General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWikiLeaks' Assange urges support for Snowden, slams Obama 'betrayal'
By Laura Smith-Spark, CNN
June 22, 2013 -- Updated 1513 GMT (2313 HKT)
(VIDEO at link)
London (CNN) -- WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange urged the world Saturday to "stand with" Edward Snowden, the man who admitted leaking top-secret details about U.S. surveillance programs, according to the text of a speech posted on Twitter.
As he appealed for a "brave country" to step forward and offer Snowden asylum, Assange also accused U.S. President Barack Obama of betraying a generation of "young, technically minded people."
Assange was scheduled to speak from the balcony of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on Saturday, but the appearance was postponed at short notice "due to a security situation," WikiLeaks said on Twitter.
...
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/22/world/europe/uk-wikileaks-assange/index.html
Here is the text of the speech he wasn't able to give:
It has now been a year since I entered this embassy and sought refuge from persecution.
As a result of that decision, I have been able to work in relative safety from a US espionage investigation.
But today, Edward Snowden's ordeal is just beginning.
Two dangerous runaway processes have taken root in the last decade, with fatal consequences for democracy.
Government secrecy has been expanding on a terrific scale.
Simultaneously, human privacy has been secretly eradicated.
A few weeks ago, Edward Snowden blew the whistle on an ongoing program - involving the Obama administration, the intelligence community and the internet services giants - to spy on everyone in the world.
As if by clockwork, he has been charged with espionage by the Obama administration.
The US government is spying on each and every one of us, but it is Edward Snowden who is charged with espionage for tipping us off.
It is getting to the point where the mark of international distinction and service to humanity is no longer the Nobel Peace Prize, but an espionage indictment from the US Department of Justice.
Edward Snowden is the eighth leaker to be charged with espionage under this president.
Bradley Manning's show trial enters its fourth week on Monday.
After a litany of wrongs done to him, the US government is trying to convict him of "aiding the enemy."
The word "traitor" has been thrown around a lot in recent days.
But who is really the traitor here?
Who was it who promised a generation "hope" and "change," only to betray those promises with dismal misery and stagnation?
Who took an oath to defend the US constitution, only to feed the invisible beast of secret law devouring it alive from the inside out?
Who is it that promised to preside over The Most Transparent Administration in history, only to crush whistleblower after whistleblower with the bootheel of espionage charges?
Who combined in his executive the powers of judge, jury and executioner, and claimed the jurisdiction of the entire earth on which to exercise those powers?
Who arrogates the power to spy on the entire earth - every single one of us - and when he is caught red handed, explains to us that "we're going to have to make a choice."
Who is that person?
Let's be very careful about who we call "traitor."
Edward Snowden is one of us.
Bradley Manning is one of us.
They are young, technically minded people from the generation that Barack Obama betrayed.
They are the generation that grew up on the internet, and were shaped by it.
The US government is always going to need intelligence analysts and systems administrators, and they are going to have to hire them from this generation and the ones that follow it.
One day, they will run the CIA and the FBI.
This isn't a phenomenon that is going away.
This is inevitable.
And by trying to crush these young whistleblowers with espionage charges, the US government is taking on a generation, and that is a battle it is going to lose.
This isn't how to fix things.
The only way to fix things is this:
Change the policies.
Stop spying on the world.
Eradicate secret law.
Cease indefenite detention without trial.
Stop assassinating people.
Stop invading other countries and sending young Americans off to kill and be killed.
Stop the occupations, and discontinue the secret wars.
Stop eating the young: Edward Snowden, Barrett Brown, Jeremy Hammond, Aaron Swartz, Gottfrid Svartholm, Jacob Appelbaum, and Bradley Manning.
The charging of Edward Snowden is intended to intimidate any country that might be considering standing up for his rights.
That tactic must not be allowed to work.
The effort to find asylum for Edward Snowden must be intensified.
What brave country will stand up for him, and recognize his service to humanity?
Tell your governments to step forward.
Step forward and stand with Snowden.
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1rkv9jt
White House Petition to President Obama: Pardon Edward Snowden: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/pardon-edward-snowden/Dp03vGYD (101,876 signatures so far)
Avaaz Petition: Stand with Edward Snowden: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/stop_prism_global/ (1,230,074 signatures)
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...is not betrayal of the American people or, more importantly, the Constitution:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)"Unreasonable" is entirely culture dependent. If the culture accepts what the NSA is doing as "reasonable" then there is no problem.
