General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe GOP Plan to Crush Silicon Valley, Science, and Technology
When House Republicans start looking for places to trim the budget there's one place they'll likely focus their attention science and technology.
_________________
When Congress returns from its summer recess in early September, it will have exactly nine legislative days to agree on a budget or the government will shut down. House Republicans are seeking far greater cuts in non-defense spending than Senate Democrats, and some members of the GOP are threatening to hold up any budget agreement until the Obama administration abandons the Affordable Care Act. Its going to be a slog, with all sorts of unseemly compromises. But let me suggest an area where Democrats should allow exactly zero more dollars to be excised from the federal budget: government research for science and technology. Weve already seen a 13 percent drop in this area over the last two years, and its hard to overstate just how damaging to the countrys future further reductions would be.
Many people still cling to the idea that government is, without exception, a drag upon the private economy. Conservatives know that when it comes to economic progress, Arthur Brooks, the president of the American Enterprise Institute, wrote last year in National Review, the best government philosophy is one that starts every day with the question, What can we do today to get out of Americans way? They imagine the United States as a land of plucky inventor-entrepreneurs (We built it! they cry) who work out of garages and depend solely on their wits. The problem is that this vision of American inventiveness is pure myth.
Steve Jobs, who has nearly been beatified in his role as independent businessman, excelled at designing products based on government-funded inventions. Some of Apples most vaunted achievementsthe mouse, a graphical user interface, the touch-screen, even Siriwere all developed in part with federal finances. Or take Google. Its search engine came out of a $4.5 million digital-libraries research grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF). You can also look at the pharmaceutical industry. According to a Congressional Budget Office study, 16 of the 21 most influential drugs introduced between 1965 and 1992 depended on federally funded research.
The list goes on. Federal money helped support the invention of lasers, transistors, semiconductors, microwave ovens, communication satellites, cellular technology, and the Internet. Now, the feds are prime backers of the Human Genome Project (which could transform medicine) and nanotechnology (which could transform manufacturing). Subtract these kinds of innovations from Americas future, and you have an economy dependent on tourism, the tottering superstructure of big finance, and the export of raw materials and farm products. More to the point, you have a weaker countrynot just in comparison with its competitors, but also in its ability to provide its citizens with richer, longer, more imaginative lives.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114329/republican-budget-cut-would-crush-silicon-valley