Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 08:09 PM Feb 2012

If the SCOTUS affirms the prop 8 decison does that mean same sex marriage will become law?

Just wondering if the SCOTUS affirms the ruling by the court of appeals, does that mean same sex marriage will become legal in all 50 states? Though to be honest, I'm not sure I want this before the SCOTUS with the likes of Scalia and Thomas on it.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the SCOTUS affirms the prop 8 decison does that mean same sex marriage will become law? (Original Post) white_wolf Feb 2012 OP
NO... The decision was written exceedingly narrowly to apply ONLY to California... hlthe2b Feb 2012 #1
If they rule on the basis of the equal protection clause it opens a new can of worms. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #2
Kennedy wrote the majority opinions in both Romer and Lawrence ruggerson Feb 2012 #3
The lawyer offered one hell of an argument against Prop 8. Kudos to him. FarLeftFist Feb 2012 #4

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
1. NO... The decision was written exceedingly narrowly to apply ONLY to California...
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 08:15 PM
Feb 2012

The 9th circuit could have decided on broader issues that would then effect much of the western region without same sex marriage laws. They did not do so. THus, if SCOTUS decides to take it, it would likewise be deciding only on the law with respect to California. I heard a very long discussion of this matter with Nina Totenberg and some other legal heads on NPR. They did a nice dissection of the implications.

 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
2. If they rule on the basis of the equal protection clause it opens a new can of worms.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 09:00 PM
Feb 2012

They tread on dangerous legal ground in my opinion. The two judges attempted to limit the case. Think of how many laws are not applied equally to all citizens. Many you might really like.

ruggerson

(17,483 posts)
3. Kennedy wrote the majority opinions in both Romer and Lawrence
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 09:04 PM
Feb 2012

on top of that we have Ted Olson as co-lead counsel.

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
4. The lawyer offered one hell of an argument against Prop 8. Kudos to him.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 09:07 PM
Feb 2012

Basically stating that if any law is enacted that oppresses any certain group of people without any reason except for oppression then the law shall be considered unconstitutional.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the SCOTUS affirms the...