General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS senators rail against intelligence disclosures over NSA practices
US senators rail against intelligence disclosures over NSA practices
Heated Senate committee hearing focuses on truthfulness over bulk surveillance as NSA and FBI officials defend program
Spencer Ackerman and Paul Lewis in Washington
theguardian.com, Wednesday 31 July 2013 10.47 EDT
NSA deputy director John C Inglis testifies during a hearing before the Senate judiciary committee. Photograph: Alex Wong/Getty Images
The bipartisan leaders of a powerful Senate committee questioned the truthfulness of the US intelligence community in a heated Wednesday morning hearing as intelligence officials conceded that their controversial bulk phone records collection of millions of Americans was not "the most important tool".
"We need straightforward answers, and I'm concerned we're not getting them," said Patrick Leahy, the Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Senate judiciary committee.
Leahy, joined by ranking Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, blasted James Clapper, the US director of national intelligence, for making untruthful statements to Congress in March about the bulk phone records collection on Americans, and NSA director Keith Alexander for overstating the usefulness of that collection for stopping terrorist attacks.
Grassley called Clapper's recent apology to senator Ron Wyden and the intelligence community "especially disturbing".
"Nothing can excuse this kind of behavior from a senior administration official," Grassley said. "Especially on a matter of such importance."
...
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/us-senate-intelligence-officials-nsa
How are the pardons for Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden coming along?
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)"They" thought this issue would be forgotten...they are sorely mistaken!
Catherina
(35,568 posts)"That's a very difficult question to answer," Inglis testified. "That's not how these programs work."
They're sorely mistaken indeed. And their weaseling is just making things worse for them and better for us.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Without that, or sending the Sgt At Arms to collect him these words are just bluster.
It is illegal to lie to Congress, with or without an oath. Until that law is asserted, Congress is just farting in the breeze.