Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 06:16 PM Feb 2012

Robert Redford: Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline: The Facts Deserve Repeating

Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline: The Facts Deserve Repeating
Posted: 02/ 8/2012 2:06 pm
Robert Redford


Joe Nocera's op-ed in the New York Times yesterday deserves a response and a reiteration of the facts surrounding the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. President Obama rejected the pipeline's permit last month when the GOP, in a political stunt, forced his hand to approve it without even the final route evident.

Let's put the rhetoric aside, and simply focus on the facts. Nocera wants us to believe that approving this pipeline is a matter of national security. He also seems to think that we should all be kicking ourselves because the Canadians are flaunting a tar sands sale trip to China.

Nocera might ask himself how likely this oil is really to go to China from Canada if Keystone XL is not built. He might ask why the oil companies are looking to bring tar sands almost 2000 miles south rather than just send it across British Columbia for export to Asia.

The answer can be found in the deep and fierce opposition to a new tar sands pipeline in Canada -- especially by the First Nations of British Columbia. In fact, those First Nations this week sent letters to President Hu of China and to the Chinese people letting them know their tar sands grievances in advance of Prime Minister Harper's trip this week.

The Keystone XL tar sands pipeline would not make the United States of America safer. Why? It would not make us safer, because the majority of the processed oil was already scheduled for export to foreign countries. That's' right, this Keystone XL pipeline's Canadian tar sands oil would have no positive impact whatsoever on America's national security.

Canada wanted to send the dirtiest oil on the planet through the heart of America so that they could access export routes. And they proposed getting there by bringing the pipeline right over the Ogallala Aquifer, one of America's most important repositories of fresh water. Along the route, Democrats and Republicans alike opposed it.

more...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-redford/joe-nocera-keystone-pipeline_b_1263231.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Redford: Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline: The Facts Deserve Repeating (Original Post) babylonsister Feb 2012 OP
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2012 #1
Great response by Mr. Redford! Spazito Feb 2012 #2

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
2. Great response by Mr. Redford!
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 06:35 PM
Feb 2012

Recommended.

He is right, Canadians are very much against the proposed pipeline from Alberta to the British Columbia port, the proposed pipeline in Canada is called the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline for the same reason Americans are opposed to the XL pipeline.

The "Harper Government" is pushing these pipelines, Canadians are NOT in favor of this except for some in Alberta, Texas North.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Redford: Keystone...