds of jobs -- maybe 90, at most, assuming 24 hour production (which they don't do). Some of those - in their training division - are easy remote jobs because they're already off-site jobs (going to the customer's facility and training them.) If those people have their kids in our excellent schools and mortgages on houses that didn't lose much or any value (this area only got brushed by the housing bubble), they're unlikely to trade for worse schools and housing, so are going to stay and work remotely, especially if their spouses have careers in the area.

On the manufacturing side, there are other industries in the area that can absorb workers skilled with plastics manufacturing -- medical devices, optics, telecom. We can absolutely absorb the mechanical and chemical sides of the house, too -- this area has much growth in those areas and not enough people for the jobs.

We also suspect MP improperly disposes of their manufacturing waste -- we keep finding plastics residue in the soil and the chemical by products in the local water.

We'll survive.

 

Light House

(413 posts)
36. Answer a question with a question.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 10:29 PM
Feb 2013

So I can put you down as being ok with these people losing possibly losing their jobs.

 
37. Sorry, thought that was obvious.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 10:57 PM
Feb 2013

Yes, I am "ok with these people losing possibly losing their jobs."

Your turn to answer my question.

 

Light House

(413 posts)
38. I'm ok with a company looking out for it's best interest
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 11:03 PM
Feb 2013

and if they feel that they need to move, then so be it.
The sad thing is that lots of people will lose their jobs, the city/state will lose the tax revenue from the company and lose the money spent from the people who used to work there.

 

Light House

(413 posts)
16. What they should also do
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:18 PM
Feb 2013

is offer their employees that want to stay with the company a relocation allowance to move.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
15. Please remember to turn off the lights and to pay the pro-rated fraction of all your CO tax
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:16 PM
Feb 2013

obligations.

I am just SURE there is an industrial park in Maldova that can accomodate your manufacturing needs.

Ilsa

(61,698 posts)
23. I bet Rick Perry has already called him:
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 07:44 PM
Feb 2013

"Come on down here! We got really cheap-cheap labor, and we'll excuse you from ALL of those pesky environmental regulations if you need for us to."

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
27. hundreds of jobs for an $85 MILLION enterprise
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 08:52 PM
Feb 2013

am I the only one who sees something put of whack there???

200 jobs statewide @$50K only total 10 million, and we know that most of the jobs are not $50K jobs.

Too many of these companies have an over-inflated impression of their worth to a community/state

and do we know how much it cost the state to woo them there and to pay them ransom to stay?

sometimes it all ends up being a wash, and Colorado is no more sacred than any other place when it comes to the whims of petulant business owners.



politicat

(9,808 posts)
32. I smell BS.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 10:02 PM
Feb 2013

Magpul's production facilities are literally 5 miles away from me, and on one of my preferred bike routes. They do not have hundreds of employees -- the parking lot has maybe 40 spaces, which are never all full. The facility is the size of your standard Walgreen's, if that. I'm involved in my town, and have at least passing acquaintance with at least half of our 6000 residents -- and I don't know anyone who works for them.

They are a nuisance, however -- they manufacture from plastics, and the by products of plastic manufacturing keep showing up in the local well water.

If they go, there aren't going to be many tears shed in this neighborhood.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Colorado ammo magazine ma...