Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:44 PM Jul 2013

What Greenwald said vs Reuters summary of what he said:

Last edited Sat Jul 13, 2013, 07:29 PM - Edit history (2)

Reuters (which cherry picked two sentences from two paragraphs thus removing the context for those two sentences) :

"Snowden has enough information to cause harm to the U.S. government in a single minute than any other person has ever had," Greenwald said in an interview with the Argentinean paper La Nacion. "The U.S. government should be on its knees every day begging that nothing happen to Snowden, because if something does happen to him, all the information will be revealed and it could be its worst nightmare."



Greenwald's interview (I bolded the parts of Greenwald's replies that Reuters cut out)
(via Google translate)


- Beyond the revelations about the spying system performance in general, what extra information has Snowden?

-Snowden has enough information to cause more damage to the U.S. government in a minute alone than anyone else has ever had in the history of the United States. But that's not his goal. Its objective is to expose software that people around the world use without knowing what they are exposing themselves without consciously agreeing to surrender their rights to privacy. It has a huge number of documents that would be very harmful to the U.S. government if they were made public.

- Are you afraid that someone will try to kill him?

It's a possibility, although I do not bring many benefits to anyone at this point. Already distributed thousands of documents and made sure that several people around the world have their entire file. If something were to happen, those documents would be made public. This is your insurance policy.
The U.S. government should be on your knees every day praying that nothing happens to Snowden, because if something happens, all information will be revealed and that would be their worst nightmare.


http://translate.google.com.br/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lanacion.com.ar%2F1600674-glenn-greenwald-snowden-tiene-informacion-para-causar-mas-dano

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Greenwald said vs Reuters summary of what he said: (Original Post) Luminous Animal Jul 2013 OP
Whoa, wordy attempt to save his career flamingdem Jul 2013 #1
I posted the original interview. You know the original interview that Reuters cherry picked. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #4
An entire paragraph isn't "cherrypicking". KittyWampus Jul 2013 #10
Reuters did not post the entire paragraphs. They cherry picked two sentences Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #17
They did not use ellipses. They did not change the meaning. No context makes Greewald sound rational KittyWampus Jul 2013 #20
So if you post more words… people may not read THIS part KittyWampus Jul 2013 #2
GG couldn't resist sharing his fantasy about the USA flamingdem Jul 2013 #5
-snicker- KittyWampus Jul 2013 #12
. flamingdem Jul 2013 #14
But that's not his goal changes the whole thing, doesn't it? nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #7
More words provide context. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #8
LOL! There is no context that makes the paragraph reasonable. It's not like they used ellipses. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #13
What are you talking about... Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #22
Thanks. allin99 Jul 2013 #3
So we can add: not particularly press savvy BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #6
Snowden himself has admitted to having an insurance file. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #15
The point is Greenwald drools over himself BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #21
... AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #9
Oh mah lawd! flamingdem Jul 2013 #16
Sheldon, is that you? Octafish Jul 2013 #19
It's clever if one is a bigot. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #36
Greenwald sounds like a shyster. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #11
Gee. So Reuters would, ah, attempt to alter what Greenwald said? Octafish Jul 2013 #18
they didn't alter anything. It's his own words. Unedited. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #23
Not from what I've read. Is there an audio or video tape I can listen to? Octafish Jul 2013 #27
Link to the article in the original Spansh Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #29
Glenn Greenwald: "Snowden has information to cause more damage." Octafish Jul 2013 #38
Thank you for doing this. Thanks so much. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #40
You are welcome. Octafish Jul 2013 #41
+++ marions ghost Jul 2013 #59
Los Three Amigos Octafish Jul 2013 #65
It's IN THE OPENING POST. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #34
Read my translation. Octafish Jul 2013 #39
Crazy, huh? And you are welcome. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #24
It is crazy. It's also interesting to see how angry so many DUers have become these days. Octafish Jul 2013 #28
OT, but who's the illustrator for that? I'm sure I saw them in the New Yorker MisterP Jul 2013 #37
Abner Dean Octafish Jul 2013 #42
thanks for whacking that mole carolinayellowdog Jul 2013 #25
Greenwald's flaming out. All the King's Horses and All the King's Men can't fix this. MjolnirTime Jul 2013 #26
Imagine the outrage at Reuters if BUSH was still in the White House. MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #30
Thank you for more exposure of the smear machine at work. woo me with science Jul 2013 #31
Greenwald is "smearing" himself. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #33
In a democracy, the people rely on investigative journalists woo me with science Jul 2013 #35
people who commit espionage come pre-smeared arely staircase Jul 2013 #44
Propaganda talking point with no evidence whatsoever woo me with science Jul 2013 #45
he gave the chinese the IP addresses of us hack targets and specific information as to which arely staircase Jul 2013 #48
Your perseverence is noted woo me with science Jul 2013 #49
Hopefully he will be brought to justice soon. nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #50
He deserves a medal for exposing the trashing of the Constitution by our own government. woo me with science Jul 2013 #57
whatever the jury decides nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #58
That's not the point. No matter what revenge our government may exact on Snowden, woo me with science Jul 2013 #61
I think he should exercise his 6th amendment rights soon. nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #62
He didn't reveal how only the fact that we hacked CIVILIAN computer systems... Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #51
civilian? lol he can explain that to the jury arely staircase Jul 2013 #52
Thank you. I was starting to translate this article when I got interrupted by some Cleita Jul 2013 #32
Here is what I don't get. Doesn't such a pronouncement make Mr. Snowden less safe? arely staircase Jul 2013 #43
Thanks for taking time. It's been unbelievable watching the smear machine at work n/t Catherina Jul 2013 #46
"Smear machine"? ProSense Jul 2013 #47
You wish. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #55
Still sounds like a threat to me. BenzoDia Jul 2013 #53
Of course it is a threat. It's conditional... kill me and I will harm you. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #54
So...what was the problem with the Reuters article then? BenzoDia Jul 2013 #56
The Reuters article did not make it clear that the threat was conditional. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #63
No, it is "kill me and I will harm the US." So anyone wanting to harm the US just has to kill him arely staircase Jul 2013 #60
As already revealed, he has info on other countries complicity with surveillance... Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #64

