Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums$576,000 in taxpayer money restores gun rights to 3 people in Oregon (thanks, NRA!)
Oregon is one of 21 states with a federal gun relief program.
In 2009, lawmakers crafted a way to help the estimated 29,000 people whose mental health histories disqualify them under federal law from buying firearms in Oregon: a formal mechanism to ask for their gun rights back.
Four years later, with a two-year budget of $576,184 and a staff of three, the Oregon Gun Relief Program has held three hearings.
(snip)
Congress responded by offering states grant money to ensure names of such individuals reach the FBI. The dollars came with a catch, the result of lobbying by the National Rifle Association: States had to use some of the money to start up gun relief programs.
"The NRA insisted on this relief mechanism," said Kristen Rand, legislative director of the Violence Policy Center, a national gun control group that opposed the legislation mainly because of the gun relief provision. "They weren't going to support it without the inclusion of the relief mechanism. They are 100 percent responsible for it being there."
Read More: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/06/mental_health_and_guns_oregon.html
Four years later, with a two-year budget of $576,184 and a staff of three, the Oregon Gun Relief Program has held three hearings.
(snip)
Congress responded by offering states grant money to ensure names of such individuals reach the FBI. The dollars came with a catch, the result of lobbying by the National Rifle Association: States had to use some of the money to start up gun relief programs.
"The NRA insisted on this relief mechanism," said Kristen Rand, legislative director of the Violence Policy Center, a national gun control group that opposed the legislation mainly because of the gun relief provision. "They weren't going to support it without the inclusion of the relief mechanism. They are 100 percent responsible for it being there."
Read More: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/06/mental_health_and_guns_oregon.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 921 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$576,000 in taxpayer money restores gun rights to 3 people in Oregon (thanks, NRA!) (Original Post)
Robb
Jun 2013
OP
fredamae
(4,458 posts)1. It is the lawMakers
who "bowed"--can't blame other's when an entire body of legislators Could have said "NO".
Robb
(39,665 posts)2. In which case the fault lies with us.
We are responsible for holding lawmakers accountable for their actions and inactions.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)3. You'll get no argument
from me on that point!
hack89
(39,171 posts)4. So cut the budget and staff
find a cheaper way to do this.