Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
quick question... NYT is it right or left leaning? (Original Post) FirstLight Jun 2013 OP
Neither... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #1
Both. It all depends on which side you're on, really. MineralMan Jun 2013 #2
the bulk of the editorials themselves are decidedly left leaning. cali Jun 2013 #14
Yes. MineralMan Jun 2013 #16
I've been assured by right wingers treestar Jun 2013 #3
They are, above all, the voice of the Establishment. Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #4
thank you FirstLight Jun 2013 #6
Good analysis flamingdem Jun 2013 #10
nope. the editorials on fiscal issues on generally left leaning cali Jun 2013 #15
this editorial is from the entire board...june 6 FirstLight Jun 2013 #5
But Hannity & the Right Wing Noise Machine are saying exactly the same thing. Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #8
imo, the verbiage used has a rightward slant. not a neutral piece by virtue of the words/tone. eom ellenfl Jun 2013 #13
socially left leaning, financially firmly on the right DJ13 Jun 2013 #7
Ask Carlos Slim. He loaned NYT 1/4 billion $. Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #9
They've had financial difficulties since the 90s flamingdem Jun 2013 #11
Whichever way the wind blows. lpbk2713 Jun 2013 #12

MineralMan

(146,318 posts)
2. Both. It all depends on which side you're on, really.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:39 PM
Jun 2013

If you stay off the editorial pages and commentary, it's a pretty good newspaper, overall. However, if you only read the right wing columnists or the other columnists, you'll base your opinion on that.

Editorial pages in newspapers appear to be the only pages many people read, it seems sometimes.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
3. I've been assured by right wingers
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:39 PM
Jun 2013

that it's a left wing, communist publication and the only thing that is accurate are the sports scores.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
4. They are, above all, the voice of the Establishment.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:42 PM
Jun 2013

They represent the (slightly) socially liberal, fiscally conservative sentiments and interests of the Old Yankee Ruling Class, which has lately fallen on somewhat hard times due to the increasing power of new oil & gas money among what Kirkpatrick Sale used to call the Cowboy faction.

They wholeheartedly supported the 2001 coup of GWB & his subsequent Iraq Clusterfuck.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
10. Good analysis
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:00 PM
Jun 2013

and I used to work for them when it had the umpf you describe. The Paper of Record and all that. Now they're scrambling, but seriously there are considerably better than most other mainstream rags.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
15. nope. the editorials on fiscal issues on generally left leaning
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:28 PM
Jun 2013

not to mention their most prominent op writer on fiscal issues being Paul Krugman.

As for Sale, his cozying up to the despicable League of the South and Thomas Naylor and the excuses he made, diminishes him.

Why not peruse recent op/ed pages?

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html

FirstLight

(13,362 posts)
5. this editorial is from the entire board...june 6
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:44 PM
Jun 2013

and I think they are actually spot on...does that mean I am no longer a liberal? ...no, seriously....I am actually using this in a english class to make a point and wonder whether I am being too biased or swayed?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.html?_r=0


"Within hours of the disclosure that federal authorities routinely collect data on phone calls Americans make, regardless of whether they have any bearing on a counterterrorism investigation, the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights.

Those reassurances have never been persuasive — whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agency’s phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism — especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability. "


Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
8. But Hannity & the Right Wing Noise Machine are saying exactly the same thing.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:52 PM
Jun 2013
Sean Hannity is warning that data mining and surveillance are "very clear violation[s] of the Fourth Amendment," a drastic change for the Fox News host, who was a loud defender of National Security Agency surveillance during the Bush administration.


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/06/12/sean-hannity-on-nsa-surveillance-then-and-now/194437

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
11. They've had financial difficulties since the 90s
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:01 PM
Jun 2013

so that's not surprising. They need to work their social media online aspect much more to stay competitive.

lpbk2713

(42,761 posts)
12. Whichever way the wind blows.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:08 PM
Jun 2013



I think they are basically driven by what sells the most copies or the most subscriptions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»quick question... NYT is ...