General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWell, Here's Some Good News: Jerry Sandusky denied new trial
HARRISBURG, Pa. -- Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky should not get a new trial after being convicted of sexually abusing 10 boys, a Pennsylvania appeals court ruled Wednesday.
The decision by a three-judge Superior Court panel came barely two weeks after they heard oral arguments by Sandusky's lawyer and a state prosecutor.
Sandusky had argued his trial lawyers did not have sufficient time to prepare, a prosecutor made improper references to him not testifying on his own behalf and the judge mishandled jury instructions.
The state attorney general's office said the 45-count conviction should stand.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9758500/no-new-trial-jerry-sandusky
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)It would be awful for the victims to have to go through the ordeal of another trial.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)MicaelS
(8,747 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Tom Corbett fumes over Jerry Sandusky question
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett blew up at a reporter who questioned his handling of the criminal probe into former Penn State football assistant Jerry Sandusky as an investigation revealed Thursday that top officials at the university had total and consistent disregard for Sanduskys victims.
Corbett, who launched the criminal investigation into Sandusky when he was the Keystone States attorney general, has faced criticism for the investigations length it was three years before an indictment was handed down and because his administration approved a $3 million grant to Second Mile, the charity Sandusky ran and used as a way to recruit victims. Sandusky was no longer running the organization at the time.
A reporter asked the governor on Thursday if the investigation, which was commissioned by Penn States Board of Trustees and written by a team led by former FBI director Louis Freeh, made him wish he had handled any element of the case differently, it drew an angry rebuke.
Why are you all obsessed with that? he said of criticism about the length of the criminal probe. Its been answered over and over and over again
45 of 48 counts. We do not hold up investigations for anything.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78458.html
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Decaffeinated
(556 posts)The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)the possibility of very serious misconduct to me. If true, it is reversible error.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)I am not entirely convinced about this case and never have been.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)for no discernible reason.