Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 10:58 PM Oct 2013

Thomas Friedman (!?): 'President Obama must not give into this hostage taking'

Source: New York Times

This time is different. What is at stake in this government shutdown forced by a radical Tea Party minority is nothing less than the principle upon which our democracy is based: majority rule. President Obama must not give into this hostage taking — not just because Obamacare is at stake, but because the future of how we govern ourselves is at stake.

What we’re seeing here is how three structural changes that have been building in American politics have now, together, reached a tipping point — creating a world in which a small minority in Congress can not only hold up their own party but the whole government. And this is the really scary part: The lawmakers doing this can do so with high confidence that they personally will not be politically punished, and may, in fact, be rewarded. When extremists feel that insulated from playing by the traditional rules of our system, if we do not defend those rules — namely majority rule and the fact that if you don’t like a policy passed by Congress, signed by the president and affirmed by the Supreme Court then you have to go out and win an election to overturn it; you can’t just put a fiscal gun to the country’s head — then our democracy is imperiled.

... President Obama is not defending health care. He’s defending the health of our democracy. Every American who cherishes that should stand with him.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/02/opinion/friedman-our-democracy-is-at-stake.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thomas Friedman (!?): 'President Obama must not give into this hostage taking' (Original Post) Newsjock Oct 2013 OP
Friedman said this????? Dawson Leery Oct 2013 #1
Wow, the clue bird has finally shat on the head of Thomas Friedman! The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #2
I was thinking the same thing Harmony Blue Oct 2013 #3
This is an attempted coup engineered by the Koch brothers. Barack_America Oct 2013 #4
This almost makes me like Freidman BeyondGeography Oct 2013 #5
When the WA post, the NYT editorial board and Friedman can't find middle ground. pa28 Oct 2013 #6
K & R defacto7 Oct 2013 #7
The buck stops with Obama duffyduff Oct 2013 #8
+zillion, duffyduff roguevalley Oct 2013 #11
Friedman? Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #9
Friedman Unit n/t hibbing Oct 2013 #10

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
4. This is an attempted coup engineered by the Koch brothers.
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 11:12 PM
Oct 2013

I'm just a bit shocked how widely and unanimously this is recognized.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
5. This almost makes me like Freidman
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 11:15 PM
Oct 2013

Nah.

It's significant though. Lots of empty-headed establishmentarians look to him for validation.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
6. When the WA post, the NYT editorial board and Friedman can't find middle ground.
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 11:19 PM
Oct 2013

Republicans should take that as a clue they are wrong. Disastrously and totally wrong.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
8. The buck stops with Obama
Wed Oct 2, 2013, 12:34 AM
Oct 2013

He better not make nice and try to give away the store to appease a bunch of fascists. That's always been my biggest fear about Obama--that reaching across the aisle crap.

What is going on is really sedition against the United States, and some people need to be arrested and thrown in prison. Numbers one and two on the list are the Kochs. They have long since given up any pretense that their activities have anything to do with freedom of speech and harmless lobbying. They are criminals.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thomas Friedman (!?): 'Pr...