Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 10:35 PM Oct 2013
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Starfish Turn To Goo, Pacific Sardine Population Collapses, Pink Salmon Turned Canary Yellow Inside (Original Post) DeSwiss Oct 2013 OP
I don't think it's related to Fukushima. NYC_SKP Oct 2013 #1
I was thinking of acidification first. kentauros Oct 2013 #4
The concentrations of radioactive isotopes is nowhere near levels that can cause these problems. NYC_SKP Oct 2013 #5
Yes, I thought of the radioactive contanimation, kentauros Oct 2013 #6
It's really icky, isn't it? Like a flesh eating organism. NYC_SKP Oct 2013 #7
"Local problem" is a good observation. kentauros Oct 2013 #9
I don't think it'd be the latter. All of what we know at this point, points right to Fukushima. AverageJoe90 Oct 2013 #12
Well I know nothing about it. zeemike Oct 2013 #15
That humpy is spawned out NoOneMan Oct 2013 #2
That's a kelt Brother Buzz Oct 2013 #11
Moose populations crashing Berlum Oct 2013 #3
From what I read, thinking is sea stars have a disease. Yellow salmon are not new, chums in 1970's uppityperson Oct 2013 #8
Pacific sardines. pa28 Oct 2013 #10
That explains all the starving seal pups washing up on beaches this spring. nt SunSeeker Oct 2013 #19
cartilage problems.? wonder if this is related to all the birds seen with over grown beaks? Sunlei Oct 2013 #13
Nothing to see here, move along. Wall Street is booming and we just beat those Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #14
Well as long as Wall Street is booming zeemike Oct 2013 #17
lmao Miranda4peace Oct 2013 #18
Big changes ahead. Rex Oct 2013 #16
k & r Duppers Oct 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Duppers Oct 2013 #21
Thanks, read later. postulater Oct 2013 #22
Why and how did you jump to the conclusion that it is related to Fukushima? nt Bonobo Oct 2013 #23
Didn't you hear? EVERYTHING is related to Fukushima NickB79 Oct 2013 #24
Show me. n/t DeSwiss Oct 2013 #26
LOL. Show you what? nt Bonobo Oct 2013 #27
You want to know ''why and how.'' DeSwiss Oct 2013 #28
You made the claim that it is Fukushima-related. Bonobo Oct 2013 #29
I made NO such claim. DeSwiss Oct 2013 #30
So your links about Fukushima are not intended to make that claim, huh. Bonobo Oct 2013 #31
Most of this thread is unsubstantiated BS NickB79 Oct 2013 #25
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. I don't think it's related to Fukushima.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 10:40 PM
Oct 2013

But I'd prefer if that was the case.

Because the alternative is far more scary: global breakdown due to a new organism or impacts from acidification or other anthropogenic conditions.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
4. I was thinking of acidification first.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 10:55 PM
Oct 2013

But I don't know anything about marine biology to state that as anything but a guess.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
5. The concentrations of radioactive isotopes is nowhere near levels that can cause these problems.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 10:57 PM
Oct 2013

Especially this far from the point source.

It's very worrisome, whatever it is.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
6. Yes, I thought of the radioactive contanimation,
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:02 PM
Oct 2013

but it wouldn't work either that fast or that completely. It has to be either a condition of the water, or some kind of bacterial.viral issue. I can't think of anything else that could make such a thing happen to their bodies like that.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
7. It's really icky, isn't it? Like a flesh eating organism.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:05 PM
Oct 2013

I don't know.

We gotta keep positive thoughts, our scientific tools allow us to see things that may have been there but evaded detection.

So, maybe it's a local problem in each case and not a systemic irreversible global thing.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
9. "Local problem" is a good observation.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:10 PM
Oct 2013

It doesn't take much to upset the balance of a local ecosystem. It's easier for a small system to recover than a large one, so let's hope it's the former!

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
12. I don't think it'd be the latter. All of what we know at this point, points right to Fukushima.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:23 PM
Oct 2013

And I certainly don't think this is a "new organism", either, or we'd have seen evidence for that already.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
15. Well I know nothing about it.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:34 PM
Oct 2013

But I wonder what caused this new organism if it is one...could the radioactivity have caused the mutation of the orginism?...one that was not a big problem before and now is?

And the radiation has had time to spread across the sea...carried by organisms that travel the curents...
Like I said I don't know anting about biology, but I wonder because things are so interrelated where all things are in the food chain.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
2. That humpy is spawned out
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 10:42 PM
Oct 2013

I see dead ones like that on the river shores often. The hit fresh water, hump, change colors, die, look like crap, and decompose. The yellow one looked about a week dead after being a 2-3 weeks spawned out. The fresh one looks like it was caught in the salt. Just my 2 cents.

