Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,034 posts)
Wed Oct 2, 2013, 04:41 PM Oct 2013

Justices to Hear ‘Raging Bull’ Copyright Appeal

By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: October 1, 2013

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear an appeal in a copyright dispute arising from the movie “Raging Bull,” and it added seven other cases to its docket.

The justices took no action on closely watched cases concerning the regulation of greenhouse gases and whether Argentina must repay some of its bondholders.

The copyright case concerns collaborations between the boxer Jake LaMotta and a friend, Frank P. Petrella, including a book and two screenplays, one of which was called “The Raging Bull.” Paula Petrella, Mr. Petrella’s daughter, contends that these works formed the basis for “Raging Bull,” the 1980 movie starring Robert De Niro.

She did not sue the movie’s owners until 2009, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, said that was too late. The copyright law itself would have allowed the suit, as its three-year statute of limitation starts to run anew every time there is a fresh infringement.

full: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/02/us/politics/justices-agree-to-hear-raging-bull-copyright-case.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justices to Hear ‘Raging ...