Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 07:49 AM Aug 2013

Not the Onion: Rumsfeld says that Obama has not made the case for war military action against Syria.

Apparently, this is not a joke but Donald Rumsfeld says that Obama has not made the case for war military action against Syria. George W Bush's defence secretary when the US invaded Iraq in 2003 based on "evidence" of WMDs that was subsequently discredited, told Fox News:

There really hasn’t been any indication from the administration as to what our national interest is with respect to this particular situation.

In further comments, it appears that Iran, rather than Syria, would be next on his hit list:

If you think of what’s really important in that region, it’s two things. It’s Iran’s nuclear program and the relationship between Iran and Syria, the Assad regime, with respect to funding terrorists that go around killing innocent men, women and children including Americans.


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/29/syria-crisis-iran-says-all-efforts-must-be-made-to-prevent-military-action-live
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not the Onion: Rumsfeld says that Obama has not made the case for war military action against Syria. (Original Post) pampango Aug 2013 OP
Rummy's only for war if he can be in on it nt treestar Aug 2013 #1
Well there's the case for war we know, and the case for war we don't know HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #2
ROFL: Broken Clock Rummy alcibiades_mystery Aug 2013 #3
Not big enough: only bigger bloodier wars can satiate Rummy's thirst Supersedeas Aug 2013 #4
You go to war with the case you have, not the case you want. smokey nj Aug 2013 #5
well that fucker should know since they started a major war without making a case spanone Aug 2013 #6

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. Well there's the case for war we know, and the case for war we don't know
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 08:12 AM
Aug 2013

and then there's also the truth that we know we don't know about the real case for war, because that case isn't going to be made to us.


Supersedeas

(20,630 posts)
4. Not big enough: only bigger bloodier wars can satiate Rummy's thirst
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 08:18 AM
Aug 2013

Now, if attacking Syria would guarantee a bloody conflict with Iran, Rummy could be convinced.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not the Onion: Rumsfeld s...