Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
2. Well... It was either the worst ad in the history of advertising, or
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 02:02 AM
Feb 2012

our first foray into public funding of campaigns.

A good ad puts the BRAND in front of your face and is just like teaching... Tell 'em what you're going to tell 'em, Tell 'em, then Tell 'em what you told 'em. If it's not that, it's public funding of presidential campaigns in that

Fiat/Chrysler owes the taxpayers money. This ad cost $14,000,000 to air, not to mention what it cost to produce.

So if it wasn't about Fiat/Chrysler, what was it about (wink wink)?

Then again I could have missed that 1 frame out of 24 when Chrysler products flashed on the screen...

cliffordu

(30,994 posts)
5. I saw two Chrysler products...or parts of them
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:20 AM
Feb 2012

look at the traffic scene for instance - the fender of a Jeep ( a nice Chrysler product, iirc...)

And the minivan in the lane up and to the right in that scene...

I've seen the commercial exactly twice. Easy peasy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Feelin' lucky, punk?