Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,963 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 04:51 PM Mar 2013

Presenting: The Whizzinator

ST. CHARLES, Mo. (AP) — A man accused of using a prosthetic penis to try to pass a drug test is now facing charges in eastern Missouri.

Authorities allege that 34-year-old Sydney Levin was submitting a urine sample last week as part of his probation when an officer allegedly spotted him using a prosthetic known as a Whizzinator. The prosthetic is advertised as a discreet device that includes synthetic “medical grade urine.”

Levin, of Lake St. Louis, was charged last week with possessing a forging instrument, KMOV-TV (http://bit.ly/11SXafU) reported. He was arrested and released after posting $25,000 bond, and pleaded not guilty on Monday.

Levin was on probation for possession of a controlled substance and felony stealing in 2009. Authorities said Levin’s probation required that he submit a urine sample as part of drug test.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/man-charged-with-using-fake-penis-for-drug-test.php?ref=fpblg

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
2. Those of us in Minnesota have been familiar with the Whizzinator for some time.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 04:59 PM
Mar 2013

Onterrio Smith never played in the NFL again.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
4. This is not a "new" device. I am an old fogey, and I've been aware of it for decades.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 05:11 PM
Mar 2013

I believe they even used a version of it on that ENTOURAGE show when one of the characters had a drug problem.

 
5. Probation piss checks are a lot different from employment drug testing.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 05:12 PM
Mar 2013

For one, there's shitloads of mirrors around the area where you piss, so they can see what your penis looks like and still give you semi-privacy - and making sure that the urine is correct. Whatever.

On the other hand, the employment drug test gives you complete privacy, and you can just hide clean piss in a bottle and get away with it.

love_katz

(2,578 posts)
7. Hide clean piss in a bottle?
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 05:17 PM
Mar 2013

Not in the employment tests that I have to submit too.

We are asked to empty our pockets, and to remove our jackets before providing the sample.

My guess is that, maybe, the standards for the test are set by the employer?

TheMightyFavog

(13,770 posts)
8. Not the one I did to get my job...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 06:52 PM
Mar 2013

I went to a local clinic, and they put me in a private bathroom. No different than getting a sample for a medical urinalysis.

 
9. Put a small bottle between your unmentionables.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:13 PM
Mar 2013

And you'll be set. They cannot search you without a warrant.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Presenting: The Whizzinat...