General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)That 2,000 times as much is on the BACKS of their own employees.
2naSalit
(86,775 posts)enjoy the most about it...
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and they don't do anything.
moondust
(20,006 posts)they probably have to get out of bed. Not every day, but once in a while.
thetruthhurtsforsome
(33 posts)or think for that matter.
It is why they shop there in the first place.
egduj
(805 posts)But I agree with you. They should spend the extra few bucks on groceries just for the principle of it.
Good grief!
Maybe those that can afford to shop at Whole Paycheck could give them a couple of bags of groceries then, 'just for the principle of it'.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)when you live on $938/mo, you buy what you can afford. Their test strips for their meter price is $9 for a box of 50.. The VA sends me %0 strips every THREE months for my other meter. Those strips cost about $70 everywhere.
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)But then I also would not be getting my medical care from the VA either.
50 test strips every 90 days, when you need to test yourself several times a day doesn't come out well.
If someone else would have test strips at $9/50 I would be there but no one does or even comes close.
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)and drop them off when I visit. So far I am only child who escaped diabetes.
What I meant was for the spirits to help me get the winning numbers so I could help those in need.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)I get enough Aviva test strips to test 4 times/day because that's what's called for in the prescription (I had to buy the Aviva meter, though).
Or maybe the same pharmacy worker is reading your prescription incorrectly......
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)$24 vs $70 at Kroeger or Walgreens. What can you do, money is tight.
RobinA
(9,894 posts)who shops at Wal*Mart cares. However, this person also is tired of Wal*Mart being singled out for industry-wide practices. If we were to shop based on labor practices there would be very few, if any, places to shop.
-former non-Wal*Mart retail worker
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)Because of WalMart there are fewer places to shop.
And I would bet that if the AFL-CIO came in and you had to vote you'd vote against you own self-interests.
Too bad you're tired, I've been fighting them for over a decade, and if they went under tomorrow, thousands of Mom and Pop stores would return. The center of MY little town is empty because there is a WalMArt down the street. Only the QuickCheck survives.
demwing
(16,916 posts)For years I've believed that it was my crappy income that kept me shopping at Walmart. Thanks to you, I now understand that I'm just thoughtless and inconsiderate. It's folks like you that bring warmth and light to the world! You ROCK!
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)I make less, as do many people, so I have to shop where the prices are cheapest.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)earns so little, or many others where there is literally no option, have no choice.
But if a majority of the people that do not fall into these categories would exercise their option to shop elsewhere, we would see Walmart change its practices faster than a republican running for office in San Francisco.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Our supermarkets have much better food sales (and we have two plus Target has food )
and one week one has great sales, the other the following week, and if plan it out that way we save alot. And one supermarket has cheap meds like SOME of walmart's are.
But, and I didn't realize this until about six months ago when someone here said it,
some areas it is the only thing around.
So there is no choice.
I also feel for the workers, closing it down won't get them another job and it breaks my heart when I see someone who used to have their own hardware shop or stationary store or paint store working there.
I applaud Manhattan for not allowing one in.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)I thought about it. $0.008/hr more. The decimal places are not incorrect either - less than a penny. Walmart has 2.1M employees. Even if none of them got a penny more than $8.75 it would cost over $17,500,000 an hour to pay them,
Is he overpaid? Quite probably. Heck certainly - although people ultimately in charge of over two million workers and revenue of nigh half a trillion probably deserve a fairly high paycheck. But if you want to compare costs you have to compare them fairly. Every shock-value CEO to worker comparison I've ever seen is careful to never bring up the number of employees, thus causing the absurd assumption seen time after time on DU and elsewhere that executive pay is a significant contributor to big company expenses, even labor expenses, and that cutting it would fund significant pay increases. It never would. The only instances where it might are in Wall Street firms where most people beyond the cleaners and security folks are well paid already, and certain small businesses that never make the evil-CEO glurge circuit. No large manufacturer, retailer or service provider exists where CEO pay would mean diddly to the workers.
By all means I would support a limit or ratio limit on CEO pay, although it would be of questionable legality and constitutionality. I just know it would do fuck all to help the 8.75/hr folks.
Incidentally, it takes less than 58 minutes of Walmart sales to pay the CEO's annual salary.
moondust
(20,006 posts)Wal-Mart employee defending her CEO when I jokingly suggested they did away with a battery warranty because the CEO wanted a raise.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)The pigs don't even pay their employees for the hours that they do work at such miserable wages. That's the Wal-Mart business model, cheat the employees, pay a slap-on-the-wrist fine and then go back to business as usual, forcing employees to work unpaid overtime.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)to use the bathroom. I view it as my own personal twenty two million dollar outhouse.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)As long as the worker is making a minimum $22 (more in certain markets)
As I see it, the issue has been the paltry, nearly non-existent wage increases over the last decades that have reduced family income to cover the bare minimum ...
The problem isn't the CEO MAKING too much; it's families making too little ...
juajen
(8,515 posts)One raise a year at $.15 cents an hr. He's lucky, because he has been promoted from only getting a $.10 an hr. raise per hr. when he first started working there. He stays because he cannot afford insurance for his family without this store. BTW, has two degrees. He is a smart guy. No good jobs around.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)American worker do not value Americans. Those who don't value Americans should not be allowed to do business in America.