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
17. Reuters did not post the entire paragraphs. They cherry picked two sentences
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:58 PM
Jul 2013

from the two original paragraphs.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
20. They did not use ellipses. They did not change the meaning. No context makes Greewald sound rational
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jul 2013

The reason you are trying so hard to make it seem rational or appropriate is because IT ISN'T.


"Snowden has enough information to cause harm to the U.S. government in a single minute than any other person has ever had," Greenwald said in an interview with the Argentinean paper La Nacion. "The U.S. government should be on its knees every day begging that nothing happen to Snowden, because if something does happen to him, all the information will be revealed and it could be its worst nightmare."

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
2. So if you post more words… people may not read THIS part
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:48 PM
Jul 2013

"Snowden has enough information to cause harm to the U.S. government in a single minute than any other person has ever had," Greenwald said in an interview with the Argentinean paper La Nacion. "The U.S. government should be on its knees every day begging that nothing happen to Snowden, because if something does happen to him, all the information will be revealed and it could be its worst nightmare."

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
5. GG couldn't resist sharing his fantasy about the USA
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:49 PM
Jul 2013

on its knees. His word choices are very telling.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
8. More words provide context.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:52 PM
Jul 2013

Your bolded sentence was part of a response to the question, "- Are you afraid that someone will try to kill him?"

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
22. What are you talking about...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:02 PM
Jul 2013

From the original interview.

- Are you afraid that someone will try to kill him?

It's a possibility, although I do not bring many benefits to anyone at this point. Already distributed thousands of documents and made sure that several people around the world have their entire file. If something were to happen, those documents would be made public. This is your insurance policy. The U.S. government should be on your knees every day praying that nothing happens to Snowden, because if something happens, all information will be revealed and that would be their worst nightmare.

