Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

meegbear

(25,438 posts)
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 02:07 PM Mar 2013

The Rude Pundit: Judge in Louisiana Says People Convicted of Violent Crimes Can Own and Carry Guns

Follow the bouncing ball of fucktardation in the Rude Pundit's home state of Louisiana. It's a short little trip:

Late last year, the God-fearin', gun-ownin' citizens of Louisiana passed by an overwhelming margin an amendment to the state's constitution. 74% of voters agreed that "the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right and any restriction of that right requires the highest standard of review by a court." Now, unlike the U.S. Constitution, people generally don't give a rat's tight sphincter over changing a state constitution on a whim and a shitload of Super PAC money, led by the avatars of assholery, the NRA. Thus, Wayne LaPierre's bidding was done. And he saw it was good.

At the time, the funny-lookin' governor with the dark and skinny name, Bobby Jindal, editorialized in favor of the amendment, offering up the scary image of law enforcement confiscating guns after Katrina and of a Second Amendment that could have its interpretation changed by the whim of a single Supreme Court Justice. Jindal was also appalled at Louisiana's own courts' application of the "rational basis" legal standard for gun rights. Said the governor, "In reality, that means that the state has almost unlimited authority to confiscate, prohibit, or infringe on this fundamental right." He wanted the irrational basis of "strict scrutiny" for the application of gun laws. Of course, Jindal, being a good conservative taint-licking dog, doesn't mention the fact that any Louisiana law can go fuck itself if the federal laws change by court or Congress.

The DA of Orleans Parish, where, well, New Orleans is, said that it was a bad idea because "This amendment will place in extreme constitutional jeopardy criminal laws that require a permit to carry a concealed weapon, prohibit violent felons from possessing firearms and prohibit the possession of firearms on elementary and high school campuses." Oh, and it also deleted language from the state constitution that said the Legislature could regulate concealed firearms.

Guess who was right?

This morning, a judge in Orleans Parish ruled that the entire statute that said violent felons couldn't carry guns was now illegal because of the new state amendment. And that was not the first case where a judge said that the law too broadly defined "violent" felons and it violated the amendment. (Bonus Walking Dead points: an earlier case involved a burglar named "Darrell Dixon.&quot It's close enough to count.))

There's a phrase for this whole circle of utterly unnecessary bullshit: shooting yourself in the foot.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2013/03/judge-in-louisiana-says-people.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Rude Pundit: Judge in Louisiana Says People Convicted of Violent Crimes Can Own and Carry Guns (Original Post) meegbear Mar 2013 OP
Yeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaa! onehandle Mar 2013 #1
Hey, violent felons have needs too. bluedigger Mar 2013 #2
On the bright side... primavera Mar 2013 #3
Investing in LA Funeral Homes would be a smart economic move along uselessobot Mar 2013 #4
Indeed uselessobot In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #5
I voted against this amendment, but it was cleverly put over localroger Mar 2013 #6

primavera

(5,191 posts)
3. On the bright side...
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 03:47 PM
Mar 2013

... no doubt when the next school gets shot up, Louisiana voters will acknowledge their mistake and their responsibility for having placed the guns in the hands of violent offenders, and will be moved to more responsible policy decisions in the future, right? Right, who am I kidding? These are gun nuts - nothing is ever their responsibility.

 

uselessobot

(43 posts)
4. Investing in LA Funeral Homes would be a smart economic move along
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 03:55 PM
Mar 2013

along with investments in casket making companies.

Why with GOP Stupidity I just may be able to retire earlier than planned!

localroger

(3,629 posts)
6. I voted against this amendment, but it was cleverly put over
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 08:11 PM
Mar 2013

It's notthat 74% of Louisianians are this stupid. OK, maybe a majority, but not that much of a majority. This amendment was one of twelve on a single ballot, a couple of which took two full screens to display on the electronic voting machine. People, especially the LEO communities, tried to get the word out that this amendment had terrible implications but too many people didn't read any of those amendments until they walked into the booth and it was overwhelming. By the time they got to this one it was just "well I'm pro-gun," when even a lot of pro-gun folks were begging them to vote against this thing. I knew it was a bad deal going in and I knew it was going to pass because of the way it was slipped in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit: Judge in...