Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,959 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 12:08 PM Jul 2013

Yet another reminder of how hard we work to ensure poor people stay poor.

Yet another reminder of how hard we work to ensure poor people stay poor.

A growing number of American workers are confronting a frustrating predicament on payday: to get their wages, they must first pay a fee.

For these largely hourly workers, paper paychecks and even direct deposit have been replaced by prepaid cards issued by their employers. Employees can use these cards, which work like debit cards, at an A.T.M. to withdraw their pay.

But in the overwhelming majority of cases, using the card involves a fee. And those fees can quickly add up: one provider, for example, charges $1.75 to make a withdrawal from most A.T.M.’s, $2.95 for a paper statement and $6 to replace a card. Some users even have to pay $7 inactivity fees for not using their cards.




http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/business/as-pay-cards-replace-paychecks-bank-fees-hurt-workers.html?hp&_r=1&pagewanted=all&
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yet another reminder of how hard we work to ensure poor people stay poor. (Original Post) kpete Jul 2013 OP
K&R The only sure way to win is to own the casino. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #1
It just gets worse... KansDem Jul 2013 #2
Just transferring the banking fees employers used to pay, to the employees. 4_TN_TITANS Jul 2013 #3
I sold my soul to the company store ... Zoeisright Jul 2013 #4
yep nt abelenkpe Jul 2013 #5
Those workers should file a claim with the Department of Labor. former9thward Jul 2013 #6
UNACCEPTABLE. pansypoo53219 Jul 2013 #7

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
2. It just gets worse...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 12:23 PM
Jul 2013

First, they pay shit wages, then they charge a fee for access to those shit wages. Why do Corporatists hate Americans?

On a personal note: I occasionally pay my water bill through an automated phone service that requires no personal contact; it's all done electronically. However, I'm charged a "convenience fee." Each time I pay in this manner I think to myself, "Convenience for whom?" I mean, I could pay by check, then someone at the water department would have to open my mail and process my check. But to pay by phone is a convenience? Wouldn't it be more convenient for the water company to do it electronically?

Oh, wait a second! Wouldn't it be more convenient for the water company to do it electronically? Now I know why there's a "convenience fee!"

4_TN_TITANS

(2,977 posts)
3. Just transferring the banking fees employers used to pay, to the employees.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 01:01 PM
Jul 2013

As if most employers suddenly can't afford to pay it. I'll bet in some cases this is violating previously agreed upon wages between the employer and employee. Guarantee this isn't happening to union employees. Everyone else couldn't begin to afford to sue the piss out of them.

former9thward

(31,935 posts)
6. Those workers should file a claim with the Department of Labor.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 01:41 PM
Jul 2013

The Wage and Hour division. The employers are effectively reducing their wages by causing a fee to be charged.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yet another reminder of h...