So that's the real question here. Where are we at, culturally?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)You certainly DON'T speak for "the culture" or anyone else beyond yourself.
I sure as fuck DON'T "accept it as reasonable" nor do millions of other law-abiding, American private citizens and OUR privacy isn't yours, George W Bush's, Dick Cheney's or Barack Obama's to bargain away for some false, temporary feeling of "security." Not before, not now, and not in the future.
treestar
(82,383 posts)At one point, the culture elected a Congress/President that passed the FISA, before that, there had been no restrictions on Presidents authority for wiretaps.
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)Certainly not me. I don't speak for anyone. But, by that token, neither do you.
So what makes you (or me) the arbiter of reasonable?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... making excuses for why it's "okay" to make up new meanings for words that are already clearly defined and used in no uncertain terms in the document that GUARANTEES certain RIGHTS to me as a citizen. Among them is the RIGHT not to have my government SPYING on me without a warrant being issued as CLEARLY stated in the 4th Amendment.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)I've actually seen people on DU say exactly that...
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...we know what happened to them. Or, to Ethel Rosenberg.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Bad examples hurt the cause.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Julius, yes, but not Ethel. Read up on it.
allin99
(894 posts)they're storing your it and keeping it until they feel like going through it later.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)As per the 4th Amendment:
They have no right to.
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)What makes that more unreasonable than going through your shit when you are merely a suspect? You still may have done nothing wrong in that case.
Different cultures define reasonable differently. Until recently I've been lucky enough to live in one whose definition I like. That is always subject to change.
In my opinion then we shouldn't focus on whether or not the law permits what's gone on. We should rally our arguments against the changing definition of what's reasonable.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)The gathering and storage of my private correspondences when I'm NOT EVEN SUSPECTED of something is not reasonable. Not. Even. Close.
Response to Shivering Jemmy (Reply #23)
allin99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)fit their needs today.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)TYY
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Interesting times these be eh? Who could have seen all this coming 2 weeks ago?
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)...a little bit crazy and a little bit scary right now, with secret wars... weapons to Syria, Jordan etc.
I'm grateful to people like Assange and Snowden for walking the walk and trying to keep truth alive for the whole world to see.
TYY
Catherina
(35,568 posts)These men are going to go down in history books as heros who tried to stop our dangerous slide into totalitarianism.
The answer is "World Peace".
Response to Catherina (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)They should be along shortly to post utterly irrelevant material and accuse the whistle blowers of various crimes and prejudices. Not to mention girlfriends in Hawaii and dyspeptic neighbors.
treestar
(82,383 posts)What happened to his Senate campaign?
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Why you so uninformed about so many things?
http://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/june/1370181600/guy-rundle/how-julian-assange-s-senate-bid-will-change-australian-politic#nav
treestar
(82,383 posts)Or do you know everything about everything?
struggle4progress
(118,316 posts)18 June 2013 Last updated at 19:01 ET
Assange 'to stay in embassy even if sex claims are dropped'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22962786
Longest stay in an embassy still isn't within easy reach, but Phoniest asylum claim or Most bogus political campaign could be
treestar
(82,383 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)keep it up dudes. It is only making Pres O stronger in resolve to help America by his continued devotion to social issues such as the economy and also making the case to VOTE!
Bash and trash on . . .
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...is the use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech. It may be used to evoke strong feelings or to create a strong impression, but is not meant to be taken literally.
Hyperboles are exaggerations to create emphasis or effect. As a literary device, hyperbole is often used in poetry, and is frequently encountered in casual speech. An example of hyperbole is: "The bag weighed a ton." Hyperbole makes the point that the bag was very heavy, though it probably does not weigh a ton.
In rhetoric, some opposites of hyperbole are meiosis, litotes, understatement, and bathos (the 'letdown' after a hyperbole in a phrase).
...just so you know so you stop doing it.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Important when he has proven himself to be a thief. I will continue to call him a crook.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)When did Obama campaign on not prosecuting people for leaking classified information?
I must have missed it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)stop asking questions or I flip my wig
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)What promise was that?
"Who knows...but he still broke it gawd dammit!"
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Billo told me so himself and so did Ron Rand and Sarah!
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Really?
Seriously?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That kind of false meme?
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/statuses/343421926057861121
Why yes, I do.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)And taken out of context.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I can't think of a single reason to stand, sit, or believe a word of either of them so pardon me if I roll on the floor instead:
Laughing, of course!
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I thought it was artistic.