What Reuters chose to print:
The U.S. government should be on its knees every day begging that nothing happen to Snowden, because if something does happen to him, all the information will be revealed and it could be its worst nightmare.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
21. The point is Greenwald drools over himself
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jul 2013

when he's sticking it to the man, and that's what grabs the headlines. By extension, Snowden becomes more invested in wanting to harm the US every time Greenwald opens his mouth. This is not helping him.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
36. It's clever if one is a bigot.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 06:57 PM
Jul 2013

And people wonder why Snowden would fear being assassinated and use insurance to stay alive.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
18. Gee. So Reuters would, ah, attempt to alter what Greenwald said?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 04:59 PM
Jul 2013

That makes it out like Greenwald is making a threat. Why would Reuters do that, apart from poisoning the minds of the public to Greenwald?

Thank you for sticking up for the truth, Luminous Animal. Seems to be a foreign concept these days.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
27. Not from what I've read. Is there an audio or video tape I can listen to?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:14 PM
Jul 2013

I'd like to hear what Greenwald actually said. I'd also like to hear what the interviewers asked.

Going from what's been reported, it's clear that Greenwald's words were mistranslated and taken out of context to make his statement into a "threat" against the United States.



About the Reuters article

The latest effort to distract attention from the NSA revelations is more absurd than most

by Glenn Greenwald
The Guardian, July 13, 2013

EXCERPT...

My point in this interview was clear, one I've repeated over and over: had he wanted to harm the US government, he easily could have, but hasn't, as evidenced by the fact that - as I said - he has all sorts of documents that could inflict serious harm to the US government's programs. That demonstrates how irrational is the claim that his intent is to harm the US. His intent is to shine a light on these programs so they can be democratically debated. That's why none of the disclosures we've published can be remotely described as harming US national security: all they've harmed are the reputation and credibility of US officials who did these things and then lied about them.

SOURCE: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/13/reuters-article-dead-man-s-switch



Going by what got printed and what was reported are two different things.

BTW: Don't worry, I speak Spanish so I'll try and be mindful of idioms and such.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
38. Glenn Greenwald: "Snowden has information to cause more damage."
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 07:12 PM
Jul 2013
The journalist who received the leaks from a CIA mole says there are more documents

by Alberto Armendariz, The Nation, Saturday, July 13, 2013

RIO DE JANEIRO -- Appearances deceive. With his striped swimsuit, white flip-flops, jean shirt and a great backpack, Glenn Greenwald looks likt a tourist walking along the Sao Conrado in Rio de Janeiro. But he's a trader, a journalist, blogger and columnist for the British daily, The Guardian who surprised the world with the revelations about the extensive computer spy network of the United States, filtered by Edwdard Snowden, the ex-intelligence analyst of the National Security Agency (NSA).

"Snowden has enough information with which to cause more damage to the government of the United States in one single minute by himself than any other person has had in the entire history of the United States," Greenwald, 46, affirmed to The Nation, and who, from these latitudes, writes regularly on the issues of international security that have made him into a celebrity, the winner of various distinguished awards.

Today, this New Yorker, ex-lawyer, is in the eye of the storm. Legislators in Washington want to bring him to trial; spies of various nations look to obtain the secret information that Snowden shared with him, the heaviest, in Hong Kong and that he continues sending from Moscow via a system of encrypted electonic mail. He knows that he's being surveilled and that his conversations are monitored. This includes the theft of his laptop from his boyfriend, from their own home.

Three men wait in the lobby of the hotel Royal Tulip with credentials from a symposium on osteoporosis, a meeting of which the (hotel) concierge has no idea. Are they really doctors or are they following Greenwald? Appearances deceive.

Q: Share with us about Snowden's decision to stay in Russian while awaiting to come to Latin America?

Yes, the most important thing is not to end up in the custody of the United States, whose government has demonstrated to be extremely vengeful in punishing those who reveal inconvenient truth, and whose judicial system can't be trusted when it treats people accused of putting the nation's security at risk; the judges do all tehy can to secure convictions in those cases. He would be imprisoned immediately to pt a stop on debate he helped start, and he'd finish the rest of his days behind bars.

