General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlan Grayson on Dems willing to cut Social Security "Members like that deserve to be Disciplined!"
Alan Grayson blasted the weak Democrats, saying some members of his party in the congress deserve to face primary challenges if they won't ev en stand up for the Democratic Party's core values, and stop being such push-overs for the GOP to stampede on cutting Social Security.
Members like that deserve to be disciplined and they have to be disciplined though the political process with primaries or through other means."
I agree with Grayson wholeheartedly! Democrats need to stop their constant retreat from our Party's core values. Values that include defending the overwhelmingly popular institutions like Social Security and Medicare that are our party's signature achievements.
Later in the video Grayson laments about our increasingly timorous Party:
"Can't we stand for SOMETHING?"
MORE:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/22/1217936/-Alan-Grayson-on-Dems-willing-to-cut-Social-Security-Members-like-that-deserve-to-be-Disciplined
xchrom
(108,903 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)This is one of our foundational issues. Diluting our Social Security system it is not only stupid, you have to wonder if it's not meant to be willfully destructive to our "champions of the middle class" brand.
you have to wonder WHO, really, these people think they're representing -- b/c it's not us.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Social issues alone will not dissuade me from leaving the party completely.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)groups working outside the party to reform the party. A third party is what they want. They want us out of their hair. We must fight for control of the party. The party has infrastructure and resources we need to defeat the corporatists. First goal is to drive them back into the Republican party where they belong.
We need goals, strategy and tactics. I hope someone smarter than me is working on this.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Many DUers don't even recognize there is a problem. It's shocking, really.
byeya
(2,842 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)20 years ago. At that point I would not vote for a Republican even if they were a good one. I do admit I would have in '08 if I recall the year correctly, because the Republican candidate for House of Representatives was far, far more liberal than the Democrat, but a Tea Party candidate beat the Republican in the primary. I am now at the point that I will not even vote for a Democratic candidate unless they are liberal. No more lesser of two evils for me. There are far too many good third party candidates.
Yes I live in an area where there are still some liberal Republicans and sadly conservative Democrats.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)as well as the Congressional Progressive Caucus. We need to win back control of the Party from the conservatives that own the party.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Matles experience with the Industrial Unions and how the AF of L sapped them of their power. The experience of those who sought to "change from within" by joining that larger union, written about in the book, found that impossible. It might be instructive.
Samual Gompers is a much better analogy to Obama than an ignorant putz like George Bush, if one insists on having an analogy. (I do think the few people I have heard hurl that one aren't thinking very much, or perhaps are just hurting from the seeming betrayal and the endless line of excuses). Gompers sided with business over the workers, let a lot of people get hurt that were working for worker independence by withholding resources or not asking for them, and, as the years have proved, set labour up to be decimated by the ownership class today.
Gompers was smart, but would rather sit at at a table with a rich man than a working person any day, and the writings of the era as well as the pictures provide plenty of evidence. He felt "for" them (perhaps), not "like" them (most definitely), and therein lies the difference.
Anyone that thinks they can work inside today's Democratic Party and change it should read that book and ask themselves why it would be any different this time.
It's a good book, but you will may have to find it at a university library.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)A third party is suicide.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)But, of course, this time might be different.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)I'll even help them.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Obama still wants the cuts, so Grayson wants to
DISCIPLINE him?
(I'm going to regret leaving the Sarcasm thingie off this one, aren't I?)
asjr
(10,479 posts)about SS, but does Mr Grayson name names? We need to know each one in order to do any good. All the senators and reps from here in TN are Republicans and I know how they feel.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
asjr
(10,479 posts)vlyons
(10,252 posts)asjr
(10,479 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)from my state of Illinois.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Time to take the Democratic Party back from the corporate swine.
byeya
(2,842 posts)marsis
(301 posts)political commentary on modern politics came from Bill Maher on the Donner Party, did anyone see this?
Maybe the best solution I've seen offered in the last 10 years. Fight stupid with stupid. Yes, I know the cons but just give it a think.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I agree heartily.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,847 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Give 'em hell, Alan!
that's not the answer. THEY NEED TO BE TARRED AND FEATHERED AND RUN OUT OF TOWN ON A RAIL!!!!!!!!!
ananda
(28,868 posts)..
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Good to hear it.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)K&R
... hand them a copy of the Democratic effing Platform and ask them "Remember this?"
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Yea, we all know who that is.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)purpose. Period. End of discussion.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Diverted. Which is why they rolled the retirement age up to 67 - meaning we have already had our benefits cut. if you retire before 67, you will receive a cut of 14% per each year, for every year you "pre-maturely" retire.
That cut should be un-done. Only then will I be satisfied that the Democratic party has any interest in my well being or that of the rest of us.
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)K&R
bvar22
(39,909 posts)We have officially entered the era of "Be careful what you say",
which has now been fully endorsed and co-signed by the Democratic Party Leadership.
Senator Paul Wellstone started saying things like you just said (see quote at bottom),
and you know what happened to him.
[font color=firebrick][center]"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone [/font][/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Democrats are turning up as bad as Republicans for being in bed with industry against the people when they should be FOR the people.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Think that enabling all the wolves who are dressed up like warm and fuzzy sheep is a supportive activity to undertake if you care at all about the sheep.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,376 posts)Thanks for the thread, kpete.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)a) we have a President (o.e. leader of the Party) who wants to capitulate on everything. He has never extracted any discipline from anybody on anything.
b) Our President is one of them who needs some of that disciplining, as he's at the forefront of negotiating away the fundamentals of our great society.
You know, I would understand the need to compromise on these programs:
#1) if they weren't already well funded with the money WE HAVE PAID INTO THEM; and
#2) if all parts of our society had been suffering for the last 30 years.
But we all know the top 1% has done magnificently, and a big part of the REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH they gave themselves came from raiding the trust funds.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)in 2014. Maybe a Hall of Shame needs to be established on the Internet where the names of elected officials who vote against the people they are supposed to represent, can be published, with their voting records and lists of donors. Then when they are primaried, that record will be available.
Coccydynia
(198 posts)It is a side effect of the Lesser of Two Evils Syndrome.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)(In case it isn't obvious).
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)and unfortunately our congressional leadership - Pelosi, Reid, Durbin, Feinstein - seem just as Republican as Obama. Situation approaching hopelessness. I think the revolution is coming