General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy So Secretive? The Trans Pacific Partnership As Global Corporate Coup- Part 2
Luckily for the populations and societies that will be affected by the agreement, there are public research organizations and alternative media outlets campaigning against it and theyve even released several leaks of draft agreement chapters. From these leaks, which are not covered by mainstream corporate-controlled news outlets, we are able to get a better understanding of what the Trans-Pacific Partnership actually encompasses.
For example, public interest groups have been warning that the TPP could result in millions of lost jobs. As a letter from Congress to United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk stated, the TPP will create binding policies on future Congresses in numerous areas, including those related to labor, patent and copyright, land use, food, agriculture and product standards, natural resources, the environment, professional licensing, state-owned enterprises and government procurement policies, as well as financial, healthcare, energy, telecommunications and other service sector regulations.
<snip>
Dubbed by many as NAFTA on steroids and a corporate coup, only two of the TPPs 26 chapters actually have anything to do with trade. Most of it grants far-reaching new rights and privileges to corporations, specifically related to intellectual property rights (copyright and patent laws), as well as constraints on government regulations.
<snip>
Pharmaceutical corporations are major proponents of these rights and are likely to be among the major beneficiaries of the intellectual property chapter of the TPP. The pharmaceutical industry ensured that strong patent rules were included in the 1995 World Trade Organization agreement, but ultimately felt that those rules did not go far enough.
Dean Baker, writing in the Guardian, explained that stronger patent rules establish a government-granted monopoly, often as long as 14 years, that prohibits generic competitors from entering a market based on another companys test results that show a drug to be safe and effective. Baker noted that such laws are actually the opposite of free trade since they involve increased government intervention in the market and restrict competition and lead to higher prices for consumers.
<snip>
http://www.nationofchange.org/why-so-secretive-trans-pacific-partnership-global-corporate-coup-1353687546
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cali
(114,904 posts)That's as immutable a law as gravity.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cali
(114,904 posts)and maybe pigs are flying outside my window.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cali
(114,904 posts)considering I am the person here who keeps this issue alive. I post more- far more about this than anyone else.
I was commenting on the likelihood of keeping corporations out of these talks when these talks are primarily for and by corporations.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cali
(114,904 posts)at the corporate leaders- and you took it wrong and got combative. that simple. I'm sorry you took it wrong. "when pigs fly" is simply an expression meaning, not going to happen.
yikes.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)YES, I AM SERIOUS.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)would rather be a part of the 1%
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)He has his whole life ahead of him with his family.
The rest of us...well....we have to do what we have to do. We didn't get elected.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)?d=a1
?d=a38
cali
(114,904 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"There are 100 disadvantages (damaging aspects) and zero advantages to TPP. The US is aiming for Japan's financial assets". Ouch.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)You want to talk about conspiracies, that is a conspiracy.
cali
(114,904 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)It needs to be in people's faces.