Q: Has Russia guaranteed his security?

There aren't many countries on planet earth that have the capacity and the desire to challenge the demands of the United States. However, Russia is one of those states and has treated him well up to now.

Q: Beyond the revelations about the functioning of the spy system in general, what additional information does Snowden have?

Snowden has enough information with which to cause more damage to the government of the United States in one single minute by himself than any other person has had in the entire history of the United States. But that is not his objective. His objective is to reveal computer programs that persons around the whole world use without knowing that they are being watched and without having consciously agreed to giving up their right to privacy. He has an enormous quantity of documents that would be most damaging to the government of the United States shoudl they be made public.

Q: Is he afraid someone will try to kill him?

That is a possibility, although I do not think that would be of much benefit to anyone at this point. He's distributed thousands of documents and has ensured that various people around the world has his complete archive. Should something happent to him, those documents would be made public. That's his insurance police. The government of the United States should be on its knees every day praying that nothing happens to Snowde, because if something should happen to him, all the informatjion would be revealed and that would make for their worst nightmare.

Q: Could Latin America provide a good place of refuge for Snowden?

Only certain countries, such as various countries in Latin American, China and Russia, have challenged the United States, they have noticed that the United States no longer is in a position of power that it previously had before the rest of the world, and that the rest of the nations no longer have to obey its demands as if they were under imperial orders. In Latin America there is a natural affinity for the United States, but at the same time there is a great resentment for specific historic policies made from Washington for the region. What happened with the aircraft carryign Evo Morales from Europe provoked a very strong reaction, it was as if Bolivia were treated as a colony and not as a sovereign state.

Q: Of the documents Snowden shared with you, is there much more information relating to Latin America?

Yes. For each nation that has an advanced system of communications, which is the case from Mexico to Argentina, there are documents that detail how the United States picks up information from the flow, the program that are used to capture the transmissions, the amount of information intercepted that are accomplished each day, and much more. One form of intercepting communications is through a United States telecommunications company that has contracts with most of the nations in Latin America. The important thing will be to see what is the reaction of the different governments. I don't believe the governments of Mexico and Colombia will do much in this regard. Perhaps, however, the governments of Argentina and Venezuela will be inclined to take concrete actions.

Translated by Octafish -- Sorry if there are any mistakes. Please let me know and I'll correct.

SOURCE: http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1600674-glenn-greenwald-snowden-tiene-informacion-para-causar-mas-dano

GOT some help from: http://www.spanishdict.com/translation

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
65. Los Three Amigos
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 07:07 PM
Jul 2013

...Three men wait in the lobby of the hotel Royal Tulip with credentials from a symposium on osteoporosis, a meeting of which the (hotel) concierge has no idea. Are they really doctors or are they following Greenwald? Appearances deceive.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
28. It is crazy. It's also interesting to see how angry so many DUers have become these days.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:22 PM
Jul 2013

It's like they're being tested for loyalty or something.



The Outer Party fulfilling their duty during the Two Minutes Hate.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
25. thanks for whacking that mole
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:05 PM
Jul 2013

it's like the propaganda hits just keep on coming, but DUers keep debunking them-- great work!

 

MotherPetrie

(3,145 posts)
30. Imagine the outrage at Reuters if BUSH was still in the White House.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 05:56 PM
Jul 2013

But because Obama is, even though his administration's trashing of our constitutional rights is more egregious than Bush's, Greenwald must be trashed in order to protect him. The blantant, utter, screaming hypocrisy sickens and disgusts me.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
31. Thank you for more exposure of the smear machine at work.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 06:08 PM
Jul 2013

Every American should be chilled at the breadth and depth of the smear machine against Snowden, how rapidly it was mobilized, and how pervasive and minutely targeted it is across the internet. This is how authoritarian systems work, and it is creepy as hell.

