Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Republican Party loss among young voters goes way beyond ‘rebranding’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/05/the-republican-party-loss-among-young-voters-goes-way-beyond-rebranding/In reading the report on the GOP and young voters from the College Republicans National Committee, one should keep in mind that they were clearly hamstrung in making recommendations for broadening the partys appeal beyond the old white guy bloc by the partys core certainty that there is nothing wrong with the policies theyve put forward. Written between the lines of the report (and often in the lines themselves) is the belief that issue is marketing and message, not values or beliefs. (This is nothing new: Republicans who have faulted GOP policies, while media darlings, dont seem to have gained traction in the party itself.)
Theres a section in report superficially about policy, but thats just it its superficial. The recommendations revolve around how to talk about policy, not engineer it. This isnt the fault of the reports authors, I think: around the edges, there are glimmers of self-awareness, hints that the CRNC would do things differently if they were given the chance.
For example, they emphasize over and over the advantage Obama gained by his attempts to actually pass legislation even legislation opposed by the winnable conservatives and moderates the CNRC interviewed. Even respondents who didnt like Obamacare, for instance, believed that Obama had attempted to change things. The mere acknowledgment of Obama as someone who, in good faith, attempted to change things would be watershed moment for the GOP leadership, and could shift the national conversation from mutual NANANA, I CANT HEAR YOU to dialogue.
The parties shout at each other rather than converse because we live in the era of the permanent campaign. Its only in campaigns that politics is a winner-take-all scenario, where shouting the loudest is what makes you a success. In crafting policy, its possible for everyone to win something; this isnt something the authors of the report (following the lead of their elders) emphasize. The belief in, and consequences of, zero-sum politics are painfully evident in the section about the traits young people value and how the GOP might align itself with them.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 684 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Republican Party loss among young voters goes way beyond ‘rebranding’ (Original Post)
xchrom
Jun 2013
OP
Anyone who thinks the Republicans can't win back the youth vote doesn't remember Nixon-Reagan
Fumesucker
Jun 2013
#2
Here is an article from the advocate I liked (can't remember why I didn't post it though).
William769
Jun 2013
#3
Turbineguy
(37,361 posts)1. Looting society at large
and giving the money to the rich is bad policy? Who knew?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)2. Anyone who thinks the Republicans can't win back the youth vote doesn't remember Nixon-Reagan
We had exactly one Democratic president for one term between Nixon and Reagan.
I recall arguing with roughly same age coworkers about Reagan and thinking what clueless dweebs they were.
William769
(55,147 posts)3. Here is an article from the advocate I liked (can't remember why I didn't post it though).