Brother Buzz

(36,463 posts)
11. That's a kelt
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:20 PM
Oct 2013

They can live weeks after spawning, and some actually return to the ocean to spawn again (Darwin's theories may be at work here). The live ones are totally safe to eat but they have zero flavor and the texture is mushy. I pass on them; best leave them for the scavengers work over.

uppityperson

(115,679 posts)
8. From what I read, thinking is sea stars have a disease. Yellow salmon are not new, chums in 1970's
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:05 PM
Oct 2013

Last edited Fri Oct 18, 2013, 03:28 AM - Edit history (1)

August 2012
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20120809/SPORTS/708099937

A couple of weeks ago, I was emailed photos of an unusual chinook salmon, bright yellow on its belly, lower fins, lower jaw, and the inside of the mouth).
The accompanying text mistakenly said the nice-sized and otherwise prime-looking king was from "local waters," but the photos had in fact been published first by the Oregon Coast Daily News, attributing the catch to a commercial fisherman off Newport, Oregon in early July.
Local or not, the photos raised an intriguing issue, and it turns out -- after a little investigation -- that a fair number of anglers in this area either have seen or heard of yellow-hued salmon of all five species, perhaps steelhead, and maybe even trout. More and more salmon with this condition are apparently being seen around the Northwest -- particularly on the British Columbia coast and in the Fraser River. That has attracted the attention of government fisheries management agencies.
(clip)
The researcher said little is known about what is called the "jaundice syndrome," but that there have been examples cited in the literature for more than 30 years, starting with chums in the 1970s. (Weitkamp said the most prominent current example in the state is a run containing what locals call yellow chums in Hood Canal)....(more)


Oct 2011
http://grassstruggle.blogspot.com/2011/10/yellow-salmon.html#.UmCk7VCsj0s

Nov 2010
http://www.myfishfinder.com/fishing_forum/index.php?topic=40544.0

However, if a lot of fish are jaundiced, there is concern as to why.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
10. Pacific sardines.
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:10 PM
Oct 2013

I was reading a report just last week explaining how this fishery was plentiful, sustainable and a good seafood choice.

Now they seem to be *gone*. Not just declining but the fish stock seems to have disappeared.



Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
13. cartilage problems.? wonder if this is related to all the birds seen with over grown beaks?
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:24 PM
Oct 2013

same area of the world. several species of birds have been effected by something in air? and water. liver damage. Is there runoff from shale oil extraction? that industry is in that part of the world? and the problem seems to have started about the same time shale oil started?

We humans need the oceans to continue with a robust plankton and algae bloom cycles or we humans & animals will go extinct.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
14. Nothing to see here, move along. Wall Street is booming and we just beat those
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:25 PM
Oct 2013

dirty rotten republicans for the World Wrestling Championship on pay per view. So sit back and relax cause the adults are in charge and they know what they're doing.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
17. Well as long as Wall Street is booming
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 11:41 PM
Oct 2013

We have nothing to worry about...thanks for the reasurance...now back to the feel good moment of victory over the Tea Party.

Response to DeSwiss (Original post)

NickB79

(19,258 posts)
24. Didn't you hear? EVERYTHING is related to Fukushima
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 07:25 AM
Oct 2013

I burnt my toast and cut myself while shaving this morning.

Fucking Fukushima.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
29. You made the claim that it is Fukushima-related.
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 03:15 AM
Oct 2013

You wrote the OP inviting comments.

I don't know what caused the events, but there is no reason to believe it was caused by Fukushima, is there?

So I repeat, why do you think it is related?

If you can't answer that question, if you have no reasons to back up your contention, don't you think its kind of inappropriate to suggest it?

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
30. I made NO such claim.
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 03:21 AM
Oct 2013

It appears that it is you who've ''jumped'' to this conclusion. A careful examination of the OP proves this beyond doubt.

I provided (copy and pasted their words) information from a source that includes a number of different articles, of which includes things that are happening in, and to the sea.

And in answer to the overarching question here: Yes everything is related.

Have a nice day!


Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
31. So your links about Fukushima are not intended to make that claim, huh.
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 03:26 AM
Oct 2013

Gotcha.

And since EVERYTHING is related, you could post links about the rise in disposable diapers or antibiotics too, right?

The funny thing is that you are comfortable with that level of "intellectual rigor".

YOU have a nice day -in the George Carlin sense.

NickB79

(19,258 posts)
25. Most of this thread is unsubstantiated BS
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 07:40 AM
Oct 2013

First, the case of the not-unprecedented yellow salmon: http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20120809/SPORTS/708099937

The researcher said little is known about what is called the "jaundice syndrome," but that there have been examples cited in the literature for more than 30 years, starting with chums in the 1970s.


Second, the sardine disappearance is also not unprecedented: http://www.vancouversun.com/travel/Sudden+disappearance+sardines+serious+economic+ecological/9034961/story.html

Sardines supported a major fishery on the B.C. coast in the mid-1920s to mid-1940s that averaged 40,000 tonnes a year.

Then the fish mysteriously disappeared — for decades — until the first one was observed again in 1992 during a federal science-based fishery at Barkley Sound on the west coast of Vancouver Island.


Furthermore, the sardines may not have disappeared at all, but rather moved to deeper waters:

While seiners fishing close to the surface got skunked, he noted that commercial hake fishermen with trawl nets at depths of 200 to 350 metres reported catching hake “filled with sardines,” Clayton said.

“I think they didn’t come to the surface this year. Right now, it’s all speculation.”


The starfish, I have no idea if it will turn out to be a big deal or not, as this is the first I've heard of it. The article does say, however, that their numbers in recent years have exploded to the point that there are solid walls of them on some seafloors. And we all know that when a species overpopulates to that degree, an epidemic die-off isn't that unusual.

I'm not saying that we should ignore any of these events, but attempting to tie them to Fukushima, when similar events occurred DECADES ago, is a stretch that defies logic. It wastes valuable time and resources that could be better spent finding the most likely causes and their solutions.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Starfish Turn To Goo, Pac...