Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 10:10 AM Jul 2013

NYTimes: Inequality in America: The Data Is Sobering

http://nyti.ms/13kuDTK

Infant and maternal mortality are the highest among advanced nations. So is the mortality rate of children under the age of 20. Life expectancy — at birth and at age 60 — is among the lowest. Teenage pregnancy rates are not only higher than in other rich nations, they are higher than in Kazakhstan and Burundi. The United States has the highest rate of children living with a single parent among the industrialized nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Within the organization, only in Turkey, Mexico and Poland do more children live in poor homes.

...

How concerned is the American political system about these gaps? One way to look at it is by the effect of government actions on social outcomes. Take poverty. The United States has the 17th-highest poverty rate in the O.E.C.D., measured as the share of people who make do with less than half the median income, ranking around the middle of the pack. If the same variable is measured after taking into account the effect of taxes and government spending programs, the American poverty rate jumps to fifth-worst.

And despite the president’s fiscal stimulus law, which lifted government spending in 2009 and 2010, the United States ranks among the bottom third of nations in the O.E.C.D. in terms of outlays on social programs — unemployment insurance, day care and the like — to help families deal with economic stress. You would think Americans must be tiring of their lack of progress. The disposable income of families in the middle of the income distribution shrank by 4 percent between 2000 and 2010, according to data compiled by the O.E.C.D. In Australia, by contrast, it increased 40 percent. Middle-income Germans, Dutch, French, Danes, Norwegians and even Mexicans gained more ground.

And indeed Americans are tiring of it. Over half — 52 percent — say that the government should redistribute wealth by taxing the rich more, according to a Gallup poll in April, the highest share since Gallup first asked the question in 1998.


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYTimes: Inequality in America: The Data Is Sobering (Original Post) Scuba Jul 2013 OP
Candidate for this year's "You Call This NEWS?" awards rocktivity Jul 2013 #1
the data "are" sobering zazen Jul 2013 #2
The media is stupid, most of the times. Octafish Aug 2013 #4
K and R nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #3

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
1. Candidate for this year's "You Call This NEWS?" awards
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 10:14 AM
Jul 2013

Well, I guess it IS news to them...


rocktivity

zazen

(2,978 posts)
2. the data "are" sobering
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 10:21 AM
Jul 2013

The NYT gets this wrong in a headline?

I had a friend who worked on their editing team and they'd get into heated discussions about all sorts of AP Style compliance issues. That's why referring to data as singular seems so weird to me, coming from them.

It's not simply a matter of a grammatical error--it's not understanding how research is conducted. Data are points of information in quant or whatever you code from qual studies. Anyone who completes a basic methodology course stops using data as a singular term and starts using it in the plural. I guess they've stopped taking methods classes in J schools.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYTimes: Inequality in Am...