Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 09:02 PM Oct 2013

Its times like this that I wish our Federal government was modeled more on the Westminster system...

in that system, when the government shuts down, new elections are called for Parliament. This type of policy can be easily transferred here on a practical level, politically may require a constitutional amendment. Maybe something narrowly defined that allows the President to dismiss Congress and call new elections when the Federal Government shuts down.

Call it the "Get fired for not doing your job" act, and we would be ready to go!

And think about this, right now, most Americans seem to blame Republicans for this, if elections were called now, I feel they would lose a lot of seats, while Democrats would retain and gain quite a few.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Its times like this that I wish our Federal government was modeled more on the Westminster system... (Original Post) Humanist_Activist Oct 2013 OP
There are pros and cons. Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #1
Not saying the whole system, just the part about being able to dismiss deadlocked Congresses... Humanist_Activist Oct 2013 #2
It would take a constitutional amendment to do it. roamer65 Oct 2013 #4
I say we start pushing for it, it seems reasonable, and will mostly work as a deterrant... Humanist_Activist Oct 2013 #5
It's feast and famine in the Westminster system. roamer65 Oct 2013 #3

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
1. There are pros and cons.
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 09:15 PM
Oct 2013

The biggest con is that an elected UK government with a big parliamentary majority has way too much power. Which explains how Margaret Thatcher was able to do as she pleased.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
2. Not saying the whole system, just the part about being able to dismiss deadlocked Congresses...
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 09:17 PM
Oct 2013

and call new elections in those situations(it would be very limited).

Checks and Balances would still be preserved.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
4. It would take a constitutional amendment to do it.
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 09:30 PM
Oct 2013

I agree and you are reading my mind from earlier today. We'd hafta get 38 states and 2/3 of each house of Congress to get it though.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
5. I say we start pushing for it, it seems reasonable, and will mostly work as a deterrant...
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 10:23 PM
Oct 2013

for Congresspersons to pull stunts like the Republicans did in the 1990's and today. They would be risking their jobs immediately, rather than hoping people forget come election season.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
3. It's feast and famine in the Westminster system.
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 09:28 PM
Oct 2013

It's great when your party is in power, but heck when it's not.

Unbridled parliamentary majorities can do a lot of damage...i.e. Stephen Harper in Canada.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Its times like this that ...