Governments and corporations that build surveillance infrastructures also build propaganda infrastructures.



woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
35. In a democracy, the people rely on investigative journalists
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 06:51 PM
Jul 2013

to help expose government overreach and tyranny. Our free press is protected in the very first amendment to the US Constitution, precisely because it was and is considered critical to the health of our democracy.

Under corporate rule, as under any type of authoritarian rule, journalists instead become lapdogs to power, dutifully reporting what the government wants them to report.

This administration is not just waging a war on whistleblowers; it is also waging a war against investigative journalism, and it has already, outrageously, attempted to criminalize what, by definition, investigative journalists do. The backlash was so severe and immediate that they are now backtracking. You, along with other reliable apologists for everything corporate and authoritarian coming out of this administration, defended these outrageous actions that the administration is now walking back.

Governments that turn authoritarian *always* attack a free press, especially a free press that is already exposing egregious abuses of power.

Governments that turn authoritarian and attack the free press also invariably create a propaganda machine to smear and vilify the journalists they so despise.

Your drumbeat of pithy snark, smears, and distractions is utterly irrelevant here. What is relevant is that the government of the United States of America continues to engage in mass surveillance directed against its own people.



woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
45. Propaganda talking point with no evidence whatsoever
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 07:37 PM
Jul 2013

deployed with the intent of smearing Snowden and distracting from the real issue here:

The government of the United States of America is engaged in mass spying and surveillance, directed against its own citizens.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
48. he gave the chinese the IP addresses of us hack targets and specific information as to which
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 07:45 PM
Jul 2013

hacks were still active and which ones had been discontinued. that is a serious violation of the law and a betrayal of his country. he did it with the whole world watching. the evidence is found in his very public actions.



Edward Snowden: Classified US data shows Hong Kong hacking targets

Top-secret US government records shown to Post by whistle-blower give details of computer IP addresses hacked by NSA in HK and mainland

The detailed records - which cannot be independently verified - show specific dates and the IP addresses of computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland hacked by the National Security Agency over a four-year period. They also include information indicating whether an attack on a computer was ongoing or had been completed, along with an amount of additional operational information.

The small sample data suggests secret and illegal NSA attacks on Hong Kong computers had a success rate of more than 75 per cent, according to the documents. The information only pertains to attacks on civilian computers with no reference to Chinese military operations, Snowden said.

"I don't know what specific information they were looking for on these machines, only that using technical exploits to gain unauthorised access to civilian machines is a violation of law. It's ethically dubious," Snowden said in the interview on Wednesday.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/06/14/edward_snowden_reveals_details_of_hong_kong_and_china_nsa_hacking.html

Snowden revealed to a foreign government how the US spies on them. That is the very definition of betrayal.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
49. Your perseverence is noted
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 08:12 PM
Jul 2013

in attempting to make this all about "Bad, Bad Snowden" instead of the outrageous, unconstitutional mass surveillance of its own citizens by the United States of America.

By the way, that's Talking Point #13 on PSPS's excellent list.

It's a hoot how the very same people who pooh pooh the US government's mass surveillance of every single American citizen by claiming that "everyone knew," and "it's old news," do not hesitate to exclaim with breathless urgency that telling the Chinese that the American government has spied on them is in any way a surprise or by any stretch of the imagination a critical breach of national security.

It's absurd, is what it is. To qualify as espionage under the law, the information provided must be shown to be damaging to the country. There's no evidence whatsoever that what Snowden chose carefully to give rises to that bar. He exposed illegal behavior by the US.

Meanwhile, the United States of America, the beacon of freedom and democracy to the world, has assembled a surveillance architecture whose capabilities surpass that of any totalitarian government in history, and they are sweeping up data in real time, from every single American citizen.

Snowden is a hero. Every single whistleblower before him who tried to use official channels to report this authoritarian nightmare was summarily silenced by our own government. Whereas Daniel Ellsberg was released on bond the same day he was arrested for revealing the Pentagon Papers, Snowden knew that he, like other whistleblowers, would face swift and fierce retribution from the US government today, including imprisonment, solitary confinement, or even torture. This is how far the United States government has fallen, how authoritarian it has become, and how deeply, deeply corrupted.

