Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYTimes: Inequality in America: The Data Is Sobering
http://nyti.ms/13kuDTKInfant and maternal mortality are the highest among advanced nations. So is the mortality rate of children under the age of 20. Life expectancy at birth and at age 60 is among the lowest. Teenage pregnancy rates are not only higher than in other rich nations, they are higher than in Kazakhstan and Burundi. The United States has the highest rate of children living with a single parent among the industrialized nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Within the organization, only in Turkey, Mexico and Poland do more children live in poor homes.
...
How concerned is the American political system about these gaps? One way to look at it is by the effect of government actions on social outcomes. Take poverty. The United States has the 17th-highest poverty rate in the O.E.C.D., measured as the share of people who make do with less than half the median income, ranking around the middle of the pack. If the same variable is measured after taking into account the effect of taxes and government spending programs, the American poverty rate jumps to fifth-worst.
And despite the presidents fiscal stimulus law, which lifted government spending in 2009 and 2010, the United States ranks among the bottom third of nations in the O.E.C.D. in terms of outlays on social programs unemployment insurance, day care and the like to help families deal with economic stress. You would think Americans must be tiring of their lack of progress. The disposable income of families in the middle of the income distribution shrank by 4 percent between 2000 and 2010, according to data compiled by the O.E.C.D. In Australia, by contrast, it increased 40 percent. Middle-income Germans, Dutch, French, Danes, Norwegians and even Mexicans gained more ground.
And indeed Americans are tiring of it. Over half 52 percent say that the government should redistribute wealth by taxing the rich more, according to a Gallup poll in April, the highest share since Gallup first asked the question in 1998.
...
How concerned is the American political system about these gaps? One way to look at it is by the effect of government actions on social outcomes. Take poverty. The United States has the 17th-highest poverty rate in the O.E.C.D., measured as the share of people who make do with less than half the median income, ranking around the middle of the pack. If the same variable is measured after taking into account the effect of taxes and government spending programs, the American poverty rate jumps to fifth-worst.
And despite the presidents fiscal stimulus law, which lifted government spending in 2009 and 2010, the United States ranks among the bottom third of nations in the O.E.C.D. in terms of outlays on social programs unemployment insurance, day care and the like to help families deal with economic stress. You would think Americans must be tiring of their lack of progress. The disposable income of families in the middle of the income distribution shrank by 4 percent between 2000 and 2010, according to data compiled by the O.E.C.D. In Australia, by contrast, it increased 40 percent. Middle-income Germans, Dutch, French, Danes, Norwegians and even Mexicans gained more ground.
And indeed Americans are tiring of it. Over half 52 percent say that the government should redistribute wealth by taxing the rich more, according to a Gallup poll in April, the highest share since Gallup first asked the question in 1998.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1283 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (34)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYTimes: Inequality in America: The Data Is Sobering (Original Post)
Scuba
Jul 2013
OP
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)1. Candidate for this year's "You Call This NEWS?" awards
Well, I guess it IS news to them...
rocktivity
zazen
(2,978 posts)2. the data "are" sobering
The NYT gets this wrong in a headline?
I had a friend who worked on their editing team and they'd get into heated discussions about all sorts of AP Style compliance issues. That's why referring to data as singular seems so weird to me, coming from them.
It's not simply a matter of a grammatical error--it's not understanding how research is conducted. Data are points of information in quant or whatever you code from qual studies. Anyone who completes a basic methodology course stops using data as a singular term and starts using it in the plural. I guess they've stopped taking methods classes in J schools.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)4. The media is stupid, most of the times.
Good catch, zazen. Thanks for the insight, as well.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)3. K and R nt