Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:38 PM Feb 2012

Over-the-air TV going the way of vaudeville?

Who would ever have thought it would come to this?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/02/28/financial/f125604S40.DTL

A new law could result in fewer TV stations on the air, in exchange for faster wireless data services for smartphones and tablet computers....

The law, part of a payroll tax package signed by President Barack Obama last week, gives the Federal Communications Commission authority to explore such an exchange. The FCC will have to write the rules for it in the coming months.

The idea is to squeeze over-the-air television, which has few viewers, into a smaller slice of the airwaves. Anything freed would be available for bidding by companies, including wireless carriers such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Wireless....

About 11 million households lack cable or satellite service and get TV signals only over the air, according to Nielsen. That compares with 89 million who are cable or satellite subscribers.


Can't have people switching back to antennas 'cause they're sick and tired of their triple-digit cable bills, now can we?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Over-the-air TV going the way of vaudeville? (Original Post) KamaAina Feb 2012 OP
Do you understand this whole exchange thing? cbayer Feb 2012 #1
me too, that would be a bummer freeplessinseattle Feb 2012 #2
I thought that the switch to broadcast digital would be the last of this. Democrats_win Feb 2012 #3
It is all about the money. RC Feb 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #5

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
1. Do you understand this whole exchange thing?
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:41 PM
Feb 2012

I just don't really get this, but it worries me because when I do get TV, I get it over the air.

Not that I am attached to it, but I love catching up with PBS shows when the TV is available and would hate to lose that access.

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
3. I thought that the switch to broadcast digital would be the last of this.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:50 PM
Feb 2012

Remember, congress mandated that over-the-air TV stations switch to digital a few years ago. Then the government was going to sell the freed-up bands. Supposidly, the money from the sale was to go to pay off the Reagan debt. Today, that idea is ludicrous since George W. Bush blew the debt up to 15 trillion and beyond!

Now the non-tax paying corporations want a good deal so they can overcharge their customers for use of OUR airwaves.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
4. It is all about the money.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:52 PM
Feb 2012

Why have free ad supported TV when you can be made to pay for ad supported TV?

Response to KamaAina (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Over-the-air TV going the...