Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:33 PM Jul 2013

Why Wouldn't Russia Kill Snowden… So Greenwald Can Bring the USA To It's Knees?

After reading Greenwald's latest bit, it sure seems like a foolish way to play this out.

If something happens to Snowden, who is to say it comes at the hands of the USA at this point.

Greenwald himself has just pointed an arrow at his special, little snowflake.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Wouldn't Russia Kill Snowden… So Greenwald Can Bring the USA To It's Knees? (Original Post) KittyWampus Jul 2013 OP
Interesting Point, Ma'am The Magistrate Jul 2013 #1
The fact that Snowden has "insurance" was reported weeks ago... Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #2
But Greenwald has just repeated this rather loudly. Again, who is to say the USA KittyWampus Jul 2013 #3
Isn't there a DU rule against Conspiracy Theorizing? Tisk,tisk. Naughty leveymg Jul 2013 #7
lolz. Just spinning along with Greenwald. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #10
No one that makes such a setup knows but it advises the party at risk TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #17
Maybe Greenwald sees a last chance at the Green flamingdem Jul 2013 #4
Solution: Call off the dogs. Give Snowden his passport and let him leave Russia. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #5
Sorry, no. You don't give a criminal his passport back. And even if he does leave Russia, KittyWampus Jul 2013 #8
Greenwald just let loose whole new packs on Snowden. nt DevonRex Jul 2013 #18
Let what you want done, be done! treestar Jul 2013 #22
Unrecommended avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #6
I am using Greenwald's own words. HE is the one who sounds like a bad movie KittyWampus Jul 2013 #9
I know right! The libertarians are coming. OMG! LOL nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #13
As a general rule, I think it's best not to speculate about potential assassinations of high-profile struggle4progress Jul 2013 #11
It's kind of a shame Greenwald didn't think of that before spouting off again. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #12
Sounds like a terror cells wet dream right there. bunnies Jul 2013 #15
IMO Greenwald is completely unprincipled: he has a definite agenda, which is struggle4progress Jul 2013 #16
Accidents do happen ... GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #14
When one makes such statements it means that accidents are off the table, in their eyes. TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #20
Sort of absurd speculation if you ask me. 1-Old-Man Jul 2013 #19
It is of more value to keep Snowden alive, defuse the info bomb, and get a copy for themselves. FarCenter Jul 2013 #21
exactly. What a moran he is. Whisp Jul 2013 #23

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
1. Interesting Point, Ma'am
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:35 PM
Jul 2013

People do need to think things all the way through....

"Beware the Spirits of Air who read men's hearts by their words."

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
3. But Greenwald has just repeated this rather loudly. Again, who is to say the USA
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:38 PM
Jul 2013

would be the one who got Snowden?

How would Greenwald know?

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
17. No one that makes such a setup knows but it advises the party at risk
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:11 PM
Jul 2013

and most likely to be culpable that it had best martial its influence and resources to make sure _____ doesn't happen and no matter how in the world _____ happens the party at risk will bear the cost.

This is no a new form of fail safe, it is just not one for ifs and but's or candy and nuts that says "I don't give a fuck if you believe in God in Heaven, motherfucker, you better pray for ______ that they shouldn't catch a cold that turns to pneumonia or if you see a wet floor anywhere you should see to it that it dry and safe because should. _____ happen to pass that damp floor later and take a spill and they should slip from this mortal coil because I shall in any and every case consider you responsible for ______'s fate."

It just says no matter what the blame and consequences will fall on one target. It tells the party the threat is leveled at that their first priority is _____'s safety.

You never seen a gangster flick? The context is ancient and clear, there is nothing to be befuddled by.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
4. Maybe Greenwald sees a last chance at the Green
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:41 PM
Jul 2013

if you know what I mean.

Then he's da man with the thumbdrive full of liberty.

Wonder where he keeps it.

Same place from whence eminates his latest anti-USA diatribe.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
8. Sorry, no. You don't give a criminal his passport back. And even if he does leave Russia,
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jul 2013

some other entity might kill Snowden and make it look like the USA govt did it just so Greewald brings us to our knees.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
6. Unrecommended
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:42 PM
Jul 2013

Ridiculous. You folks sound like a bunch of kids at camp on a dark night telling stories about ghosts and monsters to scare yourselves out of your minds, with each story more preposterous and silly than the last.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
9. I am using Greenwald's own words. HE is the one who sounds like a bad movie
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:45 PM
Jul 2013

"Snowden has enough information to cause harm to the U.S. government in a single minute than any other person has ever had," Greenwald said in an interview with the Argentinean paper La Nacion. "The U.S. government should be on its knees every day begging that nothing happen to Snowden, because if something does happen to him, all the information will be revealed and it could be its worst nightmare."

struggle4progress

(118,294 posts)
11. As a general rule, I think it's best not to speculate about potential assassinations of high-profile
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:48 PM
Jul 2013

people, lest we give loonies ideas

There have always been crazies out there eager for attention: the earliest recorded case, that I know, was the arsonist who burned down a Greek temple around 350 BC in order to be remembered

It's possible, I suppose, that operatives of some government somewhere might consider something like this -- but it's just as likely, or perhaps even more likely, that someone with severe problems might decide that such an action was a great way to win notoriety with the help of some cockamamie tale

So I'd like to discourage responsible internet users from such speculation

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
12. It's kind of a shame Greenwald didn't think of that before spouting off again.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:50 PM
Jul 2013

"Snowden has enough information to cause harm to the U.S. government in a single minute than any other person has ever had," Greenwald said in an interview with the Argentinean paper La Nacion. "The U.S. government should be on its knees every day begging that nothing happen to Snowden, because if something does happen to him, all the information will be revealed and it could be its worst nightmare."

struggle4progress

(118,294 posts)
16. IMO Greenwald is completely unprincipled: he has a definite agenda, which is
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:04 PM
Jul 2013

to encourage third-party voting, which he pursues through constant noisy outrage

GeorgeGist

(25,321 posts)
14. Accidents do happen ...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:57 PM
Jul 2013
Debris and belongings of passengers of the Russian Sukhoi aircraft that crashed on the slopes of Mount Salak are seen at the wreckage site, near Bogor.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
20. When one makes such statements it means that accidents are off the table, in their eyes.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:22 PM
Jul 2013

"If by some cosmic chance a meteorite should crash into ______'s house and they come to harm, I will wonder how you managed to bend heavenly bodies to your will but I will without fail consider you to blame and unleash what hell that I can upon your head".

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
21. It is of more value to keep Snowden alive, defuse the info bomb, and get a copy for themselves.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:23 PM
Jul 2013

Ideally, FSB works with NSA to figure out how to keep Snowden from releasing more information.

At the same time, unknown to the NSA, the FSB manages to decrypt a copy of the information for Russia's exclusive use.

Snowden becomes irrelevant.

The US privately thanks Russia for assistance, and may provide some other unspecified benefits (re Syria, missile programs, etc.)

Everyone lives happily ever after.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Wouldn't Russia Kill ...