We are lucky that Snowden learned from the mistakes of previous whistleblowers and has taken steps to protect himself and ensure that the truth about what our government is doing to us reaches the American people.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
57. He deserves a medal for exposing the trashing of the Constitution by our own government.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 08:30 PM
Jul 2013

Because of his actions, Americans have a real opportunity, finally, to halt the insidious transformation of our government under corporate neoliberals and neoconservatives into a corporate authoritarian state.

He deserves a fucking statue on the Mall.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
61. That's not the point. No matter what revenge our government may exact on Snowden,
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 08:47 PM
Jul 2013

he made sure that we got the information. He exposed from the shadows for every single American the unconscionable abuse of power, violation of privacy, and trashing of the US Constitution that is metastasizing under bipartisan corporate rule.

The corporate government of the United States of America, in brazen violation of the US Constitution, is spying on its own citizens, en masse.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
51. He didn't reveal how only the fact that we hacked CIVILIAN computer systems...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 08:16 PM
Jul 2013

and offered up the a IP addresses of the CIVILIAN computers. That is, he exposed illegal behavior committed by our government.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
52. civilian? lol he can explain that to the jury
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 08:21 PM
Jul 2013

Take the actions involving Tsinghua University. There are many reasons the N.S.A. would be interested in communications and computer activities at this Beijing-based school. For example, beginning in the past decade or so, university programs on arms control have played an important role in the Chinese government’s efforts to administer export controls on sensitive items. (For those wishing to know more, this is well detailed in a book published by the Rand Corporation called Chasing the Dragon: Assessing China’s System of Export Controls for WMD-Related Goods and Technologies.) Now, perhaps the most prominent university program in China on arms control is at—you guessed it—Tsinghua University. So, do you think there might be a reason why the N.S.A. would want to know about any communications on arms control that might take place between the Chinese government and Tsinghua?

The importance of China in global arms-control issues is hard to understate, even in American negotiations with Russia over proposals on nuclear-arms reduction. As Richard Weitz, a senior fellow and director of the Center for Political-Military Affairs at Hudson Institute, wrote last year:

China’s continued absence from strategic nuclear arms control negotiations is already impeding U.S.-Russian progress in this area. Beijing has traditionally resisted participating in formal nuclear arms control agreements. . . . Whereas U.S. officials want the next major nuclear arms reduction agreement to include only Russia and the United States, Russian negotiators want China and other nuclear weapons states to participate. In particular, Russian representatives insist they cannot reduce their major holdings of nonstrategic, or tactical, nuclear weapons without considering China’s growing military potential. Involving China in certain U.S.-Russian arms control processes could facilitate progress between Moscow and Washington in these areas and yield ancillary benefits for related issues.

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/eichenwald/2013/06/errors-edward-snowden-global-hypocrisy-tour

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
32. Thank you. I was starting to translate this article when I got interrupted by some
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 06:12 PM
Jul 2013

family and neighbors about other things. I will continue with my translation because I need to know for myself. But thank you for clearing up what I thought was some bias that seemed to be there.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
43. Here is what I don't get. Doesn't such a pronouncement make Mr. Snowden less safe?
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 07:30 PM
Jul 2013

The US has a lot of enemies and now they know one of the easiest ways to harm the US would be to kill Mr. Snowden. Like so much of this, it seems poorly thought out on his part.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
63. The Reuters article did not make it clear that the threat was conditional.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:34 AM
Jul 2013

In fact, ignored that fact.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
60. No, it is "kill me and I will harm the US." So anyone wanting to harm the US just has to kill him
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jul 2013

in order to do it.

He really doesn't think these things through very well.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
64. As already revealed, he has info on other countries complicity with surveillance...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:39 AM
Jul 2013

There is no guaranty that anyone is safe.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Greenwald said vs Re...