Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:02 PM Sep 2013

Okay, regarding Syria: A personal confession.

I haven't weighed in on the whole situation on DU because honest to God, I considered myself totally torn every which way on the matter.

I like to consider myself a pretty strong pacifist. I abhor military conflict unless it is completely justified and truly the last resort of action.

On the other hand, I was sickened by what I saw on the news regarding the use of chemical weapons on civilians. And as much as I hate military action, I also hate human rights abuses by governments upon their own people. And while some have cast doubt as to whether it was Assad who gassed his own people and have argued it may have been the rebels, everything tells me that this was indeed Assad at work.

On the third figurative hand, I was concerned that if Assad is removed from power, what effect a power vacuum might have on the Syrian people, and undoubtedly there would be major blood spilled by whomever seeks to capture the throne of power. So while my initial inclination was to somehow have Assad arrested and extradited to the Hague for war crimes (a la Slobodan Milosevic or Charles Taylor), I worried about both the logistics and the after effects of such a mission.

I don't know how much lobbing a handful of cruise missiles would have done. Probably not a whole lot. But I'm no isolationist and I think we should have done something. If only I knew what "something" was.

This is why I'm pretty much welcoming the Russian plan as the best of all possible solutions, while admitting that it itself is flawed (if it even works, that is). It won't change the balance of power and probably keep everything in Syria as a stalemate, but I don't know what else could possible be done without subjecting the Syrian people to even greater harm. And yes, the President does come out looking good on it, even if that was or was not his intention.

Am I a coward for not announcing my position or thoughts on Syria while so many of you were arguing it intensely, pro and con? Perhaps. But as a mere participant in the theoretical world of internets discussing things, my opinion in the end matters little. I don't have much of a say in the matter.

And for that, I am glad.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Okay, regarding Syria: A personal confession. (Original Post) Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2013 OP
No. You are not a coward. Wait Wut Sep 2013 #1
Thanks. nt Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2013 #2
A lot of us here have been similarly conflicted. Thanks for putting it into words so well! n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #3
No, not at all. The world needs more people like you who sit back and weigh things n/t Catherina Sep 2013 #4
I guess the problem I was having with myself was that I didn't have an answer. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2013 #5

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
1. No. You are not a coward.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:13 PM
Sep 2013

There is no perfect solution to this mess. You're seeing it from all angles. Any direction leads to more lost lives.

You've just chosen not to choose the best way for children and innocents to die. That's not cowardice. It's heartbreak.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
5. I guess the problem I was having with myself was that I didn't have an answer.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:33 PM
Sep 2013

Not that I'm expected to have one, but I honestly had no idea which road to take if I were in a position of power.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Okay, regarding Syria: A ...