Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,092 posts)
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 05:59 PM Jul 2013

Some Senators Could Be Arrested Tonight

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2013/07/15/some_senators_could_be_arrested_tonight.html


Some Senators Could Be Arrested Tonight


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) "plans to use some procedural trickery Monday night -- and it could get some senators arrested," National Journal reports.

"In an effort to get all senators to the Senate chamber at 5:30 p.m., the Nevada Democrat is going to employ a rarely used procedure called a live quorum. Reid wants all the senators back to the Capitol to discuss potential rule changes to the filibuster... If it doesn't work, however, that's where things get dicey. The Senate can then direct the sergeant at arms to compel -- or even arrest--senators to bring them to the floor."
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some Senators Could Be Arrested Tonight (Original Post) babylonsister Jul 2013 OP
"The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #1
Reid is serious huh? nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #2
He talks the talk, but can't walk the walk. Mr. David Jul 2013 #3
Hey, at least it will be worth the popcorn nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #4
And then we better fucking PRAY that the Repukes never re-take the majority. 11 Bravo Jul 2013 #16
You mean SOP? Can really be worried about a consequence that is in full swing? TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #32
We will see Sherman A1 Jul 2013 #5
CSPAN has Senate in closed session now (after 5:30) Motown_Johnny Jul 2013 #6
Sad that it's come to this, really. Lancero Jul 2013 #7
Welcome to DU, and political suicide how? nt babylonsister Jul 2013 #9
Depends on how Republicans decide to spin the event. Lancero Jul 2013 #11
the way it was for Scott Walker? No I don't think Reid will have to worry Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #24
Good! Tx4obama Jul 2013 #8
Harry said this morning that most Democrats would be there, so what does he care ... 1-Old-Man Jul 2013 #10
To make the fuckers WATCH. leeroysphitz Jul 2013 #15
When Harry says "most Democrats" how many is that? 30? nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #20
Kick and rec on the thread title ALONE. nt LaydeeBug Jul 2013 #12
+1 idwiyo Jul 2013 #17
Blah blah Harry Reid blah bl Sheldon Cooper Jul 2013 #13
Well, I hope I'm wrong. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #14
Good old Harry will end up keeping his powder dry. madinmaryland Jul 2013 #18
Oooooo ... 99Forever Jul 2013 #19
Harry will shortly get a call from the lobbyists from Booz-Allen explaining to him why he might rhett o rick Jul 2013 #21
I hope they don't resist, because that gives the cops an excuse to smack them around (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #22
the most elite of the worlds' clubs will never arrest another member... spanone Jul 2013 #23
Kick Scurrilous Jul 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Ilsa Jul 2013 #26
Wouldn't the republicans just fillibuster any attempt to change the fillibuster rule? Travis_0004 Jul 2013 #27
They can't - it's 51 votes up or down starroute Jul 2013 #29
How? Travis_0004 Jul 2013 #30
That's why it's called the Nuclear Option starroute Jul 2013 #31
Most of them should be arrested liberal N proud Jul 2013 #28
Quorum still needed for vote nakocal Jul 2013 #33
 

Mr. David

(535 posts)
3. He talks the talk, but can't walk the walk.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 06:16 PM
Jul 2013

Talk's cheap, Reid.

Do it.

Nuke 'em and let their $DIETY sort them out.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
16. And then we better fucking PRAY that the Repukes never re-take the majority.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 06:52 PM
Jul 2013

Because while I believe the Dems would utilize the rule change solely for the purpose of allowing the President to staff his executive team; I also believe that the Repugs will then use it to shove a ton of wingnut, lifetime judicial appointments right up our ass.
Be careful what you wish for.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
32. You mean SOP? Can really be worried about a consequence that is in full swing?
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 12:20 AM
Jul 2013

Hell, it is already worse than that. We are cuckolded to the point that centrist to moderate left is far as we'll go. Hell, nowadays we are so beat down that we nominate TeaPubliKlans for everything too.

You can't surrender your way to victory too often, if ever. It is not a winning strategy.

Lancero

(3,015 posts)
7. Sad that it's come to this, really.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 06:24 PM
Jul 2013

This move would be political suicide, and Republicans have pretty much left him no other choice.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
24. the way it was for Scott Walker? No I don't think Reid will have to worry
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 07:17 PM
Jul 2013

It would actually be something to turn out the base for 2014. Something the Dems desparately need. You don't win midterms by winning moderates. Any political novice knows this.

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
10. Harry said this morning that most Democrats would be there, so what does he care ...
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 06:36 PM
Jul 2013

If the Republicans don't wish to attend why would he compel them to?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
19. Oooooo ...
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 07:10 PM
Jul 2013

Scary Harry!





Maybe he can get that sergeant at arms to look for his spine while out with the search party "arresting senators."

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
21. Harry will shortly get a call from the lobbyists from Booz-Allen explaining to him why he might
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 07:11 PM
Jul 2013

not want to do this.

Response to babylonsister (Original post)

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
30. How?
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:45 PM
Jul 2013

As of today, the filibuster exist, so anything can be filibustered, including repealing the filibuster.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
31. That's why it's called the Nuclear Option
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:44 PM
Jul 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option

In U.S. politics, the nuclear option, also called the constitutional option, is when the Presiding Officer of the United States Senate disregards a rule or precedent. This allows the Senate to end a filibuster by majority vote, even though the rules of the Senate specify that ending a filibuster requires the consent of 60 senators (out of 100) for legislation, 67 for amending a Senate rule. An opinion written by Vice President Richard Nixon in 1957 concluded that the U.S. Constitution grants the presiding officer the authority to override Senate rules in this way. (The U.S. vice president is also president of the Senate.) If a majority vote to uphold the presiding officer, his interpretation of the rules becomes a precedent. In practice, the issue rarely arises as presiding officers generally follow established precedent, as interpreted by the Senate's parliamentarian.

nakocal

(556 posts)
33. Quorum still needed for vote
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 12:32 AM
Jul 2013

Reid is doing this because even if he has all of the Democrats show up he need enough republicans to show up so there will be a Quorum which would allow him to call the vote.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some Senators Could Be Ar...