General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFreepers apoplectic over Zimmerman jury asking a question about manslaughter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3042577/postsThe Freepers are heavily invested in seeing to it that gun worshipping racists are able to kill minorities in their neighborhoods at will.
To: Clint N. Suhks
Yup! It looks as though the girls intend to give Holders Black Pampers something to keep them cooled down.
3 posted on 7/13/2013 6:19:35 PM by FlingWingFlyer (If America is a nation of immigrants, where's my free stuff?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: Clint N. Suhks
IMO the fact that they didnt declare him not guilty within an hour means the jurors are idiots.
9 posted on 7/13/2013 6:22:49 PM by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: Clint N. Suhks
Ive been saying all along that the wildcard here is the all female jury. I cannot believe the defense allowed this to happen. This is a very simple case. Most of what was presented was fluff and distraction. The fact that they are asking this question and that they have been out so long indicates that they are way over-thinking this thing. Emotion is ruling over logic.
13 posted on 7/13/2013 6:24:10 PM by slumber1 (My real name is Rusty Shackleford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: szweig
Kangaroo show court. This is despicable. It cannot stand!
20 posted on 7/13/2013 6:27:42 PM by szweig (HYHEY!! (Have You Had Enough Yet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]
woolldog
(8,791 posts)in right wing circles, aimed at the all female jury.
Response to woolldog (Reply #1)
LumosMaxima This message was self-deleted by its author.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)across. I honestly came to think they felt they could fool women easier than men, LOL. Fools.
DeschutesRiver
(2,354 posts)I have watched every one of their stupid moves and wondered how they could be so unaware of how badly they were coming across to all women, and right in front of the women who would be deciding this case.
Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Prosecution got females and Defense got Whites. My feeling? As a woman myself? Gender trumps Race.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)are just as bad, IMO.
It's a good thing that jury is composed of women. They're more detail oriented and careful in reviewing details, IMO. I have faith they'll be fair and judge based on the evidence. Whatever their decision is.
(Looks like it may be manslaughter, which I said from long ago was a possibility...I never saw evidence of murder. But I don't know if manslaughter is appropriate...I'd have to deliberate all the evidence at a table with other jurors before deciding that.)
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Women, men or Martians, it doesn't matter as long as they give careful consideration to the evidence and the law.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)going on, with evidence gathered and THEN charges would then be considered.
It appeared to have been stalled without even interviewing all witnesses... the witnesses themselves were outraged.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)It is kind of like telling a four year old there is no Santa Claus....
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Azathoth
(4,609 posts)The mantra back then was "They didn't even arrest him! We just want an arrest."
When the investigation was finished, the local DA thoroughly reviewed the case and concluded there wasn't enough evidence for a prosecution. Didn't faze the people who just wanted "assurance."
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)so looking into it was completely appropriate. the SPD fucked up big time, and had pretty much given up.
that injustice was corrected, and was charged appropriately. he had no ration explanation and no evidence that the shooting was warranted, so here we are.
Azathoth
(4,609 posts)demanded they reach.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Another day at FR!
But it does make me happy to see them suffer.
Quixote1818
(28,944 posts)They should have learned after the Presidential election.
CitizenLeft
(2,791 posts)Racist imbeciles.
Northerner
(24 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)"Most of what they presented was fluff and distraction." I'm assuming that "they" refers to the defense team.
And to be fair t the defense team: if I were accused of a crime, I would hire them. The vast majority of the facts are against them, and all they have is smoke and mirrors, but they're putting on a show like Siegfried and Roy. Of course, it's highly unlikely that I'll ever be accused of a crime, and impossible that anyone will have any evidence against me.
PennsylvaniaMatt
(966 posts)The black socialist from Kenya who hates America being re-elected President
A renewed effort for gun control
A push for immigration reform
The Supreme Court overturning DOMA and Prop 8
....And you know what! I love watching their ridiculous meltdowns!
They are the biggest group of losers I have ever seen! When are they starting their "revolution?"
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)find that whole "stand your ground" thing turned against them.
A girl can dream, right?
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)global1
(25,252 posts)Really?
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)There will be a political use of it by at least one side. My guess is that both will try to use it.